Susan Lindauer – Ex-CIA Asset Can Now Speak.. 10 years after 9-11
The messy aspect ratio of this video is a recent artifact (only appeared since around Aug 2012) down to youtube dicking around. I could go on but it’s obvious what they’re doing. Just saying so you the viewer realize it not a lack of care on my part. ——————–||| ”If there Was a conspiracy Mr ‘twoofer’, wouldn’t someone with inside knowledge have spoken out by now ?” One mantra often used in support of the official account of 9/11. Well, Here you do have such a person, her harrowing account of wanting to speak out and how it was throttled in very short and brutal order. For other whistleblower accounts surrounding 9/11 check out.. Richard Andrew Grove – (” An interview w/ Richard Andrew Grove, an AIG insider 1 of 4″ — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpl503…) (http://peacerevolution.podomatic.com/) Sibel Edmonds – (“Kill The Messenger – Sibel Edmonds – Full film” — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BUG1Y…) (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/) April Gallop William Rodriguez (Just to name a few). Video Source = PDX 911Truth [Via.. mranthonyjhilder on 6 Aug 2011] ——————–||| Some protocols to keep silent those who’d like to speak out are as follows.. Threaten career advancement or future job security. Call mental health into question. Encourage social ostrichization by co-workers. Threaten with imprisonment. Utilize the legal system to stonewall whistle blower claims with terms like ‘Threat to national security’. Threaten personal safety. And of course, get the media to ignore and/or spin the details surrounding the case, manipulating public perspective. —————–||| Hear her out.. It’s unbelievable.. though ultimately quite believable. ‘We got your back.. so long as you tow the party line’.. and if you don’t tow the party line.. God help you. This case being a good example. THESE are the reasons many more insiders don’t speak up.. where you’d think they would.. They’re working within a mainframe we usual folk are not accustomed to in our day to day interactions. Where there’s a need for secrecy there is also the opportunity to manipulate sequestered information to the ends of those holding that information (insider trading being a perhaps more benign example). Institutions that work for their own interests more so than the interests of their countries’ could at best be called globalists.. and at worst traitors. Globalist interests operate on an entirely different level than we do. Practically speaking it is inhuman.. so trying to equate the two worlds off one another to the average person is often just not going to work. But no harm in trying. Enjoy.
the news network 