Vaccine News – Aluminium dans les vaccins : le rapport qui dérange

To my friends in Australia: the vaccine war deepens
The string of abuses laid on citizens of Australia by their government grows almost week by week.
Now, parental rights to raise children, without interference from the State, is under a new form of attack. This must be resisted.
Schools are bringing doctors on board, as a permanent feature. Young children will be subjected to medical diagnoses and treatment, without consent or approval from parents, even if those parents actively object. The State is stealing the role of guardian.
The Herald Sun reports. Read carefully:
“DOCTORS will have the power to treat students as young as 12 in schools even if parents refuse their consent.”
“GPs will consult at 100 Victoria high schools for up to one day a week as part of a $43.8 million program.”
“Guidelines released on Thursday show that even if a parent ‘expressly states’ that a doctor should not [examine] their child, the GP can if they deem the teen mature enough.”
“’Any student who wants to see the GP will be permitted to make an appointment,’ the policy said.”
“The GP will decide if the young person is mature enough to provide consent to any medical treatment for the prevailing issue.”
A young child “giving consent?” This is supposed to be “informed consent” when facing off with an adult doctor?
The handwriting is on the wall. Multiple vaccines will be given, to “bring children up to State standards.” This whole operation is, in fact, a front for forced vaccination. That’s the goal.

Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children
Authors’ conclusions
Influenza vaccines are efficacious in preventing cases of influenza in children older than two years of age, but little evidence is available for children younger than two years of age. There was a difference between vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, partly due to differing datasets, settings and viral circulation patterns. No safety comparisons could be carried out, emphasising the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of vaccine safety data in future studies. In specific cases, influenza vaccines were associated with serious harms such as narcolepsy and febrile convulsions. It was surprising to find only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years, given current recommendations to vaccinate healthy children from six months of age in the USA, Canada, parts of Europe and Australia. If immunisation in children is to be recommended as a public health policy, large-scale studies assessing important outcomes, and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required. The degree of scrutiny needed to identify all global cases of potential harms is beyond the resources of this review.
This review includes trials funded by industry. An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry-funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favourable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in the light of this finding.

Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines
2.) Dr. Moulden, we understand that you have made a revolutionary discovery. Can you tell us about it?
I would be happy to.

Through my extensive research and my work throughout the years, I have discovered that vaccinations are causing impaired blood flow (ischemia) to brain and body from clinically silent to death. These are strokes – across the board for all of us. I have reason to believe that all are being affected and all vaccinations ARE causing the overwhelming rise in autism, specific learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, sudden infant death, gulf war syndrome, dementia, seizure disorders, some cancers it would appear, and much much more.

American Schools Faltering Under the Weight of Mental Health Issues in Kids
By Anne Dachel
While so many parents have been diligently trying to get the message across to the world that injecting known toxins into babies and pregnant women is destroying children everywhere, the perpetrators of this crime against humanity have come up with their own version of reality.
The latest really big lie about the damage done to our kids
For the last several months I’ve been compiling stories about the disaster zones our schools are becoming. Out-of-control behavior now routinely seen in students is being dealt with desperate measures. Physical restraints and seclusion rooms are part of the typical school environment. “Behavior coaches” and off-duty police are regular members of the staff in elementary schools. “Sensory rooms” where students can calm down are an accepted part of schools. Special ed is not just about learning disabilities but also about “mental health problems.” Schools are linking up with local mental health agencies to try and address student behavior. Sped students are being excluded from schools across Britain and Ireland in soaring numbers, even down to pre-school aged children, because of behavior.
The evidence that something is horribly wrong with today’s children is worldwide and it’s growing. U.S. Health officials have been silent on these issues, but I see a change happening. Actually, it’s been several years in the making, but it’s just now in the news everywhere in our country.
WHY ARE OUR KIDS SO DYSFUNCTIONAL? SIMPLE: They’ve experienced CHILDHOOD TRAUMA at the hands of their parents.

