Geoengineering Whistleblower – Ex-Military – Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014
NOTE: Please be patient as Kristen has received an overwhelming number of emails for lab requests and will answer them all as soon as possible. Kristen Meghan, Ex-Military, former Air Force Sr. Industrial Hygienist/Environmental Specialist. Her job was Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was 4BOX1, Bio-environmental Engineer. I AM WHO I SAY I AM ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x-u7… Kristen gave a ground breaking presentation of what she had discovered about Geoengineering / Chemtrails while serving her Country. This BRAVE young lady has put her livelihood / life on the line for us. This presentation was produced, filmed and edited by John F. King https://www.youtube.com/user/johnfking00 David Keith Discussing *Weather Modification* on Colbert Report ~ Dec. 2013 http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=22F… THE FATE OF AN ENGINEERED PLANET David W Keith and Andy Parker, Scientific American, Jan2013, Vol. 308, p34-36. http://keith.seas.harvard.edu/papers/… Geoengineering Watch http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ex… GeoEngineering and the Global Assault — A Round Table Discussion with Dane Wigington, George Barnes and Dr. Doug Levine http://radio.consciouslifenews.com/ge… Kristen Meghan YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/IamKrist… Kristen Meghan Facebook Account https://www.facebook.com/Sugarfreesanity Kristen Meghan Twitter Account https://twitter.com/KristenMeghan Email KristenMeghan@gmail.com Sulfuric Acid on a paper towel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sul…
Did you know that before vaccines were invented, we didn’t even have the word allergy? Before we started injecting foreign material into our bodies, there wasn’t a word for anaphylaxis?
Shares work better than likes!
Stickers, T-Shirts, Books and Medical Bracelets! http://myincredibleopinion.com
All video episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MyIncredibleOpinionWithForrestMaready
A letter to Dr. Julie Gerberding, former CDC head turned president of Merck & Co.’s vaccine division.
Via – youtube.com/user/TRUTHstreammedia
#RevolutionForChoice #CDC #CDCFraud #Gardasil #Vaxxed
100% Proof! Human DNA in Vaccines
Presentation recorded on February 16, 2017 in Sonora, California with Marcella Piper-Terry.
#Vaxxed #PrayBig #RecombinantDNA #InsertionalMutagenesis #FetalCellLine #ProLife #Abortion #ChooseLife #RespectLife #MarchForLife #MRC5 #WI38 #RA273 #WALVAX2
Youtube Link: https://youtu.be/dlqFQLLOTEU
Senator Pan attempts to deny the horrid reality of aborted fetal cells in vaccines when questioned by Senator Anderson. Dr. Tara Zandvliet speaks up to tell the truth. Why isn’t this information being shared with you by those asking you to inject these things into your babies? Start learning all you need to know right here: tinyurl.com/9Episodes
#RevolutionForChoice #VAXXED #PanRan #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VaccineIngredients
Hear The Silence – Drama based on the true story about the MMR vaccine and its links to autism.
Christine Shields is certain that the MMR jab he received has caused her son’s autism.
Meanwhile, Dr Andrew Wakefield carries out research into just that, bravely risking his career and reputation.
What else aren’t you being told about vaccines? Find out now by watching this groundbreaking, in-depth docu-series, replaying now >>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED
Some Say Vaccines are Essential. Some Say They’re Evil.
If you have children or grandchildren, you deserve the FACTS to make your own informed choices…
We brought together 60 of the world’s top health experts to bring you… “The Truth About Vaccines”
Register NOW and you’ll be first in line to see the entire 7-part series – for free – series begins August 17th
A Missouri Marine sued the government after being left with brain damage from military issued vaccines.
Vaccines have the potential to cause devastation to all of us. Learn exactly what gambles you are taking when allowing your family to receive these harmful injections: tinyurl.com/9Episodes
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #VAXXED
This is why Big Pharma gave $246 million to politicians last year
Dr. Toni Bark discussing the unusual number of deaths and shoddy safety testing of #Gardasil — A vaccine that was never actually required to prove that it prevented cervical cancer.
75% of all deaths reported were within 25 days of receiving the vaccine.
Gardasil is not the only vaccine that causes serious harm! Listen to the brave and highly educated people who are willing to stand up against this corruption and share life-saving information with you, for FREE, right here: tinyurl.com/9Episodes
#RevolutionForChoice #VAXXED #Cervarix #InformedConsent #ScientificFraud
Gardasil injured my daughter #vaxxed #truth #science #praybig
(2014) TRIBUNALE DI MILANO : BIMBO AUTISTICO PER COLPA DEL VACCINO
Vaccino esavalente, “nesso causale con autismo”. Indenizzo per bimbo di 9 anni
Il ministero della Salute dovrà versare un assegno bimestrale, per tutta la vita, a un bimbo affetto da autismo, a cui nel 2006 fu iniettato il vaccino esavalente prodotto dalla multinazionale GlaxoSmithKline
E ancora, citando la perizia del medico legale Alberto Tornatore nominato dal Tribunale: “È probabile che il disturbo autistico del piccolo sia stato concausato, sulla base di un polimorfismo che lo ha reso suscettibile alla tossicità di uno o più ingredienti (o inquinanti), dal vaccino Infanrix Hexa Sk”.
Nelle 18 pagine della relazione del medico legale, si fa riferimento a “un poderoso documento riservato della GlaxoSmithKline” sui “cosiddetti side effects del vaccino Infanrix Hexa Sk emersi nel corso della sperimentazione clinica pre-autorizzazione o successivamente, fra l’ottobre 2009 e lo stesso mese 2011”. In particolare – come scrive il perito – ci sarebbero “cinque casi di autismo segnalati durante i trial, ma rimasti unlisted, ossia omessi dall’elenco degli effetti avversi sottoposto alle autorità sanitarie per l’autorizzazione al commercio”.
Nella sentenza – sempre citando le conclusioni del medico legale – si riporta come nel vaccino vi sarebbe “una specifica idoneità lesiva per il disturbo autistico, la cui portata, teoricamente piccola se calcolata in base alla sperimentazione clinica pre-autorizzazione”, sarebbe in realtà “sottostimata, per l’esistenza, recentemente confermata dall’autorità sanitaria australiana, di lotti del vaccino contenente un disinfettante a base di mercurio, oggi ufficialmente bandito per via della comprovata neurotossicità”.
