New study from Germany confirms higher vax coverage –> higher excess mortality

The Harvard study showed vaccination makes things worse as far as cases goes. This new study from German shows that the more you vaccinate the more people get killed. Not a surprise to me.

Steve Kirsch

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-from-germany-confirms-higher

Study PDF: https://www.skirsch.com/covid/GermanAnalysis.pdf

the-higher-the-covid-19-vaccination-rate-the-higher-the-excess-mortalityDownload

I just got a new study from a friend in Germany (Max Langen).

What this new German study shows is:  The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality.

I can’t say I’m surprised. These are the deadliest vaccine in human history by a factor of over 800. But it is always nice to get confirmation from multiple sources who have no conflicts.

The authors write (translated into English): “The correlation is + .31, is amazingly high and especially in an unexpected direction. Actually, it should be negative, so that one could say: The higher the vaccination rate, the lower the excess mortality. However, the opposite is the case and this urgently needs to be clarified. Excess mortality can be observed in all 16 countries…”

In plain English: vaccination makes things worse, not better.

I wanted to share this study with you because it might be interesting for you and maybe you want to add it to your vaccine data.

Here is the link to the original study (it will download a word docx in German).

The original German study translated into English is available as a PDF here.

And here is a news report about this study:

Bundesländer mit hoher Impfquote haben höchste Übersterblichkeit – reitschuster.de

Use Google translate plug-in to read it. It looks like this (followed by a short excerpt):

The physicist Dr. Ute Bergner , who formerly belonged to the FDP parliamentary group in the Thuringian state parliament, has meanwhile switched to the “Citizens for Thuringia” party, held on November 17. A speech in front of the Thuringian state parliament in which she presented an analysis she had commissioned .

She commissioned two statisticians to investigate whether there was a connection between the vaccination rate and excess mortality in the 16 federal states.

Prof. Dr. Rolf Steyer and Dr. Gregor Kappler analyzed the period from week 36 to week 40.

The results are alarming. The summary of the analysis states:

Excess mortality can be found in all 16 countries. The number of Covid deaths reported by the RKI in the period under review consistently only represents a relatively small part of the excess mortality and above all cannot explain the critical issue:

The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality.

The most direct explanation is:
･ Complete vaccination increases the likelihood of death.

Did a German doctor commit suicide rather than give vaccines?

Did Dr. Thomas Jendges commit suicide saying he no longer could be part of the genocide happening via the COVID vaccine?

Steve Kirsch

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/german-doctor-commits-suicide-rather

In Germany, the Head of the Chemnitz Clinic, Dr Thomas Jendges, committed suicide saying he no longer could to be part of the Genocide happening via the COVID-19 Vaccine. https://t.co/TZmWj7uXcl

— Yvonne C | Fighting Back is the New Normal (@CountryGardener) November 19, 2021

Dr. Guido Hofmann: Coronavirus is an introduction to a ‘Worldwide Dictatorship’

“What is happening here has nothing, nothing at all to do with a virus.”

In the following RAIR Foundation USA exclusively translated video, German Doctor Guido Hofmann, discusses the introduction of a global dictatorship under the guise of an alleged pandemic.

Germans have long known that German Chancellor Angela Merkel has totalitarian instincts. Many Germans have feared that If given the chance, Merkel would try to establish total control over society. Could their fears be coming to fruition?

Is Merkel using the virus to prepare the ground for a totalitarian dictatorship?

Video here:

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/D/Y/3/k/DY3kb.caa.1.mp4?u=bgruv&b=0

Source: https://rairfoundation.com/dr-guido-hofmann-coronavirus-is-an-introduction-to-a-worldwide-dictatorship/

We are killing our kids. Does anyone care?

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/we-are-killing-our-kids-does-anyone

Kids that would have never died from COVID are now dying after getting the vaccine. Will it ever end?

Steve Kirsch

Recently, Dr. Toby Rogers did a risk-benefit analysis showing we’ll kill 117 kids for every kid we save from COVID with the vaccines aged 5 to 11.

The ratio doesn’t really change if they change the dose, e.g., to a third of the adult dose. It means fewer kids saved and fewer kids killed, but Toby estimates the ratio would be about the same. Whether it is 117 or 10, it doesn’t matter. We will kill a lot more kids than we will ever save with these vaccines.

What Toby predicted is now coming true.

We can’t show it is 117 to 1, but we can show for sure we are killing more kids than we are saving because kids that would have never died before are now dying

With COVID, only children with pretty severe health problems would die: we don’t know of a single kid, 5 to 11, who died from COVID who didn’t have some pretty serious health issues before they got COVID.

Those days are now gone. We’re now killing the healthy kids.

The vaccines rolled out for kids 5 to 11 starting on November 7. It is now just 12 days later and we are now killing perfectly healthy kids.

I just got this text:

That’s hardly an isolated incident.

These deaths simply are never ever going to reported in the NY Times or on CNN. So you’re never going to hear about them except from alternate media sources like this substack article. So only around 20,000 people will ever see these deaths.