Aluminium dans les vaccins : le rapport qui dérange
Florence Méréo – 21 septembre 2017
Dans un rapport jamais rendu public depuis mars, des scientifiques pointent les risques induits par la présence d’aluminium dans les vaccins.
On y lit des échanges cordiaux mais surtout un débat âpre et passionné. Ces documents que nous nous sommes procurés, c’est l’avis du conseil scientifique de l’ANSM, le gendarme du médicament, et l’ensemble des discussions que les spécialistes ont mené sur l’étude de l’équipe du professeur Gherardi, chef du service neuromusculaire à l’hôpital Henri Mondor de Créteil, évaluant la neurotoxicité de l’aluminium présent dans les vaccins.

Hepatitis B Vaccine Discontinued After Three Newborn Babies Die
Families of three babies who died shortly after receiving their routine hepatitis B vaccine are mourning the loss of their children. The babies, vaccinated in Vietnam under the country’s National Expanded Program on Immunization, died on July 20 in the central province of Quang Tri, according to the report. [1]
The Vietnamese Health Department has since opted to discontinue the use of two vaccine lots in the entire country to protect other babies from a similar, tragic fate. According to officials, the vaccines were not expired and were properly stored. They were administered by a nurse with over twenty years of experience. [2]
On July 21, the nation’s health minister, Nguyen Thi Kim Tien, sent her condolences to the families of the deceased infants, ordering vaccine experts to investigate the tragedy. Preliminary investigations have identified anaphylactic shock as the cause of death. The chairperson of the vaccine program has asked parents to “keep calm” and continue vaccinating their children.
Health representatives have conducted damage control with home visits to the grieving parents, paying each family $377 and offering free medical care to the mothers at the hospital where their babies received the deadly vaccinations.

Vaccini e le linee cellulari di feti abortiti. Attacco alla genetica umana?
Facebook.com – luglio 2017 Marcello Pamio – Vaccini e salute
Sugli effetti collaterali dei «farmaci pediatrici» chiamati vaccini non ci sono dubbi se non nei cervelli di quelle persone profondamente analfabete e ignoranti che si informano tramite la televisione e i giornali, e da parte di quel mondo scientifico e corrotto collegato a doppia mandata con le lobbies della chimica e farmaceutica.
Moltissimi autori, ricercatori e medici onesti intellettualmente descrivono che la causa degli effetti avversi starebbe non tanto nella parte antigenica (virale o batterica che sia), quanto negli adiuvanti e conservanti usati dalle industrie: sostanze neurotossiche (sali di alluminio e mercurio, ecc.), cancerogene (formaldeide, ecc.), antibiotici, ecc.
Tutto estremamente corretto. Ma forse c’è dell’altro…
I vaccini contengono sostanze molto meno note – perché coperte dall’inviolabile segreto industriale – che si nascondono dietro sigle e/o acronimi e che potrebbero giocare invece un ruolo prioritario nell’eziologia di gravissime e incurabili patologie, per non parlare dell’inquietante modifica della genetica umana…
Le sostanze in questione sono: MRC-5, WI-38 e Vero.
Ecco le informazioni riportate dai bugiardini delle rispettive società produttrici.

VACCINO INFANRIX HEXA
Nel vaccino esavalente prodotto dalla Glaxo contro difterite, tetano, epatite-B, poliomielite, pertosse e haemophilus influenzae tipo B:
«prodotto da cellule di lievito (S. cerevisiae) tramite tecnologia del DNA ricombinante»;
«propagato in cellule VERO».

VACCINO M-M-R VAXPRO
Nel vaccino trivalente prodotto dalla Sanofi Pasteur contro morbillo, parotite, rosolia:
«prodotto su cellule embrionali di pollo»;
«prodotto su fibroblasti di polmone diploidi umani WI-38».

VACCINO PRIORIX
Nel vaccino quadrivalente prodotto dalla Glaxo contro morbillo, parotite, rosolia, varicella:
«coltivato in colture di cellule embrionali di pollo»;
«coltivato in cellule diploidi umani MRC-5».

VACCINO PROQUAD
Nel vaccino quadrivalente della Sanofi Pasteur contro morbillo, parotite, rosolia, varicella:
«prodotto su cellule embrionali di pollo»;
«prodotto su fibroblasti di polmone diploidi umani WI-38»;
«prodotto su cellule diploidi umani MRC-5».