(2014) Court of Milan: Autistic child because of the vaccine
Hexavalent vaccine, “causal link with autism”. compensation for 9-Year-olds
The Ministry of health will have to pay a bi-monthly check for the whole life to a child suffering from autism, which in 2006 was injected with the hexavalent vaccine produced by the multinational glaxosmithkline
And again, citing the expert’s report, Alberto Tornatore appointed by the court: ” it is likely that the child’s autistic disorder has been concausato, based on a polymorphism which made it susceptible to the toxicity of one or more ingredients (or pollutants), From vaccine infanrix hexa sk “.
In the 18 pages of the medical examiner’s report, reference is made to ” a powerful confidential document of glaxosmithkline ” on ” So-called side effects of vaccine infanrix hexa sk in the course of pre-authorisation clinical trials or later, between October 2009 And the same month 2011 “. in particular – as the expert writes – there would be ” five cases of autism reported during the trials, but remained unlisted, i.e. omitted from the list of adverse effects submitted to the health authorities for the marketing authorisation “.
In the judgment – always referring to the findings of the medical examiner – it is reported as in the vaccine there is “a specific suitability for autistic disorder, the extent of which is theoretically small if calculated on the basis of pre-authorisation clinical trials”, ‘underestimated, for the existence, recently confirmed by the Australian Health Authority, of batches of the vaccine containing a mercury-based disinfectant, which is now officially banned because of the proven neurotoxicity.’
VAXXED TV – VaxXed Stories: Dr. Suzanne Humphries Notices Vaccine Prescribed In Her Name
Dr. Suzanne Humphries discusses when she noticed a vaccine prescribed in her name without her permission.
Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.
Footage from the phenomenal UPRISING in Poland! Where is the MEDIA? Poland, Italy, Sweden, Australia…the list goes on! All saying “NO!” to mandatory vaccinations!
Education is EMPOWERMENT – Playing now for free: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
“Like” this page! >>> facebook.com/stowarzyszeniestopnop
International support group: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert
#RevolutionForChoice #NonCompliance #StopNop #Poland #Sweden #Italy #Australia #VaccineInjury
#NoJabNoPayNoWay #MediaBlackout #MediaCensorhship #VAXXED #Autism #HearThisWell #RiseUp
Watch this! You won’t believe the way the Netherlands media treats a Chicken Pox outbreak compared to the U.S!
Shares work better than likes!
Amazing Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books & Stickers:
All video episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MyIncredibleOpinionWithForrestMaready
100% Proof! Human DNA in Vaccines
Presentation recorded on February 16, 2017 in Sonora, California with Marcella Piper-Terry.
#Vaxxed #PrayBig #RecombinantDNA #InsertionalMutagenesis #FetalCellLine #ProLife #Abortion #ChooseLife #RespectLife #MarchForLife #MRC5 #WI38 #RA273 #WALVAX2
Youtube Link: https://youtu.be/dlqFQLLOTEU
Editor: Robin Aris
A Mothers Worst Nightmare: Infant Son Dies After 13 Vaccines in One Day
As a parent, you do everything in your power to protect your children. What if that power is taken from you by the people you should trust the most? That’s exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery of Fort Worth, TX, when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time. During an interview with VacTruth about the ordeal, Alisa states:
“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”
Totally unbeknownst to his mother, Bently’s doctor settled on 13 vaccinations that day, including two triple doses of DTap, Hepatitis B, a polio shot, three oral rotavirus doses, and a pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. It was combined into 3 shots and one taken orally. The doctor stated “Your boy is perfectly healthy and showed above average strength in his stomach and legs.” How would you feel having a pediatrician almost forcing you to vaccinate? I know that if I wasn’t aware about the dangers of vaccines, I would be inclined to believe them and trust their expertise.
When Alisa brought Bently home directly after receiving his combination of 13 vaccines, he was no longer making eye contact. He was extremely uncomfortable and was certainly not his usual joyful self.
Five days later, Bently passed away.
Bently took his last breath in his mothers arms 5 days after he received 13 vaccines in one day.
No You Don’t Need a Tetanus Shot: 4 Reasons Why
What Is Tetanus?
Tetanus, also known as lockjaw, occurs when the tetanus bacteria gets into the bloodstream and releases a nervous system toxin. The bacteria can be found extensively in cultivated soils. It also lives harmlessly in the gut of many animals. The infection caused by the bacteria is anaerobic (ie. it cant live in the presence of oxygen).
What’s The Real Cause of Tetanus?
It is not the bacteria itself which causes the development of tetanus, but the toxins it produces under certain conditions.
“Under normal conditions no disease will occur if spores are introduced into a wound.”(J. Ark Med Soc Vol 80, No 3 p134)
“It is the compromised host, or traumatised patient, either by surgery or accident, who is most apt to develop tetanus.” (J Foot Surgery Vol 23, No 3 p235).
So in other words, the tetanus bacteria may be a factor in tetanus, but not its main cause. If it was, the disease would be more common that it is, in light of the fact that it occurs frequently in many places.
4 Reasons Why You Don’t Need A Tetanus Shot
1. It’s Good Drainage That Prevents Tetanus
2. The Vaccine Doesn’t Prevent Tetanus
3. Your Chances Of Getting Tetanus Are Incredibly Low
4. The Harmful Ingredients In the Vaccine
What REALLY prevents Tetanus?
Keeping a wound clean is the best way to prevent it from getting infected, and if you do suspect tetanus, then there is the anti-toxin serum shot (which doesn’t have the harmful effects of the vaccine). Vitamin C has also been shown to be effective in treating tetanus.
No I won’t be getting a tetanus shot, or getting one for my child just because one child contracted it. I wont take the risk for something that is so incredibly rare that we’ve barely seen any cases in Australia in the last few decades. It’s time we all stopped judging other parents for the choices they make and start learning the facts.
