Why Cell Phone Radiation Danger is Serious Science Tells the Story

Why Cell Phone Radiation Danger is Serious Science Tells the Story

Despite what the telecom industry may want us to believe, if we do the research, we find there is now an overwhelming abundance of independent, peer-reviewed studies telling us that cell phone radiation is dangerous for our health. The research links cell phone radiation with many different disorders and diseases.

Cell Phones & Cancer

Researchers of the 2012 Bioinitiative Report agree that approximately ten years of cell phone use may lead to tumors.  In particular, there are significant studies that directly correlate RF radiation from cell phones with brain tumors.

Studies report that:

  • The chance of developing a brain tumor goes up as much as 40% after a decade of cell phone use.
  • People are 5 times more likely to develop a brain tumor if they began using a cell phone before the age of 20.
  • People have twice the risk of developing the cancer known as “Glioma”, if they use their cell phones for half an hour a day for more than a decade.
  • People using cell phones for 2000 hours have 240% greater risk for malignant brain tumors.

A significant report was released in 2009 by the International EMF Collaborative, a team of international EMF scientists and activists, entitled “Cell Phones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern, Science, Spin and the Truth Behind Interphone”.

Another study by an Israeli research group found that there’s recently been a sharp 4-fold increase in malignant tumors of the parotid gland on the side of the face the cell phone users generally hold the phone. Parotid tumors have historically been very rare and have shown up in people after the age of 50. Most cases since 2001 have occurred in people under the age of 20.

Read more on cell phones and cancer.

 

 

Vaccine News – VaxXed Tour: Forrest and Dr. Suzanne on Genetics and Epigenetics

VaxXed Tour: Forrest and Dr. Suzanne on Genetics and Epigenetics
Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Forrest Maready discuss genetics, and how epigenetic influences (which include vaccination) have a greater effect on health outcomes than the genetic profile one is born with.

VaxXed Stories: Jane, CA

VaxXed Stories: Sophia in Texas
Mary and Micah recount the varying degrees of vaccine reactions in 3 of their 4 children. Their two eldest children, Claire and Judah, experienced a downturn in their immune health following their routine childhood vaccinations. But most concerning was their daughter Sophia’s reaction after her 12 month shots. After receiving multiple shots, Sophia was clearly unwell even before leaving the doctor’s office. Her demeanor completely changed within the days after, losing her appetite, experiencing gastrointestinal issues and spiking an uncontrollable fever. Soon after the fever came down, Sophia had a grand mal seizure. Sophia experienced subsequent seizures and also has developed pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorder associated with streptococcus. After experiencing the damage that vaccines cause, Mary and Micah chose not to vaccinate their fourth child, whose development and health is far superior to that of his vaccinated siblings.

VaxXed Stories: Cameron in Texas
Cameron was a normally developing 6 year old boy. HIs mother Lorraine brought Cameron and his two sibling to receive the flu shot. Shortly after Cameron developed neck pain, fever, stomach pains and lethargy. He began to have seizures and ended up in the hospital in a coma. Not expecting Cameron to live, his family was relieved when he began to recover. But he did not recover fully to his previous state of health. Cameron continued to have seizures, damaging him further to the point of losing speech.

VaxXed Stories: Isabella in Texas
Isabella and her twin were born a early. Isabella received antibiotics at birth because of low white blood cell count. Her sister did not receive this intervention, but both were vaccinated in the hospital. Within days Isabella developed reflux. Both girls received multiple vaccines at 19 months. Isabella reacted severely to these shots and began to regress, eventually receiving an autism diagnosis.

How Much Is Taught on Vaccines In Medical School?
Six doctors who have administered vaccines in their practiced are all asked the same question. When you were in medical school, how much education regarding vaccines was provided before you were permitted to administer them? Interviews, camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

VaxXed Stories: Kelly in Texas
Kim lost her baby daughter Kelly in 1980 at 2 months old. Her death was ruled SIDS. Kim came to the realization years later, and after extensive research ,that the vaccination her daughter had received within the few weeks prior was very likely the cause of Kelley’s death.

VaxXed Tour: Dr Brain Hooker on “The Phone Calls”
In an interview from the VaxXed bus at the CDC rally in Atlanta, Dr. Brian Hooker recounts his phone calls and interaction with CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson. Dr. Hooker also gives us more insight into the ongoing corruption at the CDC.

