Gardasil, considered the most dangerous vaccine on the market, may soon be pushed for infants
Merck & Co, now wants to begin marketing their product to infants – and trials on babies have already begun. Merck recently launched a Gardasil vaccine trial on children at least one year old, and it’s set to conclude in early 2017.
You read that right. A pharmaceutical giant is testing a vaccine for an STD on babies. It doesn’t really get more corrupt and outrageous than that, now does it?
Gardasil was developed for the STD known as HPV, and was approved by the FDA in 2006. The disease did not become of concern until the 1980s, when research first suggested that there may be a link between HPV and cervical cancer. However, whether this link actually exists has been a major point of contention. There are several hypotheses that explain why HPV may not actually cause cancer, but one particularly interesting theory was expressed by McCormack et al in their paper published by the journal Molecular Cytogenetics in 2015. The research team also raised several significant questions about the prevailing theory on the connection between HPV and cervical cancer. For example, HPV is present in 70 to 80 percent of the American adult population, so why does cervical cancer only effect one out of ever 10,000 women?
According to their paper, neither HPV nor genetic predisposition is required for the onset of cervical cancer. In fact, all of the cervical cancer cells analyzed during the course of their study contained new abnormal karyotypes. The genetic makeup of these new abnormal karyotypes suggested that the cervical cancers originated within the karyotypes, and not from a virus. A karyotype is the size, number and shape of chromosomes within an organism. Their theory, called the Karyotypic Speciation Theory, essentially suggests that “carcinomas are generated de novo from cellular chromosomes, genes and proteins, which are not immunogenic in the host of origin (just like all other cancers).” As SaneVax.org explains, in this theory, hypothetical cancer cells that are generated by viral proteins (such as HPV) would be eliminated by antiviral immunity.
So to put it simply, the researchers posit that these changes to cell chromosomes were occurring independent of viral stimuli (which would be HPV), rather than because of it — which in turn renders vaccination for such a thing relatively useless. SaneVax.org notes that even after 25 years of research on HPV’s link to cancer, no definitive answers on how or why it causes cancer have been found.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Trial Using Infants as Young as One Year of Age
4-valent Gardasil, licensed in 2006, initially targeted older adolescent girls and young adult women. The age range was 19-26 and the vaccine was introduced as an “anti-cancer vaccine.”
When Gardasil was released, the marketing campaign claims touted it as a preventive specifically for cervical cancer. That’s why it was only recommended for girls and young women.
Gardasil Vaccine Historically NOT a Popular Vaccine
After Gardasil had been on the market for a while, its reputation, which was never very good, got worse as reports of severe adverse reactions and numerous deaths started to circulate.
People were saying “No” to Gardasil. Even people who never questioned any other vaccines didn’t want this one for their wives and daughters. The uptake of the vaccine was low and falling.
Age Recommendation Lowered to Boost Sales – Boys Included
In order to increase the number of vaccines sold, the age for administration was lowered to 12. There was a minor outcry, but nothing significant, and it died down quickly.
Then came the recommendation for girls AND boys as young as 9 years to be vaccinated because NOW they say Gardasil doesn’t just “prevent” cervical cancer, it also “prevents” oral and anal cancer, AND since boys can also contract HPV and boys have sex with girls, “It’s only responsible to get your sons vaccinated so they don’t spread HPV to our daughters.”
This was how they justified the recommendation for boys, who obviously do not have a cervix.
Infants Are Next
Watching the above scenario play out over the last few years, it quickly became pretty apparent that Gardasil was headed for the infant (vaccine) schedule.
The reason they started with older adolescents and adults was because they knew there would be an uproar if they went straight for the infants with “a vaccine for a sexually transmitted disease.”
You may think this sounds like a conspiracy theory.
“Where’s the proof?”
Gardasil contains 2 strains of HPV that are reportedly associated with cervical cancer. Those are HPV 16 & 18.
The other two strains are HPV 6 & 11. They are not associated with cancer. They are reportedly associated with recurrent respiratory infections.
Who is most at risk for severe outcomes from respiratory infections?
This was planned from the beginning. If it wasn’t, why would HPV 6 & 11 be in a vaccine for cervical cancer?
You may think this is “unbelievable.” You may think this is just “over the top” and “insanity.” Those are things I’ve seen in comments since I first posted this photo …