SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection and deaths among US veterans during 2021
We report SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection (VE-I) and death (VE-D) by vaccine type (n = 780,225) in the Veterans Health Administration, covering 2.7% of the U.S. population. From February to October 2021, VE-I declined from 87.9% to 48.1%, and the decline was greatest for the Janssen vaccine resulting in a VE-I of 13.1%. Although breakthrough infection increased risk of death, vaccination remained protective against death in persons who became infected during the Delta surge. From July to October 2021, VE-D for age 65 years was 73.0% for Janssen, 81.5% for Moderna, and 84.3% for Pfizer-BioNTech; VE-D for age ≥65 years was 52.2% for Janssen, 75.5% for Moderna, and 70.1% for Pfizer-BioNTech. Findings support continued efforts to increase vaccination, booster campaigns, and multiple, additional layers of protection against infection.
As shown in Fig. 2, risk of infection accelerated in both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated Veterans beginning in July 2021 and through September 2021, consistent with the time dependence observed in the Cox proportional hazards models. This pattern was similar across age groups, and risk of infection was highest for unvaccinated Veterans. Veterans who were fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine had the lowest risk of infection, followed closely by those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, then those who received the Janssen vaccine.
Risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection was highest in unvaccinated Veterans regardless of age and comorbidity (Fig. 3). However, breakthrough infections were not benign, as shown by the higher risk of death in fully vaccinated Veterans who became infected compared to vaccinated Veterans who remained infection-free.
We observed similar results when examining the time period corresponding to the dominance of the Delta variant (fig. S1). Specifically, among those with a positive PCR test on or after July 1, 2021, vaccination was protective against death, although with some differences by age and vaccine type. For age <65 years, vaccine effectiveness against death (VE-D) was 81.7% (95% CI: 75.7% to 86.2%) for any vaccine; 73.0% (95% CI: 52.0% to 84.8%) for Janssen; 81.5% (95% CI: 70.7% to 88.4%) for Moderna; and 84.3% (95% CI: 76.3% to 89.7%) for Pfizer-BioNTech. For age ≥65 years, VE-D was 71.6% (95% CI: 68.6% to 74.2%) for any vaccine; 52.2% (95% CI: 37.2% to 63.6%) for Janssen; 75.5% (95% CI: 71.8% to 78.7%) for Moderna; and 70.1% (95% CI: 66.1% to 73.6%) for Pfizer-BioNTech.
The weekly announced file is updated on a weekly basis and contains information on the deaths of patients who have died in hospitals in England and tested positive for COVID-19. This file contains breakdowns by ethnicity, gender and age group, presence of a pre-existing condition and age group, and certain pre-existing conditions. Below are the previous weekly files that have been published. The first weekly file was published on 21st May 2020.
So many “fully vaccinated” Aussies are getting really sick or dying from their Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections that Queensland Health claims it is no longer able to keep up with data tracking.
The pro-jab organization has confirmed that “adverse vaccination events” are soaring to record highs, and that many vaccine-induced disease cases are having to be skipped over because there are just too many of them to keep track of at this point.
“Due to the large number of adverse events being reported throughout Queensland we are unable to routinely contact every reporter individually,” reported Queensland Health on its website.
“Someone from the Public Health Unit in your area may contact you or your health provider if they require more information for reporting and surveillance purposes. If you have any concerns about ongoing symptoms or future vaccinations, please speak to your GP or Healthcare provider.”
Attributing deaths to COVID-19 vaccines – a guide for medical practitioners Version 1.3 Updated 18th August 2021
While death following COVID-19 vaccination is not an expected outcome of health care, in practice not all post-vaccination deaths will be vaccine-related but rather as a result of the person’s underlying health conditions. This document seeks to provide guidance for medical practitioners when certifying cause of death when a person has recently had a COVID-19 vaccine. When is the death of a person who has received a COVID-19 vaccine reportable to the coroner? The fact that a person received a COVID-19 vaccine some time prior to their death does not of itself make their death reportable to the coroner. The death of a person who has received a COVID-19 vaccination will only be reportable to the coroner if: • the death may be vaccine-related (health care related); or • the death is reportable for another reason (for example – the person died as a result of mechanical fall-related injury). The legal threshold for issuing a cause of death certificate in Queensland is whether the certifying doctor can form an opinion as to the probable cause of death.
A legal process has been initiated for a 5 year moratorium on childhood vaccines until tests can be conducted. This is not merely an internet petition, or a White House petition (although one has been started) but the beginning of a basis to take legal action — and we have a sympathetic ear in President Trump.
