There appear to be up to 7 fully redacted ingredients in Pfizer’s experimental genetic vaccine BNT162b2. In this video, I discuss a heavily redacted excerpt of Section 3.2.P.1 from a confidential Pfizer document, released by the MHRA in response to my Freedom of Information request. For further details, please visit alltherisks.com/trade-secret. I have already extensively documented #AllTheRisks across toxicology, molecular biology, virology, immunology and epidemiology in a fully independent biosecurity risk assessment at http://www.alltherisks.com.
CRITICAL UPDATE! In response to my Freedom of Information (FOI) request, on 11 November 2021, the MHRA provided the below heavily redacted excerpt from a confidential Pfizer document. Table 3.2.P.1-1 appears to list 7 fully redacted ingredients.
Background: COMIRNATY is a trade name of Pfizer’s experimental SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccine BNT162b2, the same experimental product deployed in the UK under Regulation 174 from the MHRA, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency. According to the CDC, “There has been no change in the formulation of the vaccine since the name change.” The FDA’s document Summary Basis for Regulatory Action – COMIRNATY, dated 23 August 2021, outlined the full approval of COMIRNATY. As below, Table 2 protected a 0.450ml excipient from public disclosure, according to U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), in lieu of “[t]rade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential”.
Without reversioning their document, as below, the FDA later spontaneously updated Table 2 to supposedly reveal this previously undisclosed excipient to simply be water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R).
However, this new disclosure cannot be reconciled with Table 3 in the same FDA document.
On 28 October 2021, the MHRA responded with the following:
The duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000 does not apply, by virtue of Section 41 (Information provided in confidence) and Section 43 (Commercial interests) of that Act.
Section 41 is an absolute exemption and no consideration of the public interest is required, except to state that we consider its disclosure to constitute an actionable breach of confidence.
Section 43 is a qualified exemption and a consideration of the public interest should be made. We have considered the public interest and cannot see any public interest argument that outweighs the commercial harm whereby the information can be used by competitors to inform their own product development and overcome regulatory hurdles.
Critical questions that must immediately be addressed by the MHRA therefore include:
What could possibly warrant the MHRA’s decision to not disclose the exact amount of water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) in BNT162b2 by invoking an absolute exemption (Section 41) and a qualified exemption (Section 43)?
Why would the disclosure of the exact amount of water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) in BNT162b2 inflict any “commercial harm” on Pfizer, as the MHRA claim?
If the only solution present in BNT162b2 in liquid or frozen state is water for injection (UNII: 059QF0KO0R) then how could confirmation that it comprises the entire solution of BNT162b2 in its pre-dilution and post-dilution state “be used by competitors to inform their own product development and overcome regulatory hurdles”?
A diagram of mine illustrating dilution and post-dilution dosing of BNT162b2 is shown below.
The Fullerton Informer – Full 5G satanic agendas exposed urgent download B4 it is removed-Joe Imbriano tells all
https://thefullertoninformer.com/appl… THE INTERVIEW OF THE CENTURY ON 5G AND THE ENTIRE WIRELESS AGENDA AND OTHER AGENDAS EXPOSED. JOE IMBRIANO AKA THE FULLERTON INFORMER TELLS ALL.YOU WILL NOT HEAR OR SEE THIS INFORMATION ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD. THIS IS THE MOST FACTUAL, COMPREHENSIVE EXPOSE ON THE 5G WIRELESS AGENDA ANYWHERE PERIOD. YOUR LINEAGE DEPENDS ON THIS INFORMATION GETTING OUT TO THE MASSES. http://wifidangers.com/ DOWLOAD SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE http://www.youtube.com/c/TheFullerton…https://www.youtube.com/user/grindall… This is a re broadcast of a speaking engagement where Joe Imbriano AKA The Fullerton Informer lays out the different eugneics agendas and SOLUTIONS! No more excuses for destroying your children. Time to act or your children will face the consequences of your ……….
Truth from “a real doctor” about vaccines, both medically and the business of running a medical clinic without accepting the bribes for vaccinating children.
