Spiritual News – Robert Breaker – Why Church on Sunday?

Robert Breaker – Why Church on Sunday?
Missionary Evangelist Robert Breaker explains why Christians since the time of Jesus Christ have always gone to church on Sunday. He also explains the 2 Testaments (Old Testament and New Testament) and how there was a change at the cross of Calvary by the death of Jesus Christ (the Testator), and how we are no longer under the Old Testament law, rather under an age of Grace. He further proves from the scriptures that under the law they were commanded to honour God on the sabbath (Saturday) but since we are no longer under the law, but under grace, we are to honour God by putting him first, thus we remember his resurrection by going to church on the first day of the week (Sunday). This is a must see video for all those who still think we are under the law, for the Bible clearly teaches that Christ is the END of law (Rom. 10:4), and we are not saved by works today (keeping the law), rather by faith alone (Eph. 2:8,9), in the finished work of Jesus Christ.

Robert Breaker – How to Read and Study the Bible

This is the 124th sermon preached in English on thecloudchurch.org. It was preached by Pastor/Missionary Evangelist Robert Breaker, who gives some ideas how a Christian can read and study his Bible.

Robert Breaker – How to Understand the Bible

This is the 104th sermon preached in English on www.thecloudchurch.org. It was preached by Pastor/Missionary Evangelist Robert Breaker, who show how to understand the Bible.

Advertisements

Vaccine News – Autism vs. Childhood Diseases: Breaking Down The Walls Of Pro-Vaccine Ignorance

Désirée Röver – Vaccines, Part 1
By OLE DAMMEGARD June 10, 2017
Ole Dammegård interviews Medical Research Journalist Désirée Röver from the Netherlands, about vaccines and the dangers involved. What started her painful journey of discovery into this dark world was the death of her 2 year old son, due to a vaccination.

 

 

Brittney Kara encourages parents to do their research before allowing toxic vaccines to be injected into their children. Start your research by watching Vaccines Revealed featuring 24 vaccine experts by clicking here http://bit.ly/2o0b5Cp and go to http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/personal-choice/ to read Brittney’s vaccine free overview.

“I met with a pediatrician today and she said she watched Vaccines Revealed and she was shocked. She said she looked up the research and it was all there. She said she doesn’t know how to continue her practice as is. She said, should she read the parents the vaccine inserts and let them choose or just cold turkey quit. I hugged her neck and thanked God for opening her eyes.” The free replay is right here . . . tinyurl.com/9Episodes
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED

Medical Doctor who Escaped Vietnam as a Child in the 1970s Explains Why He no Longer Vaccinates
The VAXXED film crew recently interviewed Dr. Anthony Phan in California. Dr. Phan escaped from Vietnam in the 1970s when he was 8 years old. He was separated from his parents and escaped on a fishing boat along with his 2 year old brother.
Making it to the U.S. as a child refugee, Dr. Phan testifies that God led him through college and medical school, and he went on to become a medical doctor at Johns Hopkins.
Dr. Phan talks about how his mentor at Johns Hopkins taught him about the importance of the Hippocratic Oath to “do no harm.”
Do no harm means your oath is to the patient. Not to the CDC, not to the government, not to the FDA, your oath is to the patient.
His mentor also reportedly stated to him:
One day Tony, in your career (this was in 1993), when you see these threesome (CDC, FDA, and the government) in bed together, be very careful. When you see pharmaceutical companies being in bed with the government, and being controlled by the health industry, you need to make a decision about where you want to take your medical career.
Either #1 you retire and get out, because it is back to being controlled again, back to where I escaped (from Vietnam) in 1975.
Dr. Phan explains that his experience with vaccines began in 2000 when he did his fellowship in Integrated Medicine. He was taught to question the practices of “conventional” medicine that are wrong.

 

THOUSANDS protest in numerous cities across Italy in what is now an INTERNATIONAL️ uprising and Revolution for Choice!
What haven’t you been told? Find out now for free: tiny.cc/FreeVaccinationEducation
Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #Italy #VaccineInjury #NonCompliance #RiseUP

Learn OUR NAMES!!! Our international battle for medical choice and parental choice is only getting started! Join our movement of people who have done their research! . . . Click here to obtain the information you need to make the most informed choices for your yourself and your family >>> tinyurl.com/9Episodes
✴️ Translation courtesy of Teresa Iodice ️
✴️ Networking, exemption information and doctor resources: tinyurl.com/RevolutionForVaccineChoice
✴️ Follow us: facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice
✴️ Read all vaccine inserts: tinyurl.com/ReadTheVaccineInsert
#RevolutionForChoice #InformedConsent #EducateBeforeYouVaccinate #VAXXED #SB277 #RiseUp #Italy #Rome #Naples

