LinkedIn censors interview with British cardiologist who criticized Pfizer vaccine data coverup


inkedIn has decided that a video about the efficacy of Covid vaccines, originally posted on YouTube and featuring Dr. Aseem Malhotra was violating its “professional community policies.”

Interviewer Maajid Nawaz posted a screenshot of the message he received from LinkedIn on Facebook, informing him of the removal and that only he can now see the post.

LBC presenter Maajid Nawaz discusses major concerns around vaccine mandates with Consultant Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra who says the corporate capture of public health is at the root of the healthcare crisis

Personal thoughts on Covid – Alex Pestana

These modellers and their assumptions were wildly inaccurate and clearly CRAP…! 💩

But they did come in very handy for state sponsored FEAR campaigns, lockdowns and draconian restrictions, designed to scare, manipulate and unduly influence whole populations of unsuspecting people, don’t you think…? 🤭

No alternative text description for this image


Random Thoughts on Covid – Suzanne Lugthart

No alternative text description for this image
One of the things that befuddles me *a lot* is how, from 7th July to 21st October 2021, there were MORE people in hospital (allegedly) for COVID than there were on the same dates in 2020. On 12th & 13th September 2021 the number was actually 10x that of a year before, pre vaccine. Many hypotheses but no answers on that one.

So, as the media set about brainwashing the gullible public into telling opinion pollsters that Plan B is long overdue and another lockdown over Black Friday is our only way to save Cyber Monday, the number to watch in the weeks ahead is the rate of growth in hospitalisations.

Last Autumn things ramped up really fast. By the end of October the number of people in hospital “with” COVID had multiplied five-fold. This October the increase was 29%, albeit from a higher base.

The numbers will go up. It’s peak winter respiratory season. But right now hospitalisations are pretty flat. I think Cyber Monday, and indeed Christmas, New Year and the rest of time, may be saved no matter what Sky News, the BBC, public health sadists and other gloomsters might tell you

Suzanne Lugthart

Award Winning Research & Insight Strategist (eBay, ITV, Etsy, Rightmove, Macmillan Cancer Support), unofficial data warrior for the travel industry


LinkedIn sued by users who say it hacked their e-mail accounts

LinkedIn sued by users who say it hacked their e-mail accounts

Plaintiffs file a class-action suit on behalf of LinkedIn members.

  by       –    Sept 22 2013, 4:25am +0300

Four plaintiffs filed a class-action suit in US district court in San Jose on Friday claiming that LinkedIn used its members’ identities without consent and broke into their third-party e-mail accounts to send promotional e-mails to the members’ contact lists. The 46-page complaint details many instances in which users complained to LinkedIn about this practice, especially in instances where LinkedIn sent e-mails to “the addresses of spouses, clients, opposing counsel, etc.”

LinkedIn, the plaintiffs claim, “provides no functional way to stop multiple subsequent advertising e-mails from being sent.” The plaintiffs say that the extent of the data-gathering was not adequately conveyed in the Terms of Service.

“If a LinkedIn user leaves an external e-mail account open,” the complaint continues, “LinkedIn pretends to be that user and downloads the e-mail addresses contained anywhere in that account to Linkedln’s servers. LinkedIn is able to download these addresses without requesting the password for the external e-mail accounts or obtaining users’ consent.”

This “hacking” appears to stem from LinkedIn’s “Grow your network on LinkedIn” page encouraging users to click a button on the page, which allows the company to slurp up the contacts list of the third-party e-mail account with which the member signed up, if the member is logged into that e-mail account in the same browser. If the user is not logged into their third-party e-mail account, LinkedIn allegedly requests the password for that account “to ostensibly verify the identity of the user,” although the company then apparently uses the password to get access to the user’s contacts.

The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial and want a federal judge to halt LinkedIn’s practice and pay its members for use of their identities in promoting the company. “LinkedIn’s scheme was initiated without obtaining the consent of or compensating Plaintiffs or Class members for their part in promoting LinkedIn’s products and services,” the complaint reads. “Plaintiffs and Class members each have a right of publicity under common law, which entitles them to be compensated for the use of their names, likenesses, and/or photographs.”

The plaintiffs did not specify the damages they sought, but noted that “At a minimum, LinkedIn places a value of ten dollars for each e-mail sent to a recipient containing an endorsement. LinkedIn charges its own members ten dollars ($10) per e-mail sent by its members to another member.”

LinkedIn gave a statement on Saturday to AllThingsD, Bloomberg, and the Los Angeles Times saying that it would fight the charges, which it believes are unfair. “LinkedIn is committed to putting our members first,” LinkedIn wrote, “which includes being transparent about how we protect and utilize our members’ data. We believe that the legal claims in this lawsuit are without merit, and we intend to fight it vigorously.”