Six doctors who have administered vaccines in their practice are all asked the same question. When you were in medical school, how much education regarding vaccines was provided before you were permitted to administer them?
Interviews, camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.
Our 8 Unvaccinated children are super healthy #vaxxed #prayBig #PeoplesStudy #truth #science
Newborn baby dies after receiving eight vaccinations on schedule; pathologists confirm vaccines responsible for death
A mother from Michigan has gone through an emotional journey in finding exactly what caused her son to mysteriously die.
What she uncovered is another case added to the excessive vaccination-induced early death.
Elijah Daniel French was born on May 4, 2007, and had mysteriously died a couple days after receiving 8 routine vaccinations, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for childhood vaccination. This was determined by child death investigator and many pathologists to have been a result from vaccination.
According to VacTruth.com: Baby Elijah was happy, healthy, and smiling until he underwent routine vaccinations. His health began to worsen, and ended up developing a high fever and breathing problems.
In the family account, it was noted that Danny had been vaccinated for seven other conditions at 5 1/2 months old, including hepatitis B, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal and polio vaccines. To make things worse, a few months later he was brought over to the doctor’s office where he was administered a second round of the same vaccines. This caused him to develop asthma and exacerbated his problems even more.
Daniel’s mother didn’t know what else to do, other than see a doctor for her Childs condition. So, she brought Daniel back to the doctor’s office where ehe was given a third round of vaccines at 14 months old. He was administered 8 vaccines in 4 injections: Varicella, Hib, DTaP and MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella). This is when Daniel’s started to dramatically worsen.
“That night, Danny was still eating and drinking but was cranky and slept more than usual,” his mother reported.
“By the next day, he was extremely fatigued, irritable and had a loss of appetite. He did not have a fever at this time. He was red and warm where they injected him. These symptoms only worsened.”
“By the third day, Danny was unable to stay awake for longer than thirty minutes, he had zero food intake, his fluid intake diminished and he cried excessively. Seventy-one hours after his doctor visit, Danny developed a fever from the vaccines and was given Children’s Tylenol. His doctor was called but there was no answer from him because it was the July 4th holiday, the office was closed.”
Three independent pathologists confirm that young Danny’s death was caused by vaccines
Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped
June 29, 2017
by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
Doctors call it a “medication administration error.” During a routine check-up at her pediatrician’s office, 4-month old Aniya was accidentally given the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and she hasn’t been the same since.
Anita Vasquez of Victoria, Texas, herself a nurse, says that “doctors are in denial” that any of the medical issues that began after her daughter received the shot are related to the vaccine.
Aniya was a happy and healthy breastfed baby before her 4-month doctor visit. Her only illness was an ear infection which had been cleared up with antibiotics shortly before that fateful day of December 29, 2016. Since then, she has suffered numerous health issues and several hospitalizations.
Rather than acknowledge the possibility that the Gardasil 9 vaccine contributed to the decline in Aniya’s health, doctors and Child Protective Services have reportedly blamed the mother. Her desperate search for answers has led instead to her being accused of Munchausen by Proxy, or “medical child abuse,” and her baby has been seized by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
Anita told Health Impact News that her concerns about the vaccine have been dismissed and ignored by virtually everyone involved in her daughter’s care. DFPS refers to her “unfounded concerns” about the Gardasil 9 vaccine. She believes that they are trying to cover up the dangers of the vaccine.
This is any mother’s worst nightmare, and no one deserves this.
Distracted Doctor Administers Wrong Vaccine – Infant Received 8 Vaccines at Same Visit
The Vasquez family nightmare began when Anita took her 13 year old son and her 4 month old baby girl to a routine check-up.
Anita is a registered nurse by trade, and she didn’t question the recommended vaccinations. Her son was to receive the Gardasil 9 vaccine, and her daughter was to receive 2 shots and an oral vaccine. The nurse drew up and labeled the vaccines and placed the syringes in a single envelope.