Official Vaccine Injury Reward Report from the U.S. Court of Official Claims
Here’s the official Annual Report of Vaccine Claims, in a letter from the United States Court of Federal Claims, to Joseph, R. Biden, Jr. (then President of the United States Senate). 151 pages of vaccine injury cases bought to court in just ONE year. NOTE just two years later, the latest version of the document for 2015/1016 is 277 pages long, accounting for 126 more pages of vaccine injury claims. The dollar demand total for this most current year was just under 1 TRILLION – 995,275,774,000.00 to be exact.
2013/2014 Federal Report of Vaccine Injury – http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FY14%20Annual%20Judgment%20Report.pdf
2014/2015 Federal Report of Vaccine Injury – http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FY2015_Report_to_Congress.pdf
2015/2016 Federal Report of Vaccine Injury – http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FY16-Report-to-Congress.pdf
Taxpayers Pay for the Pharmaceutical Companies’ Negligences and Damages
Note, that due to a law passed in 1986 under President Reagan, this money, over 900 million dollars, comes from the taxpayers, and not from vaccine makers who caused the injury. According the the New York Times, “Mr. Reagan said he had approved the bill ”with mixed feelings” because he had ”serious reservations” about the vaccine compensation program.
10 Things I Want Parents Who Vaccinate Their Kids To Know
Like most parents who don’t vaccinate, I believe in freedom of choice for all parents. If we could all respect each others choice to choose what’s best for our children, we could leave behind judgement and ridicule, and parenting would be a lot more peaceful. That’s why it’s so upsetting to see ignorant comments that are plastered all over social media, from parents who don’t believe in freedom of choice. Here are a few things I want parents who do still vaccinate to know:
1.Most of the time the diseases we vaccinate for are very mild and unlike vaccine injury, they last only a short time.
2. Even if you choose to vaccinate, please please make yourselves aware of the adverse events that can occur.
3. If you are really are worried about viruses and bacteria, you dont want to see what the toxins in vaccine can do…
4. Your children will be shedding their live virus vaccines (this includes the measles and chickenpox vaccine) after their shots.
5. The latest study of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children, found significantly higher rates of autism, allergies, ear infections, learning disabilities and chronic diseases in those vaccinated to the schedule.
6. Vaccines are far from perfect…
7. If you are worried about where to get good and unbiased information from…
8. The people trying to convince you not to vaccinate have only one motivation, and that is to prevent more suffering, because they have either witnessed it first hand in their own family or know someone who has.
9. In the time you have spent reading this, more children have been damaged by vaccines, because they believed what Doctors and the government told them.
10. It’s not too late to change your mind.
A critical look at the current vaccine program in the United States suggests a possible Perfect Storm because there are a combination of factors surrounding the vaccine program which have the potential to lead to disastrous consequences. Below is a list of these potentially disastrous factors:
The “Disastrous Factors” List:
(1) Currently medical doctors receive large bonuses for giving vaccines, and the more vaccines they give, the larger their bonuses
(2) Vaccines are hugely profitable, e.g., the worldwide pediatric vaccine market is projected to be valued at US$ 88.14 billion by the end of 2026
(3) No vaccine manufacturer or doctor can be held accountable for any vaccine injury
(4) The CDC, which is in charge of promoting vaccines, is reportedly corrupt according to CDC scientists, and receives millions of dollars each year from the pharmaceutical industry through the CDC Foundation
(5) The vaccine schedule has never been tested in a publicly available long-term study
(6) Vaccines contain ingredients which have not been adequately tested for safety, such as: mercury, aluminum, bovine cells, aborted human fetal cells, monkey lung tissue, etc
(7) Many vaccines are made in China, a country known for toxic products, e.g., infant formulas made in China were recalled three times in the last decade for toxic contaminants
(8) Vaccines are found to contain contaminants, such as glyphosate (Round Up), stainless steel, and glass
(9) Doctors and scientists who speak out about vaccines are attacked and discredited
(10) Vaccine advisory committees have conflicts of interest, e.g., four out of eight CDC advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing the vaccine
(11) Mercury, a neurotoxicant, is still used in over half of the influenza-vaccine doses (>75 million], the meningococcal vaccine, and the tetanus-toxoid vaccine in the United States
(12) ChildhoodVaccines are now mandatory in California and there is a push to make them mandatory in other States
Former SEAL: 3000 Elite Pedophiles Arrested – Media Silent
April 30, 2017 Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Former Navy SEAL Craig Sawyer says that over 3,000 pedophiles belonging to an elite satanic pedophile ring have been arrested, amid a total blackout by the mainstream media.
Speaking with Infowars‘ Michael Zimmerman at the NRA’s annual convention, Sawyer says that intelligence insiders have confirmed that Trump’s vow to take down the elite pedophile ring in Washington DC is already being fulfilled.
According to Sawyer, his independent research has led him to discover that high-level government officials routinely torture and kill young children during satanic rituals. He says that despite a concerted effort by social media and the mainstream to suppress this information, they cannot escape the avalanche of truth being released by the independent media.
CDC admits 98 million Americans were given cancer virus via the polio shot
The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page, along with Google, but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission.
To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era. He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus. This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.
In this shocking interview, top Merck scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman confesses (with laughter) that Merck vaccines (Polio) had been deliberately contaminated with SV40, a CANCER-CAUSING monkey virus from 1953 – 63. Learn all about the Vaccine-Cancer connection in the upcoming re-release of the Truth About Cancer documentary on May 16th: http://bit.ly/2qvyPzp
Did you see this radio show host ‘lose his mind’ over BillNye and #Vaccines? #HighWire
Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary
Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine
In addition to weakened or killed disease antigens (viruses or bacteria), vaccines contain very small amounts of other
ingredients – excipients or media.
Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose. These include:
Preservatives, to prevent contamination. For example, thimerosal.
Adjuvants, to help stimulate a stronger immune response. For example, aluminum salts.
Stabilizers, to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage. For example, sugars or gelatin.
Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These include:
Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens. For example, egg protein, various culture media.
Inactivating ingredients, used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.
Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example, neomycin.
The following table lists all components, other than antigens, shown in the manufacturers’ package insert (PI) for each vaccine.
Each of these PIs, which can be found on the FDA’s website (see below) contains a description of that vaccine’s manufacturing
process, including the amount and purpose of each substance. In most PIs, this information is found in Section 11: “Description.”
All information was extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts, current as of January 6, 2017.
