The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly updated its Covid-19 vaccine guidance Monday for large swaths of immunocompromised people, saying they can receive a booster dose of a Covid vaccine at least six months after completing their primary vaccination series.
But unlike boosters for the vast majority of Americans, a booster shot for an immunocompromised individual may be their fourth Covid shot.
The Food And Drug Administration (FDA) approved an emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children as young as 5 years old despite the fact that its Pfizer-connected advisory committee knew about numerous adverse events that were reported in Pfizer’s clinical trials for children, including adverse events that were determined to be “related” to the clinical vaccine trial.
The Briefing Packet for the FDA advisory committee meeting shows that the FDA advisers used clinical studies sponsored by BioNTech and conducted by or supported by Pfizer to approve the vaccine for young children.
ON PAGE 39 the FDA document states (emphasis added):
“Lymphadenopathy is considered an adverse reaction to vaccine and is noted as such in the EUA Fact Sheet. Among approximately 2250 children 5 to <12 years of age randomized 2:1 to receive BNT162b2 or placebo, as of the data cutoff date (06 September 2021), 13 participants (0.9%) in the BNT162b2 group and 1 participant (0.1%) in the placebo group had events of lymphadenopathy.” Lymphadenopathy is a lymph nodes disease. On page 40 the document states that “Lymphadenopathy has been identified as related to BNT162b2 in individuals ≥12 years of age and it is also observed in the pediatric 5 to <12 years of age group.” The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a related AE of mild arthralgia (right elbow joint pain), with an onset the same day as Dose 2 (administered in the left deltoid muscle), that was reported as resolved the next day.” The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a related AE of moderate paresthesia (bilateral lower extremity tingling) with onset at 1 day post-Dose 2 and reported as recovered/resolved 3 days after onset.” The document states that “In the BNT162b2 group, a psychiatric disorder event of tic was reported in 1 participant: One participant in the BNT162b2 group had an AE of Grade 3 tic with onset at 7 days post Dose 2 and reported as recovering/resolving at the time of the data cutoff. The AE was considered by the investigator as related to study intervention.” The document later notes that “There were 6 participants (0.4%) in the BNT162b2 group and 3 participants (0.4%) in the placebo group had events of lymphadenopathy.”
On PAGE 42 the document states that a trial participant dropped out of the trial due to an Adverse Event, stating “One participant (0.1%) in the BNT162b2 group discontinued from the vaccination period due to an AE (details in Section 3.7.2) and two participants (0.1%) in the BNT162b2 group and 1 participant (0.1%) in the placebo group withdrew from the study before the 1-month post Dose 2 visit. Neither of these withdrawals was reported as due to an AE.”
One participant had blood that passed through his/her anus, which is known as hematochezia, characterized by bloody stool. The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a non-serious related AE reported by the investigator as moderate hematochezia 4 days after Dose 2. The participant had heme occult positive stool; was seen in the emergency department, and had no further tests done; and went home and the event resolved the same day without sequelae. This participant had a medical history of asthma and nondrug allergy and had no other reported AEs.”
The Food and Drug Administration approved the “first oral blood thinning medication for children” a few months ahead of their COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children ages 5-11.
In late June 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a drug called Pradaxa; oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years of age with venous thromboembolism, a condition that involves blood clots forming in the veins. Pradaxa is the “first FDA-approved blood thinning medication that children can take by mouth,” reads the FDA News Release.
“With today’s approval of Pradaxa, pediatric patients have another therapeutic option to treat and prevent potentially deadly blood clots,” said Ann Farrell, M.D., director of the Division of Non-Malignant Hematology for the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
A few months later, the FDA authorized children ages 5-11 to be injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 shot.
FDA Approves First Oral Blood Thinning Medication for Children
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years old with venous thromboembolism (a condition where blood clots form in the veins) directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least five days. The FDA also approved Pradaxa oral pellets to prevent recurrent clots among patients 3 months to less than 12 years old who completed treatment for their first venous thromboembolism.
Truth from “a real doctor” about vaccines, both medically and the business of running a medical clinic without accepting the bribes for vaccinating children.
Six doctors who have administered vaccines in their practice are all asked the same question. When you were in medical school, how much education regarding vaccines was provided before you were permitted to administer them?
Interviews, camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.
Our 8 Unvaccinated children are super healthy #vaxxed #prayBig #PeoplesStudy #truth #science
Newborn baby dies after receiving eight vaccinations on schedule; pathologists confirm vaccines responsible for death
A mother from Michigan has gone through an emotional journey in finding exactly what caused her son to mysteriously die.
What she uncovered is another case added to the excessive vaccination-induced early death.
Elijah Daniel French was born on May 4, 2007, and had mysteriously died a couple days after receiving 8 routine vaccinations, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for childhood vaccination. This was determined by child death investigator and many pathologists to have been a result from vaccination.
According to VacTruth.com: Baby Elijah was happy, healthy, and smiling until he underwent routine vaccinations. His health began to worsen, and ended up developing a high fever and breathing problems.
In the family account, it was noted that Danny had been vaccinated for seven other conditions at 5 1/2 months old, including hepatitis B, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal and polio vaccines. To make things worse, a few months later he was brought over to the doctor’s office where he was administered a second round of the same vaccines. This caused him to develop asthma and exacerbated his problems even more.
Daniel’s mother didn’t know what else to do, other than see a doctor for her Childs condition. So, she brought Daniel back to the doctor’s office where ehe was given a third round of vaccines at 14 months old. He was administered 8 vaccines in 4 injections: Varicella, Hib, DTaP and MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella). This is when Daniel’s started to dramatically worsen.