Here’s another example. Another canary in the coal mine.

First time in her 14-year career: seeing an 8 year old with myocarditis

I saw this Tweet from one of my followers. First time in her 14 year career she has ever seen an 8 year old child with myocarditis. Welcome to the “new normal.”

It’s happening for older kids too, not just the youngest. Here’s a video of Ernest Ramirez who lost his only child, his 16-year old son. I’ve talked to Ernest. His son had zero health issues. He got the first dose of Pfizer and just 5 days later his heart had doubled in size and he died of cardiac arrest while in the park. Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the nation’s most respected cardiologists reviewed the autopsy report and determined the vaccine killed the child. But the CDC simply ignores that because the medical examiner who did the autopsy (after a huge amount of pleading by the father) just said his son died of heart failure, not the vaccine.

 The vaccines clearly made things worse, not better:

So how we handle this? Our government will ignore all of this data push even harder to vaccinate every child in sight as soon as possible. In just 10 days, they’ve vaccinated 10% of our kids.

7 Pfizer COVID-19 Trade Secrets in 3.2.P.1?

There appear to be up to 7 fully redacted ingredients in Pfizer’s experimental genetic vaccine BNT162b2. In this video, I discuss a heavily redacted excerpt of Section 3.2.P.1 from a confidential Pfizer document, released by the MHRA in response to my Freedom of Information request. For further details, please visit alltherisks.com/trade-secret. I have already extensively documented #AllTheRisks across toxicology, molecular biology, virology, immunology and epidemiology in a fully independent biosecurity risk assessment at http://www.alltherisks.com.

Summary Basis for Regulatory Action – Comiranty

Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sgZYqm7vJhxEk4Zc0nbFsv69ClCZqniX/view

CRITICAL UPDATE! In response to my Freedom of Information (FOI) request, on 11 November 2021, the MHRA provided the below heavily redacted excerpt from a confidential Pfizer document. Table 3.2.P.1-1 appears to list 7 fully redacted ingredients.

Background: COMIRNATY is a trade name of Pfizer’s experimental SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccine BNT162b2, the same experimental product deployed in the UK under Regulation 174 from the MHRA, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency. According to the CDC, “There has been no change in the formulation of the vaccine since the name change.” The FDA’s document Summary Basis for Regulatory Action – COMIRNATY, dated 23 August 2021, outlined the full approval of COMIRNATY. As below, Table 2 protected a 0.450ml excipient from public disclosure, according to U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), in lieu of “[t]rade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential”.

Without reversioning their document, as below, the FDA later spontaneously updated Table 2 to supposedly reveal this previously undisclosed excipient to simply be water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R).

However, this new disclosure cannot be reconciled with Table 3 in the same FDA document.

Therefore, on 20 October 2021, I raised a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the MHRA entitled: Exact quantity of Water for Injection pre and post dilution in BNT162b2.

On 28 October 2021, the MHRA responded with the following:

The duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000 does not apply, by virtue of Section 41 (Information provided in confidence) and Section 43 (Commercial interests) of that Act.

Section 41 is an absolute exemption and no consideration of the public interest is required, except to state that we consider its disclosure to constitute an actionable breach of confidence.

Section 43 is a qualified exemption and a consideration of the public interest should be made. We have considered the public interest and cannot see any public interest argument that outweighs the commercial harm whereby the information can be used by competitors to inform their own product development and overcome regulatory hurdles.

Critical questions that must immediately be addressed by the MHRA therefore include:

1. What could possibly warrant the MHRA’s decision to not disclose the exact amount of water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) in BNT162b2 by invoking an absolute exemption (Section 41) and a qualified exemption (Section 43)?
2. Why would the disclosure of the exact amount of water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) in BNT162b2 inflict any “commercial harm” on Pfizer, as the MHRA claim?
3. If the only solution present in BNT162b2 in liquid or frozen state is water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) then how could confirmation that it comprises the entire solution of BNT162b2 in its pre-dilution and post-dilution state “be used by competitors to inform their own product development and overcome regulatory hurdles”?

A diagram of mine illustrating dilution and post-dilution dosing of BNT162b2 is shown below.

CDC Forced to Admit It Doesn’t Collect Data on Natural Immunity to COVID

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Centers for Disease and Control said it has no record of an individual previously infected with COVID becoming reinfected or transmitting the virus to others — because the agency doesn’t collect that data.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-data-natural-immunity-covid

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, said it has no record of an individual previously infected with COVID becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to others.

The FOIA request, submitted Sept. 2 by attorney Aaron Siri of the Siri & Glimstad law firm on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), sought the following information:

“Documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.”

The CDC responded Nov. 5, stating:

“A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”

According to Siri, the revelation that the CDC does not collect data on people who have acquired natural immunity to the virus raises questions about vaccine mandates, specifically how the the government, or employers can mandate vaccines for people who may not need them and who could be at a greater-than-average risk of experiencing an adverse reaction to the shots.