VaxXed Stories: Emme in Texas
Terry, a veterinary opthamologist was aware of the dangers of vaccines for animals. Unfortunately she wasn’t aware that dangers were just as present with human vaccines. Her daughter Emme received her vaccines per the schedule. Emme was developing normally until she received multiple vaccines at 12 months which included the MMR. She regressed losing speech and developing abnormal behaviors. With eventual testing, they discovered Emme’s titers for rubella were astronomically high, which has been shown to be a common theme in other autistic individuals who have regressed after the MMR.

VaxXed Stories: Draven in Texas
Immediately after his 2 month vaccines Draven developed a severe allergy to his mother’s breastmilk, breaking out in hives. He continued to develop allergies to a myriad of foods and suffers asthma, rashes and congestion.

****************************************************

The Rapture – Pastor David Lankford

ONE FOR ISRAEL Ministry – Jewish Johnathan Ben-David forgave his killer and you would not believe why!!!

How to accept Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour

Testimony by Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty

1 Corinthians 15 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 by which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

Hebrews 6 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
2 of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
3 And this will we do, if God permit.
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6 if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
8 but that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

53 – Old testament Prophecy about Jesus

1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant,and as a root out of a dry ground:he hath no form nor comeliness;and when we shall see him,there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He is despised and rejected of men;a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief:and we hid as it were our faces from him;he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he hath borne our griefs,and carried our sorrows:yet we did esteem him stricken,smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions,he was bruised for our iniquities:the chastisement of our peace was upon him;and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray;we have turned every one to his own way;and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,yet he opened not his mouth:he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter,and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb,so he openeth not his mouth.
8 He was taken from prison and from judgment:and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living:for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
9 And he made his grave with the wicked,and with the rich in his death;because he had done no violence,neither was any deceit in his mouth.
10 Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him;he hath put him to grief:when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin,he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days,and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.
11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied:by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many;for he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great,and he shall divide the spoil with the strong;because he hath poured out his soul unto death:and he was numbered with the transgressors;and he bare the sin of many,and made intercession for the transgressors.

The Only Sin That Leads To Hell – Kenneth E Hagin

 

10 radiation-emitting cell phone brands you need to throw out immediately

10 radiation-emitting cell phone brands you need to throw out immediately

There are two types of electromagnetic radiation:

  • Ionizing – high frequency and high energy (x-rays, cosmic rays, etc.

  • Non-ionizing – low frequency and low energy (radio frequency, power frequency, etc.)

Cell phones transmit a form of non-ionizing radiation from their antennas. This transmittance is how wireless calls and WiFi connections occur. Body tissues close to it absorb this energy. (1)
The radiation is increased during active phone calls, but the exposure continues long afterward. A study was published in 2009 that measured the pelvic bone density in 150 men, all of whom wore their phones attached to their belt for 15 hours a day for about six years. The scientists found the bone mineral density was decreased on the side of the pelvis where the cell was carried.
In one case, a woman with no predisposition for cancer became afflicted with multi-focal breast cancer. Her cancer specialists connected the dots, and the pattern and distribution of the cancerous cells outlined the shape of her cell phone. This seemed peculiar enough; then the woman explained that she is continuously tucking her phone into her bra.

CDC is hiding a massive collection of damning scientific evidence proving vaccines are linked to autism… shocking details from the recorded phone calls of Dr. William Thompson

The Berlin Wall of vaccine injury denialism is about to crumble. Although every effort is being made by the vaccine establishment to crush and silence the truth about vaccine injuries — including heavy-handed censorship of the “VAXXED” documentary — the truth is that vaccines cause autism in some children.

That fundamental scientific reality has been desperately — and criminally — suppressed by the CDC and vaccine pushing propagandists whose pseudoscience dogma infects every powerful institution across a corrupt political regime steeped in medical totalitarianism.

In 2014, a top CDC scientist named Dr. William Thompson confessed to taking part in a massive scientific cover-up to alter data that demonstrated a link between vaccines and autism. He not only went public with a statement of confession, he also spoke at length to Dr. Brian Hooker, now regarded as the key investigator in the #CDCwhistleblower phenomenon.

What follows below is a partial transcript from a series of phone calls that took place between Dr. Brian Hooker and Dr. William Thompson in 2016. Here, you’ll learn that the CDC is sitting on a treasure trove of scientific evidence proving the vaccine-autism link, yet unless Dr. Thompson is called to testify before Congress (or a federal judge), this secret will likely remain deliberately hidden from public view by a criminal CDC whose tactics of censorship, intimidation and deception more closely resemble a criminal mafia than an institution of science and reason.

