Physicians for informed consent

“I woke up to the vaccine issue when I was pregnant with my first child. When writing the birth plan for my daughter, it seemed absurd to give her a Hep B vaccine at one day old. So, we skipped that one. Then I began researching vaccines, one by one, and made decisions based on our family circumstances and travel plans. If I had to do it again, I would not have given any vaccines–but it took time and study to arrive at that decision.”
Tiffany Baer, M.D.
PIC Advisor
Full bio:
Dr. Tiffany Baer is a graduate of Sackler Medical School in Tel Aviv, Israel. She received her Board certification in Internal Medicine (2000) and Holistic Medicine (2002). She worked in Occupational Medicine in a private clinic (2000-2007) and at Kaiser Permanente (2007-2014). She completed a five year post graduate medical training program in Anthroposophical Medicine in May 2013. She started a part time private practice in 2010, with special emphasis on Anthroposophical Medicine. The principles of Anthroposophical Medicine include a holistic view of each patient and an expanded view of health which integrates the body, soul and spirit. She prefers to use natural, non-toxic medicines as a primary strategy, but will prescribe pharmaceuticals when necessary.

Physicians for informed consent

Philip Incao, M.D.
Dr. Philip Incao has been studying children’s health, the immune system, infections and vaccinations since 1970, and has given many lectures and written several articles on these topics. His special interest is learning how to apply to practical healing Rudolf Steiner’s invaluable and profound insights into the human being. Dr. Incao wrote two chapters and the concluding summary of the book, The Vaccination Dilemma, edited by Christine Murphy and published by Steiner Books. Dr Incao’s article on vaccinations and the immune system, “Supporting Children’s Health” in the September 1997 issue of Alternative Medicine Digest magazine, generated much interest and was reprinted in Asia, Norway, Canada and Australia. He has served as an expert witness in court of law in several trials concerning vaccinations and has submitted medical opinions in support of parents seeking compensation for their vaccine-damaged children. Dr. Incao studied liberal arts and life sciences at Wesleyan University, and then received his MD from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in 1966. He studied Anthroposophy and Anthroposophic Medicine in Forest Row, England and Arlesheim, Switzerland.
Dr. Incao was the first president of the Physicians’ Association for Anthroposophic Medicine (PAAM) in the US. He teaches in training programs for anthroposophic physicians and training programs for Waldorf teachers. Dr. Philip Incao was one of the first few practitioners of Anthroposophic Medicine in the U.S., and had a busy family practice in upstate New York in a Waldorf school-and biodynamic farming community for 23 years, until 1996. He then moved to Denver to help the growth of anthroposophic medicine in the west. He founded and practiced at the Gilpin Street Holistic Center in Denver until August 2006, when he moved to Crestone, Colorado where he continues to practice part-time in his home.
My process of enlightenment on vaccines was gradual, but two of the most important early factors in my learning process in the 1980’s were the book DPT: A Shot in the Dark by Barbara Loe Fisher and Harris Coulter, originally published by Warner books and the TV documentary, DPT: Vaccine Roulette, produced by Leah Thompson. Both of the above were so well conceived, well-done, and made such powerful, transparent cases against DPT that the establishment backlash was swift and severe.
The book, which got good reviews and was selling well, was taken out of circulation and off the shelves by Warner books and they refused to release the copyright to another publisher. As for the TV documentary, after its initial airing in the DC area, the planned nationwide airing was cancelled and the producer Leah Thompson was blackballed from meaningful TV work for years. She was later honored by the National Vaccine Information Center for her courageous commitment to truth in her reporting.

CDC Requests Your Comments Regarding the MMR and the MMRV Vaccines; Let’s Give Our All to Them Now!