VACCINO PENTAVAC
Nel vaccino pentavalente prodotto dalla Sanofi Pasteur contro difterite, tetano, pertosse, polio, haemophilus influenzae tipo B:
«adsorbito su alluminio idrossido»;
«prodotto su cellule VERO».

Per far crescere i ceppi virali usati poi nei vaccini, le corporation necessitano di un terreno di coltura rappresentato da cellule umane o animali o entrambe assieme (pollo e uomo).
Vediamo adesso nel dettaglio cosa rappresentano e soprattutto cosa nascondono le sigle:
VERO, WI-38, MRC-5.

10 Reasons Why Flu Shots Are More Dangerous Than a Flu!
Before we get into the very sensitive topic presented here, let us be very clear that we’re not against vaccination. We practice critical thought and this isn’t a black or white issue. There are times when vaccination it’s absolutely necessary. This my friends isn’t one of those times.
What we are against is blind acceptance of using a compound that isn’t proven safe when there are MANY natural alternatives to boost your immune system. We are talking about the flu here not small pox.
Make no mistake, when it comes to the flu, it’s a money driven game!
The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself. Let’s take a look at the reasons behind this verdict

Please Create the RFK Independent Vaccine Safety Commission
In January, you approached Robert Kennedy Jr. to head up an independent commission investigating vaccine safety. We respectfully request that you follow through on this sensible plan and create a truly independent commission with no ties to the CDC or pharmaceutical industry to take another look at vaccine safety.
The rates of developmental disabilities in the United States are skyrocketing – 1 in 6 children, 1 in 4 boys. 1 in 20 boys will receive an autism diagnosis, up from 1 in 10,000 in the 1970s. Clearly something is wrong and the smoking gun points to vaccines. If you want to Make America Great Again you have to Make America’s Children Great – and this requires ending the life-long harm caused by an excessive and unsafe vaccine schedule. We currently have the sickest generation of American children in the history of this country and amongst the highest rates of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in the industrialized world.

 

 

Vaccine News – Study – Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants

The Italians are NOT backing down! This is a WORLDWIDE movement against the private interests of Big Pharma!
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #SB277 #Italy #Rome

If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
By Gretchen DuBeau – 09/13/16 03:25 PM EDT
Of course, if we look back over the decades and note the lack of rampant epidemics in our nation, while remembering that vaccine protection is in perpetual decline, the myth of herd immunity quickly unravels. Our society has never achieved this level of herd immunity, yet not a single major outbreak of disease has occurred.
Noted author and neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, offers this analysis:
It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.
The herd immunity argument has always been inconsistent. On the one hand, the theory goes, people who cannot receive vaccines for whatever reason are protected from the disease through a high level of vaccination in the rest of society. On the other hand, the theory continues, parents who don’t vaccinate their children put the health of wider society at risk. How can a handful of people not getting vaccinated be protected from getting sick, while at the same time being so disease-ridden that they make others sick? This doesn’t make sense.
While herd immunity may not exist, herd mentality most definitely does. Health authorities, media commentators, and schools and their parent–teacher associations waste no opportunity in perpetuating this myth. Proponents have done such a thorough job of convincing the public that a parent who questions it is treated like someone who thinks the earth is flat or believes climate change is a conspiracy. On the contrary: an unprejudiced view of the science about vaccines, and an examination of history, clearly show that the herd immunity theory is—and always has been—flawed.
Vaccines may have a place in our medical arsenal, but they are not the silver bullet they’re portrayed to be. Year after year the pharmaceutical industry, looking for lucrative new profit centers, churns out new vaccines. They use pseudo-science to convince the public that these products are safe and effective, and they use public shaming to convince the citizenry that non-compliance is a public health threat. This entire racket completely falls apart with a close examination of the herd immunity myth. Until we are honest in our assessment of both the safety and efficacy of vaccines, kids will continue to be hurt, rights will continue to be trampled, and mythology will continue to trump science.
Gretchen DuBeau is Executive Director of Alliance for Natural Health USA.

