The UN plans to replace USA, France, Italy, UK, the Republic of Korea, Russia and Japan populations with MUSLIM migrants ASAP! THEY’RE NOT EVEN HIDING IT ANYMORE!
United Nations Publishes Population Replacement Plan On Their Website
The United Nations has a solution for the problem of the declining birthrates and aging populations. The issue will be fixed by an influx of Muslim refugees.
First, they take virtually all disposable income from people through taxation.
Second, they kill the economy and drive up housing and education expenses, forcing responsible people to delay marriage and reduce birthrates.
Third, they subsidize the reproduction of irresponsible people.
Fourth, import illiterate immigrants and pay them to reproduce in America.
Fifth, promote class divisions and pit the poor against anyone that opposes them.
Finally, they wait for the majority to become a class of people who rely on government for their very survival and we fix the rules to secure ourselves as the permanent ruling class.
United Nations Replacement Migration Plan:
United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.
NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION
20000317
NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.
Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.
Major findings of this report include:
— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.
— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.
– 2 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000
— Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.
— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.
— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working- age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.
— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.
— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.
— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.
— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration,
– 3 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000
in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.
The report may be accessed on the internet site of the Population Division (http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm). Further information may be obtained from the office of Joseph Chamie, Director, Population Division, United Nations, New York, NY, 10017, USA; tel. 1-212-963-3179; fax 1-212-963-2147.
There is more to the story about vaccinations than you are being told. Watch our entire exciting 9-part online docu-series! as we uncover the truth!
Documentary Report Calls For “Immunonutrition” To Replace Vaccines
By Bill Sardi
March 30, 2017
What the vaccine industry is hiding is a horror story beyond any one’s imagination.
In 1993 the deaths of 93,000 elderly Americans vaccinated with a “hot lot” flu vaccine that caused the life expectancy of Americans to drop for the first time in eight decades was covered up by health authorities and the news media. If you can hide 93,000 vaccine-related deaths, what else is the vaccine industry hiding?
Furthermore, millions of infants and older old adults at mortal risk for infectious disease are needlessly being subjected to problematic vaccines. An authoritative report investigated and written by this author shows most unvaccinated healthy and well-nourished individuals infected by potentially pathogenic bacteria or viruses develop antibodies naturally, do not experience symptoms and therefore do not need to be vaccinated. This is mistakenly called herd immunity by immunologists.
While it is true vaccines prevent morbidity (fever, diarrhea, etc.), hospitalizations and deaths from infectious disease, this is in the context of malnourished human populations that are commonly deficient in one key trace mineral required for the development of long-term immunity.
H1N1 flu mist killed my son #vaxxed #vaccinesKill #science #PrayBig
Vaccine billionaire buys former U.S. consulate in Mumbai for $113 million
Vaccine billionaire Cyrus Poonawalla has bought a former maharaja’s mansion in Mumbai from the U.S. government for around 7.5 billion rupees ($113 million), newspapers reported, making it the most expensive ever residential purchase in the country.
The seaside mansion was used as the U.S. consulate from 1957, and later renamed Lincoln House. It was put on the market four years ago, after the consulate was relocated to a purpose built compound in a newer business district.
Poonawalla, one of India’s richest men, told the Times of India newspaper that he secured the property after real estate groups were told there were limits on potential redevelopment plans for the heritage-listed house and seaside plot.
“We thought it was a good price given the location,” son Adar Poonawalla, who ran negotiations, told the Hindustan Times.
This Is How a Vaccine Billionaire Lives
Vaccines are profitable. And it doesn’t take a whole lot of critical thinking to determine how profitable once you see how one vaccine billionaire is now living in India. The above pictured seaside mansion was purchased by Cyrus Poonawalla for a cool $113 billion. The vaccine billionaire bought a former US consulate from the US, but he will use it to continue leading his luxurious lifestyle as a residential home. It is the most expensive residential home purchase in the history of India and it should come as no surprise that a vaccine pusher was able to make the purchase. The home had been on the market for four years prior to his purchase date on September 14th, 2015.