In a blog post, Siri wrote:

“… yet the CDC is actively crushing the rights of millions of naturally immune individuals in this country if they do not get the vaccine on the assumption they can transmit the virus. But despite clear proof the vaccinated spread the virus, the CDC lifts restrictions on the vaccinated?! That is dystopian.”

Siri added:

“Every single peer reviewed study has found that the naturally immune have far greater than 99% protection from having COVID, and this immunity does not wane. In contrast, the COVID vaccine provides, at best, 95% protection and this immunity wanes rapidly. I am no mathematician, but a constant 99% seems preferable to a 95% that quickly drops.”

The response from the CDC came as part of a broader exchange between the agency and Siri’s law firm, dating back to this past summer, in which ICAN and Siri’s law firm submitted a citizen’s petition to the CDC calling for restrictions on those individuals with natural immunity to be lifted.

What do the data show?

As far back as last year, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, argued, “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection.”

Yet data collected from numerous studies show just the opposite of what the CDC and public health authorities claim in their far-reaching vaccination campaign. In fact, many studies show individuals who have acquired natural immunity demonstrate a stronger and longer-lasting level of immunity and a decreased likelihood to transmit COVID to others.

The Brownstone Institute, founded in May 2021 in response to “the global crisis created by policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020,” documented 81 peer-reviewed scientific studies which all come to the same conclusion: Natural immunity confers more effective and longer-lasting protection against COVID than vaccine-induced immunity.

The same institute previously documented 30 peer-reviewed scientific studies on natural immunity in relation to COVID infection.

Further examples abound. For instance, the Cleveland Clinic in June published a preprint study showing individuals previously infected with COVID were less likely to be reinfected than fully vaccinated individuals who never contracted the virus.

The authors of the Cleveland Clinic study concluded vaccination provides no additional benefit to those who already have acquired natural immunity.

In another recent preprint study, conducted by Israeli researchers, individuals fully vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were found to be 6 to 13 times more likely to be infected with the Delta variant as compared to those with natural immunity.

The FOIA request filed Siri’s law firm on behalf of ICAN and provided data from numerous other global studies, supported by a group of expert witnesses, including:

• Research conducted by the National Institutes of Health examined the likelihood of reinfection in people carrying antibodies against COVID, collecting data from more than 3.2 million people who had undergone antibody testing. Researchers found those individuals with antibodies became less likely to test positive for COVID as time went on.

The authors of the study wrote: “The data from this study suggest that people who have a positive result from a commercial antibody test appear to have substantial immunity to SARS-CoV-2, which means they may be at lower risk for future infection.”

• Official UK government data show a probable reinfection rate of 0.025%, but a vaccine breakthrough rate of 23% for Delta variant infections.
• An Irish review of 11 cohort studies involving more than 600,000 individuals who recovered from COVID found, in all studies, reinfection was “an uncommon event,” adding that there was “no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time.”
• Israel is one of the global leaders in overall vaccination against COVID. Nevertheless, research by the Israeli Health Ministry found vaccinated individuals had 6.72 times the rate of infection as compared to those that had previously contracted COVID.
• Another Israeli study found the naturally immune had a higher rate of protection against infection, hospitalization and severe illness as compared to those who were vaccinated.
• In Barnstable County, Massachusetts, despite a 69% vaccination coverage rate among its eligible residents at the time of the study, the CDC found 74% of those infected in a COVID outbreak were fully vaccinated for COVID, and the vaccinated had, on average, a higher presence of the virus in their nasal cavity than the unvaccinated who were infected.
• Following a COVID outbreak among employees of a gold mine in French Guiana, findings showed no employees with a previous history of infection were reinfected, while 63.2% of employees with no previous history of infection ended up contracting the virus.
• Findings from researchers at the NYU School of Medicine showed “[i]n COVID patients, immune responses were characterized by a highly augmented interferon response which was largely absent in vaccine recipients.”
• Researchers at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark studied the immune response following COVID infections, finding the overwhelming majority of individuals who had recovered from infection had detectable, functional SARS-CoV2 spike-specific adaptive immune responses, making vaccination for any of them redundant.
• Yale University researchers determined that “plasma from previously infected vaccinated individuals displayed overall better neutralization capacity when compared to plasma from uninfected individuals that also received two vaccine doses.”
• University of California researchers concluded “[n]atural infection induced expansion of larger CD8 T cell clones occupied distinct clusters, likely due to the recognition of a broader set of viral epitopes presented by the virus not seen in the mRNA vaccine.”
• A study conducted by the CDC and the Wisconsin’s Department of Health Services evaluated the shedding of infectious COVID and observed high viral load in 68% of fully vaccinated individuals and in 63% of unvaccinated individuals. This demonstrates that those who are vaccinated will not only shed virus, but also will do so at the same rate as the unvaccinated. Most notably, this study did not identify anyone with prior natural infection that had any viral load.
• Researchers at Osaka University found “the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to acquire complete resistance to wild-type spike vaccines.”
• Washington University School of Medicine researchers determined “[p]eople who recover [even] from mild COVID have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades.”