If in doubt about whether a PI has been updated since then, check the FDA’s website at:
THE ONLY AMMO THAT YOU WILL NEED TO OPEN THE MINDS OF EVEN THE IGNORANT!
VACCINE INSERTS pdf’s: http://www.immunize.org/fda/
Food and Drug Administration FDA Product Approval: Vaccine index
Flu Cases Show Huge Drop Thanks To…Less Flu Shots?
By Paul Webber – May 2, 2017
I was stunned to read an article from BlackburnNews.com, titled, Big Drop In Reported Flu Cases. I wasn’t particularly stunned to read that flu cases in the region were down, I was more stunned to read a writer’s blasphemous inability to achieve logic. I haven’t seen a swing and miss this bad since Pedro Cerrano swung and missed for the first hour of the movie, Major League. So I’m here to help the cause.
The opening sentence really tells us a lot (not all, but a lot) of what we need to know. Lots of residents aren’t getting a flu shot, lots or residents aren’t getting the flu. Valid? Not totally, but that’s a decent start. We now find out that there is a 94% decrease in confirmed flu cases from the prior year. What do we also know? I remind you, less than half of residents got a flu shot. So what conclusion is drawn by health officials? That flu shots are helping stave off the flu.
My head hurts. I need to take a breath. That’s a fallacy. This writer is employed and paid to write things. My head is exploding.
2-Month Old Infant Suffered Apnea and Died Following 8 Vaccines
Monday, August 01, 2016
(NaturalNews) Another family is mourning the loss of their two-month old baby following routine vaccinations. Cash Dewayne Thomas was having apnea episodes following the vitamin K injection and hepatitis B vaccine given to him at birth. When his mother sought help from numerous doctors, they ignored her concerns and would not put Cash on a breathing monitor.
At his two-month well-baby checkup, Cash’s pediatrician assured his mother the vaccines were safe and signed off for the nurse to vaccinate Cash with eight more vaccine doses, even though Cash’s breathing problems had not been addressed. He died 16 days later, which is one of the critical days infants pass away or suffer breathing issues after vaccination.
After burying their son, Cash’s parents, Whitney Hill and Jesse Dewayne Thomas, regretted that they listened to the doctor over their own instincts. They entrusted the doctors with their infant son and know the vaccines led to his breathing problems and ultimately his death.
Cash’s mother and father want to send a strong message to parents who support vaccines and hope their son’s story will help save others from suffering a loss like they have.
“Life ruined by a single vaccine” — All This Father Wanted Was To See His Newborn, Instead This Happened…
This is the story of Ben Hammond, his family, and a tragedy that has become all too familiar and all too often ignored by both mainstream and local media. Controversy has erupted on both sides of the vaccine movement, and it’s far from over.
Father of Five, Paralyzed by the DTaP Vaccination
Ben and Tanya’s fifth child, James, was born eight weeks premature in September 2012. The doctors at the hospital made the father get a 3-in-1 vaccination (DTaP: whooping cough, diphtheria, and tetanus) before he could see his baby.
He was up to date on vaccinations, but the hospital told him he needed the whooping cough booster.
Instead of protecting him, the vaccine almost killed him; it left him paralyzed, unable to work, and struggling with serious lifelong health issues, the family says.
“Horrendous, absolutely horrendous. Watching your husband go from the big, Aussie man that he was to a complete quad. I’m now no longer a wife; I’m now his carer,” Tanya said in an interview with 9 News Perth (Australia). 
Vaccine failure is well established: Malignant mumps in MMR vaccinated children
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:05 UTC
A new study finds highly malignant mumps infections in those successfully vaccinated against the virus…
A provocative new study titled, “Epidemic of complicated mumps in previously vaccinated young adults in the South-West of France,” reveals that the MMR vaccine, despite generating high rates of presumably protective IgG antibodies against mumps, does not always translate into real-world immunity against infection as we have repeatedly been told. To the contrary, the study details cases where, despite the detection of high levels of antibodies against the mumps virus, patients contracted a malignant form of mumps that only rarely follows from natural, community acquired infection.
Vaccine Failure Is Well Established In the Scientific Literature
While counter-intuitive to those who uncritically accept the official marketing copy of the vaccine industry and their cheerleaders within government and the mainstream media, the research community and general public is beginning to appreciate how prevalent and well-documented vaccine failure really is, especially in the case of measles, hepatitis B, chickenpox,pertussis (whooping cough), HIV, polio, HPV, and influenza vaccines that do not work as advertised.
Study 2014 – Epidemic of complicated mumps in previously vaccinated young adults in the South-West of France
Five cases of meningitis, 1 of orchitis, and 1 of unilateral hearing impairment were identified. Each of the 7 patients had been previously vaccinated with MMR, 4 had received 2 doses of this vaccine. Blood tests revealed high rates of IgG antibodies, usually considered as sufficient for immunological protection, and every patient had at least 1 positive RT-PCR test for mumps.
Outbreaks of complicated mumps may still occur despite a broad coverage of MMR vaccination. The clinical presentation suggested mumps but the final diagnosis could only be confirmed by genomic detection of the virus. Unusual viral strains with increased neurovirulence, insufficient population coverage associated with immunity decrease over time may explain outbreaks of complicated mumps. A full vaccine scheme of contact people or a third injection of vaccine for previously vaccinated people who are at risk of developing mumps are required to prevent further spreading of the disease during the outbreak.
Lead developer of HPV vaccine admits it’s a giant, deadly scam
Thursday, September 29, 2016 by: Samantha Debbie
(NaturalNews) An expert involved in the approval process for the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix, is speaking out about the dangers and why you shouldn’t risk your child’s health in getting them.
Diane Harper, M.D., professor and chair of the department of Family and Geriatric Medicine at the University of Louisville, revealed at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination that HPV vaccines are essentially worthless, because rates of cervical cancer in the U.S. are extremely low anyway.
Her speech was intended to promote the benefits of vaccines, but she changed her mind and went in a different direction in an effort to “clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines,” according to The Daily Sheeple.
Dr. Harper, a former vaccine research scientist for Merck, said she wouldn’t be able to sleep at night unless she aired the truth about HPV vaccines. In her speech, given in Reston, Virginia, she said that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment, and 90 percent do so within two years.
