Asset – the news network

Susan Lindauer – Ex-CIA Asset Can Now Speak.. 10 years after 9-11

The messy aspect ratio of this video is a recent artifact (only appeared since around Aug 2012) down to youtube dicking around. I could go on but it’s obvious what they’re doing. Just saying so you the viewer realize it not a lack of care on my part. ——————–||| ”If there Was a conspiracy Mr ‘twoofer’, wouldn’t someone with inside knowledge have spoken out by now ?” One mantra often used in support of the official account of 9/11. Well, Here you do have such a person, her harrowing account of wanting to speak out and how it was throttled in very short and brutal order. For other whistleblower accounts surrounding 9/11 check out.. Richard Andrew Grove – (” An interview w/ Richard Andrew Grove, an AIG insider 1 of 4″ — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpl503…) (http://peacerevolution.podomatic.com/) Sibel Edmonds – (“Kill The Messenger – Sibel Edmonds – Full film” — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BUG1Y…) (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/) April Gallop William Rodriguez (Just to name a few). Video Source = PDX 911Truth [Via.. mranthonyjhilder on 6 Aug 2011] ——————–||| Some protocols to keep silent those who’d like to speak out are as follows.. Threaten career advancement or future job security. Call mental health into question. Encourage social ostrichization by co-workers. Threaten with imprisonment. Utilize the legal system to stonewall whistle blower claims with terms like ‘Threat to national security’. Threaten personal safety. And of course, get the media to ignore and/or spin the details surrounding the case, manipulating public perspective. —————–||| Hear her out.. It’s unbelievable.. though ultimately quite believable. ‘We got your back.. so long as you tow the party line’.. and if you don’t tow the party line.. God help you. This case being a good example. THESE are the reasons many more insiders don’t speak up.. where you’d think they would.. They’re working within a mainframe we usual folk are not accustomed to in our day to day interactions. Where there’s a need for secrecy there is also the opportunity to manipulate sequestered information to the ends of those holding that information (insider trading being a perhaps more benign example). Institutions that work for their own interests more so than the interests of their countries’ could at best be called globalists.. and at worst traitors. Globalist interests operate on an entirely different level than we do. Practically speaking it is inhuman.. so trying to equate the two worlds off one another to the average person is often just not going to work. But no harm in trying. Enjoy.

Civil forfeiture laws represent one of the most serious assaults on private property rights in the nation today. With civil forfeiture, police and prosecutors can seize your property and use it to fund their budgets—all without charging you with a crime. Americans are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but with civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent—and law enforcement has a huge incentive to police for profit, not justice.

If police suspect that you committed a crime, they can arrest you and put you on trial. At that trial, prosecutors must prove you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

But if police suspect your car was involved in a crime, they can take it, sell it and, in most places, pocket the proceeds to pad their budgets. They need not prove you committed any crime—or even arrest you—to take your property away.

Welcome to the upside-down world of civil asset forfeiture.
With civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent to get it back.

And because most state and federal laws allow police and prosecutors to pocket the proceeds, they have a big incentive to pursue profits, not justice.

How big? In 1986, the Justice Departments forfeiture fund took in 94 million dollars. Now it has more than a billion. State and local agencies receive forfeiture funds, too—but we don’t know how much because most states don’t publicly report on forfeiture.

No surprise—abuse is rampant. One New York police department spent forfeiture funds on food, gifts and entertainment. In Georgia, forfeiture funds paid for football tickets for a DAs office. In Louisiana, cops used funds to pay for ski trips to Aspen. And a DA in Texas used forfeiture dollars to buy TV ads for his re-election campaign.

Meanwhile, citizens are seeing cash, cars and other property taken away for the flimsiest of reasons. Carrying too much cash? Police can accuse you of selling drugs or laundering money and seize it, no conviction or even arrest required.

An Institute for Justice study grades state laws on how well they protect people from wrongful forfeitures. Only three states receive a B or better. The rest range from mediocre to awful—and so does federal law.

Worse, a federal legal loophole allows police and prosecutors to bypass state protections and keep pocketing forfeiture money. IJ’s research shows that the easier and more profitable these laws make forfeiture, the more it is used and abused.

Its time to end civil forfeiture. People shouldn’t have their property taken away without being convicted of a crime. And law enforcement shouldn’t be policing for profit

Learn more at http://www.ij.org/PolicingForProfit

http://www.dailypaul.com/302401/wisconsin-cops-steal-families-bail-money