Vaccine News – Bev Pattenden – Vaccine facts, damage and angry grandmothers around Australia

#VaxxedAustralia
Editor: Robin Aris

This is Part 4, where things really get interesting! The first two man-made causes of paralytic polio have something in common with the third: The paralysis almost always occurs at the same place as the “injury”. Does this seemingly obscure fact inform us as to the main way polio paralyzes? I think so!
Watch Part 1

Watch Part 2

Watch Part 3

Nazis, Nazis Everywhere! Dr. Brian Hooker speaks candidly about revealing the CDC’s ‘Deep Throat’. Polly Tommey banned from Australia. Then the #Vaxhole of the Week. This is #Highwire @DelBigtree @HighWireTalk
http://www.facebook.com/HighWireTalk
http://www.tinyurl.com/highwiretalk
http://www.instagram.com/highwiretalk
twitter : @DelBigtree @HighWiretalk

Vaccines maim children. Vaccines kill children. Will you let that happen to your child? Say no, and go vaccine free: http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com [The footage that I say is from Mexico is actually Columbia.]

En Corrèze, l’équipe de “Complément d’enquête” a rencontré Stanislas Geoffrit et Amandine Chaouche. Leur petit garçon de 2 ans souffre d’épilepsie et d’une méningo-encéphalite herpétique. Livio est handicapé à 80%. Il ne marche pas, ne parle pas, et suit un traitement médical très lourd.
“Quinze jours après le rappel, Livio est dans le coma”
Selon ses parents, le petit garçon était en bonne santé avant une injection d’Infanrix (ou DTP, le vaccin obligatoire contre la diphtérie, le tétanos et la polio). Le couple “faisant confiance au pédiatre et au système de santé”, Livio est vacciné à 2 mois. Le lendemain, le bébé est pris d’une “énorme fièvre” qui dure “plus d’une semaine”. Le pédiatre rassure les parents. A 4 mois, l’enfant subit deux autres injections. “Moins de quinze jours après, Livio est dans le coma”, raconte son père.
Le couple a dû cesser de travailler et vit de l’allocation pour enfant handicapé : 1 200 euros par mois. Il a porté plainte contre le pédiatre et contre GSK, le fabricant du vaccin. Amandine est de nouveau enceinte, mais cette fois, “il n’y aura pas de vaccin : s’il faut aller en prison, j’irai en prison”, prévient Stanislas. Dans trois mois, des experts examineront Livio pour établir si sa maladie est liée au vaccin. Si le lien de cause à effet est reconnu, l’indemnisation pourrait atteindre plusieurs millions d’euros.
Un extrait de “Vaccinés contre les vaccins”, un reportage diffusé dans “Complément d’enquête. Vaccins, médicaments, médecins : la défiance” le 25 février 2016.

In Corrèze, the “Survey Supplement” team met with stanislas geoffrit and amandine chaouche. Their 2-Year-old boy suffers from epilepsy and encephalitis. Livio is disabled at 80 %. He doesn’t work, doesn’t talk, and follows a very heavy medical treatment.
“fifteen days after the reminder, livio is in a coma”
According to his parents, the little boy was healthy before an injection of infanrix (or dtp, the mandatory vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and polio). The couple “trusting the pediatrician and the health system”, livio is vaccinated at 2 months. The next day, the baby is taken from a ” huge fever ” that lasts ” more than a week “. the pediatrician rassure the parents. At 4 months, the child undergoes two further injections. “less than days later, livio is in a coma”, says his father.
The couple had to stop working and live in the disabled child allowance: € 1 per month. He filed a complaint against the pediatrician and against gsk, the vaccine manufacturer. Amandine is pregnant again, but this time, “there will be no vaccine: if you have to go to jail, I will go to jail”, warns stanislas. In three months, experts will examine livio to establish whether his illness is related to the vaccine. If the causal link is recognized, compensation could reach several million euros.
An Extract from ” vaccinated against vaccines “, a report circulated in ” further investigation. Vaccines, drugs, doctors: Defiance ” on 25 February 2016.

