Dr. Alvin Moss testifies at the West Virginia Education Committee the morning of Saturday, March 18, 2017. He responds to the question, “What is in vaccines?” Dr. Moss is a physician and professor in the Center for Health Ethics & Law department at West Virginia University.
Share this video outside of Facebook
The Alex Jones Channel – Vaccines Exposed The Hidden Crime Against Children
Scott Miller’s jaw-dropping documentary, “Vaccine Syndrome”, which covers this atrocity in-depth, is included in the “Vaccines Revealed” 9-part docu-series, replaying now for free: tinyurl.com/9Episodes
At the time of this news-clip, over 1.5 MILLION service members had been injected with the deadly Anthrax vaccine, under threat of court-martial for refusal to comply. #GulfWar #Anthrax #RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED
Do you wonder whether you or someone you love should get the Shingles vaccine? In this video, Dr. Northrup explains why there is a big push lately to get the Shingles vaccine – and vaccines in general. She tells you in detail how vaccines work – and don’t work – and gives you a reality check so you can make an informed decision as to whether or not this vaccine is right for you. #VaXism NEWS #Maine
Another brave MD!
Chase’s Vaccine Injury- Facts The Biased Mainstream Media Doesn’t Want You To Know
May 14, 2017
Vaccine Spruiker and propagandist extraordinaire, Jane Hansen, a Newscorp ‘journalist’ has once again unleashed her ferocious claws. This time, her targets were the parents of a 4-year old boy named Chase who suffers from hypertonic quadriplegic cerebral palsy.
Hansen’s mediocre reporting leads readers on a trail of manipulated lies and half-truths in a desperate attempt to shift the public’s perception away from the reality of vaccine injury. Her article falsely claims that Chase’s parents were manipulated by a “conspiracy theorist” named Peter Little (former solicitor and current advocate for the victims of vaccine injury) and a deregistered doctor named Andrew Katelaris, into believing their son’s condition was caused by vaccination. However, some basic research will show Hansen’s deliberate deceit.
Jacinta Walker, known as Cini and Marc Stevens welcomed their son Chase into the world in August 2012. Life started off a little rocky for this much-loved boy with delivery room complications and meconium (the baby’s first faeces) being found in his oesophagus. His Apgar scores (a quick method used to summarise the health of a newborn child) however were 8 at 1 minute, 9 at 5 minutes and 10/10 at the 10 minute mark of life, indicating the best possible physical outcome. Shortly thereafter, he was administered the routine vitamin K injection allegedly without his parents’ consent and within two hours of that shot, he started experiencing seizures. Midwives initially dismissed Cini’s concerns but 10 hours later, Chase was rushed off to the special care nursery where his oxygen levels were observed at a low 82%, indicating he was lacking oxygen supply. Within a few hours he developed jaundice and was put in an incubator where he spent the next 4 days.
In order to find out what may have been causing Chase’s seizures, an MRI was performed on day 4 of life, which showed no signs of brain abnormalities. The following day, his medical records indicate he had a 30-second seizure. Despite this, just 1 ½ hours later, Chase was given the hepatitis B vaccine – a shot that is intended to stop infection with hepatitis B virus (which is typically acquired during unsafe sex and by intravenous drug users sharing needles).
His mother believes he may have mistakenly received two doses of this vaccine as there appears to be two records on the same date, on two different pages of his baby book, one of which is crossed off with the word “error” beside it. The word “error” and the date of the entry that had been crossed off, was in a different handwriting to the one that had been placed in the correct section of his baby book. While this does not prove Chase had been given two doses, it does leave some unanswered questions. It is also interesting to note that the Immunisation Register has no record of this vaccine ever being administered.
Indian Journal of medical ethics THEME – ETHICAL AND LEGAL CHALLENGES OF VACCINES AND VACCINATION Lessons learnt in Japan from adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine: a medical ethics perspective
The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been linked to a number of serious adverse reactions. The range of symptoms is diverse and they develop in a multi-layered manner over an extended period of time.
The argument for the safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine overlooks the following flaws:
(i) no consideration is given to the genetic basis of autoimmune diseases, and arguments that do not take this into account cannot assure the safety of the vaccine;
(ii) the immune evasion mechanisms of HPV, which require the HPV vaccine to maintain an extraordinarily high antibody level for a long period of time for it to be effective, are disregarded;
(iii) the limitations of effectiveness of the vaccine. We also discuss various issues that came up in the course of developing, promoting and distributing the vaccine, as well as the pitfalls encountered in monitoring adverse events and epidemiological verification.
