The UN plans to replace USA, France, Italy, UK, the Republic of Korea, Russia and Japan populations with MUSLIM migrants ASAP! THEY’RE NOT EVEN HIDING IT ANYMORE!
United Nations Publishes Population Replacement Plan On Their Website
The United Nations has a solution for the problem of the declining birthrates and aging populations. The issue will be fixed by an influx of Muslim refugees.
First, they take virtually all disposable income from people through taxation.
Second, they kill the economy and drive up housing and education expenses, forcing responsible people to delay marriage and reduce birthrates.
Third, they subsidize the reproduction of irresponsible people.
Fourth, import illiterate immigrants and pay them to reproduce in America.
Fifth, promote class divisions and pit the poor against anyone that opposes them.
Finally, they wait for the majority to become a class of people who rely on government for their very survival and we fix the rules to secure ourselves as the permanent ruling class.
United Nations Replacement Migration Plan:
United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.
NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION
20000317
NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.
Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.
Major findings of this report include:
— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.
— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.
– 2 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000
— Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.
— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.
— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working- age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.
— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.
— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.
— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.
— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration,
– 3 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000
in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.
The report may be accessed on the internet site of the Population Division (http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm). Further information may be obtained from the office of Joseph Chamie, Director, Population Division, United Nations, New York, NY, 10017, USA; tel. 1-212-963-3179; fax 1-212-963-2147.
Vaccination debate arrives in Tacoma via documentary tour bus
Posted 4:44 PM, June 20, 2017, by Steve Kiggins, Updated at 05:38PM, June 20, 2017
TACOMA, Wash. – The number of mumps cases reported this year in Washington state outpaces totals from years past.
State health officials said one possible factor could be parents who haven’t gotten their children vaccinated.
Nearly 5 percent of kindergartners in Washington weren’t immunized for the 2016-2017 school year because of personal beliefs or medical reasons — that’s more than double the national average of 2 percent, according to the Washington State Department of Health.
But there is a group visiting our state who says this may not be a bad thing. Producers for a documentary called “Vaxxed” brought their tour bus to Tacoma`s Franklin Park to speak with parents who worry their kids were injured from vaccinations.
“I’m not here to tell parents not to vaccinate,” said Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who is touring with the documentary’s producers. “I’m here to tell parents there’s a bigger picture.”
Part of that bigger picture includes hundreds of names scribbled on the side of the Vaxxed tour bus. The names represent those who claim to have been injured by vaccinations.
According to Humphries, parents should do their research before vaccinating their child.
Truth About Tetanus Infection and the Vaccine
Step on a rusty nail … go get a Tetanus shot, Right? Wrong!
Tetanus has nothing to do with rust! No amount of rust rubbed on your body or eaten or injected will cause Tetanus.
(It will likely cause some other type of harm though.)
Horse droppings always contain tetanus bacteria. It lives in a horses intestines. Horses are the main source of the bacteria.
If a deep wound is infected with tetanus, a toxin may be produced. It is this toxin that causes problems.
Was that rusty nail you stepped on covered in horse manure? In the days of the horse and carriage, streets were covered in horse droppings. But unless you live on a hobby farm or ranch today, that is likely not a problem.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries’s video
FDA approved: Human cancer cells added to vaccines
Posted by: Lori Alton, staff writer in Vaccine Dangers December 6, 2014
(NaturalHealth365) Consumers already concerned about vaccine dangers are likely to find little reassurance in recent reports that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials are giving vaccine manufacturers the green light to use human cancer cells to produce future vaccines.
But, the big question to ask is ‘why?’ The FDA, with this approval, shows no regard for basic safety issues.
Looks like profits are more important than human health concerns
The FDA’s approval is not related to any effort to make vaccines safer or more effective. Not surprisingly, the latest situation to fuel the fire over vaccine use comes down to cost of production.
To manufacture vaccines through the use of human cancer tumor cells – sadly, in ready supply – is less expensive than prior methods of breeding lab animals to provide culture media. Therefore, vaccine manufacturers are more likely to rake in millions of dollars in the process.
