Magic Trick: Promoting Diseases that Don’t Exist

Magic Trick: Promoting Diseases that Don’t Exist

Jon Rappoport Infowars.com October 10, 2013

The disease/treatment/profit machine requires more and more diseases, even if they aren’t real.

Here is an unspoken but largely accepted medical notion of what a disease is:

A group of physical symptoms shared by many people, which has a single cause.

For example, take the flu.  Wikipedia lists the common symptoms:  chills, fever, muscle pains, headache, coughing.  For each type of flu, there is single virus announced as the cause.  E.g., Swine Flu; H1N1 virus.

Drug companies develop medicines and vaccines to kill the virus or prevent it from gaining a foothold in the body.  They sell the drugs and vaccines.  Profits soar.  Nice and neat.

Of course, many doctors don’t bother to test patients to see if they have a disease like seasonal flu.  It’s too time consuming to take a blood sample and send it to a lab and wait for the results.

So the doctor makes an eyeball diagnosis based on symptoms and the season of the year.

As I explained in my previous article, “What happens when only 16% of flu patients have the flu?”, a cursory investigation of this practice can lead to embarrassing results.

Every year, many blood samples from patients are, in fact, sent to labs, and only a small fraction of these “flu cases” turn out to reveal any flu virus at all.

But this fact is blithely ignored.

You have hundreds of thousands of people in the US who display the general “flu symptoms,” but it turns out most of them don’t have the flu.  They have a variety of other problems.

But admitting this is bad for business.  How can drug companies justify making flu drugs and vaccines when most “flu cases” don’t have the flu?  

The solution?  Fake it.  Pretend all people diagnosed with the flu actually have it.

Bottom line?  Just because you have a group of people who have the same general symptoms…that doesn’t mean they have the same disease…and it doesn’t mean the same germ is causing their symptoms. 

Consider Autism.  If you were to Google “Diagnostic Criteria for 299.00 Autistic Disorder,” at autreat.com you would read through a whole menu of behaviors.  These behaviors are, in fact, the definition of Autism.  They are the entire definition.

There is NO cause listed.  There is no single cause.  No germ or fungus or mold or errant gene or neurological defect.

So in this instance, the medical cartel pretends they already somehow know Autism (the collection of behaviors) is a single disease, and “they will eventually find the single cause.”

But again, just because you have a great many children who have the same GENERAL symptoms (behaviors)…that doesn’t mean they have the same disease…that doesn’t mean the cause of disease is the same across the board. 

Nowhere in the definition of Autism will you find a single cause or any sort of bottom-line physical explanation.  You will only find lists of behaviors.

So…how do they know Autism (or each sub-category in the so-called spectrum) is a single disease?