“That night, Danny was still eating and drinking but was cranky and slept more than usual,” his mother reported.
“By the next day, he was extremely fatigued, irritable and had a loss of appetite. He did not have a fever at this time. He was red and warm where they injected him. These symptoms only worsened.”
“By the third day, Danny was unable to stay awake for longer than thirty minutes, he had zero food intake, his fluid intake diminished and he cried excessively. Seventy-one hours after his doctor visit, Danny developed a fever from the vaccines and was given Children’s Tylenol. His doctor was called but there was no answer from him because it was the July 4th holiday, the office was closed.”
Three independent pathologists confirm that young Danny’s death was caused by vaccines
Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped
June 29, 2017
by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
Doctors call it a “medication administration error.” During a routine check-up at her pediatrician’s office, 4-month old Aniya was accidentally given the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and she hasn’t been the same since.
Anita Vasquez of Victoria, Texas, herself a nurse, says that “doctors are in denial” that any of the medical issues that began after her daughter received the shot are related to the vaccine.
Aniya was a happy and healthy breastfed baby before her 4-month doctor visit. Her only illness was an ear infection which had been cleared up with antibiotics shortly before that fateful day of December 29, 2016. Since then, she has suffered numerous health issues and several hospitalizations.
Rather than acknowledge the possibility that the Gardasil 9 vaccine contributed to the decline in Aniya’s health, doctors and Child Protective Services have reportedly blamed the mother. Her desperate search for answers has led instead to her being accused of Munchausen by Proxy, or “medical child abuse,” and her baby has been seized by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
Anita told Health Impact News that her concerns about the vaccine have been dismissed and ignored by virtually everyone involved in her daughter’s care. DFPS refers to her “unfounded concerns” about the Gardasil 9 vaccine. She believes that they are trying to cover up the dangers of the vaccine.
This is any mother’s worst nightmare, and no one deserves this.
Distracted Doctor Administers Wrong Vaccine – Infant Received 8 Vaccines at Same Visit
The Vasquez family nightmare began when Anita took her 13 year old son and her 4 month old baby girl to a routine check-up.
Anita is a registered nurse by trade, and she didn’t question the recommended vaccinations. Her son was to receive the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and her daughter was to receive 2 shots and an oral vaccine. The nurse drew up and labeled the vaccines and placed the syringes in a single envelope.
Anita says that Dr. Veronica Guel-Valdivia came into the room talking on her cell phone. When the doctor finished her phone conversation, she asked Anita to put baby Aniya on the table.
Polio Paralyzes 17 Children in Syria, W.H.O. Says
Unlike Syria’s first polio outbreak in 2013, caused by a wild strain that paralyzed 36 children before it was brought under control, the new outbreak derived from the polio vaccine itself, Mr. Jasarevic said.
The vaccine, a weakened form of the polio virus that triggers the immune system’s response, is secreted in the waste of vaccinated children, and over time can mutate into an infectious strain that may afflict the unvaccinated. The risks are especially high in areas where not all children have received the vaccine and where the mutated virus can spread from contaminated sewage or water.
“These vaccine-derived outbreaks really are a marker of poor vaccination and poor sanitation in the community,” said Dr. Homer Venters, director of programs at Physicians for Human Rights, an international aid group based in New York that supports humanitarian work in war zones, including Syria and Yemen.
After receiving a flu shot, this beautiful young girl suffered vaccine-induced paralysis, also known as Transverse Myeltis, one of many labels given to our modern-day “Polio”, which was never eradicated by vaccines and in fact, is many times directly caused by them.
What else aren’t you being told? Find out here, while this groundbreaking, 9-part docu-series is still free>>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes
Guillain-Barré Syndrome is another label given to this paralysis, very often caused by vaccines.
More info here: vactruth.com/2012/04/25/change-names-of-diseases
✴️ Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
✴️ Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
✴️ Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Polio #TransverseMyelitis #VaccineInjury
Flu Vaccine Efficacy Slips From Prior Estimate, CDC Says
Robert Lowes
June 23, 2017
The influenza vaccine for the 2016-2017 season was 42% effective in preventing an infection from any A or B virus in people of all ages, down from a preliminary estimate of 48% in February, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced earlier this week.
The CDC frames the effectiveness rating in terms of reducing a vaccinated person’s risk of getting sick and having to visit a clinician on an outpatient basis because of the flu.
The vaccine worked the best among children aged 6 months to 8 years, at 61%, and the least among individuals aged 18 to 49 years, at 19%. For people aged 65 years or older — a demographic group that’s especially vulnerable to the flu — effectiveness stood at 25%.
The CDC reported the efficacy rates at a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 21 and 22.
Vaccine effectiveness varied considerably by influenza virus type. It was at its lowest in all age groups — 34% — for the A/H3N2 virus that dominated this season. Performance picked up for the A/H1N1 pandemic virus (54%), the B/Yamagata virus (55%), and the B/Victoria virus (60%), according to epidemiologist Jill Ferdinands, PhD, in the CDC’s Influenza Division.
The CDC adjusts its efficacy estimates for such factors as age, sex, and underlying medical conditions.
The 42% overall effectiveness of the latest influenza vaccine is somewhat lower than the 47% for the 2015-2016 vaccine, but a big improvement over the 23% for the 2014-2015 edition. Vaccine performance suffers when the viruses they’re designed to thwart undergo genetic drift after the vaccine is formulated. However, the CDC reported that most of the flu viruses in circulation in 2016-2017 were similar to those in the latest vaccine, which came in trivalent and quadrivalent formulas.
The prenatal flu vaccine and ASD: Good research, bad conclusions.
Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D.
June 23, 2017
Very early this year, a research group from the insurance giant Kaiser Permanente published a paper concluding no evidence of harm in administering prenatal influenza vaccines. The study authors asserted that there was no relationship between those who received the flu shot during pregnancy and later autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis in the child. However, that proclamation was not consistent with the study’s results. Specifically, women who received the vaccine during their first trimester of pregnancy showed a 20% greater risk of having the child later develop ASD. This was based on a sampling of 13,477 women who received the maternal flu shot in the first trimester, resulting in 260 ASD cases, versus 151,698 “control” women who received no flu shot during pregnancy, resulting in 2,338 ASD cases. This result was statistically significant with a p value of 0.01, which in this case means that the possibility that this is a “chance” finding and not a “true” association was just 1%. In other words, the chances of this being a “true” association are 99%.
In statistics, the gold standard “cut-off” to determine statistical significance is actually a higher p value of 0.05, meaning that the possibility of a chance association is less than 5%. Thus, the first trimester flu shot – ASD relationship should have been deemed statistically significant, with p=0.01, and accordingly a policy change should have been made to suspend use of that vaccine, at least in the first trimester of pregnancy.
However, the study authors instead reached into their statistical “bag of tricks” and trotted out what is termed the “Bonferroni” adjustment. This adjustment is applied in statistics only under very specific instances, when multiple, unrelated statistical evaluations are made using a single data sampling. In this adjustment, simply, the p value is adjusted by multiplying its original value with the number of “independent” evaluations completed in the study of that single data set (Bland et al. 1995 BMJ 310:170). In the case of Zerbo et al. 2017, there were 8 evaluations completed (4 evaluations regarding the flu shot and 4 evaluations regarding women who actually contracted the flu during pregnancy) and thus the original p value of 0.01 was adjusted to 0.08, above the “cut off” value used for deeming “statistical significance.” The Zerbo et al. authors rounded the result up to p=0.1, further moving the result away from the “magic” 0.05 cut-off level, causing the significant result to disappear.
There’s a huge problem here, however, which I pointed out in my letter to the editor of the journal (Hooker 2017 JAMA Pediatrics 171:600) published in their June 2, 2017 edition. The Bonferroni adjustment, among other corrections for multiple, independent comparisons, should not be applied to statistics when there is any interdependence within the different evaluations completed within the data sample. In this case, 4 of the evaluations completed dealt specifically with the timing of the maternal flu shot (first, second and third trimesters, as well as overall risk at any point in pregnancy) and subsequent ASD incidence. So, not only were these four trials all focused on an ASD outcome, but they all dealt with different phases of pregnancy, which were then summed to develop an “overall” risk at any phase of pregnancy. By definition, these trials were anything but statistically independent. An example of an independent evalution would be polling different groups of college students for their tastes in music, food, art, and perhaps health care practices, where none of the preferences could be empirically tied to the next.
Spokane WA parents report on their vaccinated and Unvaccinated children #vaxxed #peoplesStudy #praybig #truth #science
Don’t Vaccinate to Protect My Cancer Kid
Posted on February 10, 2015
I read with great interest the recent ‘measles epidemic’ articles that addressed the vaccine debate from the point of view of a cancer parent. My interest is the result of being a cancer parent myself – my little girl has been battling leukemia on and off for the past 10 years. I read these articles, and I became angry. Very, very angry. Once again, the government and drug companies are exploiting the plight of children stricken by cancer to achieve a profit-driven end without actually helping them. In fact, this profitable end could cause great harm, even increasing the rates of pediatric leukemia, if their obvious goal of a federally mandated vaccination protocol is achieved. I am a seasoned Momcologist, a term the research-driven cancer parents call themselves. We are the cancer equivalent of Thinking Moms, critical thinkers. I have done extensive reading on the etiology of leukemia, its connection to autoimmune disease, and how vaccines and natural disease may influence these sorts of childhood illnesses. Come connect the dots with me.
Clearly, I empathize with the raw fear the parents in these articles have that their immunocompromised children may contract an illness that could be devastating. I have walked for years in their shoes. I get it. However, the parents in these articles are either grossly misinformed, or their comments have been edited with bias. Let’s get some facts straight about cancer treatment and infection. One of the first things we were warned about after my daughter’s diagnosis was live-virus vaccination. No one in the family was to receive a live-virus vaccine while my daughter was on treatment because these viruses can and do shed (1, 2, 3, 4), some for as much as four weeks (5), potentially infecting the immunocompromised patient with disastrous results. That includes the measles vaccine (MMR II and ProQuad), the intranasal flu vaccine, and the chicken pox shot. In fact, my other children were able to get medical waivers not to receive vaccines because of my daughter’s illness. I know my child is much more likely to encounter a peer at school who has been recently vaccinated with a live-virus vaccine than she is to encounter natural disease from an unvaccinated child.
Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio
June 28, 20173:22 PM ET
For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.
So far in 2017, there have been only six cases of “wild” polio reported anywhere in the world. By “wild,” public health officials mean the disease caused by polio virus found naturally in the environment.
By contrast, there have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they’re caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children
“It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem,” says Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco.
The oral polio vaccine used throughout most of the developing world contains a form of the virus that has been weakened in the laboratory. But it’s still a live virus. (This is a different vaccine than the injectable one used in the U.S. and most developed countries. The injectable vaccine is far more expensive and does not contain live forms of the virus.)
Andino studies how viruses mutate. In a study published in March, he and his colleagues found that the laboratory-weakened virus used in the oral polio vaccine can very rapidly regain its strength if it starts spreading on its own. After a child is vaccinated with live polio virus, the virus replicates inside the child’s intestine and eventually is excreted. In places with poor sanitation, fecal matter can enter the drinking water supply and the virus is able to start spreading from person to person.