While downplaying the concern that vaccines made from cancer cells could transfer cancer to vaccine recipients, proponents of the use of human cancer cells as an additional substrate for the manufacture of vaccines claim there are several ‘advantages’. The primary argument is that cancer cell substrate would offer greater virus yield and production potential for new vaccines – otherwise unavailable through the use of previous substrates.
Official transcripts reveal an uncertain future for humanity
A recently uncovered transcript, from a September 19, 2012 meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) within the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), reveals misgivings even among the experts as to the safety of vaccines manufactured from human cancer cells.
A committee member identified in the transcript only as ‘Dr. H’, from the University of North Carolina, is quoted as stating, “I’m guessing the safety concerns we have are ones that you typically wouldn’t observe in humans on the time scale that a Phase I trial takes place on…We are worried about these vaccines causing cancer in people many years down the road, well beyond the conclusion of the Phase I study.”
Temporal Association of Certain Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Vaccination of Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Case–Control Study
Results: Subjects with newly diagnosed AN were more likely than controls to have had any vaccination in the previous 3 months [hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.21–2.68]. Influenza vaccinations during the prior 3, 6, and 12 months were also associated with incident diagnoses of AN, OCD, and an anxiety disorder. Several other associations were also significant with HRs greater than 1.40 (hepatitis A with OCD and AN; hepatitis B with AN; and meningitis with AN and chronic tic disorder).
Natural News – Incredibly disturbing animation reveals how vaccines are really made… WARNING: this will turn your stomach
Wednesday, April 05, 2017 by: Mike Adams
interesting how so many people scrutinize the ingredients in the groceries they buy, yet they allow themselves to be injected with vaccines without having any clue what ingredients they contain?
Vaccines are deliberately made with all sorts of bizarre ingredients, the CDC confirms. These ingredients include toxic heavy metals, animal blood components, human fetal tissue, monkey kidney cells, inflammatory chemicals that harm nerve cells, chemical preservatives, taste-enhancing chemicals (like MSG) and much more.
Even more shockingly, the way vaccines are made is beyond merely gross… it’s inhumane! Did you know that African Green Monkeys are raised in cages, infected with disease, murdered by drug companies then organ harvested to extract diseased kidneys that are used to make Smallpox vaccines?
Did you know that the human chickenpox vaccine is made from human tissue harvested from aborted human babies? Did you know that the abortion industry and the vaccine industry work to make sure a steady supply of aborted baby parts is supplied to vaccine manufacturers to keep the factories humming?
33 Fragen an deinen Impfarzt
Diese Fragen können schon vorab per Fax oder Email an deinen Impfarzt gesendet werden, damit er/sie sich auf das kommende Impfberatungsgespräch vorbereiten kann. Gegebenenfalls kann ja der Thermin nach hinten verschoben werden, sollte der Arzt diese Fragen nicht beantworten können.
International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination – New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines Micro-and Nanocontamination
Abstract
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed
What did the new Italian study find?
Examining 30 vaccines — representing 44 samples in total — the researchers found particulate matter, in aggregates and clusters, of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter in 43 of the 44 samples whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.
The scientists were “baffled” by their findings of lead, tungsten, gold, chromium, stainless steel, gold-zinc aggregate, platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, silicon and many others. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, an interaction occurs and a bigger-sized compound is created that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body. The authors conclude the following from their findings:
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers.
The analyses carried out showed that, in all samples checked, vaccines contain non-biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the producers.
Here are some gentle detox ideas for a child who has been vaccinated (to help counteract the harmful effects of vaccines):
Detoxification bath – This bath can be used to pull bacteria and viruses from the spine, and cellular waste, metals and chemicals from the body. Add 5 drops of “Lavender“ to your child’s bath with a 1/4 cup of epsom salt. You can also do this as a foot bath.