Full video to share with those not on Facebook – youtube.com/watch?v=rjGKqPoaS_w #VaccineMoratorium #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #Vaxxed #HearThisWell
Vaxxed – A Revolution For Choice
How will it end? What pivotal event will historians point to and say that was the day the madness ended? I think I know.
This is a studio version of a talk I gave at the CDCTruth event in Atlanta on October 15, 2016.
Shares work better than likes!
237 deaths by Pentavalent vaccine and still counting
By JACOB PULIYEL | NEW DELHI | 13 November, 2016
Under Right to Information we know that up to August 2016 there have been 237 deaths reported to the government here within 72 hours of vaccination with Pentavalent. We examined deaths in states which were giving DPT and Pentavalent vaccine concurrently.
There were three deaths following the use of Pentavalent vaccine in Sri Lanka. The Government of Sri Lanka suspended the use of the vaccine. WHO experts investigated the deaths. They found there was a clear temporal association of the deaths to the vaccine (WHO terminology, meaning the deaths followed soon after vaccination) and there was no alternate explanation for the deaths. According to the standard protocol in investigation of vaccine deaths these deaths would have to be declared as “probably” caused by Pentavalent vaccine. The experts balked at the prospect of giving such a report. No country would use this vaccine after that. Instead they wrote in their report that they were deleting “probable” and “possible” from the standard classification. The report maintained that although it was probably related to vaccine, they were reporting it as “unlikely” to be related to vaccination.
The full report was not published online, only the conclusion was made public.
The full report was presented to the Delhi High Court in a vaccine case. Once this devious methodology employed by the WHO experts was known, it was exposed by the British Medical Journal.
Following the exposé, the WHO set up a 40-member committee called the CIOMS/WHO committee. 19 of the 40 were representatives of vaccine manufacturers with conflicts of interest. They developed a new algorithm for investigating adverse events after immunization, which decreed that any reaction seen first in Phase 4 trial must be ignored.
When a drug is developed it is tested in a randomised controlled trial called the Phase 3 trial. The numbers tested are limited to a few thousand. If there is no adverse reaction the drug is licensed for Phase 4 trials with it given to a larger number. Reactions that happen less than 1 in 10,000 are noticed for the first time in Phase 4 trials. If the same reaction happens repeatedly it is considered as a “signal” that the reaction is caused by the drug and studies in the community in the form of case-control investigations are done to establish if the reactions happen in the community setting.
But here are the important questions regarding HPV:
If two doses are just as effective as three, why recommend three doses in the first place, especially for a vaccine that costs $120 per dose (the highest of the childhood vaccine schedule)? And would they have discovered this error if they had completed the full four years of safety/efficacy research instead of fast-tracking the vaccine? The new schedule recommends 6 to 12 months between the two doses. Are they increasing the time between doses to reduce the number of severe neurological reactions? Couldn’t they have discovered that if they had stuck to the four-year safety study? And more concerning, could this also be true for other vaccines?
Asking questions about whether or not vaccines are truly “safe and effective” doesn’t make you anti-vaccine. You have the right to know.
In an unprecedented move last November, the CDC announced they were reducing the number of doses of recommended HPV vaccine from 3 doses to 2 AND warning doctors to wait longer before giving the second dose. The 3-dose series has been the existing recommendation for nearly a decade, and on the current CDC schedule, which advises 70 doses of vaccines for all children, the HPV vaccine is recommended for all boys and girls 11 to 18 years old.
They say the reduced recommendation is to gain better compliance, but the reality is the CDC may have been overdosing American teens by putting the first two doses too close together, triggering severe neurological and autoimmune reactions. Research has shown that most severe side effects occurred after that second dose (given only 1 month after the first). And now the CDC has found that three doses, which they had been advising for 10 years, has no better efficacy – only more side effects. Isn’t this information something that should have been discovered during initial safety testing? And is there a chance there are unnecessary doses of other vaccines on the CDC schedule that may be causing more harm with no actual benefit?
Eyes wide open yet?
This is a 3 yr. Old little boy who is having a severe reaction to the chicken pox vaccine..
He was diagnosed yesterday and the Dr. states in his discharge papers that it was caused by the vaccine. This is his 2nd reaction to a vaccine. The symptom is the blisters that you see, and are very painful and itchy. He is attending an independent private school and apparently this is required..
Do we not see something severely wrong here??
CANCER IN KIDS?!!
Cancer is now the 2nd leading cause of DEATH in children.
Remember when it used to mostly affect older people. What’s going on here?
Could it be that most VACCINES contain a toxic additive called Formaldehyde that is KNOWN to cause cancer in humans when you inhale it?