7 Trivia Facts About Polio
t’s called the “Gold Standard of Medicine.”
I’m referring to the current vaccine schedule. But is there an apparent hidden catch? Can justification for the aggressive vaccine schedule arguably be traced back to the polio vaccine that is trotted out as proof vaccines work?
If you don’t believe me, question any parent on vaccines. The knee-jerk question in almost every case is, “What about polio?”
Well, what about it? Here I discuss 7 trivia facts for VacTruth.com readers to investigate further about polio and question the motives of those who would profit from vaccines and disease.
Trivia Fact #1 – Chemicals Used in Pesticides Increased Your Chance for Viral Infections
Trivia Fact #2 – Milk Was Heavily Contaminated with Pesticides; Quietly Taken Off Shelves While Farmers Paid
Trivia Fact #3 – Polio Is/Was Transmitted Through Contaminated Milk
Trivia Fact #4–Removing Your Tonsils Exposed You to the Worst Kind of Paralysis
Trivia Fact #5 – Pharmaceutical Companies Funded the writing of the “History of Poliomyelitis”

Trivia Fact #6 – A Dangerous Vaccine: Americans Not Told Vaccine Caused Paralysis

vTrivia Fact #7 – Researchers Discover How to Paralyze Monkeys with Vaccines

More Than 100 Seniors Died After Receiving This Flu Shot Given By Pharmacies
by Yelena Sukhoterina
As it happens every winter, the marketing push for receiving a flu shot continues. CVS is offering a 20% shopping pass when you get your flu shot. They are also marketing a high-dose vaccine, which is of course more profitable for the manufacturer and the pharmacy, but there are plenty of reasons to be wary of it — especially for seniors.
Fluzone® High-Dose is an injectable vaccine, specifically approved for people ages 65 and older. Manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur, this shot contains three flu strains and four times more antigen (substance that causes an immune response) than regular flu shots, claims CVS Pharmacy (Rite Aid also offers it and admits that “more studies are being done” to see whether it actually offers an improvement at all).
The pharmacy does admit that the vaccine is not recommended for anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction (especially Guillain-Barré syndrome) to vaccines in the past.
But between their marketing campaigns and promoting a 20% shopping coupon, they omitted a vital piece of information: 105 seniors died after taking part in two Fluzone high-dose vaccine trials, and 91 died after getting the regular Fluzone vaccine.

“Little Study Was Done” — Pediatrician Warns Parents about a Toxin in Vaccines Given to Most Babies That Is WORSE Than Mercury
by Yelena Sukhoterina
Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and through drug needles. These are not two activities that a newborn baby is capable of doing, and yet, within 24 hours of being born, a baby receives a Hep B vaccination — whether the mother is infected or not.
When parents sign in to have a baby at the hospital, they are signing up for their baby to receive the Hep B vaccination.
What the parents don’t realize is that they sign the baby up to be given 250 micro-grams (mcg) of aluminum contained in this vaccine.
Board Certified Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, a graduate of Dartmouth Medical School, explains how dangerous this amount of aluminum can potentially be – an adult daily maximum is 50 micro-grams.
This safety limit comes from a 2012 study that compared premature babies who were administered a solution contaminated with aluminum to those who had a solution without this toxic metal.
Now Dr. Thomas is speaking out against what he says is a potentially dangerous and misguided process administered under the guise of public health, one that is unnecessarily putting countless thousands of babies at risk.

Study – Aluminum Exposure in Neonatal Patients Using the Least Contaminated Parenteral Nutrition Solution Products
Abstract
Aluminum (Al) is a contaminant in all parenteral nutrition (PN) solution component products. Manufacturers currently label these products with the maximum Al content at the time of expiry. We recently published data to establish the actual measured concentration of Al in PN solution products prior to being compounded in the clinical setting [1]. The investigation assessed quantitative Al content of all available products used in the formulation of PN solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the Al exposure in neonatal patients using the least contaminated PN solutions and determine if it is possible to meet the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al. The measured concentrations from our previous study were analyzed and the least contaminated products were identified. These concentrations were entered into our PN software and the least possible Al exposure was determined. A significant decrease (41%–44%) in the Al exposure in neonatal patients can be achieved using the least contaminated products, but the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al was not met. However, minimizing the Al exposure may decrease the likelihood of developing Al toxicity from PN.