According to Reuters India, Poonawalla is literally loaded with riches.
Why Would You Vaccinate a Newborn for Hepatitis B?
Since we do not expect them to use a meat slicer, have sex or play with dirty needles, what could the reason for vaccination at this age possibly be? All moms are screened (99% screening rate in New Hampshire for expectant moms) so an infected Mom is unlikely to slip through the cracks. An infected mom and her newborn need not only the vaccine, but also immune globulin, and possibly an antiviral drug. So vaccinating all babies does not provide adequate treatment for those who really need it.
When newer Hepatitis B vaccines became available, they were recommended only for those at high risk. But many high risk individuals did not choose to be vaccinated.
So the decision was made to instead vaccinate infants. Infants may be at infinitesimal risk, but they will eventually grow to an age where their risk increases. They are a captive audience. Infants can’t say “no” to a vaccine, like their parents can, and do. It makes sense, I guess, if your goal is to reduce numbers of cases using the most easily-imposed route. It makes some sense at the population level. It makes sense if there are almost no side effects from the vaccine.
But what if there are side effects?
Babies cannot tell you if they are experiencing a side effect. What if the birth dose contributes to later childhood neurologic problems in those who are susceptible? When your new baby is vaccinated on the day of birth,
You don’t know what that child might have been like, without being vaccinated.
You cannot compare “before” and “after.”
You cannot easily determine what is a side effect from that very first dose of vaccine.
Much important safety information has never been published.
At least fifteen children under the age of five have died in a botched measles vaccination campaign in Sudan, where mainstream claims children as young as 12 years old were administering the shots. NPR’s interviewed a top MD who said he didn’t think there were any 12 year olds giving out shots, so mainstream cannot get their story straight. 1
In total, about 300 people from the village of Nachodokopele (which is in Namorunyang state, borders Ethiopia, and is part of South Sudan’s Equatoria region) received inoculations against measles during the four-day vaccination campaign.
Recently, 2 children died and 12 fell ill after receiving the measles vaccine at a government health center in Muzaffarpur, India. Lalita Singh, a civil surgeon, has ordered an inquiry into the sad incident.
Pharma Giant’s Vaccines Had Glass In Them, But They Refuse Recall
By Erin Elizabeth – December 12, 2016
(Editor’s note: Companies owned by multi-billion pharma giant Sanofi, have paid huge criminal fines in the past (feel free to look it up in the mainstream media) so the fact that professors and medical doctors think this is horrific, too does not surprise us!)
Sanofi Pasteur, one the world’s leading vaccine makers (No. 2 among vaccine makers, with global sales of $6 billion) with a checkered past, had a potentially serious and costly problem on its hands in April of 2013: Its Monroe County plant discovered pieces of glass in batches of a vaccine intended for babies. It is unclear how many ActHIB vaccines affected by delamination were distributed as Sanofi refused to provide numbers when asked.
The glass was found in samples of a vaccine that had already been distributed to customers and which would not expire until September 2014. Sanofi did the right thing and sent the samples to an outside laboratory for analysis where the lab found evidence of delamination (which occurs when vaccine vials shed flakes of glass called lamellae).
But, in true Big Pharma fashion, their responsibility stopped there.
Sanofi allowed doctors and nurses all over the country to continue injecting babies with the potentially problematic ActHIB for another YEAR AND A HALF.
Police investigate girl’s death after flu vaccine
Siobhan Barry
The death of a two-year-old girl from Brisbane who had received the seasonal flu vaccine will be referred to the Queensland coroner.
Police are preparing a report after the girl died earlier this month.
She had been immunised the day before.
Concerns over adverse reactions prompted authorities last week to temporarily ban the seasonal flu vaccine for children under five.
No, I Won’t Stop “Sharing” Vaccine Information
Posted on June 2, 2017
Just stop.
Stop saying that we should spend our time on raising awareness for starving children or some other cause that you deem more worthy of our efforts.
Stop suggesting that we removed wheat and dairy from our son’s diet “based on fear.”