Parents WHO DO THEIR RESEARCH say no to vaccines!
Join our movement of INFORMED parents and individuals! The 9-part docu-series, Vaccines Revealed, is available now for you to watch, just click here: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED

When parents of autistic children become the mouthpiece for big pharma, you know we have entered into the dark side.

Tens of thousands marching in the streets in Warsaw, #Poland
“The state does NOT own our children!!!” This is what UPRISING looks like!
LIKE their page >>> facebook.com/stowarzyszeniestopnop
“Vaccines REVEALED” … 9 part docu-series playing now for FREE: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
More info: http://stopnop.com.pl/poland-calls-the-whole-world-to-prote…
“3 czerwca 2017 r. zdeterminowani rodzice z dziećmi zalali ulice Warszawy protestując przeciw przymusowi szczepień. Liczba uczestników przekroczyła najśmielsze marzenia! STOP NOP apeluje do lekarzy: CHODŹCIE Z NAMI!”
“June 3, 2017, determined parents with their children flooded the streets of Warsaw protesting against compulsory vaccination. The number of participants exceeded our wildest dreams! STOP NOP urges doctors: Come join us!”
Education is empowerment – Happening now: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #StopNop

A family’s life in ruins .. after the flu vaccine left their baby girl disabled.
Dixie Marshall’s Exclusive report.

He is the doctor doctor from lorenzin who opposed the vaccine requirement in Italy.

Vaccine injury testimony

PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE WIDELY!!
Ex-Pharma rep who refuses to vaccinate his newborn baby after working within the Pharma industry.
“In my experience, doctors don’t do outside research. They tell their patients whatever the Pharma rep tells them. And Pharma wants to keep you sick, that’s where the money is. Vaccines play into this and my son will never be vaccinated.”
EVERY PARENT NEEDS TO HEAR THIS. And every non-parent too because mandatory vaccines are coming for adults next. 271 vaccines in development — pharma’s next blockbuster product line.
Your doctor doesn’t have time to research — it’s up to you to show them the vaccine inserts. Pharma won’t. Because there are no gold-standard, placebo based safety studies in there, yet the toxic vaccine additives are there in black and white.
Read them the ingredients and “safety” info so they can no longer ignore the TRUTH and they will begin to LISTEN TO PATIENTS more and Pharma less!
Be your own advocate!! Take back your HEALTH!!
Learn more here: Www.LearnTheRisk.org
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/learntherisk
Join our FB group: Learn The Risk
TAKE ACTION: http://www.LearntheRisk.org/take-action
CONTRIBUTE: http://www.LearnTheRisk.org/donate
Follow us on Twitter: @learntherisk

Universal vaccination. A dream for some. A nightmare for many others. Find out why.
Shares work better than likes. Both- even better!
All video episodes on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwc0nUV55sTXXwS2E8UchmA

Dr Paul Thomas and more parents stories #vaxxed -#praybig #PeoplesStudy #truth #science

Study – Waning protection following 5 doses of a 3-component diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine
RESULTS:
Our primary analysis compared 340 pertussis cases diagnosed at ages 4-12years with 3841 controls. The any DTaP analysis compared 462 pertussis cases with 5649 controls. The majority of all DTaP doses in the study population were DTaP3 (86.8%). Children who were more remote from their 5th dose were less protected than were children whose 5th dose was more recent; the adjusted odds of pertussis increased by 1.27 per year (95% CI 1.10, 1.46) after 5 doses of DTaP3 and by 1.30 per year (95% CI 1.15, 1.46) after any 5 DTaP vaccines doses.

CONCLUSIONS:
Waning protection after DTaP3 was similar to that following 5 doses of any type of DTaP vaccines. This finding is not unexpected as most of the DTaP vaccines administered were DTaP3. Following 5 doses of DTaP3 vaccines, protection from pertussis waned 27% per year on average. NCT number: NCT02447978.