Does a New Hepatitis Vaccine Cause Heart Attacks?
In this Revolution and Revelation, Milton Packer asks how you would answer this question
The FDA has a really important question and wants your advice.
This is not a fairy tale. This is a real-life story.
Hepatitis B is a serious disease. A company (Dynavax) has a new hepatitis vaccine that induces hepatitis antibodies more vigorously than existing vaccines and does so after 2 doses (instead of the usual 3). The vaccine works through a unique adjuvant. The serological advantages of the Dynavax vaccine were demonstrated in a randomized trial of >8000 patients; about 5600 people received the new vaccine and about 2800 people received the existing standard.
Why does the FDA need your help?
In the trial, an acute myocardial infarction occurred in 14 people in the Dynavax group, but in only one person receiving the conventional vaccine. The events were confirmed by adjudication. Since the Dynavax group was twice as large, the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the trial was seven times greater with the new vaccine. The FDA wants to know if the new vaccine should be approved for use in millions of people.
The FDA asked the committee if there was reasonable evidence that the vaccine was safe. On July 28, the committee vote 12-1 (with 3 abstentions) in favor of the safety of the new vaccine. I was one of the three abstentions. Most of the committee believed that the vaccine’s serological advantages outweighed the uncertainty, but the vote is non-binding. The FDA will decide on the new vaccine by August 10.
Why did I abstain? Based on the available data, it was impossible for anyone to know if the imbalance in myocardial infarctions was real or spurious. So although the question was fascinating and the discussion was terrific, my vote wasn’t that complicated.
There is a simple rule in life: if you don’t know, you should say that you don’t know.

Italy update with Andy and Francesca #vaxxed #praybig

German Supreme Court Upholds Biologist’s Claim that Measles Virus Does Not Exist
Could There Be Something Wrong with the Germ Theory?
by Paul Fassa
Health Impact News
Our modern medicine’s paradigm is based mostly on the germ theory of microbes invading our bodies and causing disease, thus creating the need for a war against microbes to eliminate them all and conquer all diseases. Fear is the motivation for creating the weapons of antibiotics, antivirals, and vaccines befitting this concept, but our modern populations are sicker than ever.
Are the weapons creating chronic debilitating diseases in exchange for acute illnesses considered infectious that most manage to get over with a renewed resilience to the dreaded pathogenic microbes blamed for all illness? Are we actually destroying our immune systems with our war on microbes?
Ever since Pasteur’s claim to fame as the father of the germ theory, our overall health has decreased even while lifespans have increased. But during Pasteur’s late 19th century early 20th century media dominance and since then till now, there have been many scientists denouncing Pasteur’s model of disease, even providing evidence that he was a plagiarist and fraud.
Let’s focus on some of the few scientists and medical practitioners who have not agreed with the germ theory’s dogma that places microbes as agents of death that should be feared while ignoring other aspects of health

Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
Conclusions
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.
Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.
In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.

Groundbreaking: China Study Links Immune Activation By Vaccination & Autism
Jeff Roberts
*This article is a summary of a larger article put together by J.B. Handley at Healthcare in America. It is a conglomeration of a wide body of recent research pieced together by a growing group of concerned scientists. For more information, please visit the website, vaccinepapers.org.
A study out of China is the first to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination (hep B/BCG) on brain development in rats. Results indicate vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant (i.e., hep B) spike cytokine levels in the hippocampus region of the brain, in particular the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), the key cytokine known for its dysregulating effect on neuronal circuitry and the key cytokine implicated in autism.

Did Chinese scientists find autism’s missing puzzle piece?
BY J.B. HANDLEY February 22, 2017
Scientists appear to be far closer to explaining the mechanisms of action within the body that cause autism. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in Canada, France, Israel, and China. Four clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered are forming an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.

Vaccine facts, damage and angry grandmothers around Australia
Bev Pattenden talks about the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, aborted fetal cells, and animal cells that are being injected into people by vaccines. She is one of many angry grandmothers around Australia who are standing up to speak about vaccine damage. All Communications, Answers, comments and opinions provided by Dianne Ellis and Bev Pattenden are only general information, and are not intended to be a substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, legal, or other professional advice. Bev Pattenden, Dianne Ellis and ‘The Healing Hour’ do not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages and comments left on these Forums, Blogs, social media or Knowledge Base. You should always speak with your doctor, general practitioner, physician or other healthcare professional before taking any medication or nutritional, herbal or homeopathic supplement, or adopting any natural treatment for a health problem. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, promptly contact your health care provider. Information provided by Bev Pattenden or Dianne Ellis is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you do anything recommended on this site, without the supervision of a licensed medical doctor, you do so at your own risk

Conform prospectului, vaccinul PRIORIX utilizat in Romania pentru imunizare ROR NU acoperă “virusul” de rujeolă al “epidemiei” actuale.
Detalii gasisiti mai jos:

1. Prospectul zice că ar acoperi un tip de “virus” Schwarz.
Compozitie calitativa si cantitativa:
Priorix este un preparat combinat, liofilizat, format din tulpinile atenuate ale virusurilor rujeolic Schwarz, urlian RIT 4385 (derivat din tulpina Jeryl Lynn) si rubeolic Wistar RA 27/3, obtinute separat prin propagare fie in tesut embrionar de gaina (urlian si rujeolic), fie in celule diploide umane MRC5 (rubeolic).