Stop making ridiculous assumptions without bothering to ask us our experience. The fact is that our family, and by extension your family, was profoundly affected by vaccines. The thing most precious to us in the entire world, our child, was vaccine injured. This is not a “difference of opinion” we have with you. The physical harm done to our son is not an opinion. It’s a fact. We have spent thousands of dollars with a well-respected medical doctor and have documented proof of the damage that vaccines did to our child. We removed wheat and dairy, among other things, from his diet based on these lab reports, on actual science, not based on fear. No, we will not stop posting vaccine information. While we are not unsympathetic to starving children, the thing that has directly affected us — and thousands of others — is vaccine injury. So stop suggesting that we focus elsewhere.
If our child had cancer from pesticides sprayed on our food, and we had proof of that in the form of lab reports from a respected medical doctor, would you ask us to stop posting about pesticides? Would you suggest that we focus on world hunger rather than cancer?
Why is vaccine injury so difficult for those who have not yet experienced it, to accept? I’ll tell you why . . . because vaccines are a religion. They are a belief system. If you actually read the trials done to get a vaccine to market, then you discover that they are not based on solid science. There are no true placebos used in clinical trials, those that profit from vaccine sales conduct the “safety studies,” and the infamous Danish study would fail a junior high biology class.
UNEXPECTED PROTEIN FOUND IN MEASLES-MUMPS VACCINE
By David Brown December 9, 1995
An unusual and unexpected virus protein has been found in minute quantities in measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, but the scientists studying it don’t believe it poses any hazard to people getting the immunization shots.
RT is most commonly associated with retroviruses, a class of virus that can permanently alter the genes — and consequently the behavior — of cells they infect. The AIDS virus is the best-known retrovirus, although there are others that cause diseases, such as leukemia.
The discovery of RT in batches of MMR in June immediately raised the possibility that a complete retrovirus might somehow be contaminating the vaccine. The presence of the protein was detected by Swiss researchers using a new test that is a million times more sensitive than its predecessor.
Chicken proteins are normally found in many vaccines. No whole retrovirus, however, has been found in any vaccine samples. Furthermore, experiments done with Merck’s chicken embryo cells — the presumed source of the RT in that company’s vaccine — have not uncovered any virus capable of passing from chicken cells to human cells when the two are grown together in the laboratory.
The protein, called reverse transcriptase, almost certainly comes from the remnants of ancient viruses that have been “preserved” for eons in the chromosomes of chickens. Chicken cells are used to make many vaccines, including the one in which the protein was found. There is no evidence that whole copies of the ancient viruses are in any vaccine.
“Based on the data we have so far, we believe the vaccine should be on the market, and people should continue immunizing their children,” said Kathryn Zoon, head of the Food and Drug Administration’s office in charge of vaccine safety.
“We are not investigating a situation in which there has been any adverse reaction at all,” said Brian W.J. Mahy, director of the branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that studies viruses.
The measles-mumps-rubella vaccine used in the United States is made by only one manufacturer, Merck & Co. Inc. However, the reverse transcriptase (RT) protein has been found in similar vaccines made by European companies, as well as in yellow fever and some influenza vaccines. All are prepared in chicken embryo cells.
Merck each year sells about 12 million doses of the vaccine (often abbreviated MMR) in the United States. MMR is given to children soon after their first birthday, and again when they are either about 4 or 11 years old. About 450 million doses of the Merck vaccine have been sold worldwide since it was introduced 24 years ago, a company spokeswoman said yesterday.
The World Health Organization estimates that measles vaccine prevents about 90 million cases of the disease annually, and about 1.5 million deaths.