This transcript is sourced from an extraordinary book that I highly recommend, called Vaccine Whistleblower – Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC by Esq. Kevin Barry and Dr. Boyd E Haley.

From the book:

Dr. Thompson: Right now I am sitting in a very pretty position in terms of providing you a lot of information and let me tell you what is um just became available and I was talking to Marshalyn and my team lead, my immediate supervisor, this week and I was telling them what should be done because it is just outrageous. You will die when you hear this.

We have eight hundred kids with autism that have been given the ADI, well that’s autism diagnostic interviews for the parents, right, so, all of them have been give the ADI and the ADOS. So, they’ve all been given these instruments, all confirmed cases of autism. Um, we have population controls of similar size and we have disability controls of similar size. Now, this is the study I was brought in to clean up. Diana Schendel left town, left for Denmark, and I was brought in to clean it up. It’s a big mess but regardless, there is now data available. Ya know, and there is going to be more data available. We’re going to have twelve hundred kids with autism as part of this uh study, um, with all their medical records and all their vaccine records abstracted. So, um, what’s amazing, now this is what’s going to be shocking to you, it shocked the crap out of me. They have ya know six different sites interviewing data and um they all put in proposals to do studies. So far there is about sixty proposals in, um, for people ready to do studies. Not a single one of them looks at vaccines, not one! [laughing] So, I, well, I ripped into these people this week. And I’m like, “These vaccine studies have to be done. This is the largest case-control study you could ever do. They’re all objectively identified as kids with autism. You have the vaccine records.” And what I just, and I, after seeing the Posey hearing I was like, “What are you …” I was like, “How are you guys going to answer the question when you know they want these environmental studies and want to look at all these risk factors. What are you going to say when you have twelve hundred autism cases and a bunch of controls and you never looked at vaccines and you have all their vaccine records?” [laughing] . . .

Dr. Hooker: Oh my goodness . . .

Dr. Thompson: And we have their prenatals, we have all the prenatal stuff that wasn’t [unintelligible].

Dr. Hooker: I mean, this is like Disneyland.

Dr. Thompson: It is like Disneyland. So here’s the point, here’s what I said to them. I said, I told them, “This study needs to be done.” I said, “It should be contracted out to some independent organization,” and I said uh, “Groups like SafeMinds should be included in the study and uh we [laughing] we’re insane to be sitting on this data and not um ya know have an independent group, independent of the CDC, completely,” I said. CDC not even touch it, not even have a coauthor on it. Anyway, so, the point I’m trying to make I want to give you the name of the study so you can start telling people who to ask questions about this study because this data is sitting ready to go. No one has analyzed it yet. And they don’t really want people to know that this data exists, again. Ya know, you were the first person to get the MMR/autism—I just can’t believe we actually got you that data.

Dr. Hooker: That’s incredible to me. I’m very thankful; let’s put it that way.

Dr. Thompson: It’s mind-boggling that um it sat on one CD and actually the guy that had the one CD just came down with pancreatic cancer. Literally, that study data could have been gone for good. Anyways, so the name of the study is The Study to Explore Early Development. It’s called SEED. What?

Dr. Hooker: SEED? S-E-E-D.

Dr. Thompson: Do you have a computer in front of you?

Dr. Hooker: Yes I do.

Dr. Thompson: Just search for CDC and then SEED and then autism and you should be able to pull up a description of the study.

Dr. Hooker: Okay, hold on . . . SEED, autism spectrum disorders. Okay, there it is! Okay, let me bookmark this while I’ve got it.

Dr. Thompson: Well that’s the gold mine. That’s the mother-load of mother-loads. Because it doesn’t matter what Insel does. He doesn’t have confirmed cases of autism in his study. His study will probably be some type of record review where they look at kids that have autism in the records.

Dr. Hooker: So, is this data that I would eventually be able to access myself?

Dr. Thompson: Well, right now it’s under lock and key and only the principle investigator can get to access it. But if you can get Posey to ask questions about this study, um, this will become, the, ya know, like [laughing] the leak in the dam.

Dr. Hooker: Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, here there is a tab on data and statistics that I am looking at okay and I see that, so. . . .

Dr. Thompson: Now there’s one study that has been published from it, just describing the study and the sample so, it is, Diana Schendel is the first author, 2012 paper, and you can just look it up. It might actually be on the website, I’m not sure. But, it’s a Diana Schendel paper and it just pissed me off. I read it for the first time on Friday and she references two of her papers with Thorsen. I was just like, are you guys are f**king insane, I’m like, are you guys really this f**king insane.