Probiotics – A probiotic is essential to restore gut flora and balance the immune system. This is very important especially if a child experienced an adverse reaction to a vaccine (like eczema, ear infections, arthritis, diabetes, gastrointestinal disease, etc.). I love “Life Start” by Natren (for babies/young children) and this probiotic by Garden of Life.
Omega 3 Oil – This is especially important to take if your child suffered an adverse reaction or had MMR, DPT, Dtap, or Varicella vaccines. Cod liver oil is thought to be the most superior of all fish oils but with the cost of CLO and potential rancidity, I use Udo’s Oil.
Cilantro Chelation Therapy – Dr. Yoshiaki Omura discovered that the leaves of the coriander plant can accelerate the excretion of mercury and aluminum from the body. If you give the body what it needs, it will heal itself, and cilantro has a molecular bond that binds to heavy metals and pulls them from the body. Cilantro therapy is gentle and inexpensive.
To use: Incorporate cilantro into your detoxing regimen by juicing with cilantro consuming it raw. Your child should have a minimum of 1 teaspoon daily for 2-3 weeks. You can also do a detox bath with two drops of coriander and epsom salt.
Elderberry – This is an excellent herb for children and can be taken as a syrup or in supplement form. Research shows that elderberry inhibits enzymes used by viruses to penetrate and infect healthy cells. Another option is Elderberry Defense which contains Echinacea, royal jelly, and olive leaf. Echinacea strengthens the immune system, fights viral infections in the body, and increases the production of T-lymphocytes to fight bacterial toxins, and stimulates macrophages (that filter out and destroy foreign particles, bacterial and toxins in the lymph system).
Royal jelly contains many nutrients and all 8 essential amino acids, helps prevent illness, and combats the stress on the body caused by vaccines. Olive leaf has been shown to be an effective remedy against almost every type of disease-causing microorganism, relieves many health problems, and has exhibited microbial effects against over 130 infectious diseases. It would be pertinent to take this remedy if your child has had any of the live vaccines including MMR, Varicella, Flu Vaccine, OPV, DPT, and would also be indicated in Dtap.
There are several ways to take elderberry: You can make your own elderberry syrup for children under two, purchase elderberry in soft chew or herbal form (2 capsules daily mixed in applesauce), or drink an elderberry-infused tea.
Vitamin C helps counteract the damage of heavy metals, chemicals, and toxins contained in vaccines and strengthens the immune system. The best way to get vitamin C is through food but since we’re detoxing, adding a supplement and taking it frequently throughout the day is beneficial. I typically recommend vitamin C chewables but powdered form and liposomal form is also an option.
Silica helps gently pull toxins out of the tissues and into the blood stream to be eliminated from the body. Studies on silicic acid show that it is an effective non-invasive therapy for reducing the burden of aluminum in the body, that it slows down the accumulation of aluminum in brain tissue and the gastrointestinal tract, substantially reduces aluminum bioavailability to humans, reduces toxicity in plants and animals, and enhances the excretion of aluminum in urine without negative side-effects. In other words, silica can only help a good detox. You can purchase silica in liquid mineral form, as a cell salt, or as an herbal supplement (horsetail).
Homeopathic Antidotes – Some children benefit greatly from homeopathic antidotes. Typically, a homeopath or naturopathic doctor will either recommend a remedy based on the constitutional type of your child and side effects they experienced as a result of vaccinations, or will recommend a vaccine potentized as a homeopathic remedy known as a “vaccine antidote.”
If your child was vaccinated against chicken pox, measles, mumps, rubella, and polio, you would want a Varicella antidote, MMR antidote, and IPV antidote. If they were injected with vitamin K or Hepatitis B, you would want a vitamin K and Hep B antidote. Antidotes generally have no negative side-effects and are in an easy-to-take sugar pellet form that can be dissolved under the tongue or crushed up.
Water – When toxins are pulled from the body, they need to be flushed out. Full kidney function is dependent upon there being enough water in the body. Avoid soda, dairy, and junk juices and encourage your child to drink plenty of water (5-8 cups) throughout the day. You can sweeten it with a little honey and lemon (for increased vitamin C) or add some liquid chlorophyll.