Over 40 young girls reported to have died from HPV vaccines
All safety trials for HPV vaccines were done on 15-year-olds, said Dr. Harper, and not 9-year-olds, the demographic for which the immunizations are now recommended. Furthermore, there is a real risk associated with these vaccines, she added.
More than 15,000 girls have experienced adverse side effects from Gardasil, according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). A number likely to be far higher in reality, since many vaccine side effects go unreported.
At least 44 girls are known to have died from these vaccines. Some side effects experienced by those receiving the HPV vaccines include seizures, blood clots, brain inflammation, lupus and Guillain Barre Syndrome, a rare but serious autoimmune deficiency that causes the immune system to attack and damage nerve cells.
While the majority of those with GBS recover, the disorder may cause muscle weakness, difficulty breathing, paralysis and sometimes death.
As with most vaccines, parents are usually not made aware of the risks.
HPV vaccines work on only four of the 40 strains of the venereal disease
How Vaccinated Kids Infect The Non-Vaccinated
Posted on:Sunday, February 8th 2015 at 3:45 pm Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2015
With the thousands of mainstream media articles blaming the non-vaccinated for disease outbreaks, this article will provide a necessary counterbalance by showing the vaccinated can (and do) infect the non-vaccinated…
A groundbreaking study published in 2013 in the journal Vaccine titled, “Comparison of virus shedding after lived attenuated and pentavalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine,” referenced the fact that rotavirus vaccines contain live viruses capable of causing infection, shedding and even transmission to non-vaccinated subjects:
“In fact, transmission of these two rotavirus vaccines or vaccine-reassortment strains to unvaccinated contacts has been detected [9–13], even in the absence of symptoms.”
One of the five studies referenced in the passage above confirming that the vaccinated can infect the non-vaccinated, “Sibling transmission of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq) associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis,” published in 2009, is the first report in the literature to identify the transmission of rotavirus vaccine-derived virus to unvaccinated contacts resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis requiring emergency medical attention:
“We document here the occurrence of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq [Merck and Co, Whitehouse Station, NJ]) transmission from a vaccinated infant to an older, unvaccinated sibling, resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis that required emergency department care.”
The study also indicated that two of the five strains of rotavirus within the Rotateq reassorted to produce a more harmful virus either within the vaccinated infant or within the subsequently infected unvaccinated sibling:
“Results of our investigation suggest that reassortment between vaccine component strains of genotypes P7G1 and P1AG6 occurred during replication either in the vaccinated infant or in the older sibling, raising the possibility that this reassortment may have increased the virulence of the vaccine-derived virus.”
This phenomenon of Rotateq vaccine strain reassortment and subsequent gastoenteritis infection in vaccine recipients was also observed in a 2012 study in 61 infants. Additionally, A Nicaraguan study published in 2012 found “the widespread use of the RotaTeq vaccine has led to the introduction of vaccine genes into circulating human RVs.,” revealing that the widespread introduction of the vaccine strain has altered the genetic makeup of wild-type rotavirus that now infects exposed populations.
It has been estimated that between 80-100% of infants shed rotavirus at some point during 25-28 days after vaccination.  This reveals that the vaccinated, contrary to widespread assumptions about the the risks represented by the non-vaccinated, pose a clear risk of infecting the non-vaccinated, and may be producing the ideal virological conditions for the recombination of diverse rotavirus strains into vaccine-resistant ‘super viruses.’
Another case study, reported on in the National Vaccine Information Center’s document on vaccine viral shedding:
“In 2010, a case report was published in Pediatrics describing a 30-month old healthy boy who had never received rotavirus vaccine and was infected with vaccine strain rotavirus. 237 He ended up in the emergency room with severe gastroenteritis 10 days after his healthy two-month old brother was given a dose of Merck’s RotaTeq vaccine. A stool sample was taken in the emergency room and came back positive for RotaTeq vaccine derived strains after RT-PCR testing.”
The authors of the case report noted that “transmission of RotaTeq strains to unvaccinated contacts was not evaluated in the pivotal [pre-licensure] clinical trials.” They added that both RotaTeq and Rotarix [GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals] vaccines have “the potential for vaccine-virus transmission to contacts.”
Study 2014 Feb 26 – Comparison of virus shedding after lived attenuated and pentavalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine.
Transmission of rotavirus vaccine or vaccine-reassortant strains to unvaccinated contacts has been reported. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate and characterize the nature of vaccine-virus shedding among rotavirus vaccine recipients. Two groups of healthy infants who received a complete course of RotaTeq (RV5) or Rotarix (RV2) were enrolled (between March 2010 and June 2011) to compare fecal shedding for one month after each vaccine dose. Shedding was assessed using both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Eighty-seven infants (34 girls and 53 boys) were enrolled in the study. After the first vaccine dose, the peak time of virus shedding occurred between day 4 and day 7, with positive detection rates of 80-90% by real-time RT-PCR and 20-30% by EIA. In both groups, vaccine shedding occurred as early as one day and as late as 25-28 days. Mixed effects logistic regression analysis of real-time RT-PCR data showed no significant differences between two groups when shedding rates were compared after the first vaccine dose (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; P=0.71) or after the second vaccine dose (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; P=0.99). However, infants receiving RV2 shed significantly higher viral loads than those receiving RV5 when compared after the first vaccine dose (P=0.001) and after the second dose (P=0.039). In terms of shedding rates detected by real-time RT-PCR, vaccine uptake of RV5 or RV2 among infants in Taiwan was comparable. Clinical significance of higher shedding viral loads in RV2 should be further observed.
Study 2010 Feb – Sibling transmission of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq) associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis.
Although rotavirus vaccines are known to be shed in stools, transmission of vaccine-derived virus to unvaccinated contacts resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis has not been reported to our knowledge. We document here the occurrence of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq [Merck and Co, Whitehouse Station, NJ]) transmission from a vaccinated infant to an older, unvaccinated sibling, resulting in symptomatic rotavirus gastroenteritis that required emergency department care. Results of our investigation suggest that reassortment between vaccine component strains of genotypes P7G1 and P1AG6 occurred during replication either in the vaccinated infant or in the older sibling, raising the possibility that this reassortment may have increased the virulence of the vaccine-derived virus. Both children remain healthy 11 months after this event and are without underlying medical conditions.