Duration of Protection: GSK DTaP Vaccines
Further study details as provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
Primary Outcome Measures:
Estimated GSK-only DTaP relative decrease in protection against pertussis disease (PCR-confirmed) [ Time Frame: Between 1 and 84 months of age of the subjects who received all 5 doses of DTaP (GSK-only) vaccine ]
Estimation done by comparing time since the 5th DTaP dose between PCR-positive cases and PCR-negative controls
Estimated DTaP (any brand) relative decrease in protection against pertussis disease (PCR-confirmed) [ Time Frame: Between 1 and 84 months of age of the subjects who received all 5 doses of DTaP (any brand) vaccine ]
Estimation done by comparing time since the 5th DTaP dose between PCR-positive cases and PCR-negative controls

Secondary Outcome Measures:
Estimated GSK-only DTaP relative decrease in protection against pertussis disease (PCR-confirmed) [ Time Frame: Between 1 and 84 months of age of the subjects who received all 5 doses of DTaP (GSK-only) vaccine ]
Estimation derived from comparing PCR-positive cases and matched controls
Estimated DTaP (any brand) relative decrease in protection against pertussis disease (PCR-confirmed) [ Time Frame: Between 1 and 84 months of age of the subjects who received all 5 doses of DTaP (any brand) vaccine ]
Estimation derived from comparing PCR-positive cases and matched controls

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm
Dr. Moulden stated:
What we have done to each other [with vaccines] has produced the most profound damage to humankind by humankind in the history of humanity. And the reason why we got here is partly because of:
Our arrogance in thinking that we know everything. In physiology and medicine we do not know everything!
[Our greed] to advance our own self-interest to make money, to sell products and to advance corporate alliances. Commercialization has overtaken the fundamental human value of “do unto others as you would have others do unto you.” When society turns toward this human value, then we would all be working together for the greater good of each other. [However, other values have become more important] I don’t care whose feet I step on or how I get there as long as my American dream is realized. I don’t care who has to pay for it on the way of getting there. [1]
Dr. Moulden’s Credibility
Was Dr. Moulden a crackpot as some sources claim, or was he a brilliant physician and researcher? This series of articles will set the record straight, and summarize the contribution that his work has made to medical knowledge.
When I evaluate the credibility of people who are unknown to me, I begin by seeking answers to a few basic questions. For example: Is this person offering opinion, or can he or she back up the claims with valid science? Does he have educational credentials? Are there other physicians and scientists who support his or her beliefs and recommendations? Is this person controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, allopathic medical associations, or the US FDA (US Food and Drug Administration)? And finally, what do Quackwatch and their friends have to say about the person?
Dr. Moulden had a PhD in Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology. He had a master’s degree in child development, and was also a medical doctor. [2] His work was respected by other researchers who don’t march to the drumbeat of the pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Moulden was a threat to the pharmaceutical industry, and their Quackwatch family of 21 related websites treated him as an enemy. [3, 4]

Holistic doctor Andrew Moulden was helping so many .See the great work he was doing before being found dead just a few years ago (Some say heart attack some say suicide- it’s shrouded in mystery)

Study – Feline postvaccinal sarcoma: 20 years later
The first reports of feline high-grade fibrosarcomas occurring at sites traditionally used for vaccination appeared in 1991 and were based on a series of cases seen by veterinary pathologists over the preceding 5 y in the northeastern United States (1). Soon such tumors were being reported from all over North America and Europe, stimulating a great deal of debate, speculation, recrimination, and investigation over the ensuing 10 years (2–4).

The only proven cause for injection site sarcomas in cats is prior administration of a killed, adjuvanted vaccine. Rabies and leukemia vaccines are the only ones with solid causal associations (4,8).

The interval between vaccine administration and detection of sarcoma can be as short as 4 mo and as long as 13 to 15 y. Most probably occur within 1 to 3 y.

The tumor arises via malignant transformation of reactive fibroblasts at the periphery of a nodule of necrotizing and granulomatous cellulitis at the site of previous vaccination. Only a small proportion of such nodules, estimated at 5% in one study (9), is destined for malignant transformation, and the risk does not justify routine excision of these nodules. The magnitude and duration of that inflammation is probably influenced by variables in vaccine formulation and genetically conditioned patient response