Massage – During a detox it is especially important to “milk the lymph nodes” through gentle massage. The Lymphatic system is the clean-up crew of the body and massage helps remove cell wastes, proteins, excess fluid, viruses, and bacteria trapped in the lymph nodes.
Dandelion Root (herbal or tincture)- Supporting the liver during a detox is very important because the liver performs over 5,000 functions – including toxin filtration. Although there are several herbs that can support and cleanse the liver, none are safer, more effective, or as inexpensive as dandelion. Dandelion helps the liver and gallbladder filter out toxins, purifies the blood, stimulates the kidneys to eliminate toxins through the urine, and assists with cell metabolism.
You can purchase dandelion greens from the store (to use in juices and smoothies) or purchase in pill form, as an herbal tea, or pick them from your own back yard. If you have a hard time believing that the “weed” in your yard could serve such an important purpose, might I recommend reviewing the studies on dandelion in the PubMed database? They are quite impressive.
Raw Food, Juices, & Smoothies – The absolute best way to counteract the harmful effects of a vaccine is through food, and my favorite way of doing this for children is through raw smoothies and juices. Shoot for at least 2-3 raw juices or smoothies per day during a detox, in addition to their normal meals. You can check out my Pinterest for some of my favorite juices and smoothies and “Ergonomics of a Smoothie” for smoothie tips. Try to include foods like broccoli, collards and kale, daikon radish, garlic, onions, spices, and sunny-side up eggs from free-range chickens in their diet during this time.
Dutch whistle-blower reveals Big Pharma’s “business model” — Creating pandemics to sell their vaccines, with zero liability for their poisons, while their excess vaccines are disposed of with the same safety precautions used with hazardous waste.
Why you can fuck off when you say I NEED to vaccinate my children….
June 20, 2017
Vaccines are not scientific, because there has never been – I repeat, NEVER – been a published study that used an unvaccinated controlled/placebo group, to demonstrate the long-term efficacy, and long-term safety of any vaccine used in the U.S. Not one controlled study in any scientific journal evaluating the long-term benefits and risks vs. dangers of vaccination vs. unvaccinated (Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, M.D. world-leading in Immunogenetics, speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington Virginia, Sept. 1997.
Also, there has been no long-term study done on the safety of multiple vaccines given at the same time, or the carcinogenic and reproductive complications that may occur. Thus, no doctor or other health professional can honestly tell you your baby will be safe and there is no future cancer risk.
For those of you who remember science class, the use of a control (untreated or “placebo”) group to test results was considered fundamental in producing scientific findings. This bizarre absence of scientific method in vaccine studies tells you something vaccine industry integrity.
I ask you to show me one, just ONE, scientific study on any routine childhood vaccination showing that vaccinated kids are better off in the long-term than unvaccinated kids. You have to read all the raw data on the study and make sure that the control group is actually unvaccinated and the “placebo” they are using isn’t just another vaccine, or a vaccine that has just had the somewhat safe antigen removed and all the poisonous, toxic ingredients left in.
In fact, most general non-“big-pharma” health studies show that non-vaccinated people are healthier all around, and more disease resistant than vaccinated people. A 2011 German study (The Kiggs Study) examined 17,461 children aged 0-19 across Germany, and found vaccinated kids were 2-5 times more likely to suffer from a range of diseases such as otitis media, allergies, asthma, bronchitis, migraines, and experience ten times the number of epileptic seizures than unvaccinated kids. The study also found that many parents who did not vaccinate subsequent children due to side effects in the first children, stated the unvaccinated younger siblings were much healthier. You can argue that the correlation does not always equal causation. However, if you are a pro-vaxxer, please be fair and balanced, and use your same line of critical analysis toward non-placebo big pharma vaccination studies.
The one and only published comparison (non-controlled) study I have found comparing vaccinated kids to unvaccinated kids, was one in 2008 which showed that infants who were vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine with Thimerosal (Thimerosal is 50% Mercury by weight) had nine times higher rate of developmental disabilities than unvaccinated children (The Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, Sept. 2008 entitled Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in U.S. children aged 1 to 9 years by Gallagher and Goodman.).