Two
The risk of dying of cervical cancer is approximately 1.7/100,000 women in Australia [2], or 2.4/100,000 women in the US [3] – bearing in mind that Gardasil only claims to protect against the strains thought to be responsible for approximately 70% of all cervical cancers [4]. Compare this with the rate of serious adverse reactions for Gardasil – an estimated 3.34/100,000 doses [5]. Serious reactions are classified as those that lead to hospitalization, permanent disability or death. Given that only an estimated1-10% of vaccine adverse reactions are reported [6], the real numbers of adverse reactions may be many, many times higher. In other words, it appears the vaccine may be more dangerous than the condition it is claimed to prevent…
Three
We still have no evidence that Gardasil can actually prevent cervical cancer, let alone cervical cancer deaths. This is because the clinical trials followed up participants for 5 years [7], yet cervical cancer can take 20-40 years to develop [8]. Instead, they based their decision to approve the vaccine on its purported ability to prevent so-called “pre-cancerous lesions” – the vast majority of which resolve on their own, without ever progressing to cancer, anyway [4].
Four
The “placebo” used in Gardasil clinical trials, was actually an injection of aluminum [9] – a known neurotoxin [10-11], that induces DNA damage [12], suppresses the immune system [13-14], and mimics the hormone estrogen in the human body [15]. It is also suspected of playing a role in the development of some cancers, including breast cancer [16], and….wait for it….cervical cancer [17].
Five
Merck – the makers of Gardasil – helped the vaccine to be included in school mandates and compulsory vaccination programs via clever marketing campaigns and lobbying legislators. They even helped to draft legislation that made Gardasil vaccination mandatory to attend school [18]. They also provided funding to professional associations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,, who began heavily promoting the vaccine, via ready-made presentations, emails and letters…even before the clinical trial results were published [19-20].
Six
In 2012, it was reported that Gardasil alone was associated with 61% of all serious adverse reactions reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), including 63% of all deaths, and 81% of permanent disability in females younger than 30 [21].
Seven
Merck’s own pre-licensure data shows that vaccination of young women already infected by HPV strains 16 and 18 may actually exacerbate pre-existing infections or pre-cancerous lesions, and increase their risk of cervical cancer by 44% [22]. Unfortunately, there is no screening for such infections offered to teenage girls, before vaccination of Gardasil.
Eight
HPV16 virus (one of the strains included in the vaccine), is so closely related to the human proteome, that forcing the body to create antibodies against it (what the Gardasil vaccine is designed to do), almost certainly results in making antibodies against our own self [23]. Perhaps this is why auto-immune conditions are one of the most commonly reported side effects of Gardasil [24-26].
Nine
Gardasil contains an ingredient called Polysorbate 80 (also known as “Tween 80”), a non-ionic detergent that is used to prevent individual ingredients in the vaccine from separating. Polysorbate has been linked to reproductive problems and infertility in animal studies [27]. Also disturbing is the fact that Polysorbate 80 is used in drugs and biomedical research, for its ability to transport medications across the blood-brain barrier, thereby accessing the central nervous system [28]. This means that the presence of polysorbate 80 could make other ingredients, such as aluminum, even more dangerous, however, no studies have been performed, on humans or animals, to evaluate potential synergistic toxicity.
Ten
Over the past four decades, cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in Western countries have decreased by 74%, largely through pap smear campaigns [4]. It is unlikely that vaccination will have much effect in decreasing the already small cancer rate. In fact, if vaccinated women stop having pap smears, the cancer rate will likely increase [29].
Eleven
The vast majority of sexually-active women will have at least one HPV infection at some point in their lives, usually without any symptoms. Ninety percent of infections will clear without any treatment within 2 years [30-31], and only 1% of infections will persist and eventually become cervical cancer [32], although there are usually other risk factors involved, including cigarette smoking, and long-term use of oral contraceptive pill [33].
So…is the so-called “cervical cancer vaccine” worth it? You be the judge…
Vaccinations affect natural immunity.
Vaccines create more powerful strains of bacteria and viruses. Superbugs.
Vaccines create autoimmune disorders/complexes even in those who are not “genetically susceptible”
Furthermore, the potential risk of the vaccine exceeds the potential benefit.
Vaccines take time to do damage.
Vaccines can NOT guarantee immunity. It is ONLY a hope.
Vaccines viruses shed to immuno-compromised children, pregnant women & the elderly.
ALL Vaccines are contaminated.
the news network 