Anita says that Dr. Veronica Guel-Valdivia came into the room talking on her cell phone. When the doctor finished her phone conversation, she asked Anita to put baby Aniya on the table.
Polio Paralyzes 17 Children in Syria, W.H.O. Says
Unlike Syria’s first polio outbreak in 2013, caused by a wild strain that paralyzed 36 children before it was brought under control, the new outbreak derived from the polio vaccine itself, Mr. Jasarevic said.
The vaccine, a weakened form of the polio virus that triggers the immune system’s response, is secreted in the waste of vaccinated children, and over time can mutate into an infectious strain that may afflict the unvaccinated. The risks are especially high in areas where not all children have received the vaccine and where the mutated virus can spread from contaminated sewage or water.
“These vaccine-derived outbreaks really are a marker of poor vaccination and poor sanitation in the community,” said Dr. Homer Venters, director of programs at Physicians for Human Rights, an international aid group based in New York that supports humanitarian work in war zones, including Syria and Yemen.
After receiving a flu shot, this beautiful young girl suffered vaccine-induced paralysis, also known as Transverse Myeltis, one of many labels given to our modern-day “Polio”, which was never eradicated by vaccines and in fact, is many times directly caused by them.
What else aren’t you being told? Find out here, while this groundbreaking, 9-part docu-series is still free>>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes
Guillain-Barré Syndrome is another label given to this paralysis, very often caused by vaccines.
More info here: vactruth.com/2012/04/25/change-names-of-diseases
✴️ Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
✴️ Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
✴️ Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Polio #TransverseMyelitis #VaccineInjury
Flu Vaccine Efficacy Slips From Prior Estimate, CDC Says
Robert Lowes
June 23, 2017
The influenza vaccine for the 2016-2017 season was 42% effective in preventing an infection from any A or B virus in people of all ages, down from a preliminary estimate of 48% in February, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced earlier this week.
The CDC frames the effectiveness rating in terms of reducing a vaccinated person’s risk of getting sick and having to visit a clinician on an outpatient basis because of the flu.
The vaccine worked the best among children aged 6 months to 8 years, at 61%, and the least among individuals aged 18 to 49 years, at 19%. For people aged 65 years or older — a demographic group that’s especially vulnerable to the flu — effectiveness stood at 25%.
The CDC reported the efficacy rates at a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 21 and 22.
Vaccine effectiveness varied considerably by influenza virus type. It was at its lowest in all age groups — 34% — for the A/H3N2 virus that dominated this season. Performance picked up for the A/H1N1 pandemic virus (54%), the B/Yamagata virus (55%), and the B/Victoria virus (60%), according to epidemiologist Jill Ferdinands, PhD, in the CDC’s Influenza Division.
The CDC adjusts its efficacy estimates for such factors as age, sex, and underlying medical conditions.
The 42% overall effectiveness of the latest influenza vaccine is somewhat lower than the 47% for the 2015-2016 vaccine, but a big improvement over the 23% for the 2014-2015 edition. Vaccine performance suffers when the viruses they’re designed to thwart undergo genetic drift after the vaccine is formulated. However, the CDC reported that most of the flu viruses in circulation in 2016-2017 were similar to those in the latest vaccine, which came in trivalent and quadrivalent formulas.
The prenatal flu vaccine and ASD: Good research, bad conclusions.
Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D.
June 23, 2017
Very early this year, a research group from the insurance giant Kaiser Permanente published a paper concluding no evidence of harm in administering prenatal influenza vaccines. The study authors asserted that there was no relationship between those who received the flu shot during pregnancy and later autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis in the child. However, that proclamation was not consistent with the study’s results. Specifically, women who received the vaccine during their first trimester of pregnancy showed a 20% greater risk of having the child later develop ASD. This was based on a sampling of 13,477 women who received the maternal flu shot in the first trimester, resulting in 260 ASD cases, versus 151,698 “control” women who received no flu shot during pregnancy, resulting in 2,338 ASD cases. This result was statistically significant with a p value of 0.01, which in this case means that the possibility that this is a “chance” finding and not a “true” association was just 1%. In other words, the chances of this being a “true” association are 99%.