“We discovered there’s only a few [mutations] that have to happen and they happen rather quickly in the first month or two post-vaccination,” Andino says. “As the virus starts circulating in the community, it acquires further mutations that make it basically indistinguishable from the wild-type virus. It’s polio in terms of virulence and in terms of how the virus spreads.”
New Polio Virus Evolution Insights Could Lead to Improved Vaccine
Blocking ‘Gateway Mutations’ Could Prevent Vaccine from Re-Evolving Virulence
By Nicholas Weiler on March 27, 2017
A relentless vaccination campaign has succeeded in eradicating the polio virus from most of the world, reducing the burden of the disease by 99 percent since the year 2000 and preventing more than 13 million children from contracting the disease, according to World Health Organization estimates. However, in regions where vaccination has remained incomplete, on rare occasions the weakened virus used in the vaccine has evolved the ability to escape the vaccinated person and spread to other, unprotected individuals.
Now a new study led by researchers at UC San Francisco and Tel-Aviv University in Israel has revealed that in every vaccine-derived polio outbreak, the polio virus used the same three evolutionary steps to evolve from harmless vaccine into a regional menace. In the new study – published online March 23, 2017, in Cell – the researchers mapped out these key steps, identifying so-called “gatekeeper mutations” that must occur before the vaccine can evolve and regain full virulence. They have used this knowledge to develop a new polio vaccine that should be unable to escape and cause outbreaks, which they hope to put into clinical trials soon.
“If one could get everyone fully vaccinated, this would prevent the virus from being able to spread and evolve, but particularly in areas of the world that are riddled with conflict and poverty, it is very hard to get full coverage,” said Raul Andino, PhD, a professor of microbiology and immunology at UCSF and senior author of the new study. “Thus, it has been critical to understand how the virus manages to evolve virulence, and come up with strategies to stop it.”
Official Push to Hide Drug & Vaccine Side Effects; Reduce Informed Consent
Posted on: Monday, June 26th 2017 at 3:45 pm
Written By: Jefferey Jaxen
In a disturbing turn of events, Big Pharma pushes to hijack informed consent by removing side effects from direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising.
Direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising (DTCPA) has exploded during the past several decades and is now the most prominent type of health communication the public encounters. DTCPA has been legal in the US since 1985, but exponentially expanded in 1997 when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed a rule that once forced drug companies to offer a detailed list of side-effects in their long format commercials. The impact was immediate. Spending by drug companies on TV ads hit $664 million within a year. By 2005, the industry was spending more than $3 billion annually on televised direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads. 2008 saw Big Pharma post just under $5 billion. Spending on DTCPA rose 9% to $5.6 billion in 2016 and expected to rise further in 2017. To date, the US and New Zealand are the only two countries that allow DTCPA.
In what appears to be a coordinated effort both the FDA and the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) have each announced their intentions to hide or eliminate side effects from DTCPA and patient information leaflets (PIL). Lending credence to larger picture unfolding, both the FDA and the AMS announced their intentions to toy with further concealing drug and vaccine side effects on the same day [June 19].
Hijacking Informed Consent
The FDA announced it will begin a study titled Experimental Study of Risk Information Amount and Location in Direct-to-Consumer Print Ads. To fulfill the regulatory requirements for fair balance and the brief summary (the part of the ad which lists side effects, contraindications and effectiveness) drug companies must included risk information about their product in DTC print ads both in the main part of the ad where the product claims appear, and in a separate brief summary page. The FDA’s rationale for its new study claims that listing the unfavorable risks and side effects of a drug may be ‘overwarning’ consumers in addition to potentially leading to habituation. The agency’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion is planning to test what happens when the side effects are reduced or eliminated from DTC television ads.
The AMS is a self-proclaimed “independent body in the UK representing the diversity of medical science” who, according to their website, is funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche. Their recent project was “…to examine how the generation, trustworthiness and communication of scientific evidence can be enhanced [key term] to strengthen its role in decisions by patients, carers, healthcare professionals and others about the benefits and harms of medicines.” In other words since the UK can’t market drugs and vaccines directly to the consumers the AMS has set out to see how eliminating informed consent by hiding product side effects from patients will boost pharmaceutical product uptake. Their report starts out with perhaps the most important statistic to date showing widespread rejection of Big Pharma and its influence on the medical community:
“Only about a third (37%) of the public trust evidence from medical research, compared to approximately two-thirds (65%) who trust the experiences of their friends and family, according to a report launched today.”
In a rational health world focused on true healing, such dismal percentages would be evidence to rework a broken medical system, remove Big Pharma conflicts of interest in research and medical practice and begin to listen to patients. Instead, the AMS report goes on to call for “improvements” to the PIL and “a bigger role” for UK’s National Health Service to be a “source of trusted information online”. The report calls for the European Commission and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to work with pharmaceutical companies to “reform” PIL’s.
Currently the EMA has two open complaints against it by the Nordic Cochrane Centre over maladministration, conflict of interest, secrecy and unprofessionalism concerning the handling of HPV vaccine safety data, research and whistleblowers. What kind of improvements in the PIL are being suggested? The AMS is calling for a more “balanced view” because there is too much focus on the potential side effects of drugs and vaccines on the PIL’s and not enough on their benefits. The rationale for reworking the PIL is not rooted in reality. The broken peer-reviewed process and pharmaceutical industry influence on medical research has continually omitted both greater incidences and number side effects along with exaggeration of benefits.