Dr. Hooker: Well here it is. I looked it up on PubMed. It’s in JADD, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities.

Dr. Thompson: That’s the one paper that describes the first sample. There’s SEED1 and SEED2.

Dr. Hooker: They piled it one. There’s like twenty coauthors.

Dr. Thompson: Yeah, it’s all the Pis [Principal Investigators], everyone. It’s a big study; there is six sites that are contributing data. But, it is the mother-load. Oh and then you know what else I found out this week? I almost went nuts.

Dr. Hooker: We can’t have you do that again, dude!

Dr. Thompson: No, I know. Do you know the name Lisa Croen?

Dr. Hooker: Yes I know Lisa Croen, she’s in California.

Dr. Thompson: She’s with Northern California Kaiser. So, Diana Schendel is still involved in these studies. There are fifty proposals. One of the studies on um prenatal infection and I started asking questions. I’m like, “Who’s doing the prenatal infections study?” She said, “Lisa and Lisa has invited Diana to participate.” I’m like, “You are having Diana Schendel as a coauthor on a childhood infections paper while she’s in Denmark with her boyfriend?!” [laughing] I just, you don’t know how insane this all is. It’s absolutely insane. Marshalyn and my supervisor is Laura Scheve. I don’t know if you’ve seen that name.

Dr. Hooker: Yes, I’ve seen Laura’s name before.

Dr. Thompson: So anyways, the two of them are looking at them and they’re like, “Maybe you’re right; maybe that is a bad idea.” [laughing]

Dr. Hooker: You think?! I think ya know Diana is putting herself in danger just by showing her head.

Dr. Thompson: I could not believe that she was there. I could not believe she was there.

Dr. Hooker: Oh my goodness, that is just crazy.

Dr. Thompson: So anyways, the bottom line is I want to get you the best data available. That is the best data available. No one has analyzed it yet. If you can get someone. And I just, Brian, you have to get someone other than you asking these questions because you are like, ya know, they just. . .

Dr. Hooker: I am damaged goods, I understand. No, and I do have some people in mind.

Dr. Thompson: You just have to feed these questions around to different people and have different people ask these questions and ya know, so it’s prenatal, I would tell there is both maternal influenza prenatal records; there’s rhogam . . .

Dr. Hooker: Really, rhogam . . . okay.

Dr. Thompson: Yeah, it’s all there. Um, but I’ve never looked at it yet. But I could actually go into the database right now and do a frequency count on things. But, I’m not going to do anything like that right now. I’m just really trying to sort this all out. I’m trying to, ya know I’m being in trouble because I’m blowing up and stuff like that and I’m getting really agitated and I just have to settle down.

Dr. Hooker: Right, you had mentioned on 1 think on a previous voicemail something about maybe taking a leave of absence or um or uh putting in for a new assignment.

Dr. Thompson: Yeah, I was considering getting detailed out of the branch. The downside to that is I would no longer have access to this type of information that I am sharing with you. I’m learning more and more. As I ask more and more, I’m learning more and more. I am, these people are like in one big bubble, they uh and their bubble is getting smaller and smaller. But, these Pis, it’s two Pis that are really tight with Diana. That’s Lisa Croen and Dani Fallin, you know, Dani Fallin F-A-L-L-I-N.

Dr. Hooker: That’s a name that is not familiar to me.

Dr. Thompson: She is a genetics expert and she is at Hopkins and um . . .

Dr. Hooker: And Lisa Croen as well.

Dr. Thompson: Now Dani really likes Diana and is tight with Diana because we’ve been collecting genetic information from all of these

subjects. All of these subjects have bloods drawn and swabs. Here’s the other crazy thing, the CDC has not been able to get resources to sequence all these kids that we have. We have samples where you could sequence every single kid. And only a couple hundred have been sequenced and it is because Dani Fallin went and got money from the NIH. And I’m just like are you serious, you guys can’t go out and get a small sum of money and it’s not even a lot of money, it would just be like a couple of million dollars. And they could get every single kid sequenced; they’re sitting on these. Yes, they’re sitting on these samples.

Dr. Hooker: Can you imagine what we could do with them?

Dr. Thompson: Oh my God! When I heard the Congressmen asking these questions, what are you guys doing? We are sitting on this gold mine. Here is the deal, the CDC is they’re paralyzed. The whole system is paralyzed right now. And the whole branch is paralyzed and it’s becoming more paralyzed. There’s less and less and less being done as the place is coming to a grinding halt. Really, what we need is for Congress to come in and say give us the data and we’re going to have an independent contractor do it and bring in the autism advocates and have them intimately involved in the study.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/053599_CDC_William_Thompson_scientific_fraud.html#ixzz45FKs788q

Mind Control by Cell Phone

Mind Control by Cell Phone

May 7, 2008 |By R. Douglas Fields

Electromagnetic signals from cell phones can change your brainwaves and behavior. But don’t break out the aluminum foil head shield just yet.