In statistics, the gold standard “cut-off” to determine statistical significance is actually a higher p value of 0.05, meaning that the possibility of a chance association is less than 5%. Thus, the first trimester flu shot – ASD relationship should have been deemed statistically significant, with p=0.01, and accordingly a policy change should have been made to suspend use of that vaccine, at least in the first trimester of pregnancy.
However, the study authors instead reached into their statistical “bag of tricks” and trotted out what is termed the “Bonferroni” adjustment. This adjustment is applied in statistics only under very specific instances, when multiple, unrelated statistical evaluations are made using a single data sampling. In this adjustment, simply, the p value is adjusted by multiplying its original value with the number of “independent” evaluations completed in the study of that single data set (Bland et al. 1995 BMJ 310:170). In the case of Zerbo et al. 2017, there were 8 evaluations completed (4 evaluations regarding the flu shot and 4 evaluations regarding women who actually contracted the flu during pregnancy) and thus the original p value of 0.01 was adjusted to 0.08, above the “cut off” value used for deeming “statistical significance.” The Zerbo et al. authors rounded the result up to p=0.1, further moving the result away from the “magic” 0.05 cut-off level, causing the significant result to disappear.
There’s a huge problem here, however, which I pointed out in my letter to the editor of the journal (Hooker 2017 JAMA Pediatrics 171:600) published in their June 2, 2017 edition. The Bonferroni adjustment, among other corrections for multiple, independent comparisons, should not be applied to statistics when there is any interdependence within the different evaluations completed within the data sample. In this case, 4 of the evaluations completed dealt specifically with the timing of the maternal flu shot (first, second and third trimesters, as well as overall risk at any point in pregnancy) and subsequent ASD incidence. So, not only were these four trials all focused on an ASD outcome, but they all dealt with different phases of pregnancy, which were then summed to develop an “overall” risk at any phase of pregnancy. By definition, these trials were anything but statistically independent. An example of an independent evalution would be polling different groups of college students for their tastes in music, food, art, and perhaps health care practices, where none of the preferences could be empirically tied to the next.
Spokane WA parents report on their vaccinated and Unvaccinated children #vaxxed #peoplesStudy #praybig #truth #science
Don’t Vaccinate to Protect My Cancer Kid
Posted on February 10, 2015
I read with great interest the recent ‘measles epidemic’ articles that addressed the vaccine debate from the point of view of a cancer parent. My interest is the result of being a cancer parent myself – my little girl has been battling leukemia on and off for the past 10 years. I read these articles, and I became angry. Very, very angry. Once again, the government and drug companies are exploiting the plight of children stricken by cancer to achieve a profit-driven end without actually helping them. In fact, this profitable end could cause great harm, even increasing the rates of pediatric leukemia, if their obvious goal of a federally mandated vaccination protocol is achieved. I am a seasoned Momcologist, a term the research-driven cancer parents call themselves. We are the cancer equivalent of Thinking Moms, critical thinkers. I have done extensive reading on the etiology of leukemia, its connection to autoimmune disease, and how vaccines and natural disease may influence these sorts of childhood illnesses. Come connect the dots with me.
Clearly, I empathize with the raw fear the parents in these articles have that their immunocompromised children may contract an illness that could be devastating. I have walked for years in their shoes. I get it. However, the parents in these articles are either grossly misinformed, or their comments have been edited with bias. Let’s get some facts straight about cancer treatment and infection. One of the first things we were warned about after my daughter’s diagnosis was live-virus vaccination. No one in the family was to receive a live-virus vaccine while my daughter was on treatment because these viruses can and do shed (1, 2, 3, 4), some for as much as four weeks (5), potentially infecting the immunocompromised patient with disastrous results. That includes the measles vaccine (MMR II and ProQuad), the intranasal flu vaccine, and the chicken pox shot. In fact, my other children were able to get medical waivers not to receive vaccines because of my daughter’s illness. I know my child is much more likely to encounter a peer at school who has been recently vaccinated with a live-virus vaccine than she is to encounter natural disease from an unvaccinated child.
Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio
June 28, 20173:22 PM ET
For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.
So far in 2017, there have been only six cases of “wild” polio reported anywhere in the world. By “wild,” public health officials mean the disease caused by polio virus found naturally in the environment.
By contrast, there have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they’re caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children
“It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem,” says Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco.
The oral polio vaccine used throughout most of the developing world contains a form of the virus that has been weakened in the laboratory. But it’s still a live virus. (This is a different vaccine than the injectable one used in the U.S. and most developed countries. The injectable vaccine is far more expensive and does not contain live forms of the virus.)
Andino studies how viruses mutate. In a study published in March, he and his colleagues found that the laboratory-weakened virus used in the oral polio vaccine can very rapidly regain its strength if it starts spreading on its own. After a child is vaccinated with live polio virus, the virus replicates inside the child’s intestine and eventually is excreted. In places with poor sanitation, fecal matter can enter the drinking water supply and the virus is able to start spreading from person to person.
“We discovered there’s only a few [mutations] that have to happen and they happen rather quickly in the first month or two post-vaccination,” Andino says. “As the virus starts circulating in the community, it acquires further mutations that make it basically indistinguishable from the wild-type virus. It’s polio in terms of virulence and in terms of how the virus spreads.”
New Polio Virus Evolution Insights Could Lead to Improved Vaccine
Blocking ‘Gateway Mutations’ Could Prevent Vaccine from Re-Evolving Virulence
By Nicholas Weiler on March 27, 2017
A relentless vaccination campaign has succeeded in eradicating the polio virus from most of the world, reducing the burden of the disease by 99 percent since the year 2000 and preventing more than 13 million children from contracting the disease, according to World Health Organization estimates. However, in regions where vaccination has remained incomplete, on rare occasions the weakened virus used in the vaccine has evolved the ability to escape the vaccinated person and spread to other, unprotected individuals.
Now a new study led by researchers at UC San Francisco and Tel-Aviv University in Israel has revealed that in every vaccine-derived polio outbreak, the polio virus used the same three evolutionary steps to evolve from harmless vaccine into a regional menace. In the new study – published online March 23, 2017, in Cell – the researchers mapped out these key steps, identifying so-called “gatekeeper mutations” that must occur before the vaccine can evolve and regain full virulence. They have used this knowledge to develop a new polio vaccine that should be unable to escape and cause outbreaks, which they hope to put into clinical trials soon.
“If one could get everyone fully vaccinated, this would prevent the virus from being able to spread and evolve, but particularly in areas of the world that are riddled with conflict and poverty, it is very hard to get full coverage,” said Raul Andino, PhD, a professor of microbiology and immunology at UCSF and senior author of the new study. “Thus, it has been critical to understand how the virus manages to evolve virulence, and come up with strategies to stop it.”
Official Push to Hide Drug & Vaccine Side Effects; Reduce Informed Consent
Posted on: Monday, June 26th 2017 at 3:45 pm
Written By: Jefferey Jaxen
In a disturbing turn of events, Big Pharma pushes to hijack informed consent by removing side effects from direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising.
Direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising (DTCPA) has exploded during the past several decades and is now the most prominent type of health communication the public encounters. DTCPA has been legal in the US since 1985, but exponentially expanded in 1997 when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed a rule that once forced drug companies to offer a detailed list of side-effects in their long format commercials. The impact was immediate. Spending by drug companies on TV ads hit $664 million within a year. By 2005, the industry was spending more than $3 billion annually on televised direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads. 2008 saw Big Pharma post just under $5 billion. Spending on DTCPA rose 9% to $5.6 billion in 2016 and expected to rise further in 2017. To date, the US and New Zealand are the only two countries that allow DTCPA.
In what appears to be a coordinated effort both the FDA and the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) have each announced their intentions to hide or eliminate side effects from DTCPA and patient information leaflets (PIL). Lending credence to larger picture unfolding, both the FDA and the AMS announced their intentions to toy with further concealing drug and vaccine side effects on the same day [June 19].