The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants
Professor Christopher Exley, world’s leading expert on aluminium.
“There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants !!!”
The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants
Documentary – The Age of Aluminium (Die Akte Aluminium)
The Age of Aluminium: Die Akte Aluminium. A film and documentary created by Bert Ehgartner (Full English version).
Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
Dec 1, 2016
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which individuals are more at risk?
No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession. You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and Autoimmunity – the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice. Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the “Godfather of Autoimmunology” – the study of the immune system turned on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines – specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum – as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases. The bigger evidence is a huge body of research that’s poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years. Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
“On one hand,” vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the paper’s authors, Alessandra Soriano, of the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer. He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology. “On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity. Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA.”
ASIA – or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld’s syndrome) — first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant – an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system. Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.
Study – ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Abstract
The role of various environmental factors in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases is well established. Of which, factors entailing an immune adjuvant activity such as infectious agents, silicone, aluminium salts and others were associated with defined and non-defined immune mediated diseases both in animal models and in humans. In recent years, four conditions: siliconosis, the Gulf war syndrome (GWS), the macrophagic myofasciitis syndrome (MMF) and post-vaccination phenomena were linked with previous exposure to an adjuvant. Furthermore, these four diseases share a similar complex of signs and symptoms which further support a common denominator.Thus, we review herein the current data regarding the role of adjuvants in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases as well as the amassed data regarding each of these four conditions. Relating to the current knowledge we would like to suggest to include these comparable conditions under a common syndrome entitled ASIA, “Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants”.
200 Evidence-Based Reasons NOT To Vaccinate – FREE Research PDF Download!
Posted on: Sunday, February 22nd 2015 at 1:45 pm
Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2017
The media, your pediatrician, politicians and health authorities like the CDC and FDA claim that vaccines are safe and effective. So why do hundreds of peer-reviewed studies indicate the opposite is true? Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.
It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.
With this aim in mind, GreenMedInfo.com has painstakingly collected over 300 pages of study abstracts culled directly from the National Library of Medicine’s pubmed.gov bibliographic database on the wide-ranging adverse health effects linked to vaccines in the today’s schedule (over 200 distinct adverse effects, including death), as well as numerous studies related to vaccine contamination, and vaccine failure in highly vaccine compliant populations.
This is the literature that the media, politicians and governmental health organizations like the CDC, pretend with abject dishonesty does not exist – as if vaccine injury did not happen, despite the over 3 billion dollars our government has paid out to vaccine injured through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund since it was inaugurated in 1986.
We have written extensively about this research previously, highlighting different studies, focusing on translating their implications to the lay persons (view our vaccine article section here), but we believe that collecting and condensing solely the primary literature itself makes a much more powerful statement.
This document is being made free to download to the world at large in order to encourage the lay public, health professionals, activists, and elected officials alike to read, acknowledge and share the voluminous literature with their family, friends, colleagues and related stakeholders. You will find this research undermines the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule (on behalf of a vaccine industry that is indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products), with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.
If the vaccination arm of modern medicine today is to continue to promote itself as a science- and evidence-based practice, it must acknowledge and incorporate the implications of the research we are releasing here, or lose any pretense at credibility. Failing to do so will reveal that the widespread push to remove your choice in the matter is agenda and not evidence driven, and due to the fact that vaccines all carry the risk of irreversible harm and even death (any vaccine insert proves this), it clearly violates the Nuremberg code of medical ethics to promote them as a priori safe and effectiveness. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-all http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gmipub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf
Vaccine Mechanisms in Autism
Disclaimer: The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this Website. All research is referenced at the end of this article.
This article will explain how specific vaccine adjuvants, in combination with the herbicide glyphosate, keep the brain in a permanent inflammatory state leading to the symptoms as seen in autism. It will point out key adjuvants believed to be involved with the development of autism. Lastly, it will briefly touch upon the key part in the brain involved and touches upon novel therapeutic possibilities.
Vaccination debate arrives in Tacoma via documentary tour bus
Posted 4:44 PM, June 20, 2017, by Steve Kiggins, Updated at 05:38PM, June 20, 2017
TACOMA, Wash. – The number of mumps cases reported this year in Washington state outpaces totals from years past.
State health officials said one possible factor could be parents who haven’t gotten their children vaccinated.
Nearly 5 percent of kindergartners in Washington weren’t immunized for the 2016-2017 school year because of personal beliefs or medical reasons — that’s more than double the national average of 2 percent, according to the Washington State Department of Health.
But there is a group visiting our state who says this may not be a bad thing. Producers for a documentary called “Vaxxed” brought their tour bus to Tacoma`s Franklin Park to speak with parents who worry their kids were injured from vaccinations.
“I’m not here to tell parents not to vaccinate,” said Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who is touring with the documentary’s producers. “I’m here to tell parents there’s a bigger picture.”
Part of that bigger picture includes hundreds of names scribbled on the side of the Vaxxed tour bus. The names represent those who claim to have been injured by vaccinations.
According to Humphries, parents should do their research before vaccinating their child.
Truth About Tetanus Infection and the Vaccine
Step on a rusty nail … go get a Tetanus shot, Right? Wrong!
Tetanus has nothing to do with rust! No amount of rust rubbed on your body or eaten or injected will cause Tetanus.
(It will likely cause some other type of harm though.)
Horse droppings always contain tetanus bacteria. It lives in a horses intestines. Horses are the main source of the bacteria.
If a deep wound is infected with tetanus, a toxin may be produced. It is this toxin that causes problems.