Dirty Vaccines: New Study Reveals Prevalence of Contaminants
Posted by Celeste McGovern on Jan 30, 2017 5:31:20 PM
Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated by Unsafe Levels of Metals and Debris Linked to Cancer and Autoimmune Disease, New Study Reports
Researchers examining 44 samples of 30 different vaccines found dangerous contaminants, including red blood cells in one vaccine and metal toxicants in every single sample tested – except in one animal vaccine.
Using extremely sensitive new technologies not used in vaccine manufacturing, Italian scientists reported they were “baffled” by their discoveries which included single particles and aggregates of organic debris including red cells of human or possibly animal origin and metals including lead, tungsten, gold, and chromium, that have been linked to autoimmune disease and leukemia.
In the study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.
Lead particles were found in the cervical cancer vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, for example, and in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal manufactured by Novartis as well as in the Meningetec vaccine meant to protect against meningitis C.
Samples of an infant vaccine called Infarix Hexa (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenzae type B) manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline was found to contain stainless steel, tungsten and a gold-zinc aggregate.
Other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was identified in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France that were tested.
GSK’s Fluarix vaccine for children three years and older contained 11 metals and aggregates of metals. Similar aggregates to those identified in the vaccines have been shown to be prevalent in cases of leukemia, the researchers noted.

If a parent is vaccinating their child, these are just some facts they need to understand.
Greg Wyatt·Tuesday, June 20, 2017
“If a parent is vaccinating their child, these are just some facts they need to understand.

1. I understand that the pharmaceutical company who made this vaccine has NO liability if it injures or kills my child.
2. If my child is killed or hurt by a vaccine, the public will pay through increased taxes for any damage the vaccine does and in Canada it’s very little payment for a dead or injured child.
3. I understand that these vaccines contains neurotoxins such as aluminum and mercury that far exceed “safe levels” deemed by the EPA.
4. I understand that these vaccines contain carcinogenic ingredients PROVEN to cause CANCER.
5. I understand that some vaccines are made from aborted fetal cell lines, of both humans and animals and their DNA is INJECTED into you and your child along with everything else (including an adjuvant that tells your immune system to attack EVERYTHING in the vaccine, INCLUDING HUMAN CELLS.)
6. I understand that getting this vaccine does not ensure that I will be protected from the disease. Many OUTBREAKS include a Population of 100% vaccinated individuals.

Patients with an Allergy to Eggs Are at Risk of Anaphylaxis from MMR Vaccine
Posted on: Wednesday, February 1st 2017 at 10:30 am
Written By: Christina England, BA Hons
According to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Patients with an Allergy to Eggs Are at Risk of Anaphylaxis if Vaccinated with the MMR!
It is estimated that up to 15 million US citizens are currently suffering from food allergies. In 2013, a paper published on the CDC website stated that between 1997 and 2011, the prevalence of food and skin allergies increased in children under age of 18. This is extremely worrying, as according to the Food Allergy Research & Education website, a food allergy sends someone to the emergency department every three minutes, which, according to them, amounts to approximately 200,000 visits to the ER every year.
The NIAID Recommend the MMR to Children with Egg Allergies
In 2010, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) published a paper titled Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States. The paper described how the NIAID had joined forces with 30 professional organizations, federal agencies and patient advocacy groups to set guidelines for the management and safety of patients suffering from food allergies.
One of the sections highlighted was a section titled Vaccinations in Patients with Egg Allergies.’ The authors wrote:
“In Summary: Patients who have generated IgE antibodies to an allergen are at risk for anaphylaxis with systemic exposure to that allergen. Thus, patients who have IgE-mediated egg allergy are at risk for anaphylaxis if injected with vaccines containing egg 17 protein.” (own emphasis)
They continued:
“More detailed information about specific egg-containing vaccines (measles, mumps, and rubella [MMR], MMR with varicella [MMRV], influenza, yellow fever, and rabies) is provided in … the Guidelines.
The EP recognizes that changes in these recommendations may occur in the future as there is an increased understanding of the risk factors for allergic reactions and as vaccine manufacturing processes improve and decrease the final egg protein content of vaccines. For the most current recommendations, health care professionals should refer to the Web sites of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP):
http://aapredbook.aappublications.org/
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/acip/
However, despite stating that patients who have an allergy to eggs are at risk of anaphylaxis if they receive a vaccine containing the egg 17 protein, it appears that they are recommending the vaccine anyway.
I say this, because in section 5.1.11.1 they stated:
“Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella Vaccine
Guideline 31: The EP recognizes the varying consensus recommendations of the different organizations on this particular vaccine and recommends that children with egg allergy, even those with a history of severe reactions, receive vaccines for MMR and MMRV. The safety of this practice has been recognized by ACIP and AAP and is noted in the approved product prescribing information for these vaccines.” (own emphasis)
What I found interesting was the fact that the NIAID did not apply the same guidelines to any of the other vaccinations listed.
In fact, their recommendations for the flu vaccine clearly stated:
“In Summary: The EP concludes that insufficient evidence exists to recommend administering influenza vaccine, either inactivated or live-attenuated, to patients with a history of severe reactions to egg proteins. Severe reactions include a history of hives, angioedema, allergic asthma, or systemic anaphylaxis to egg proteins (or chicken proteins). Less severe or local manifestations of allergy to egg or feathers are not contraindications. However, the EP notes that egg allergy is relatively common among the very patients who would highly benefit from influenza vaccination. Such patients include children and young adults (from 6 months to 18 years old for seasonal influenza, and from 6 months to 24 years old for H1N1 influenza) and all patients with asthma. It should be noted that live-attenuated vaccine is not licensed for use in patients with asthma.” (own emphasis)
They continued:
“Although ACIP and AAP, and also the vaccine manufacturers, do not recommend influenza vaccination in patients who are allergic to egg, several publications have described different approaches to giving the influenza vaccine to patients with severe allergic reactions to egg. These approaches, which depend on the ovalbumin content and the results of SPTs or intradermal tests with the vaccine, include a single dose of vaccine, two doses of vaccine, or multiple doses. However, the evidence supporting these approaches is limited by the small numbers of patients included in each study. Moreover, data indicate that, although the vaccines are relatively safe, there remains some, albeit low, risk of systemic reactions. Also, negative SPT results do not accurately predict safety of vaccination, in that 5 percent of patients with negative SPTs had systemic reactions to vaccination.” (own emphasis)
With these recommendations in mind, we need to ask ourselves how many of our doctors are fully aware of any of these guidelines? If they are aware of this information, why are so many doctors not adhering to them?