Severely disabled son of anti-vax couple taken by police after dramatic confrontation Sean Davidson
By Sean Davidson
A four-year-old boy with disabilities who was the subject of an amber alert when his parents took him from a Brisbane hospital has been taken by police after they stormed a NSW property and confronted his family.
Police issued an amber alert in late April, after the young boy left with his parents from Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital in Brisbane.
They were later found in New South Wales, and the boy was taken to John Hunter Hospital in Newcastle.
He was returned to his parents care and no charges were laid.
Last night authorities attended a property in Newcastle “regarding a child at risk” and took the boy into their care.
“After extensive negotiations a four-year-old child was taken to John Hunter Hospital for medical assessment,” NSW Police told 9news.com.au in a statement.
Dramatic videos posted online captured the confrontation between authorities and the boy’s parents as he was taken away.
“I understand you’re upset, but we can’t leave here without the child,” an officer can be heard saying.
“We have a court order for his removal,” another officer said.
“You have no warrant to do this,” one person can be heard saying.
A woman, who appeared to be the one filming the incident, is heard claiming the boy’s parents have “so much evidence against them people of malpractice and negligence”.
It’s not clear who she is referring to.
Johns Hopkins Scientist Reveals Shocking Report on Flu Vaccines
by SYLVIA BOOTH HUBBARD
A Johns Hopkins scientist has issued a blistering report on influenza vaccines in the British Medical Journal (BMJ). Peter Doshi, Ph.D., charges that although the vaccines are being pushed on the public in unprecedented numbers, they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Further, says Doshi, the studies that underlie the CDC’s policy of encouraging most people to get a yearly flu shot are often low quality studies that do not substantiate the official claims.
Promoting influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies in the United States, says Doshi of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Drug companies and public officials press for widespread vaccination each fall, offering vaccinations in drugstores and supermarkets. The results have been phenomenal. Only 20 years ago, 32 million doses of influenza vaccine were available in the United States on an annual basis. Today, the total has skyrocketed to 135 million doses.
“The vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza seems to be overstated,” Doshi says. Mandatory vaccination polices have been enacted, often in healthcare facilities, forcing some people to take the vaccine under threat of losing their jobs.
The main assertion of the CDC that fuels the push for flu vaccines each year is that influenza comes with a risk of serious complications which can cause death, especially in senior citizens and those suffering from chronic illnesses. That’s not the case, said Doshi.
When read carefully, the CDC acknowledges that studies finding any perceived reduction in death rates may be due to the “healthy-user effect” — the tendency for healthier people to be vaccinated more than less-healthy people. The only randomized trial of influenza vaccine in older people found no decrease in deaths. “This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes,” says Doshi.
Jonathan Irwin fears for daughter Molly after HPV vaccine side-effects claim Call for government action
19 May 2017
Jack and Jill’s Jonathan Irwin has a strong message for the government this week to stop vilifying worried parents and to list the manufacturers side effects with the HPV vaccine for young girls.
As a worried parent himself Jonathan spoke to the Leinster Leader about the issue, after his daughter Molly has been dogged with ill health since she got the vaccine aged 13.
“My now 17-year-old daughter, who was so athletic before she had this vaccine, has been left bed-ridden, experiencing debilitating, chronic health issues as a result of this vaccine. That’s a fact,” he said.
The vacine is supposed to be a safeguard against cervical cancer. He insists that he is not anti-vacine but he claims parents were not given a full list of the possible side effects from the HSE.
“I want to send a message to the Minister for Health, as my daughter is one of those chronically ill as a result of Gardasil HPV vaccine,” he said.
“Please stop vilifying parents, like me, when we are simply telling the truth and start sharing the full list of side effects of this vaccine, rather than an edited version. I am compelled to speak up about my daughter’s chronic illness in the aftermath of the HPV vaccine Gardasil and to send a message to Minister Harris to please stop vilifying parents, like me, when we are simply telling the truth about our family experience.”
Emergency Alert: Vaccines are Designed to Kill You
Alex Jones speaks with long time infowarriors Dr. Rima E. Laibow and Major General Albert Stubblebine III about how you yourself are under genetic attack by the elite and how you need to stand up and fight back.
CRASH COURSE: Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 in SB277 California
Limited online access to 40 participants! We encourage users to gather in small groups and review the outline and links below prior to meeting so we can teach each other and discover ways to fix this very BROKEN law in a state that is forcing vaccines on our children in order to get childcare and an education! We know adult mandates are coming.