Hijacking Informed Consent
The FDA announced it will begin a study titled Experimental Study of Risk Information Amount and Location in Direct-to-Consumer Print Ads. To fulfill the regulatory requirements for fair balance and the brief summary (the part of the ad which lists side effects, contraindications and effectiveness) drug companies must included risk information about their product in DTC print ads both in the main part of the ad where the product claims appear, and in a separate brief summary page. The FDA’s rationale for its new study claims that listing the unfavorable risks and side effects of a drug may be ‘overwarning’ consumers in addition to potentially leading to habituation. The agency’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion is planning to test what happens when the side effects are reduced or eliminated from DTC television ads.
The AMS is a self-proclaimed “independent body in the UK representing the diversity of medical science” who, according to their website, is funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche. Their recent project was “…to examine how the generation, trustworthiness and communication of scientific evidence can be enhanced [key term] to strengthen its role in decisions by patients, carers, healthcare professionals and others about the benefits and harms of medicines.” In other words since the UK can’t market drugs and vaccines directly to the consumers the AMS has set out to see how eliminating informed consent by hiding product side effects from patients will boost pharmaceutical product uptake. Their report starts out with perhaps the most important statistic to date showing widespread rejection of Big Pharma and its influence on the medical community:
“Only about a third (37%) of the public trust evidence from medical research, compared to approximately two-thirds (65%) who trust the experiences of their friends and family, according to a report launched today.”
In a rational health world focused on true healing, such dismal percentages would be evidence to rework a broken medical system, remove Big Pharma conflicts of interest in research and medical practice and begin to listen to patients. Instead, the AMS report goes on to call for “improvements” to the PIL and “a bigger role” for UK’s National Health Service to be a “source of trusted information online”. The report calls for the European Commission and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to work with pharmaceutical companies to “reform” PIL’s.
Currently the EMA has two open complaints against it by the Nordic Cochrane Centre over maladministration, conflict of interest, secrecy and unprofessionalism concerning the handling of HPV vaccine safety data, research and whistleblowers. What kind of improvements in the PIL are being suggested? The AMS is calling for a more “balanced view” because there is too much focus on the potential side effects of drugs and vaccines on the PIL’s and not enough on their benefits. The rationale for reworking the PIL is not rooted in reality. The broken peer-reviewed process and pharmaceutical industry influence on medical research has continually omitted both greater incidences and number side effects along with exaggeration of benefits.
The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants
Professor Christopher Exley, world’s leading expert on aluminium.
“There are NO clinically approved vaccine aluminium adjuvants !!!”
The Toxicity of Aluminum Adjuvants
Documentary – The Age of Aluminium (Die Akte Aluminium)
The Age of Aluminium: Die Akte Aluminium. A film and documentary created by Bert Ehgartner (Full English version).
Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
Dec 1, 2016
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which individuals are more at risk?
No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession. You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and Autoimmunity – the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice. Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the “Godfather of Autoimmunology” – the study of the immune system turned on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines – specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum – as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases. The bigger evidence is a huge body of research that’s poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years. Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
“On one hand,” vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the paper’s authors, Alessandra Soriano, of the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer. He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology. “On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity. Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA.”
ASIA – or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld’s syndrome) — first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant – an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system. Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.
Study – ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Abstract
The role of various environmental factors in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases is well established. Of which, factors entailing an immune adjuvant activity such as infectious agents, silicone, aluminium salts and others were associated with defined and non-defined immune mediated diseases both in animal models and in humans. In recent years, four conditions: siliconosis, the Gulf war syndrome (GWS), the macrophagic myofasciitis syndrome (MMF) and post-vaccination phenomena were linked with previous exposure to an adjuvant. Furthermore, these four diseases share a similar complex of signs and symptoms which further support a common denominator.Thus, we review herein the current data regarding the role of adjuvants in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases as well as the amassed data regarding each of these four conditions. Relating to the current knowledge we would like to suggest to include these comparable conditions under a common syndrome entitled ASIA, “Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants”.
