THOUSANDS protest in numerous cities across Italy in what is now an INTERNATIONAL️ uprising and Revolution for Choice!
What haven’t you been told? Find out now for free: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Italy #VaccineInjury #NonCompliance #RiseUP
If you’re being forced to take a vaccine against your will, here’s how you can protect yourself from vaccine toxins.
I SAW VAXXED AND I WAS SHATTERED!
Greg Wyatt·Friday, June 9, 2017
This afternoon I went to Midtown Art Cinema with my husband to see VAXXED. Over the past few years, I had begun to have more and more questions about vaccines as my blind confidence in the US healthcare system shifted. I was intrigued that a movie about vaccines was so controversial as to be blocked from the Tribeca Film Festival. When I found that VAXXED was coming to Atlanta, I knew I had to see it. Since any decision on vaccinating any future children would involve my husband, I wanted him to see it also.
I received a Masters in Public Health at the same time I worked towards my MD. I pursued a degree in public health because I wanted to do more than just impact the health of the individual. I wanted a perspective that would allow me to have a broader scope of positive influence. For many in public health and medicine in general, the individuals that work at CDC are placed on a pedestal. We view them and their research as the epitome of scientific excellence. We regard their findings and recommendations as the gospel. We trust them to pursue hard science and trust that when they publish data, they are not being influenced by anything more that the pursuit of truth. I was shattered when I saw VAXXED because this movie told the story of a situation where something other than truth motivated certain professionals involved in safety research involving the MMR vaccine. I learned for the first time about the whistle-blower Dr. William Thompson. The truth he exposed, revealed in black and white an instance where life-saving information was withheld. Information that could have saved countless lives.
My heart broke for the parents of children with autism. There was story after story of beautiful babies who were developing perfectly and engaged with their families up until they received the MMR vaccine. I fought back tears as Polly Tomey shared how she defended her choice to follow the pediatrician’s advice to give her child the MMR vaccine despite concerns expressed by her mom and a good friend. Our patient’s place such trust in us as physicians. As physicians, we place our trust in organizations such as the CDC to give us the information we need to keep our patients safe. It changes you when you find that those you thought you could trust could not be trusted.
“I Believed I Was Doing The Right Thing” Shares Pro-Vaccine Mother in The Medical Field
As a parent, what would your worst nightmare be? A car accident or losing your child in a crowded room? Sometimes the things that will scare you the most in regards to your children are the things that you believe are safe. What if you willingly gave your child a medicine or food that potentially harms or disables them for life? That has become the reality for thousands of families in the United States battling vaccine injury. Here’s my family’s vaccine battle.
We are going to fast forward a bit to 2012 when I gave birth to my first child, Hayden. I still had unwavering support for vaccines at the time and didn’t think twice when they administered vial after vial to my newborn baby. High fever and swelling at the injection site was something I was all too familiar with due to my medical training. What I wasn’t prepared for was him contracting the very thing he was vaccinated against only 2 weeks after his 6 month wellness check. This 9 letter bacterial infection is something no mother wants to hear especially in their infant, pneumonia.As a parent, what would your worst nightmare be? A car accident or losing your child in a crowded room? Sometimes the things that will scare you the most in regards to your children are the things that you believe are safe. What if you willingly gave your child a medicine or food that potentially harms or disables them for life? That has become the reality for thousands of families in the United States battling vaccine injury. Here’s my family’s vaccine battle.
– Pneumonia After the Pneumococcal Vaccine
– My Sons Health After Pneumonia
Multiple skin allergies
Asthma and needed daily nebulizer doses of albuterol
Mucous drainage constantly
Chronic ear infection enough for them to recommend tubes
Why I Chose To Stop Vaccinating My Child
I didn’t just up and decide one day that I wasn’t vaccinating anymore, it was the process of elimination to see what would help my son get healthier. I cut out some foods and changed up what products we used on our bodies and around the house. Taking out undesirable chemicals and foods within the house was only putting a band-aid on his already shot immune system. Last on my list was discontinuing vaccines or just delaying to see if it would change anything. I can’t explain to you the positive results my son experienced.
Parent of autistic teen sues CDC to allow vaccine whistleblower testimony
by sattkisson on February 13, 2017
The following is an update of a story first published Oct. 19, 2016
The father of an autistic child has filed a federal lawsuit against the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in his son’s medical malpractice case. Rolf Hazlehurst is attempting to force CDC to let a vaccine whistleblower scientist, Dr. William Thompson, testify in the case of 17-year old Yates Hazlehurst. Dr. Thompson, a senior scientist at CDC has told Congress that he and his CDC colleagues manipulated data and destroyed evidence to downplay a link their study discovered between autism and vaccines in African American boys. CDC had earlier blocked Dr. Thompson from testifying.
The difference between cigarette companies and vaccine companies
“Do you know the difference between companies that sell cigarettes and companies that sell vaccines in America? When cigarettes injure or kill people, tobacco companies are financially liable in civil court. But when vaccines injure or kill people, drug companies are not.
That’s right. If you get lung cancer from smoking cigarettes, you can sue the tobacco company. But if you or your child suffers brain damage or dies after getting a vaccine, the drug company cannot be sued. And you can’t hold any person who licensed, recommended, gave or voted to mandate the vaccine accountable in a court of law, either.
Here is why:
In 1986, Congress gave drug companies a partial civil liability shield for vaccine injuries and deaths. In 2011, the US Supreme Court effectively banned all vaccine injury lawsuits, ruling that vaccines are—quote— ‘unavoidably unsafe.’ Then, in 2016, Congress lowered licensing standards for experimental vaccines so that drug companies can fast track them to market without conducting large clinical trials.”
— Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)
Where are the media? Where is the media? Protest stop nop!
Let the whole world finds out about terror in Poland!
Disconnect between evidence & CDC claims Re: childhood vaccination schedule
Can we in good conscience ignore the evidence that for a minority of children CDC’s Childhood Vaccination Schedule poses serious risks of harm?
Clearly, public health authorities have a public responsibility to obtain scientific data from tests evaluating the combined effect of toxic components (called synergistic toxicity studies) of all the combinations of vaccines that millions of infants are likely to receive – including the timing at which vaccines are given. The fact is that CDC has failed to initiate such studies. Indeed, the safety of the cumulative effect of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule – with its multiple vaccines simultaneously administered – has never undergone scientific tests.
“No field trials have compared the effectiveness and harms of all vaccines used according to various schedules listed in the recent BMJ infographic.6 12 The time for such studies is ethically and logistically past.
The full evidence base to make such complex decisions as the timing of each vaccination, in conjunction with developmental issues and the effect each vaccine has on the response to the others, is seldom fully available when vaccination schedules are devised…despite concerns about overloading infants’ immune systems we can find no evidence of harm.
However, because detailed reports for most clinical trials of vaccines are not available, and have not been independently reviewed, we cannot be certain of vaccines’ harms profiles. [Emphasis added]
The evidence base used in designing schedules is incomplete We should start by carrying out a more accurate assessment of the magnitude of disease threats. Those vaccines not targeting impending or credible threats should then be phased out or delayed. We also need randomised trials comparing different vaccination schedules to provide good quality data on the potential harms of single or multiple vaccinations. All aspects of vaccination should be monitored and assessed by independent studies.”
(Is the Timing of Recommended Childhood Vaccines Evidence-Based? Dr. Tom Jefferson and Dr. Vittorio Demicheli, BMJ (2016)
When did Merck know about the safety hazards of thimerosal, the mercury disinfectant its widely used in its vaccines?
The first “hard evidence” that Merck knew about the hazards posed for children who were exposed to significantly more mercury than the generally accepted dose, is documented in a seven page memo, dated 1991. The memo was addressed to the president of Merck’s vaccine division, and was signed by Dr. Maurice Hilleman, an internationally renowned vaccinologist, who acknowledged that:
“6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule would get a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish. When viewed in this way, the mercury load appears rather large.
The key issue is whether thimerosal, in the amount given with the vaccine, does or does not constitute a safety hazard. However, perception of hazard may be equally important.” (This memo was uncovered during the course of litigation; it was publicly disclosed by Myron Levin of the Los Angeles Times in 2005)
15 Moms Who Believe Their Kids Were Destroyed By Vaccines
By: Naomi Abrams On: Jun 05, 2017
Vaccines are one of the most controversial topics in the realm of parenthood. More than $3.6 billion has been awarded to victims and their families. Every mom wants what is best for her kids, but sometimes what is considered “routine” or required does more harm than good. Whether it is due to a rare reaction or undiagnosed medical condition, such as immune deficiency, sometimes the results of vaccinations are devastating and even tragic.
It must be clearly and loudly stated that I am not a medical expert and don’t advise any parent either way on what is best for their kids. That being said, there are many stories where parents believe adverse reactions happened, and they deserve to be discussed and shared. While no conclusive evidence can be drawn, it’s worth talking about these stories. Doing research and making informed decisions is one of the most important and undervalued aspects of being a parent, and you should never be afraid to look deeper into such things.
I won’t overwhelm you with medical jargon and obscure statistics; I will simply let the voices of the impacted kids and their family members be heard, possibly for the first time. I won’t tell you vaccines do or do not cause autism, or make you feel bad for your decisions, but simply talk to you…from one concerned and inquisitive mom to another. Read on to learn about 15 Parents Who Believe Their Kids Were Seriously Injured Or Killed By Vaccines.
Kenyan Doctors Used Vaccines To Sterilize Women
This story is incredibly relevant to our fight, but often times we forget the serious nature of allowing a Government to essentially inject whatever they want into our bodies. Last year, a UN Vaccine Program became the centerpiece of battle over human rights in Kenya. Catholic Bishops discovered evidence came to show that vaccines were used to sterilize women. The charges were disturbing and the people who were effected were shaken to their very cores. It was exacting evidence of our worst fears coming true. It was the reality of a potential slippery slope meeting the surface of our fears.
According to TheNewAmerican.com:
The explosive revelations were released after medical researchers and the Catholic Church found a sterilization agent in tetanus inoculations being foisted on Kenyan women by two UN agencies in cooperation with the national government. Incredibly, it is not the first time that international vaccine campaigns by the UN targeting Third World populations have been exposed as covert sterilization and eugenics programs. Some critics have even referred to the latest plot as race-based genocide.
Some things to keep in mind here:
The vaccines used a sterilizing agent to prevent fertility. US Vaccines haven’t been evaluated for this agent (according to Sect 13). The agent tricked the body into thinking that pregnancy was a foreign invader, causes the body to attack the emryo and terminate it. It is possible that this same effect happens on young people involving allergies. The body is tricked into thinking something is invading and it reacts.
According to the organization and other medical experts, the hCG found in the UN tetanus vaccines causes women’s bodies to develop an immune response to attack the hormone, which is essential to pregnancy. So, when a woman who has received the UN shots gets pregnant, her body fights the crucial hCG — resulting in the death of the unborn child in the womb.