CDC – The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission
Referenced Report from the National Vaccine Information Center
by Barbara Loe Fisher Co-founder & President
Your Health. Your Family. Your Choice.
Can People Receiving Live Virus Vaccines Transmit Vaccine Strain Virus to Others?
Public health officials say that unvaccinated children pose a big danger to those around them and even threaten the health of fully vaccinated children and adults because vaccines can fail to prevent infection in vaccinated persons.
Today, the most common argument used to justify “no exceptions” mandatory vaccination laws is that unvaccinated people pose a serious health threat to others who “cannot be vaccinated,” such as the immunocompromised.
Some parents of unvaccinated children are asking the opposite question:
Could my unvaccinated or immune compromised child get sick from coming in contact with a recently vaccinated person?
When it comes to live virus vaccines, the short answer is:
During a viral infection, live virus is shed in the body fluids of those who are infected for varying amounts of time and can be transmitted to others. Vaccine strain live virus is also shed for varying amounts of time in the body fluids of vaccinated people and can be transmitted to others. Although public health officials maintain that live attenuated virus vaccines rarely cause complications in the vaccinated person and that vaccine strain viral shedding rarely causes disease in close contacts of the recently vaccinated, it is important to be aware that vaccine strain live virus infection can sometimes cause serious complications in vaccinated persons and vaccine strain live viruses can be shed and transmitted to others with serious or even fatal consequences
Censored Study of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated sees Daylight
by James O. Grundvig
The study defined NDD as “Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability.”
The Study Accepted, Released, Censored
Frontiers Journal received the study on September 17, 2016. After a two-month peer review process, published it on November 21 for its “68,000 on board editors” from institutions around the world (www.frontiersin.org), with the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Harvard University being the top two providing the science editors.
Over the course of four days, more than 80,000 views of the study found it important enough to read, going “viral” according to one familiar with its release. Then on November 28, the bottom fell out when Frontiers scrapped the publication. In one week, it went from being accepted, published, and then retracted. The abstract can still be found online.
The paper, however, wasn’t retracted; it was “unaccepted,” according to Mawson via email. That means Frontiers didn’t retract it, since it was never officially published. What’s left for a study after its accepted, reviewed 80,000 times in less than 100 hours? . . . Censorship.
Beyond that clarification, Mawson wrote: “I am not allowed to comment on the paper/work by my Dean.”
Melissa Cochrane, the communications manager for Frontiers Journal, which is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, replied via email:
“As we have previously noted, this article was provisionally accepted but not published. In response to concerns raised regarding the abstract and the provisional PDF — which were made provisionally available online — Frontiers then reopened its review. Following further manuscript assessment by the Field Chief Editor of Frontiers in Public Health, in consultation with an external expert, the manuscript was subsequently rejected, not retracted as retraction can only occur once a paper has been officially published and indexed.
“The rejection was due to severe limitations in the validity of the results.”
A day later, Ms. Cochrane replied to an email seeking clarification on the “rejection” process, writing:
Vaccines Cause Health Issues Big and Small
Metals Debris Found in Vaccine Supply
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
A landmark new study has found metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine tested. The study should have profound and immediate impact on public health policies and vaccine industry procedures around the globe.
A team of scientists used a highly sensitive technology—an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an x-ray microprobe—to scan for solid contaminants in 44 samples of 30 vaccines. The researchers reported their results in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination. They found widespread contamination by toxic aluminum salts, red blood cells of unknown origin and inorganic, foreign particle debris in aggregates, clusters and independent particulates. The composition of those clusters, the researchers observe, are consistent with “burnt waste.”
Study – New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro-and Nanocontamination
International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) The following video from Gary Franchi of NextNewsNetwork reveals the shocking admission by the CDC that this year’s flu vaccine doesn’t work.
As this story has gone extremely viral, I’ve also added these additional links to other news stories that report on the CDC’s admission that this year’s flu shot contains the wrong strain:
Huffington Post: “Flu Vaccine Doesn’t Protect Against This Season’s Most Dominant Strain”
The Seattle Times: “Vaccine problems may signal rocky flu season” – “New evidence shows that FluMist and seasonal shots likely won’t protect very well against this year’s flu viruses…”
ABC News: “Flu vaccine may not be effective for this year’s strains, CDC says”
Freedom Outpost: “CDC Health Advisory: Get Your Flu Shot. It “Might” Work This Year. Sort Of”
Should I Get the Flu Shot? CDC Data Raise Concerns
In February the CDC revealed that the 2014-2015 influenza vaccine had an efficacy rate of only 19 percent. If that was not bad enough, in June the CDC’s committee that advises on immunization practices announced that nasal spray flu vaccines should not be used in the 2016-2017 flu season because, in the CDC’s own words, “no protective benefit could be measured” from taking them.
Indeed, numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies have shown that the flu vaccine is not effective either at reducing the flu or reducing flu-related deaths.
When a team of researchers at the National Institutes of Health compared flu vaccine rates with influenza-related illness over a 19-year period, from 1980 to 1999, they found that deaths from the flu increased as vaccination rates increased. “In conclusion, the increase in elderly influenza vaccination coverage in the U.S. after 1980 was not accompanied by a decline in influenza-related mortality,” the researchers concluded.
A study, led by a researcher at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and published in the journal Archives of Internal Medicine, found that increasing vaccination coverage did not correlate with declining mortality and the decline in influenza-related mortality could not be attributed to the flu vaccine but was rather the result of naturally acquired immunity. Observational studies crediting the flu vaccine with contributing to decreased deaths from the flu, “substantially overestimate vaccination benefit,” these researchers concluded.
A study published in the American Journal of Perinatology of vaccine effectiveness in pregnant women in Northern California across five flu seasons found that women who received flu vaccines during pregnancy had the same risk for influenza-like illness as unvaccinated women, and infants born to women who received flu vaccines also had the same risks for influenza or pneumonia as infants born to unvaccinated women. In other words, vaccine status made no difference to whether or not pregnant women or their offspring got the flu.
A study published in Pediatrics International of Japanese children ages 6 months to 2 years who were vaccinated against the flu found that the influenza vaccine did not reduce the rate of influenza A infections in children under two.