200 Evidence-Based Reasons NOT To Vaccinate – FREE Research PDF Download!
Posted on: Sunday, February 22nd 2015 at 1:45 pm
Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2017
The media, your pediatrician, politicians and health authorities like the CDC and FDA claim that vaccines are safe and effective. So why do hundreds of peer-reviewed studies indicate the opposite is true? Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.
It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.
With this aim in mind, GreenMedInfo.com has painstakingly collected over 300 pages of study abstracts culled directly from the National Library of Medicine’s pubmed.gov bibliographic database on the wide-ranging adverse health effects linked to vaccines in the today’s schedule (over 200 distinct adverse effects, including death), as well as numerous studies related to vaccine contamination, and vaccine failure in highly vaccine compliant populations.
This is the literature that the media, politicians and governmental health organizations like the CDC, pretend with abject dishonesty does not exist – as if vaccine injury did not happen, despite the over 3 billion dollars our government has paid out to vaccine injured through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund since it was inaugurated in 1986.
We have written extensively about this research previously, highlighting different studies, focusing on translating their implications to the lay persons (view our vaccine article section here), but we believe that collecting and condensing solely the primary literature itself makes a much more powerful statement.
This document is being made free to download to the world at large in order to encourage the lay public, health professionals, activists, and elected officials alike to read, acknowledge and share the voluminous literature with their family, friends, colleagues and related stakeholders. You will find this research undermines the national and global agenda to continue to expand the vaccine schedule (on behalf of a vaccine industry that is indemnified against lawsuit for defective or harmful products), with increasing legislative pressure to remove exemptions and mandate them against the evidence of harm and at best equivocal effectiveness as a preventive health measure.
If the vaccination arm of modern medicine today is to continue to promote itself as a science- and evidence-based practice, it must acknowledge and incorporate the implications of the research we are releasing here, or lose any pretense at credibility. Failing to do so will reveal that the widespread push to remove your choice in the matter is agenda and not evidence driven, and due to the fact that vaccines all carry the risk of irreversible harm and even death (any vaccine insert proves this), it clearly violates the Nuremberg code of medical ethics to promote them as a priori safe and effectiveness. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-all http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gmipub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf
Vaccine Mechanisms in Autism
Disclaimer: The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this Website. All research is referenced at the end of this article.
This article will explain how specific vaccine adjuvants, in combination with the herbicide glyphosate, keep the brain in a permanent inflammatory state leading to the symptoms as seen in autism. It will point out key adjuvants believed to be involved with the development of autism. Lastly, it will briefly touch upon the key part in the brain involved and touches upon novel therapeutic possibilities.
Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which individuals are more at risk?
No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession. You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and Autoimmunity – the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice. Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the “Godfather of Autoimmunology” – the study of the immune system turned on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines – specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum – as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases. The bigger evidence is a huge body of research that’s poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years. Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
200 Evidence-Based Reasons NOT To Vaccinate – FREE Research PDF Download!
Quick download here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gmipub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf
The media, your pediatrician, politicians and health authorities like the CDC and FDA claim that vaccines are safe and effective. So why do hundreds of peer-reviewed studies indicate the opposite is true? Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.
It is abundantly clear that if the present-day vaccine climate, namely, that everyone must comply with the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccination schedule or be labeled a health risk to society at large, is to succumb to open and balanced discussion, it is the peer-reviewed biomedical evidence itself that is going to pave the way towards making rational debate on the subject happen.
With this aim in mind, GreenMedInfo.com has painstakingly collected over 300 pages of study abstracts culled directly from the National Library of Medicine’s pubmed.gov bibliographic database on the wide-ranging adverse health effects linked to vaccines in the today’s schedule (over 200 distinct adverse effects, including death), as well as numerous studies related to vaccine contamination, and vaccine failure in highly vaccine compliant populations.