2. Rapoartele europene zic că “epidemia” este cu “virus” B3.
The primary case was in Romania for 17 days before symptom onset, and stayed in an area with reported measles transmission [8].
All cases sequenced from the outbreak were genotype B3, however the distinct sequence data were inconclusive to establish a link with the outbreak in Romania

3. Taxonomia susţine că sunt lucruri FOARTE diferite.

Economy News – Zero Hedge – New Study Says Robots Took All Of Detroit’s Jobs, Not Mexico

Zero Hedge – New Study Says Robots Took All Of Detroit’s Jobs, Not Mexico
by Tyler Durden Mar 28, 2017 10:40 PM
As Trump gets ready to renegotiate NAFTA and impose tariffs on companies looking to outsource production to Mexico, a new study from MIT and Boston University suggests that industrial robots, not Mexico, may be the bigger factor contributing to the high levels on unemployment in the Midwest.
Entitled “Robots and Jobs: Evidence From US Labor Markets,” the authors of the study found that the addition of 1 robot per 1,000 workers results in an 18-35 bps reduction in the employment-to-population ratio and 25-50bps reduction in wages.  Per Bloomberg:
One additional robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by 0.18 percentage points to 0.34 percentage points and slashes wages by 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent, based on their analysis. To put that in context, the U.S. saw an increase of about one new industrial robot for every thousand workers between 1993 and 2007, based on the study.
“The employment effects of robots are most pronounced in manufacturing, and in particular, in industries most exposed to robots; in routine manual, blue collar, assembly and related occupations; and for workers with less than college education,” the authors write. “Interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, we do not find positive and offsetting employment gains in any occupation or education groups.”
Worth noting: the authors estimate that robots may have increased the wage gap between the top 90th and bottom 10 percent by as much as 1 percentage point between 1990 and 2007. There’s also room for much broader robot adoption, which would make all of these effects much bigger.

Study – Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo
NBER Working Paper No. 23285
Issued in March 2017
As robots and other computer-assisted technologies take over tasks previously performed by labor, there is increasing concern about the future of jobs and wages. We analyze the effect of the increase in industrial robot usage between 1990 and 2007 on US local labor markets. Using a model in which robots compete against human labor in the production of different tasks, we show that robots may reduce employment and wages, and that the local labor market effects of robots can be estimated by regressing the change in employment and wages on the exposure to robots in each local labor market—defined from the national penetration of robots into each industry and the local distribution of employment across industries. Using this approach, we estimate large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages across commuting zones. We bolster this evidence by showing that the commuting zones most exposed to robots in the post-1990 era do not exhibit any differential trends before 1990. The impact of robots is distinct from the impact of imports from China and Mexico, the decline of routine jobs, offshoring, other types of IT capital, and the total capital stock (in fact, exposure to robots is only weakly correlated with these other variables). According to our estimates, one more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment to population ratio by about 0.18-0.34 percentage points and wages by 0.25-0.5 percent.

Zero Hedge – The Robots Win: Blackrock Bets On Computers Over Human Stock Pickers, Fires Dozens
by Tyler Durden Mar 28, 2017 6:53 PM
As part of a massive overhaul that has been hinted at in recent months, and was unviled on Tuesday, BlackRock announced a reorganization of its actively managed equities business that will include job losses, pricing changes and a greater emphasis on computer models that inform investments.
BlackRock’s new strategy centers on a view that has been facilitated by the not so stealthy central bank takeover of capital markets in recent years, according to which it is difficult for human beings to beat the market with traditional bets on large U.S. stocks. As a result, at least seven stock portfolio managers are among several dozen employees who are expected to go as part of the revamp.
Instead of handing their funds to other humans for investing purposes, for the first time BlackRock’s Main Street customers will be able to buy lower-cost quantitative stock funds that rely on data and computer systems to make predictions, an investment option previously available only to large institutional investors. This option also virtually assures that the next market crash will be unlike anything ever seen. Some existing funds will merge, get new investment mandates or close.
For now the overhaul is only taking place at Blackrock, and represents the most dramatic attempt to rejuvenate a unit that has long lagged rivals in performance. Clients have pulled their money from the actively managed stock business in three of the past four years even as BlackRock’s total assets climbed to a record $5.1 trillion, according to the WSJ. BlackRock had $275.1 billion in active equity assets under management at the end of December, down from $317.3 billion three years earlier.