Our society celebrates the historical conquests of vaccines over disease. However, the data shows this celebration may not be deserved. National Morbidity Reports, from the U.S. Public Health Reports, show the rise and fall of deaths related to disease epidemics. In most cases, the death rate was decreasing significantly before vaccines were even introduced.
Gardasil May Cause Cancer NOT TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY
Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (2) Why has this not been done? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence! There appears to be no official requirement for vaccines to be tested for carcinogenicity and no incentive for manufacturers to do so. Many experts consider that vaccines are conducive towards the dramatic worldwide increase in cancer cases. REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER
A normal phenomenon in virology is that virus strains which have been removed are replaced by new ones. It is not known by anyone, including the vaccine manufacturer whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.
The chief editor of the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, immunologist Charlotte Haug writes about several unanswered questions including that of replacement in her article “We Need to Talk about HPV Vaccination – Seriously”:
Abhorred vacuum.There is another serious question that may be answered sooner: what effect will the vaccine have on the other cancer-causing strains of HPV? Nature never leaves a void, so if HPV-16 and HPV-18 are suppressed by an effective vaccine, other strains of the virus will take their place. The question is, will these strains cause cervical cancer?
Results from clinical trials are not encouraging. Vaccinated women show an increased number of precancerous lesions caused by strains of HPV other than HPV-16 and HPV-18. The results are not statistically significant, but if the trend is real – and further clinical trials should tell us in a few years – there is reason for serious concern. (3)
In an article in the New England Journal of Medicine “ Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination – Reasons for Caution”, Dr. Haug again poses the question of replacement:
“How will the vaccine affect other oncogenic strains of HPV? If HPV-16 and HPV-18 are effectively suppressed, will there be selective pressure on the remaining strains of HPV? Other strains may emerge as significant oncogenic serotypes”. (4)
Replacement was obviously one of several unanswered questions when FDA, Merck and the Norwegian government signed a contract which involved research studies on thousands of young Norwegian schoolgirls. The agreement was that Gardasil would be approved in US under the condition that extensive research projects were carried out in Norway. There was implication of corruption in connection with introduction of Gardasil in the childrens’ vaccination program. (5)
The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck:
“You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway … to assess whether administration of GARDASIL will result in replacement of these diseases due to vaccine HPV types with diseases due to non-vaccine HPV types.” (6) ABNORMAL PAP SMEARS AFTER GARDASIL VACCINATION
Corrupt Vaccine “Safety Testing” Explained By Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Dr. Andrew Wakefield gives a short overview of why vaccine “safety testing” is fraudulent on so many levels, including the fact that vaccines are NOT tested the same way pharmaceutical drugs are tested: double blind placebo tests. This video is of a Q&A after the screening of his documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe – a MUST SEE documentary by everyone. http://www.vaxxedthemovie.comhttp://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com — with Andrew Wakefield, Del Bigtree and Polly Tommey.
Cherai doesn’t vaccinate because vaccines contain harmful ingredients that maim and kill children. Cherai is not worried about infectious diseases because she keeps her child healthy, and therefore, protected. If you are on the fence about vaccination and would like to learn more, start here: http://www.GoVaccineFree.org.
PLEASE LISTEN AND SHARE!!
“I used to work at an Urgent Care center and I can tell you that vaccines are pushed for profit, not health. And when parents called to say their child was having a vaccine reaction, the doctor didn’t even want to know. We were instructed to tell them everything was normal.” — Lupita Salazar
Please SHARE widely.
Learn more here: Www.LearnTheRisk.org
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/learntherisk
Join our FB group: Learn The Risk
TAKE ACTION: http://www.LearntheRisk.org/take-action
CONTRIBUTE: http://www.LearnTheRisk.org/donate
Share your story: info@LearnTheRisk.org
Twitter: @learntherisk
Instagram: #LearnTheRisk
the news network 