Was that rusty nail you stepped on covered in horse manure? In the days of the horse and carriage, streets were covered in horse droppings. But unless you live on a hobby farm or ranch today, that is likely not a problem.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries’s video
FDA approved: Human cancer cells added to vaccines
Posted by: Lori Alton, staff writer in Vaccine Dangers December 6, 2014
(NaturalHealth365) Consumers already concerned about vaccine dangers are likely to find little reassurance in recent reports that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials are giving vaccine manufacturers the green light to use human cancer cells to produce future vaccines.
But, the big question to ask is ‘why?’ The FDA, with this approval, shows no regard for basic safety issues.
Looks like profits are more important than human health concerns
The FDA’s approval is not related to any effort to make vaccines safer or more effective. Not surprisingly, the latest situation to fuel the fire over vaccine use comes down to cost of production.
To manufacture vaccines through the use of human cancer tumor cells – sadly, in ready supply – is less expensive than prior methods of breeding lab animals to provide culture media. Therefore, vaccine manufacturers are more likely to rake in millions of dollars in the process.
While downplaying the concern that vaccines made from cancer cells could transfer cancer to vaccine recipients, proponents of the use of human cancer cells as an additional substrate for the manufacture of vaccines claim there are several ‘advantages’. The primary argument is that cancer cell substrate would offer greater virus yield and production potential for new vaccines – otherwise unavailable through the use of previous substrates.
Official transcripts reveal an uncertain future for humanity
A recently uncovered transcript, from a September 19, 2012 meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) within the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), reveals misgivings even among the experts as to the safety of vaccines manufactured from human cancer cells.
A committee member identified in the transcript only as ‘Dr. H’, from the University of North Carolina, is quoted as stating, “I’m guessing the safety concerns we have are ones that you typically wouldn’t observe in humans on the time scale that a Phase I trial takes place on…We are worried about these vaccines causing cancer in people many years down the road, well beyond the conclusion of the Phase I study.”
Temporal Association of Certain Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Vaccination of Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Case–Control Study
Results: Subjects with newly diagnosed AN were more likely than controls to have had any vaccination in the previous 3 months [hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.21–2.68]. Influenza vaccinations during the prior 3, 6, and 12 months were also associated with incident diagnoses of AN, OCD, and an anxiety disorder. Several other associations were also significant with HRs greater than 1.40 (hepatitis A with OCD and AN; hepatitis B with AN; and meningitis with AN and chronic tic disorder).
Natural News – Incredibly disturbing animation reveals how vaccines are really made… WARNING: this will turn your stomach
Wednesday, April 05, 2017 by: Mike Adams
interesting how so many people scrutinize the ingredients in the groceries they buy, yet they allow themselves to be injected with vaccines without having any clue what ingredients they contain?
Vaccines are deliberately made with all sorts of bizarre ingredients, the CDC confirms. These ingredients include toxic heavy metals, animal blood components, human fetal tissue, monkey kidney cells, inflammatory chemicals that harm nerve cells, chemical preservatives, taste-enhancing chemicals (like MSG) and much more.
Even more shockingly, the way vaccines are made is beyond merely gross… it’s inhumane! Did you know that African Green Monkeys are raised in cages, infected with disease, murdered by drug companies then organ harvested to extract diseased kidneys that are used to make Smallpox vaccines?
Did you know that the human chickenpox vaccine is made from human tissue harvested from aborted human babies? Did you know that the abortion industry and the vaccine industry work to make sure a steady supply of aborted baby parts is supplied to vaccine manufacturers to keep the factories humming?
33 Fragen an deinen Impfarzt
Diese Fragen können schon vorab per Fax oder Email an deinen Impfarzt gesendet werden, damit er/sie sich auf das kommende Impfberatungsgespräch vorbereiten kann. Gegebenenfalls kann ja der Thermin nach hinten verschoben werden, sollte der Arzt diese Fragen nicht beantworten können.
International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination – New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines Micro-and Nanocontamination
Abstract
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed
What did the new Italian study find?
Examining 30 vaccines — representing 44 samples in total — the researchers found particulate matter, in aggregates and clusters, of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter in 43 of the 44 samples whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.
The scientists were “baffled” by their findings of lead, tungsten, gold, chromium, stainless steel, gold-zinc aggregate, platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, silicon and many others. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, an interaction occurs and a bigger-sized compound is created that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body. The authors conclude the following from their findings:
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers.
The analyses carried out showed that, in all samples checked, vaccines contain non-biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the producers.
Here are some gentle detox ideas for a child who has been vaccinated (to help counteract the harmful effects of vaccines):
Detoxification bath – This bath can be used to pull bacteria and viruses from the spine, and cellular waste, metals and chemicals from the body. Add 5 drops of “Lavender“ to your child’s bath with a 1/4 cup of epsom salt. You can also do this as a foot bath.
Probiotics – A probiotic is essential to restore gut flora and balance the immune system. This is very important especially if a child experienced an adverse reaction to a vaccine (like eczema, ear infections, arthritis, diabetes, gastrointestinal disease, etc.). I love “Life Start” by Natren (for babies/young children) and this probiotic by Garden of Life.
Omega 3 Oil – This is especially important to take if your child suffered an adverse reaction or had MMR, DPT, Dtap, or Varicella vaccines. Cod liver oil is thought to be the most superior of all fish oils but with the cost of CLO and potential rancidity, I use Udo’s Oil.
Cilantro Chelation Therapy – Dr. Yoshiaki Omura discovered that the leaves of the coriander plant can accelerate the excretion of mercury and aluminum from the body. If you give the body what it needs, it will heal itself, and cilantro has a molecular bond that binds to heavy metals and pulls them from the body. Cilantro therapy is gentle and inexpensive.