Preventing Gardasil Vaccine Injuries & Deaths
Posted: 7/14/2009 9:00:00 PM

She is just 16: the intelligent, lively pretty girl from Kansas, who was a high school gymnast and cheerleader and got straight A’s until, in 2008, three Gardasil shots changed her life and she became one more Gardasil reaction statistic.1
Today, Gabrielle never knows when she will be back in the hospital emergency room. Diagnosed with inflammation in the brain and body, the brain seizures won’t stop. She has had strokes. The right side of her body is weakened. She is in almost constant pain. Gabi has developed lupus now. Her doctor says she could die.
Fast-Tracked Vaccine
Gardasil vaccine was fast tracked to licensure by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006.2 It contains genetically engineered virus-like protein particles (VLPs) and aluminum, 3,4,5 which affect immune function. 6,7,8 The exact mechanism of protection is unknown and the vaccine has not been evaluated for the potential to cause cancer or be toxic to the genes.10
It is a vaccine that, by the summer of 2009, already caused more than 15,000 thousand reports of vaccine reactions, including more than 3,000 injuries and 48 deaths.11 14 of the girls who died after getting Gardasil were under age 16 just like Gabrielle.
At the National Vaccine Information, we issued our first press release in the summer of 2006 warning parents that Gardasil had not been adequately tested in young girls before government health officials recommended that all 11 and 12 year old girls get three doses of the vaccine.12 Merck only studied Gardasil in fewer than 1200 girls under age 16 and followed them up for about two years before lobbyists tried, unsuccessfully in 2007, to get the vaccine mandated for all sixth grade girls in every state.13
Pharmaceutical Products Carry Risks Greater for Some
Every pharmaceutical product, including every vaccine, carries a risk of injury or death. That risk can be greater for some than others.
At the not-for-profit National Vaccine Information Center, we have been operating a Vaccine Reaction Registry for nearly three decades.44 The most tragic cases of vaccine injury we see are when doctors revaccinate babies, children, teenagers and adults over and over again and ignore the fact that symptoms are getting worse and worse after each dose of vaccine.
Know Gardasil Reaction Symptoms
It is so important to know how to recognize Gardasil vaccine reaction symptoms like:

fainting
seizures
numbness & tingling
pain & weakness
hair loss
rashes
extreme fatigue
other health problems

Woman has stroke after Gardasil shot
No link has been established but worries increase as reports surface
Ashley Andyshak News-Post Staff Jul 21, 2008
The only vaccine approved to target human papillomavirus is under fire as reports surface of serious side effects and even death among young women who received it.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Gardasil in 2006 for girls and women age 9 to 26. The vaccine is administered in three doses, and targets several strains of HPV that can cause cervical cancer.
Manufacturer Merck & Co. last month added fatigue, weakness and muscle pain to the list of possible adverse reactions to Gardasil, but families like the Davisons, who live in Frederick, don’t believe the warnings are enough.
Mary Davison said her mother had cervical cancer, and she wanted to protect her three daughters from the same fate. Katherine Davison, 20, and her two younger sisters received their first Gardasil shots in November 2007, and their second in January.
None of the girls experienced any immediate side effects, but on Feb. 1, her 20th birthday, Katherine began feeling dizzy and developed flu-like symptoms.
The next day, her family doctor assumed she had the flu and gave her a phenergan shot to stop her vomiting.
The following day, Katherine lost feeling in the left side of her body. Her left eye was drooping and her pupils were unevenly dilated, and the dizziness persisted. Her parents took her to Frederick Memorial Hospital for a series of CT scans, which helped determine the problem: Katherine had had a stroke.

Killing Kids in the NICU

The August 2015 JAMA study referenced by Michelle in her InfoWars interview confirmed that vaccinations given to ELBW infants lead to serious adverse events, including fever. In children under three months of age, fever necessitates expensive, painful, and invasive procedures, including blood, nasal and urine cultures, and often a spinal tap (picture). Infants are then given antibiotics for several days, until the culture results are known. This leads to disruption of the gut-microbiome and can lead to life-long serious health problems, including autoimmune diseases. Current and ongoing research provides firm evidence that the gut microbiome plays a primary role in the development of ALL physiological systems and metabolic processes in babies and children. If doctors and nurses took the time to consider their actions, it should be obvious that injecting these vile solutions – which contain damaging aluminum, chemicals, and foreign proteins – will have negative impact the baby’s growth, development, and general health, especially ELBW and VLBW infants.
JAMA investigators indeed concluded that within the first three days after being vaccinated, infants were indeed subjected to a higher incidence of sepsis workups. Vaccinated infants also had an increased need for respiratory support which often included intubation and being placed on a ventilator.
The information, while startling, isn’t new.