Hospitals and airplanes ban the use of cell phones, because their electromagnetic transmissions can interfere with sensitive electrical devices. Could the brain also fall into that category? Of course, all our thoughts, sensations and actions arise from bioelectricity generated by neurons and transmitted through complex neural circuits inside our skull. Electrical signals between neurons generate electric fields that radiate out of brain tissue as electrical waves that can be picked up by electrodes touching a person’s scalp. Measurements of such brainwaves in EEGs provide powerful insight into brain function and a valuable diagnostic tool for doctors. Indeed, so fundamental are brainwaves to the internal workings of the mind, they have become the ultimate, legal definition drawing the line between life and death.

Brainwaves change with a healthy person’s conscious and unconscious mental activity and state of arousal. But scientists can do more with brainwaves than just listen in on the brain at work-they can selectively control brain function by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This technique uses powerful pulses of electromagnetic radiation beamed into a person’s brain to jam or excite particular brain circuits.

Although a cell phone is much less powerful than TMS, the question still remains: Could the electrical signals coming from a phone affect certain brainwaves operating in resonance with cell phone transmission frequencies? After all, the caller’s cerebral cortex is just centimeters away from radiation broadcast from the phone’s antenna. Two studies provide some revealing news.

The first, led by Rodney Croft, of the Brain Science Institute, Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia, tested whether cell phone transmissions could alter a person’s brainwaves. The researchers monitored the brainwaves of 120 healthy men and women while a Nokia 6110 cell phone—one of the most popular cell phones in the world—was strapped to their head. A computer controlled the phone’s transmissions in a double-blind experimental design, which meant that neither the test subject nor researchers knew whether the cell phone was transmitting or idle while EEG data were collected. The data showed that when the cell phone was transmitting, the power of a characteristic brain-wave pattern called alpha waves in the person’s brain was boosted significantly. The increased alpha wave activity was greatest in brain tissue directly beneath to the cell phone, strengthening the case that the phone was responsible for the observed effect.
Alpha Waves of Brain Alpha waves fluctuate at a rate of eight to 12 cycles per second (Hertz). These brainwaves reflect a person’s state of arousal and attention. Alpha waves are generally regarded as an indicator of reduced mental effort, “cortical idling” or mind wandering. But this conventional view is perhaps an oversimplification. Croft, for example, argues that the alpha wave is really regulating the shift of attention between external and internal inputs. Alpha waves increase in power when a person shifts his or her consciousness of the external world to internal thoughts; they also are the key brainwave signatures of sleep.      Cell Phone Insomnia If cell phone signals boost a person’s alpha waves, does this nudge them subliminally into an altered state of consciousness or have any effect at all on the workings of their mind that can be observed in a person’s behavior? In the second study, James Horne and colleagues at the Loughborough University Sleep Research Centre in England devised an experiment to test this question. The result was surprising. Not only could the cell phone signals alter a person’s behavior during the call, the effects of the disrupted brain-wave patterns continued long after the phone was switched off.

“This was a completely unexpected finding,” Horne told me. “We didn’t suspect any effect on EEG [after switching off the phone]. We were interested in studying the effect of mobile phone signals on sleep itself.” But it quickly became obvious to Horne and colleagues in preparing for the sleep-research experiments that some of the test subjects had difficulty falling asleep.

Horne and his colleagues controlled a Nokia 6310e cell phone—another popular and basic phone—attached to the head of 10 healthy but sleep-deprived men in their sleep research lab. (Their sleep had been restricted to six hours the previous night.) The researchers then monitored the men’s brainwaves by EEG while the phone was switched on and off by remote computer, and also switched between “standby,” “listen” and “talk” modes of operation for 30 minute intervals on different nights. The experiment revealed that after the phone was switched to “talk” mode a different brain-wave pattern, called delta waves (in the range of one to four Hertz), remained dampened for nearly one hour after the phone was shut off. These brainwaves are the most reliable and sensitive marker of stage two sleep—approximately 50 percent of total sleep consists of this stage—and the subjects remained awake twice as long after the phone transmitting in talk mode was shut off. Although the test subjects had been sleep-deprived the night before, they could not fall asleep for nearly one hour after the phone had been operating without their knowledge.