Vaccine news – Measles Virus Does Not Exist

Measles Virus Does Not Exist
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David Bardens attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in a medical journal. At that time, a Judge in the regional court in Ravensburg, South Germany, ruled in the favour of Dr. Bardens in a controversial decision claiming the criteria for evidence had been met.
The First Civil Senate of the BGH confirmed a judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) on in February 2016. The sum of 100,000 euros which was offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus did have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to bear all procedural costs.
Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.
In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.
Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.
The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realise the error because they violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work “lege artis”, i.e. in accordance with internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments. Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.
The OLG Stuttgart overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from February 16, 2016.
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.
Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.
In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.

OLG Stuttgart Urteil vom 16.2.2016, 12 U 63/15
Auslobung: Rechtsbindungswille bei einer negativen Auslobung; Auslegung eines Preisausschreibens hinsichtlich des Nachweises des Masernvirus
Tenor
1. Auf die Berufung des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landgerichts Ravensburg vom 12.03.2015 – 4 O 346/13 – abgeändert und wie folgt gefasst:
(1) Der Beklagte wird verurteilt, an den Kläger 492,54 EUR nebst jährlicher Zinsen hieraus in Höhe von 5 %-Punkten über dem jeweiligen Basiszinssatz seit 16.04.2014 zu bezahlen.
(2) Im Übrigen wird die Klage abgewiesen.
2. Die weitergehende Berufung des Beklagten wird als unzulässig verworfen.
3. Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits in beiden Instanzen trägt der Kläger.
4. Das Urteil und das Urteil des Landgerichts, soweit es aufrechterhalten wird, sind vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Der Kläger kann die Vollstreckung gegen Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 115 % des vollstreckbaren Betrages abwenden, wenn nicht der Beklagte vor der Vollstreckung Sicherheit in Höhe von 115 % des jeweils zu vollstreckenden Betrages leistet.
5. Der Gegenstandswert für das Berufungsverfahren wird auf bis zu 110.000,00 EUR festgesetzt.

Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
Conclusions
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.
Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.
In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.
http://www.wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Protokoll_13_4_20150001.pdf

Trump Warns Flu Shots Are The Greatest ‘Scam’ In Medical History
Posted on January 27, 2017 by Baxter Dmitry
The flu shot is the greatest scam in medical history, created by Big Pharma to make money off vulnerable people and make them sick, warns President Donald Trump.
In an interview with Opie and Anthony on Sirius XM, Trump slammed flu shots as “totally ineffective” and declared that he has never had one.
“I’ve never had one. And thus far I’ve never had the flu. I don’t like the idea of injecting bad stuff into your body. And that’s basically what they do. And this one (latest flu vaccine) has not been very effective to start off with.
“I have friends that religiously get the flu shot and then they get the flu. You know, that helps my thinking. I’ve seen a lot of reports that the last flu shot is virtually totally ineffective.“
Trump is right – flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history. They are full of “bad stuff” including formaldehyde and mercury – two powerful neurotoxins – and the vaccine industry even admits that laboratory tests prove the popular jab does not work.

Study reveals 83 children awarded for damages in vaccine court have an autism diagnosis! Mary Holland, one of the study authors, says neither CDC nor Congress has ever adequately responded to this study’s claims (see study link in first comment and listen to Podcast with Mary Holland in second comment for more detail)
Please note: this story on Fox ran in 2011. The study they are reporting about was published in the NYU Law School’s legal journal, you can find a copy of it in the first comment below. NYU Law Professor Mary Holland, one of the study’s authors, noted that the CDC NEVER reposnded to the study in any way, not even to try and refute it. A podcast interview with Mary is included as the second comment, it’s a fascinating listen, thank you.

IS VACCINE INJURY ONE IN A MILLION?
With 320 million people populating the U.S. if vaccine injury is one in a million how many vaccine injuries are there? The Vaxxed Bus travels the country to see. Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Dr. Rachael, featured in the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe & cohost of the syndicated show The Doctors, says, “I am scared of vaccines at this point,” after reviewing CDC data and hearing the stories of vaccine injury. www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com