CDC Presents Updated Estimates of Flu Vaccine Effectiveness for the 2014-2015 Season
Flu vaccine did not protect against drifted H3N2 viruses, but protected against vaccine-like H3N2 and B viruses
On February 26, 2015, updated interim influenza (flu) vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates for the current 2014-2015 season were presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The updated VE estimate against influenza A H3N2 viruses was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6%-29%).This result is similar to the VE point estimate of 23%, which was reported in a January 16 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) and confirms reduced protection against H3N2 viruses this season. The VE estimate against influenza B viruses this season was 45% (95% CI: 14% – 65%).
How well the flu vaccine works can vary depending on a number of factors, including the similarity between circulating influenza viruses and vaccine viruses, and the age, health or immune status of the person vaccinated. The findings for VE against H3N2 viruses this season are about one-third of the VE expected when the flu vaccine is well matched to circulating influenza viruses. The VE against influenza B viruses this season is similar to the effectiveness observed when vaccine viruses and most circulating viruses are well matched.
ACIP votes down use of LAIV for 2016-2017 flu season
For Immediate Release: Wednesday, June 22, 2016
CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) today voted that live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), also known as the “nasal spray” flu vaccine, should not be used during the 2016-2017 flu season. ACIP continues to recommend annual flu vaccination, with either the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) or recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), for everyone 6 months and older.
ACIP is a panel of immunization experts that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This ACIP vote is based on data showing poor or relatively lower effectiveness of LAIV from 2013 through 2016.
Whooping cough resurgence due to vaccinated people not knowing they’re infectious?
June 24, 2015
Santa Fe Institute
The dramatic resurgence of whooping cough is due, in large part, to vaccinated people who are infectious but who do not display the symptoms, suggests a new study.
…vaccinated people who are infectious but who do not display the symptoms of whooping cough, suggesting that the number of people transmitting without symptoms may be many times greater than those transmitting with symptoms.
The problem is, the newer vaccines might not block transmission. A January 2014 study in PNAS by another research team demonstrated that giving baboons acellular pertussis vaccines prevented them from developing symptoms of whooping cough but failed to stop transmission.
Building on that result, Althouse and Scarpino used whopping cough case counts from the CDC, genomic data on the pertussis bacteria, and a detailed epidemiological model of whooping cough transmission to conclude that acellular vaccines may well have contributed to — even exacerbated — the recent pertussis outbreak by allowing infected individuals without symptoms to unknowingly spread pertussis multiple times in their lifetimes.
Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example, the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to “Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated,” and to “Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit.”1
A statement on the website of St. Jude’s Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.2
“The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual,” says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. “Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public.”
Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.
Officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say the best way to prevent pertussis is to get vaccinated. But data from the Vermont Department of Health (DOH) suggest that going through the pertussis vaccination regimen is not a sure-fire way to ward off the highly contagious disease.
In 2014, an outbreak of whooping cough (pertussis) broke out in the San Diego area. Of the 621 individuals who were infected, nearly all of them were completely up to date on all preventive vaccinations. If vaccines are given to protect from disease, how could this happen?
San Diego public health official Dr. Wilma Wooten argued that the cause was related to a decrease in the protection offered by vaccines after the first year. This answer is most revealing, in that it speaks to the actual efficacy of vaccines. It also shows that the concept of herd immunity is largely myth—and completely misunderstood.
The theory of herd immunity states that when a critical mass of the population (usually stipulated at 95%) is vaccinated against a disease, the possibility of outbreaks is eliminated. This is the main argument that is used to shame parents who wish to refuse certain vaccinations for their children: by not vaccinating, they put the health of the “herd” at risk.
However, if vaccines start losing effectiveness after the first year, as Dr. Wooten says, then constant revaccination would be required, since the immunity offered is only temporary for most vaccines. Achieving the required rate of protection is virtually impossible under this paradigm.
Of course, if we look back over the decades and note the lack of rampant epidemics in our nation, while remembering that vaccine protection is in perpetual decline, the myth of herd immunity quickly unravels. Our society has never achieved this level of herd immunity, yet not a single major outbreak of disease has occurred.
The argument for herd immunity was actually developed out of observations of natural immunity, not vaccination. Statisticians observed that populations were protected when sufficient members contracted the wild form of a disease, and subsequently acquired lifelong immunity. With vaccines, however, evidence shows that unvaccinated children may catch infectious diseases from vaccinated children. What is true of natural immunity is not true of vaccination.
Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines (1991)
Parents have come to depend on vaccines to protect their children from a variety of diseases. Some evidence suggests, however, that vaccination against pertussis (whooping cough) and rubella (German measles) is, in a small number of cases, associated with increased risk of serious illness.
This book examines the controversy over the evidence and offers a comprehensively documented assessment of the risk of illness following immunization with vaccines against pertussis and rubella. Based on extensive review of the evidence from epidemiologic studies, case histories, studies in animals, and other sources of information, the book examines:
The relation of pertussis vaccines to a number of serious adverse events, including encephalopathy and other central nervous system disorders, sudden infant death syndrome, autism, Guillain-Barre syndrome, learning disabilities, and Reye syndrome.
The relation of rubella vaccines to arthritis, various neuropathies, and thrombocytopenic purpura.
The volume, which includes a description of the committee’s methods for evaluating evidence and directions for future research, will be important reading for public health officials, pediatricians, researchers, and concerned parents.
Whooping cough increase related to current vaccine
The move to an artificially created vaccine for whooping cough is behind an increase in cases of the deadly disease in the US, a new study suggests.
The findings highlight the need to do similar research in Australia where whooping cough cases have spiralled upward in the past decade, co-author Associate Professor Manoj Gambhir, from the University of Monash, says.
In 2012 the US saw the highest number of pertussis (whooping cough) cases since 1955.
At the same time there has been a shift in the age group reporting the largest number of cases from adolescents to 7 to 11 year olds.
In the paper, published today in PLOS Computational Biology, Gambhir and colleagues use mathematical modelling of 60 years of pertussis disease data to determine what best explains this increase.