To use: Incorporate cilantro into your detoxing regimen by juicing with cilantro consuming it raw. Your child should have a minimum of 1 teaspoon daily for 2-3 weeks. You can also do a detox bath with two drops of coriander and epsom salt.
Elderberry – This is an excellent herb for children and can be taken as a syrup or in supplement form. Research shows that elderberry inhibits enzymes used by viruses to penetrate and infect healthy cells. Another option is Elderberry Defense which contains Echinacea, royal jelly, and olive leaf. Echinacea strengthens the immune system, fights viral infections in the body, and increases the production of T-lymphocytes to fight bacterial toxins, and stimulates macrophages (that filter out and destroy foreign particles, bacterial and toxins in the lymph system).
Royal jelly contains many nutrients and all 8 essential amino acids, helps prevent illness, and combats the stress on the body caused by vaccines. Olive leaf has been shown to be an effective remedy against almost every type of disease-causing microorganism, relieves many health problems, and has exhibited microbial effects against over 130 infectious diseases. It would be pertinent to take this remedy if your child has had any of the live vaccines including MMR, Varicella, Flu Vaccine, OPV, DPT, and would also be indicated in Dtap.
There are several ways to take elderberry: You can make your own elderberry syrup for children under two, purchase elderberry in soft chew or herbal form (2 capsules daily mixed in applesauce), or drink an elderberry-infused tea.
Vitamin C helps counteract the damage of heavy metals, chemicals, and toxins contained in vaccines and strengthens the immune system. The best way to get vitamin C is through food but since we’re detoxing, adding a supplement and taking it frequently throughout the day is beneficial. I typically recommend vitamin C chewables but powdered form and liposomal form is also an option.
Silica helps gently pull toxins out of the tissues and into the blood stream to be eliminated from the body. Studies on silicic acid show that it is an effective non-invasive therapy for reducing the burden of aluminum in the body, that it slows down the accumulation of aluminum in brain tissue and the gastrointestinal tract, substantially reduces aluminum bioavailability to humans, reduces toxicity in plants and animals, and enhances the excretion of aluminum in urine without negative side-effects. In other words, silica can only help a good detox. You can purchase silica in liquid mineral form, as a cell salt, or as an herbal supplement (horsetail).
Homeopathic Antidotes – Some children benefit greatly from homeopathic antidotes. Typically, a homeopath or naturopathic doctor will either recommend a remedy based on the constitutional type of your child and side effects they experienced as a result of vaccinations, or will recommend a vaccine potentized as a homeopathic remedy known as a “vaccine antidote.”
If your child was vaccinated against chicken pox, measles, mumps, rubella, and polio, you would want a Varicella antidote, MMR antidote, and IPV antidote. If they were injected with vitamin K or Hepatitis B, you would want a vitamin K and Hep B antidote. Antidotes generally have no negative side-effects and are in an easy-to-take sugar pellet form that can be dissolved under the tongue or crushed up.
Water – When toxins are pulled from the body, they need to be flushed out. Full kidney function is dependent upon there being enough water in the body. Avoid soda, dairy, and junk juices and encourage your child to drink plenty of water (5-8 cups) throughout the day. You can sweeten it with a little honey and lemon (for increased vitamin C) or add some liquid chlorophyll.
Massage – During a detox it is especially important to “milk the lymph nodes” through gentle massage. The Lymphatic system is the clean-up crew of the body and massage helps remove cell wastes, proteins, excess fluid, viruses, and bacteria trapped in the lymph nodes.
Dandelion Root (herbal or tincture)- Supporting the liver during a detox is very important because the liver performs over 5,000 functions – including toxin filtration. Although there are several herbs that can support and cleanse the liver, none are safer, more effective, or as inexpensive as dandelion. Dandelion helps the liver and gallbladder filter out toxins, purifies the blood, stimulates the kidneys to eliminate toxins through the urine, and assists with cell metabolism.
You can purchase dandelion greens from the store (to use in juices and smoothies) or purchase in pill form, as an herbal tea, or pick them from your own back yard. If you have a hard time believing that the “weed” in your yard could serve such an important purpose, might I recommend reviewing the studies on dandelion in the PubMed database? They are quite impressive.
Raw Food, Juices, & Smoothies – The absolute best way to counteract the harmful effects of a vaccine is through food, and my favorite way of doing this for children is through raw smoothies and juices. Shoot for at least 2-3 raw juices or smoothies per day during a detox, in addition to their normal meals. You can check out my Pinterest for some of my favorite juices and smoothies and “Ergonomics of a Smoothie” for smoothie tips. Try to include foods like broccoli, collards and kale, daikon radish, garlic, onions, spices, and sunny-side up eggs from free-range chickens in their diet during this time.
Dutch whistle-blower reveals Big Pharma’s “business model” — Creating pandemics to sell their vaccines, with zero liability for their poisons, while their excess vaccines are disposed of with the same safety precautions used with hazardous waste.
Why you can fuck off when you say I NEED to vaccinate my children….
June 20, 2017
Vaccines are not scientific, because there has never been – I repeat, NEVER – been a published study that used an unvaccinated controlled/placebo group, to demonstrate the long-term efficacy, and long-term safety of any vaccine used in the U.S. Not one controlled study in any scientific journal evaluating the long-term benefits and risks vs. dangers of vaccination vs. unvaccinated (Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, M.D. world-leading in Immunogenetics, speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington Virginia, Sept. 1997.
Also, there has been no long-term study done on the safety of multiple vaccines given at the same time, or the carcinogenic and reproductive complications that may occur. Thus, no doctor or other health professional can honestly tell you your baby will be safe and there is no future cancer risk.