Epidemiologic Tenets of Causality
Epidemiology is the study of the causes of disease. Continually advancing for hundreds of years, it is the scientific discipline which focuses on the identification of cause and effect. Traditionally, it has been associated with the identification of the cause of disease (e.g. the identification of polluted water sources as the cause of gastrointestinal illness in London). It is also associated with the identification of an effective treatment for a disease (e.g. the role of citrus fruit ingestion in the prevention of scurvy).
Over the course of study, epidemiologists have postulated a series of tenets or conditions that must be in place in order for the causative relationship to be identified. These tenets are
Through the use of research timing and research directionality, scientists work to demonstrate these seven tenets, and thereby build a strong causative argument.
With the UK’s national media in a feeding frenzy whipped up by the UK’s Department of Health claiming the current outbreaks of relatively few measles cases are all the fault of Dr Andrew Wakefield, the BBC appears to have slipped up and confirmed that the main plank of the General Medical Council’s case against Dr Wakefield and his two colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital, London, England in 1998 has bitten the dust.
The main plank of the GMC’s case was that there was only one study carried out by Dr Wakefield and his colleagues on the “Lancet 12” children, that it did not have ethics approval and that it was the study reported in February 1998 in the UK’s medical journal “The Lancet”.
Whilst the BBC is meant to be independent and unbiased as a news source, it has been propping up the UK Government and Health Department’s official line for many years over the MMR/autism issue not being caused by vaccines and that Dr Wakefield was wrong.
But who in fact is wrong? If you cannot get your facts right over something pretty major then how can you have your facts right on that issue?
In a report yesterday it appears to have allowed a significant chink in the UK Government’s position. The BBC confirms there were in fact two studies carried out: one was for the Legal Aid Board but it was not the one the GMC panel Chaired by Dr Surendra Kumar decided it was.
The three defendant doctors claimed there were two studies: that the Lancet study was not the Legal Aid Board study and that the Lancet study had a different ethical approval – contrary to the GMC’s allegations.
So why has the BBC not covered this. It is important news. But here we see them including these significant facts as an aside in a different news report. This shows however that the BBC’s health journalists are fully aware of the facts and have a grasp of these important details but do not report their importance and significance to the British public who pay directly to fund the BBC. It is defrauding the British public – they are not getting what they pay vast millions of pounds sterling for.
Further, the complainant to the GMC, Mr Brian Deer, who had been paid by Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times to get “a big story” about the MMR vaccine, withheld crucial lost documents from the GMC investigation, the GMC’s lawyers, the Defendant doctor’s lawyers and everyone else including all the world’s media. The documents date back many years showing that all the three doctors subjected to the GMC investigation did in fact have and were routinely operating under ethics approval 162/95 and not ethics approval 172/96 – which was for a different study never carried out which Dr Kumar and his GMC panel decided was carried out.
Additionally Dr Kumar’s position as GMC panel Chairman demonstrates it was a “Kangaroo Court“. Barely two months after the decision to strike Dr Wakefield from the medical register, Dr Kumar was publicly calling for compulsory MMR vaccination.
Compulsory MMR vaccination is an approach described in 2008 as “stalinist” by the BMA chairman Dr Hamish Meldrum who also said forcing parents to have their children innoculated was “morally and ethically dubious”: No jabs, no school says Labour MP BBC 11 May 2008. Dr Kumar’s strongly held views on MMR vaccination were never disclosed and raised the question of whether Dr Kumar should have been debarred just from sitting on the panel under the Nolan Principles regulating standards in public life in the UK.
Here is what the BBC reported [CHS emphasis added]:
The General Medical Council found Dr Wakefield guilty of serious professional misconduct in 2010 and he was struck off the medical register. It did not investigate whether his findings were right or wrong but focused on the way he carried out his research.
Dr Wakefield’s study considered whether there was a link between the three-in-one MMR vaccine and autism and bowel disease.
It focused on tests carried out on 12 children who had been referred to hospital for gastrointestinal problems.
Dr Wakefield was also paid to carry out another study at the same time to find out if parents who claimed their children were damaged by the MMR vaccine had a case. Some children were involved in both studies.”
Government rejects measles outbreak ‘blame’ – 13 April 2013 Last updated at 07:34
And on CHS we have shown in numerous reports with how numerous times the causation position that MMR vaccine causes autistic conditions has been proven time and again and that there is a considerable body of medical and scientific evidence to that effect. Here are just a few examples:
Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines
US Government In US$20 million Legal Settlement For Vaccine Caused Autism Case
Japanese & British Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism
Ginger Taylor’s List of Research Linking Vaccines to Autism
All is of course ignored by the BBC – cowed into submission and controlled by the UK Government – which holds the purse strings for its budgets.