A Change in Vaccine Efficacy and Duration of Protection Explains Recent Rises in Pertussis Incidence in the United States
Published: April 23, 2015
Over the past ten years the incidence of pertussis in the United States (U.S.) has risen steadily, with 2012 seeing the highest case number since 1955. There has also been a shift over the same time period in the age group reporting the largest number of cases (aside from infants), from adolescents to 7–11 year olds. We use epidemiological modelling and a large case incidence dataset to explain the upsurge. We investigate several hypotheses for the upsurge in pertussis cases by fitting a suite of dynamic epidemiological models to incidence data from the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS) between 1990–2009, as well as incidence data from a variety of sources from 1950–1989. We find that: the best-fitting model is one in which vaccine efficacy and duration of protection of the acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine is lower than that of the whole-cell (wP) vaccine, (efficacy of the first three doses 80% [95% CI: 78%, 82%] versus 90% [95% CI: 87%, 94%]), increasing the rate at which disease is reported to NNDSS is not sufficient to explain the upsurge and 3) 2010–2012 disease incidence is predicted well. In this study, we use all available U.S. surveillance data to: 1) fit a set of mathematical models and determine which best explains these data and 2) determine the epidemiological and vaccine-related parameter values of this model. We find evidence of a difference in efficacy and duration of protection between the two vaccine types, wP and aP (aP efficacy and duration lower than wP). Future refinement of the model presented here will allow for an exploration of alternative vaccination strategies such as different age-spacings, further booster doses, and cocooning.
FDA NEWS RELEASE – FDA study helps provide an understanding of rising rates of whooping cough and response to vaccination
For Immediate Release: Nov. 27, 2013
A new study is helping to provide a better understanding of vaccines for whooping cough, the common name for the disease pertussis. Based on an animal model, the study conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and published November 25, 2013, in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows that acellular pertussis vaccines licensed by the FDA are effective in preventing the disease among those vaccinated, but suggests that they may not prevent infection from the bacteria that causes whooping cough in those vaccinated or its spread to other people, including those who may not be vaccinated.
While the reasons for the increase in cases of whooping cough are not fully understood, multiple factors are likely involved, including diminished immunity from childhood pertussis vaccines, improved diagnostic testing, and increased reporting. With its own funds plus support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the FDA conducted the study to explore the possibility that acellular pertussis vaccines, while protecting against disease, might not prevent infection.
Study- Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model
Although pertussis resurgence is not completely understood, we hypothesize that current acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines fail to prevent colonization and transmission.
To test our hypothesis, infant baboons were vaccinated at 2, 4, and 6 mo of age with aP or whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines and challenged with
pertussis at 7 mo. Infection was followed by quantifying colonization in nasopharyngeal washes and monitoring leukocytosis and symptoms. Baboons vaccinated with aP were
protected from severe pertussis-associated symptoms but not from colonization, did not clear the infection faster than naïve animals, and readily transmitted
pertussis to unvaccinated contacts. Vaccination with wP induced a more rapid clearance compared with naïve and aP-vaccinated animals. By comparison, previously infected
animals were not colonized upon secondary infection. Although all vaccinated and previously infected animals had robust serum antibody responses, we found key differences in T-cell immunity.
Previously infected animals and wP-vaccinated animals possess strong pertussis-specific T helper 17 (Th17) memory and Th1 memory,whereas aP vaccination induced a Th1/Th2 response instead. The
observation that aP, which induces an immune response mismatched to that induced by natural infection, fails to prevent colonization or transmission provides a plausible explanation for the
resurgence of pertussis and suggests that optimal control of pertussis will require the development of improved vaccine
Flu shot effectiveness for 2015-16 disappointing, data shows
Flu shot protects better than last year, but not good enough, experts say
It’s the time of year when experts crunch the numbers to see how well the flu shot worked. The result? Better than last year, but still not good enough.
“Overall, just shy of 45 to 50 per cent,” said Dr. Danuta Skowronski of the BC Centre for Disease Control, who presented the data to the Global Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness meeting at the World Health Organization last week.
“That’s lower than we would like to see, but it’s an improvement over the previous year, because it couldn’t be worse, frankly”
In 2014-15, the flu shot offered essentially zero protection against the circulating influenza virus of that season. Back then, the prevailing strain was H3N2.
A Shot Never Worth Taking: The Flu Vaccine ~ by Kelly Brogan, MD
•It’s not indicated: I’m sure you don’t know a single person who has died of the flu, and if you think you do, I can almost guarantee you that the diagnosis was not confirmed in a way that ruled out the 150-200 infectious pathogens that cause flu-like syndromes, none of which would be “covered” by the vaccine. Despite the astronomical figures the CDC flashes before us of “flu deaths”, there were 18 (yes, 1-8) confirmed in 2001, for example. Access to these figures is suspiciously concealed, but in the end, forget the stats, and use some common sense to see the fear mongering and sales marketing for what it is.
•It doesn’t work: The Cochrane Database – an objective, gold-standard assessment of available evidence has plainly stated, in TWO STUDIES, that there is no data to support efficacy in children under two, and in adults. Even the former Chief Vaccine Officer at the FDA states: “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.” Liking the idea of being protected from the flu does not equate to being protected from the flu. That’s essentially what your vaccine-promoting doctor (or pharmacist) is engaging in – promoting an idea.
Study 2010: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.
The corresponding figures for poor vaccine matching were 2% and 1% (RD 1, 95% CI 0% to 3%). These differences were not likely to be due to chance. Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms and an estimated 1.6 additional cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome per million vaccinations. The harms evidence base is limited.
Study 2014: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.
On this basis, vaccination shows very limited effects: NNV 92 (95% CI 63 to 201) against ILI in pregnant women and NNV 27 (95% CI 18 to 185) against laboratory-confirmed influenza in newborns from vaccinated women.Live aerosol vaccines have an overall effectiveness corresponding to a NNV 46 (95% CI 29 to 115).The performance of one-dose or two-dose whole virion pandemic vaccines was higher, showing a NNV of 16 (95% CI 14 to 20) against ILI and a NNV of 35 (95% CI 33 to 47) against influenza, while a limited impact on hospitalisation was found (NNV 94, 95% CI 70 to 1022).Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms. No evidence of association with serious adverse events was found, but the harms evidence base was limited.The overall risk of bias in the included trials is unclear because it was not possible to assess the real impact of bias.