Study – Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Results Most of the 13 926 infants (91.2%) received 3 or more immunizations. The incidence of sepsis evaluations increased from 5.4 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 19.3 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 3.7; 95% CI, 3.2-4.4). The need for increased respiratory support increased from 6.6 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 14.0 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (ARR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.5), and intubation increased from 2.0 per 1000 patient-days to 3.6 per 1000 patient-days (ARR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2). The postimmunization incidence of adverse events was similar across immunization types, including combination vaccines when compared with single-dose vaccines. Infants who were born at 23 to 24 weeks’ gestation had a higher risk of sepsis evaluation and intubation after immunization. A prior history of sepsis was associated with higher risk of sepsis evaluation after immunization.
Conclusions and Relevance All ELBW infants in the NICU had an increased incidence of sepsis evaluations and increased respiratory support and intubation after routine immunization. Our findings provide no evidence to suggest that physicians should not use combination vaccines in ELBW infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether timing or spacing of immunization administrations confers risk for the developing adverse events and whether a prior history of sepsis confers risk for an altered immune response in ELBW infants.

GARDASIL Vaccine: The Damage Continues
by Barbara Loe Fisher
The vaccine reaction reports keep coming into the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) from mothers describing how they took their healthy teenage girls into a pediatrician or gynecologist’s office where they were given a GARDASIL shot and, then, nothing was ever the same again. The reports of HPV vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths continue to roll in, not only to NVIC but also to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (Search HPV4 at http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.html) newspapers, and television stations. And the only response that comes from officials at the CDC, FDA and drug companies when perfectly healthy teenage girls collapse into unconsciousness, suffer a massive seizure, get paralyzed or die suddenly after being injected with GARDASIL is the zombie mantra: “It is a coincidence.”
Last week a nurse who is an administrator in the outpatient department for a group of hospitals in California called and asked if NVIC had been getting reports of unusual collapse after GARDASIL vaccination. I said, yes, we are getting those reports and she said “A lot of our patients are collapsing after the shot is given. It happens with GARDASIL more frequently than with any other vaccine we give.” That same week, NVIC received a report from the mother of a 15 year old daughter who got her first GARDASIIL shot last month. Within 10 minutes of being injected, she collapsed and had her first grand mal seizure, became incontinent, temporarily lost vision in her right eye, suffered uncontrolled vomiting and had to be taken by ambulance to the hospital. Another report to NVIC that week also involved first-time seizures in a 15 year old girl after she got a GARDASIL shot.
Through June 30, 2008, there have been reports that at least 17 to 20 deaths have occurred following GARDASIL and were filed with the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), although the FDA has yet to admit even one death is causally related to the vaccine, suggesting that the girls would have died that day even if no vaccine had been given. Many of the teenage girls ,who die suddenly after vaccination without explanation, were among the brightest and the best and in top physician condition. This was true for 17 year old Jessica Ericzon, a New York softball player, snowboarder and honor roll student who dropped dead within 48 hours of getting a GARDASIL shot. A coroner could find no cause for her death after an autopsy.
There have been so many reports of reactions, injuries and deaths following GARDASIL vaccination (20-25 percent of all vaccine adverse event reports being filed with VAERS are for GARDASIL vaccine reactions) that the FDA and CDC issued a statement defending the vaccine’s safety on July 22

 

Flu shot effectiveness for 2015-16 disappointing, data shows

Flu shot effectiveness for 2015-16 disappointing, data shows
Flu shot protects better than last year, but not good enough, experts say
It’s the time of year when experts crunch the numbers to see how well the flu shot worked. The result? Better than last year, but still not good enough.
“Overall, just shy of 45 to 50 per cent,” said Dr. Danuta Skowronski of the BC Centre for Disease Control, who presented the data to the Global Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness meeting at the World Health Organization last week.
“That’s lower than we would like to see, but it’s an improvement over the previous year, because it couldn’t be worse, frankly”
In 2014-15, the flu shot offered essentially zero protection against the circulating influenza virus of that season. Back then, the prevailing strain was H3N2.