Pharmaceutical companies would like you to think that when you inject it, it magically becomes “safe”. It is not safe in any amount and when injected, it’s far more potent than when inhaled. Pharma thinks we are stupid enough to believe in magic…but you are not falling for that lie, right?!!
NOT A COINCIDENCE! #LearnTheRIsk #cancer #askWHY
13 Year-Old Boy Permanently Disabled from Chicken Pox Vaccine Wins His Case in Vaccine Court
A young man was recently awarded compensation in the United States Court of Federal Claims Vaccine Court, for injuries he sustained after being administered the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations in 2009. After five long years of litigation, Health and Human Services (HHS), the Respondent in all vaccine injury cases, conceded that the varicella vaccination did in fact cause RD’s vaccine injury, transverse myelitis, which has left him a tetraplegic.
In November 2014, HHS conceded that the vaccination caused RD’s injuries. Even with this concession, his case continued for another year in the damages phase, during which time the parties continued to negotiate the amount of damages that RD would receive for his injuries. Although he was compensated for his suffering and injuries, the monetary award will never compensate for the lifelong effects this young man is suffering from his vaccine injury.
Five Long Years
RD was only 13 when his life changed forever. At a routine well-child visit in 2009, the doctor informed RD’s parents that he was due to receive the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations. His parents complied with the doctor’s order and RD received the vaccinations.
RD’s mother explained that, at that time in RD’s state, only one dose of varicella vaccine was required and RD had already received one dose of that vaccine. This second dose that was administered to RD at this well visit was determined to be the cause of RD’s horrific injuries, and it was not even required for him, which his family didn’t realize until it was too late.
About 14 days later, RD began to experience excruciating pain shooting through his body along with tingling, numbness and paralysis of his limbs. After extensive testing and many invasive procedures, RD was diagnosed with transverse myelitis.
Breaking: interview with Vaxxed producer who was banned from Australia
Producer of film Vaxxed banned from Australia
by Jon Rappoport
August 9, 2017
Polly Tommey, producer of the famous documentary, Vaxxed (trailer), has been banned from Australia. If that sounds quite insane—it is.
Vaxxed has been screening across the world. It is an explosive revelation about egregious fraud at the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
The film focuses on the 2014 public confession of a long-time researcher at the CDC, William Thompson. Thompson admits that he and his colleagues committed a crime, by manipulating data to give the MMR vaccine a free pass, “proving” it had no connection to autism—when in fact, as Thompson states, the vaccine does raise the risk of autism in children.
Here are a few statements from the The Sydney Morning Herald’s report, headlined: “Anti-vaccination advocate ‘banned from Australia’ after documentary tour.”
“The producer Polly Tommey behind a controversial anti-vaccination film which has been touring Australia has been banned from returning to the country for three years, she claims.”
“Ms Tommey spearheaded a sold-out national roadshow of the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe organised by the Australian Vaccinations-Skeptics Network.”
“In a video, posted to Youtube on Tuesday, Ms Tommey claimed authorities seized her phone and copied her emails as she left Australian soil to continue the New Zealand leg of the film tour.”
A letter to Dr. Julie Gerberding, former CDC head turned president of Merck & Co.’s vaccine division.
Via – youtube.com/user/TRUTHstreammedia #RevolutionForChoice #CDC #CDCFraud #Gardasil #Vaxxed
100% Proof! Human DNA in Vaccines
Presentation recorded on February 16, 2017 in Sonora, California with Marcella Piper-Terry.
#Vaxxed #PrayBig #RecombinantDNA #InsertionalMutagenesis #FetalCellLine #ProLife #Abortion #ChooseLife #RespectLife #MarchForLife #MRC5 #WI38 #RA273 #WALVAX2
Youtube Link: https://youtu.be/dlqFQLLOTEU
Senator Pan attempts to deny the horrid reality of aborted fetal cells in vaccines when questioned by Senator Anderson. Dr. Tara Zandvliet speaks up to tell the truth. Why isn’t this information being shared with you by those asking you to inject these things into your babies? Start learning all you need to know right here: tinyurl.com/9Episodes #RevolutionForChoice #VAXXED #PanRan #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VaccineIngredients
Hear The Silence – Drama based on the true story about the MMR vaccine and its links to autism.
Christine Shields is certain that the MMR jab he received has caused her son’s autism.
Meanwhile, Dr Andrew Wakefield carries out research into just that, bravely risking his career and reputation.
What else aren’t you being told about vaccines? Find out now by watching this groundbreaking, in-depth docu-series, replaying now >>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED
Some Say Vaccines are Essential. Some Say They’re Evil.