CDC Requests Your Comments Regarding the MMR and the MMRV Vaccines; Let’s Give Our All to Them Now!
Informed Consent
According to the Federal Register publication notice, October 18, 2016, (Pp. 71735-71736):
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-660), as amended by section 708 of Public Law 103-183, added section 2126 to the Public Health Service Act, Section 2126, codified at 42 U.S.C. 300aa-26, requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop and disseminate vaccine information materials for distribution by all health care providers in the United States to any patient (or to the parent or legal representative in the case of a child) receiving vaccines covered under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
That is something most, if not all, health professionals who administer vaccines/vaccinations DO NOT comply with nor abide by since most information disseminated states that vaccines are ‘safe’ when we find contradictory information on all vaccine package inserts, including the MMR-II and MMRV.

12 ‘Must See’ Films To Watch Before Making An Informed Choice About Vaccination!

12 ‘Must See’ Films To Watch Before Making An Informed Choice About Vaccination!

Deadly Immunity –  Robert F. Kennedy Jr. investigates the government cover-up of a mercury/autism scandal

Autism: Made In The USA – In this award-winning documentary film Gary Null explores the causes and solutions to the epidemic of autism in our children. In this film you will see children who have made an extraordinary recovery as they reconnect with the world around them

Bought – We’ve ended up with an entire society getting sicker and sicker while the industrial powers get richer and richer

Trace Amounts –  This film presents interviews with specialists in the field that discuss just how very how dangerous mercury is

Shots In The Dark – Despite the serious and numerous side effects of vaccines, pharmaceutical companies, the medical profession and government authorities continue to bury their heads in the sand, refusing to see a serious problem

The Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccines – In the developed world we have the sickest generations of children – with many new chronic disorders and the highest levels of vaccinations and vaccines ever. This is not coincidence. Vaccines affect the normal functioning of your and your child’s immune system and cause chronic disorders in a significant proportion of the population:

The Vaccinated Girls – The experiences of 3 girls suffering from serious health conditions caused by Gardasil:  facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice/vi…

The Greater Good –   This documentary tells the rarely heard stories of three families adversely impacted by vaccination.

Vaccine Nation – In this documentary film, award-winning investigative film director Dr. Gary Null challenges the basic health claims by government health agencies and pharmaceutical firms that vaccines are perfectly safe. This is one of the most critical questions facing today’s children and future generations to come

Cervical Cancer Vaccine:  Is It Safe? –  Young Women In Ireland Speak Of Their Debilitating Conditions Due To The Gardasil Vaccine

DPT: Vaccine Roulette – Documentary On The DPT vaccination produced in 1982

Hear The Silence – Drama based on the true story about the MMR vaccine and its links to autism

“Informed consent is meaningless without the right to say: “No!”. – Rima E. Laibow, MD

“Informed consent is meaningless without the right to say: “No!”. – Rima E. Laibow, MD
After the horrors of the Second World War which included the murder and abuse of millions with the complicity of the “health care” authorities of various warring parties, the international community developed conventions and declarations to the end that “Never again!” would the health system be used to harm either individuals or whole populations.
Among these were the Universal Declaration of Rights, Geneva Declaration and the Nuremberg Code.
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person… No one shall be subjected to … inhuman or degrading treatment… Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights… No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence…” –
“I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat…”
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.” –
Informed consent may be defined:
“Informed consent is a process for getting permission before conducting a healthcare intervention on a person… In the United Kingdom and countries such as Malaysia and Singapore, informed consent in medical procedures requires proof as to the standard of care to expect as a recognised standard of acceptable professional practice (the Bolam Test), that is, what risks would a medical professional usually disclose in the circumstances (see Loss of right in English law). Arguably, this is “sufficient consent” rather than “informed consent.” … Medicine in the United States, Australia, and Canada take a more patient-centeric approach to “informed consent.” Informed consent in these jurisdictions requires doctors to disclose significant risks, as well as risks of particular importance to that patient. This approach combines an objective (the reasonable patient) and subjective (this particular patient) approach.” –

THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be
so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element
of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and
should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter
involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter
element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental
subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment;
the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably
to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each
individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and
responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity

Ethical Codes & Research Standards