A Shot Never Worth Taking: The Flu Vaccine ~ by Kelly Brogan, MD
•It’s not indicated: I’m sure you don’t know a single person who has died of the flu, and if you think you do, I can almost guarantee you that the diagnosis was not confirmed in a way that ruled out the 150-200 infectious pathogens that cause flu-like syndromes, none of which would be “covered” by the vaccine. Despite the astronomical figures the CDC flashes before us of “flu deaths”, there were 18 (yes, 1-8) confirmed in 2001, for example. Access to these figures is suspiciously concealed, but in the end, forget the stats, and use some common sense to see the fear mongering and sales marketing for what it is.
•It doesn’t work: The Cochrane Database – an objective, gold-standard assessment of available evidence has plainly stated, in TWO STUDIES, that there is no data to support efficacy in children under two, and in adults. Even the former Chief Vaccine Officer at the FDA states: “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.” Liking the idea of being protected from the flu does not equate to being protected from the flu. That’s essentially what your vaccine-promoting doctor (or pharmacist) is engaging in – promoting an idea.

Study 2010: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.
Main results:
The corresponding figures for poor vaccine matching were 2% and 1% (RD 1, 95% CI 0% to 3%). These differences were not likely to be due to chance. Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms and an estimated 1.6 additional cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome per million vaccinations. The harms evidence base is limited.

Study 2014: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.
Main results:
On this basis, vaccination shows very limited effects: NNV 92 (95% CI 63 to 201) against ILI in pregnant women and NNV 27 (95% CI 18 to 185) against laboratory-confirmed influenza in newborns from vaccinated women.Live aerosol vaccines have an overall effectiveness corresponding to a NNV 46 (95% CI 29 to 115).The performance of one-dose or two-dose whole virion pandemic vaccines was higher, showing a NNV of 16 (95% CI 14 to 20) against ILI and a NNV of 35 (95% CI 33 to 47) against influenza, while a limited impact on hospitalisation was found (NNV 94, 95% CI 70 to 1022).Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates. Inactivated vaccines caused local harms. No evidence of association with serious adverse events was found, but the harms evidence base was limited.The overall risk of bias in the included trials is unclear because it was not possible to assess the real impact of bias.

Peter C. Gøtzsche, MD is a Danish medical researcher, and leader of the Nordic Cochrane Center at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark

For more informative videos and free information visit http:drmcdougall.com
Peter C. Gøtzsche, MD is a Danish medical researcher, and leader of the Nordic Cochrane Center at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark. He has written numerous reviews within the Cochrane collaboration.
Dr.Gøtzsche has been critical of screening for breast cancer using mammography, arguing that it cannot be justified; His critique stems from a meta-analysis he did on mammography screening studies and published as Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? in The Lancet in 2000. In it he discarded 6 out of 8 studies arguing their randomization was inadequate.
In 2006 a paper by Gøtzsche on mammography screening was electronically published in the European Journal of Cancer ahead of print. The journal later removed the paper completely from the journal website without any formal retraction. The paper was later published in Danish Medical Bulletin with a short note from the editor, and Gøtzsche and his coauthors commented on the unilateral retraction that the authors were not involved in.
In 2012 his book Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy was published. In 2013 his book Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How Big Pharma has Corrupted Healthcare was published.

The book is comprehensive, with worldwide examples across many categories of drugs of how the pharmaceutical industry operates. It describes the history of the pharmaceutical industry well, and is current, with references from 2013. The comprehensive attack on the largest drug companies is scathing, and it provokes physicians to be more cautious about prescribing. But most important, it shows us that evidence-based medicine and guidelines have been hijacked, as the evidence base has been systematically distorted.11,12 Consequently, we must rethink which evidence and which recommendations we should use to help our patients. A helpful start is the Public Citizen approach of not using any new drug until it is 7 years old.13

Authors’ conclusions:
The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate. The evidence of adverse events following immunisation with the MMR vaccine cannot be separated from its role in preventing the target diseases.