If you have children or grandchildren, you deserve the FACTS to make your own informed choices…
We brought together 60 of the world’s top health experts to bring you… “The Truth About Vaccines”
Register NOW and you’ll be first in line to see the entire 7-part series – for free – series begins August 17th
A Missouri Marine sued the government after being left with brain damage from military issued vaccines.
Vaccines have the potential to cause devastation to all of us. Learn exactly what gambles you are taking when allowing your family to receive these harmful injections: tinyurl.com/9Episodes #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #VAXXED
This is why Big Pharma gave $246 million to politicians last year
Dr. Toni Bark discussing the unusual number of deaths and shoddy safety testing of #Gardasil — A vaccine that was never actually required to prove that it prevented cervical cancer.
75% of all deaths reported were within 25 days of receiving the vaccine.
Gardasil is not the only vaccine that causes serious harm! Listen to the brave and highly educated people who are willing to stand up against this corruption and share life-saving information with you, for FREE, right here: tinyurl.com/9Episodes #RevolutionForChoice #VAXXED #Cervarix #InformedConsent #ScientificFraud
Gardasil injured my daughter #vaxxed #truth #science #praybig
(2014) TRIBUNALE DI MILANO : BIMBO AUTISTICO PER COLPA DEL VACCINO
Vaccino esavalente, “nesso causale con autismo”. Indenizzo per bimbo di 9 anni
Il ministero della Salute dovrà versare un assegno bimestrale, per tutta la vita, a un bimbo affetto da autismo, a cui nel 2006 fu iniettato il vaccino esavalente prodotto dalla multinazionale GlaxoSmithKline
E ancora, citando la perizia del medico legale Alberto Tornatore nominato dal Tribunale: “È probabile che il disturbo autistico del piccolo sia stato concausato, sulla base di un polimorfismo che lo ha reso suscettibile alla tossicità di uno o più ingredienti (o inquinanti), dal vaccino Infanrix Hexa Sk”.
Nelle 18 pagine della relazione del medico legale, si fa riferimento a “un poderoso documento riservato della GlaxoSmithKline” sui “cosiddetti side effects del vaccino Infanrix Hexa Sk emersi nel corso della sperimentazione clinica pre-autorizzazione o successivamente, fra l’ottobre 2009 e lo stesso mese 2011”. In particolare – come scrive il perito – ci sarebbero “cinque casi di autismo segnalati durante i trial, ma rimasti unlisted, ossia omessi dall’elenco degli effetti avversi sottoposto alle autorità sanitarie per l’autorizzazione al commercio”.
Nella sentenza – sempre citando le conclusioni del medico legale – si riporta come nel vaccino vi sarebbe “una specifica idoneità lesiva per il disturbo autistico, la cui portata, teoricamente piccola se calcolata in base alla sperimentazione clinica pre-autorizzazione”, sarebbe in realtà “sottostimata, per l’esistenza, recentemente confermata dall’autorità sanitaria australiana, di lotti del vaccino contenente un disinfettante a base di mercurio, oggi ufficialmente bandito per via della comprovata neurotossicità”.
(2014) Court of Milan: Autistic child because of the vaccine
Hexavalent vaccine, “causal link with autism”. compensation for 9-Year-olds
The Ministry of health will have to pay a bi-monthly check for the whole life to a child suffering from autism, which in 2006 was injected with the hexavalent vaccine produced by the multinational glaxosmithkline
And again, citing the expert’s report, Alberto Tornatore appointed by the court: ” it is likely that the child’s autistic disorder has been concausato, based on a polymorphism which made it susceptible to the toxicity of one or more ingredients (or pollutants), From vaccine infanrix hexa sk “.
In the 18 pages of the medical examiner’s report, reference is made to ” a powerful confidential document of glaxosmithkline ” on ” So-called side effects of vaccine infanrix hexa sk in the course of pre-authorisation clinical trials or later, between October 2009 And the same month 2011 “. in particular – as the expert writes – there would be ” five cases of autism reported during the trials, but remained unlisted, i.e. omitted from the list of adverse effects submitted to the health authorities for the marketing authorisation “.
In the judgment – always referring to the findings of the medical examiner – it is reported as in the vaccine there is “a specific suitability for autistic disorder, the extent of which is theoretically small if calculated on the basis of pre-authorisation clinical trials”, ‘underestimated, for the existence, recently confirmed by the Australian Health Authority, of batches of the vaccine containing a mercury-based disinfectant, which is now officially banned because of the proven neurotoxicity.’
VAXXED TV – VaxXed Stories: Dr. Suzanne Humphries Notices Vaccine Prescribed In Her Name
Dr. Suzanne Humphries discusses when she noticed a vaccine prescribed in her name without her permission.
Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.