Japan dials back climate change emissions target

Japan dials back climate change emissions target

     WARSAW, Poland     (AP) — Japan’s decision to drastically scale back its target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions could hurt efforts to craft a global deal to fight climate change, delegates at U.N. talks said Friday.

The new target approved by the Japanese Cabinet calls for reducing emissions by 3.8 percent from their 2005 level by 2020.

The revision was necessary because the earlier goal of a 25 percent reduction from the 1990 level was unrealistic, the chief government spokesman, Yoshihide Suga, told reporters in Tokyo.

The new target represents a 3 percent increase over 1990 emissions.

Given Japan’s status as the world’s third largest economy and fifth largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, the decision to back away from the more ambitious target could be a significant setback for efforts to reach a new global climate agreement in 2015.

The European Union’s delegates at the climate talks in Warsaw “expressed disappointment,” while U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres summed up the mood by saying there’s “regret” over Japan’s decision.

However, she praised Japan’s advances in increasing energy efficiency and in solar energy investments, and predicted that the Japanese “will soon see that the current target is actually conservative.”

“I don’t have any words to describe my dismay,” China’s official Xinhua News Agency cited Su Wei, deputy chief of the Chinese delegation to the climate talks, as telling reporters in Warsaw.

© 2013 The Associated Press.  All rights reserved.  This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

EPA releases carbon dioxide emissions rules for new power plants

EPA releases carbon dioxide emissions rules for new power plants

Natural gas can meet the standards, but coal faces a struggle.

  by       –    Sept 20 2013, 8:19pm +0300

Over a year ago, the US Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would start the process of implementing rules that would limit the carbon dioxide emissions from newly built power plants. The intended rules would put a uniform limit on fossil-fuel burning plants of 1,000 pounds of CO2 for each Megawatt-hour of electricity produced.

Today, the EPA has announced a revised set of rules to replace last year’s effort. The revised versions split the single standard and only hold large natural gas plants to the 1,000 lbs/MW-hr figure. Coal and smaller plants will only have to meet a less stringent 1,100 lbs/MW-hr standard. If a new plant is built that does not meet these standards, its operators will have seven years to bring it into compliance—possibly enough time to develop carbon capture and storage technology.

Based on figures from the US Energy Administration, natural gas plants nearly meet the proposed standards already, while coal is nowhere close. But given the low cost of natural gas, nobody was planning to build a coal plant anyway, something explicitly recognized by the EPA’s proposal: “existing and anticipated economic conditions mean that few, if any, solid fossil fuel-fired EGUs will be built in the foreseeable future.” As such, the new rule is unlikely to have much of an impact, something that’s also recognized by the EPA: “the EPA projects that this proposed rule will result in negligible CO2 emission changes, quantified benefits, and costs.”

So why bother proposing the rule at all? Because past decisions will now compel the EPA to formulate rules that limit carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants. The stakes there will obviously be much higher, and the ensuing fight will be far more challenging. By setting precedents with these rules, the EPA will undoubtedly lay important foundations for putting general emissions controls in place.

The public and any other interested parties will now have 60 days to comment on the rules, including at a public hearing. At the end of that period, the EPA may either amend the rules again or attempt to put them into effect. Even though utilities and other interested parties have been extensively consulted while the rules were formulated, legal challenges are almost certain to delay the actual implementation