This is the literature that the media, politicians and governmental health organizations like the CDC, pretend with abject dishonesty does not exist – as if vaccine injury did not happen, despite the over 3 billion dollars our government has paid out to vaccine injured through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund since it was inaugurated in 1986.
We have written extensively about this research previously, highlighting different studies, focusing on translating their implications to the lay persons (view our vaccine article section here), but we believe that collecting and condensing solely the primary literature itself makes a much more powerful statement.
Study – ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
Abstract
The role of various environmental factors in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases is well established. Of which, factors entailing an immune adjuvant activity such as infectious agents, silicone, aluminium salts and others were associated with defined and non-defined immune mediated diseases both in animal models and in humans. In recent years, four conditions: siliconosis, the Gulf war syndrome (GWS), the macrophagic myofasciitis syndrome (MMF) and post-vaccination phenomena were linked with previous exposure to an adjuvant. Furthermore, these four diseases share a similar complex of signs and symptoms which further support a common denominator.Thus, we review herein the current data regarding the role of adjuvants in the pathogenesis of immune mediated diseases as well as the amassed data regarding each of these four conditions. Relating to the current knowledge we would like to suggest to include these comparable conditions under a common syndrome entitled ASIA, “Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants”.
Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Gov. Researchers Confirm
A remarkable study reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it – doubly disproving two doses of MMR vaccine is “99% effective,” as widely claimed.
One of the fundamental errors in thinking about measles vaccine effectiveness is that receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine equates to bona fide immunity against these pathogens. Indeed, it is commonly claimed that receiving two doses of the MMR vaccine is “99 percent effective in preventing measles,”1 despite a voluminous body of contradictory evidence from epidemiology and clinical experience.
This erroneous thinking has led the public, media and government alike to attribute the origin of measles outbreaks, such as the one recently reported at Disney, to the non-vaccinated, even though 18% of the measles cases occurred in those who had been vaccinated against it — hardly the vaccine’s claimed “99% effective.” The vaccine’s obvious fallibility is also indicated by the fact that that the CDC now requires two doses.
But the problems surrounding the failing MMR vaccine go much deeper. First, they carry profound health risks (over 25 of which we have indexed here: MMR vaccine dangers), including increased autism risk, which a senior CDC scientist confessed his agency covered up. Second, not only does the MMR vaccine fail to consistently confer immunity, but those who have been “immunized” with two doses of MMR vaccine can still transmit the infection to others — a phenomena no one is reporting on in the rush to blame the non- or minimally-vaccinated for the outbreak.
MMR Vaccinated Can Still Spread Measles
Last year, a groundbreaking study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).
This finding even aroused the attention of mainstream news reporting, such as this Sciencemag.org article from April 2014 titled “Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time.”
Titled, “Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011,” the groundbreaking study acknowledged that, “Measles may occur in vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented.”
In order to find out if measles vaccine compliant individuals are capable of being infected and transmitting the infection to others, they evaluated suspected cases and contacts exposed during a 2011 measles outbreak in NYC. They focused on one patient who had received two doses of measles-containing vaccine and found that,
Study – Predicting post-vaccination autoimmunity: who might be at risk?
Abstract
Vaccinations have been used as an essential tool in the fight against infectious diseases, and succeeded in improving public health. However, adverse effects, including autoimmune conditions may occur following vaccinations (autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants–ASIA syndrome). It has been postulated that autoimmunity could be triggered or enhanced by the vaccine immunogen contents, as well as by adjuvants, which are used to increase the immune reaction to the immunogen. Fortunately, vaccination-related ASIA is uncommon. Yet, by defining individuals at risk we may further limit the number of individuals developing post-vaccination ASIA. In this perspective we defined four groups of individuals who might be susceptible to develop vaccination-induced ASIA: patients with prior post-vaccination autoimmune phenomena, patients with a medical history of autoimmunity, patients with a history of allergic reactions, and individuals who are prone to develop autoimmunity (having a family history of autoimmune diseases; asymptomatic carriers of autoantibodies; carrying certain genetic profiles, etc.).
the news network 