For those of you who remember science class, the use of a control (untreated or “placebo”) group to test results was considered fundamental in producing scientific findings. This bizarre absence of scientific method in vaccine studies tells you something vaccine industry integrity.
I ask you to show me one, just ONE, scientific study on any routine childhood vaccination showing that vaccinated kids are better off in the long-term than unvaccinated kids. You have to read all the raw data on the study and make sure that the control group is actually unvaccinated and the “placebo” they are using isn’t just another vaccine, or a vaccine that has just had the somewhat safe antigen removed and all the poisonous, toxic ingredients left in.
In fact, most general non-“big-pharma” health studies show that non-vaccinated people are healthier all around, and more disease resistant than vaccinated people. A 2011 German study (The Kiggs Study) examined 17,461 children aged 0-19 across Germany, and found vaccinated kids were 2-5 times more likely to suffer from a range of diseases such as otitis media, allergies, asthma, bronchitis, migraines, and experience ten times the number of epileptic seizures than unvaccinated kids. The study also found that many parents who did not vaccinate subsequent children due to side effects in the first children, stated the unvaccinated younger siblings were much healthier. You can argue that the correlation does not always equal causation. However, if you are a pro-vaxxer, please be fair and balanced, and use your same line of critical analysis toward non-placebo big pharma vaccination studies.
The one and only published comparison (non-controlled) study I have found comparing vaccinated kids to unvaccinated kids, was one in 2008 which showed that infants who were vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine with Thimerosal (Thimerosal is 50% Mercury by weight) had nine times higher rate of developmental disabilities than unvaccinated children (The Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, Sept. 2008 entitled Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in U.S. children aged 1 to 9 years by Gallagher and Goodman.).
Our society celebrates the historical conquests of vaccines over disease. However, the data shows this celebration may not be deserved. National Morbidity Reports, from the U.S. Public Health Reports, show the rise and fall of deaths related to disease epidemics. In most cases, the death rate was decreasing significantly before vaccines were even introduced.
Gardasil May Cause Cancer NOT TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY
Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (2) Why has this not been done? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence! There appears to be no official requirement for vaccines to be tested for carcinogenicity and no incentive for manufacturers to do so. Many experts consider that vaccines are conducive towards the dramatic worldwide increase in cancer cases. REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER
A normal phenomenon in virology is that virus strains which have been removed are replaced by new ones. It is not known by anyone, including the vaccine manufacturer whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.
The chief editor of the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, immunologist Charlotte Haug writes about several unanswered questions including that of replacement in her article “We Need to Talk about HPV Vaccination – Seriously”:
Abhorred vacuum.There is another serious question that may be answered sooner: what effect will the vaccine have on the other cancer-causing strains of HPV? Nature never leaves a void, so if HPV-16 and HPV-18 are suppressed by an effective vaccine, other strains of the virus will take their place. The question is, will these strains cause cervical cancer?
Results from clinical trials are not encouraging. Vaccinated women show an increased number of precancerous lesions caused by strains of HPV other than HPV-16 and HPV-18. The results are not statistically significant, but if the trend is real – and further clinical trials should tell us in a few years – there is reason for serious concern. (3)
In an article in the New England Journal of Medicine “ Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination – Reasons for Caution”, Dr. Haug again poses the question of replacement:
“How will the vaccine affect other oncogenic strains of HPV? If HPV-16 and HPV-18 are effectively suppressed, will there be selective pressure on the remaining strains of HPV? Other strains may emerge as significant oncogenic serotypes”. (4)
Replacement was obviously one of several unanswered questions when FDA, Merck and the Norwegian government signed a contract which involved research studies on thousands of young Norwegian schoolgirls. The agreement was that Gardasil would be approved in US under the condition that extensive research projects were carried out in Norway. There was implication of corruption in connection with introduction of Gardasil in the childrens’ vaccination program. (5)
The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck:
“You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway … to assess whether administration of GARDASIL will result in replacement of these diseases due to vaccine HPV types with diseases due to non-vaccine HPV types.” (6) ABNORMAL PAP SMEARS AFTER GARDASIL VACCINATION
Corrupt Vaccine “Safety Testing” Explained By Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Dr. Andrew Wakefield gives a short overview of why vaccine “safety testing” is fraudulent on so many levels, including the fact that vaccines are NOT tested the same way pharmaceutical drugs are tested: double blind placebo tests. This video is of a Q&A after the screening of his documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe – a MUST SEE documentary by everyone. http://www.vaxxedthemovie.comhttp://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com — with Andrew Wakefield, Del Bigtree and Polly Tommey.
Cherai doesn’t vaccinate because vaccines contain harmful ingredients that maim and kill children. Cherai is not worried about infectious diseases because she keeps her child healthy, and therefore, protected. If you are on the fence about vaccination and would like to learn more, start here: http://www.GoVaccineFree.org.
PLEASE LISTEN AND SHARE!!
“I used to work at an Urgent Care center and I can tell you that vaccines are pushed for profit, not health. And when parents called to say their child was having a vaccine reaction, the doctor didn’t even want to know. We were instructed to tell them everything was normal.” — Lupita Salazar
Please SHARE widely.
Learn more here: Www.LearnTheRisk.org
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/learntherisk
Join our FB group: Learn The Risk
TAKE ACTION: http://www.LearntheRisk.org/take-action
CONTRIBUTE: http://www.LearnTheRisk.org/donate
Share your story: info@LearnTheRisk.org
Twitter: @learntherisk
Instagram: #LearnTheRisk
the news network 