Although this research shows that cell phone transmissions can affect a person’s brainwaves with persistent effects on behavior, Horne does not feel there is any need for concern that cell phones are damaging. The arousal effects the researchers measured are equivalent to about half a cup of coffee, and many other factors in a person’s surroundings will affect a night’s sleep as much or more than cell phone transmissions.

“The significance of the research,” he explained, is that although the cell phone power is low, “electromagnetic radiation can nevertheless have an effect on mental behavior when transmitting at the proper frequency.” He finds this fact especially remarkable when considering that everyone is surrounded by electromagnetic clutter radiating from all kinds of electronic devices in our modern world. Cell phones in talk mode seem to be particularly well-tuned to frequencies that affect brainwave activity. “The results show sensitivity to low-level radiation to a subtle degree. These findings open the door by a crack for more research to follow. One only wonders if with different doses, durations, or other devices, would there be greater effects?”

Croft of Swinburne emphasizes that there are no health worries from these new findings. “The exciting thing about this research is that it allows us to have a look at how you might modulate brain function and this [look] tells us something about how the brain works on a fundamental level.” In other words, the importance of this work is in illuminating the fundamental workings of the brain-scientists can now splash away with their own self-generated electromagnetic waves and learn a great deal about how brainwaves respond and what they do.

Mind Matters is edited by Jonah Lehrer, the science writer behind the blog The Frontal Cortex and the book Proust was a Neuroscientist.

Cell phone radiation breast cancer link – New study raises grave concerns

Cell phone radiation breast cancer link – New study raises grave concerns

(NaturalNews) A new study raises concerns of a possible association between cell phone radiation exposure and breast cancer in young women.
The research team, led by Dr. Lisa Bailey, a former president of the American Cancer Society’s California Division and one of California’s top breast surgeons, studied four young women – aged from 21 to 39 years old – with multifocal invasive breast cancer.
The researchers observed that all the patients developed tumors in areas of their breasts next to where they carried their cell phones, often for up to 10 hours per day, for several years. None of the patients had a family history of breast cancer. They all tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 – breast cancer genes linked to about one-half of breast cancer cases – and they had no other known breast cancer risks.
Imaging of the young girls’ breasts revealed a clustering of multiple tumor foci in the part of the breast directly under where their cell phones touched their body.
Tiffany Frantz, one of the young girls involved in the study, said that she had no idea of the risks involved. “I put my cellphone right in my bra,” said Miss Frantz in a TV interview that also won an Emmy. However, her mother Traci Frantz immediately made the connection right after Tiffany developed breast cancer at age 21. “We never took it seriously until after she was diagnosed.” Her tumors were exactly where her cellphone had been kept in her bra for about six years. No one ever told us that this was a very bad idea.” said Traci Frantz. Surgeons had to remove Tiffany’s left breast. Her family had no genetic or other risk factors.

Dangers of other EMF exposures

Cell phones emit a form of electromagnetic field (EMF) called radio frequency radiation. This radiation exposure has previously been linked to brain tumors, cancer, cardiovascular disease, depression and other serious illnesses.
Studies show that other EMF exposures from similar, supposedly harmless, everyday appliances and devices can also be dangerous. The recently published “BioInitiative Report 2012” concluded, “there is sufficient evidence from in vitro and animal studies, from human biomarker studies, from occupational and light-at-night studies, and a single longitudinal study with appropriate collection of urine samples to conclude that high MF (magnetic field) exposure may be a risk factor for breast cancer.” The report’s authors went on to say that “there is rather strong evidence from case-control studies that longterm, high occupational exposure (over 10 milliGauss) to ELF (Extremely low frequency) magnetic fields is a risk factor for breast cancer.”

EMF safety standards outdated

Currently, the main international guidance comes from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. These guidelines offered no protection for Traci Frantz and others who unknowingly put their health at risk by carrying their cell phone in close proximity to their body.
Nor do these guidelines protect individuals from high magnetic field exposures in the home and workplace. The existing exposure limit for magnetic fields is 904 mG in the US – some 90 times higher than the levels at which independent studies have observed adverse biological effects!
Even cell phone manufacturers suggest that users keep their cell phone at least one-half inch or more away from any body part. But these recommendations, lost in the small print in user manuals, are not heeded.
Current safety limits can no longer be said to be protective of public health, and they should be replaced.
Sources for this article include:
http://www.bioinitiative.org
http://www.sbwire.com
http://www.hindawi.com
http://science.naturalnews.com