13 Year-Old Boy Permanently Disabled from Chicken Pox Vaccine Wins His Case in Vaccine Court
A young man was recently awarded compensation in the United States Court of Federal Claims Vaccine Court, for injuries he sustained after being administered the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations in 2009. After five long years of litigation, Health and Human Services (HHS), the Respondent in all vaccine injury cases, conceded that the varicella vaccination did in fact cause RD’s vaccine injury, transverse myelitis, which has left him a tetraplegic.
In November 2014, HHS conceded that the vaccination caused RD’s injuries. Even with this concession, his case continued for another year in the damages phase, during which time the parties continued to negotiate the amount of damages that RD would receive for his injuries. Although he was compensated for his suffering and injuries, the monetary award will never compensate for the lifelong effects this young man is suffering from his vaccine injury.
Five Long Years
RD was only 13 when his life changed forever. At a routine well-child visit in 2009, the doctor informed RD’s parents that he was due to receive the hepatitis A and varicella vaccinations. His parents complied with the doctor’s order and RD received the vaccinations.
RD’s mother explained that, at that time in RD’s state, only one dose of varicella vaccine was required and RD had already received one dose of that vaccine. This second dose that was administered to RD at this well visit was determined to be the cause of RD’s horrific injuries, and it was not even required for him, which his family didn’t realize until it was too late.
About 14 days later, RD began to experience excruciating pain shooting through his body along with tingling, numbness and paralysis of his limbs. After extensive testing and many invasive procedures, RD was diagnosed with transverse myelitis.
RD’s parents filed a case in Vaccine Court, which took over five years to settle. RD and his family faced arduous heartbreak along the way. In the ruling, a representative from the United States Department of Justice agreed that “a preponderance of the evidence establishes that petitioner’s transverse myelitis was caused-in-fact by the administration of his August 12, 2009 varicella vaccine.” [1]
RD’s lawyer, Patricia Finn, stated that:
“The injuries that RD suffered from this vaccine are severe and lifelong. Even though he has received a significant award as far as the awards in the Vaccine Court go, no amount of money will ever compensate him for what he has lost.
But RD is an amazing young man who has not let this injury stop him in any way. He has graduated high school with his class, attends a Tier 1 college, and has great aspirations that I know he will achieve despite the challenges he faces because of his injuries.”
RD’s Immune System Attacked His Spine

Autism vs. Childhood Diseases: Breaking Down The Walls Of Pro-Vaccine Ignorance
By Tami Canal On June 19, 2017
I can’t tell you how absolutely fed up I am with tragically misinformed people who proclaim that they would prefer to have an autistic child versus one with a case of the measles, mumps, chicken pox, etc.
A comment like that demonstrates immense ignorance in regards to the LIFETIME of issues that autism presents–things like social dysfunction, the inability to speak, aggression, self-destructive behavior, and a staggeringly diminished life expectancy. If you are one of the people who have ever believed measles or other infectious diseases to be worse than autism, this is for you.
Let’s take a look and examine these so-called “deadly” childhood diseases.

1. Chicken Pox (Varicella) = itchy rash with small fluid-filled blisters; 5-7 days of feeling tired and sluggish; mild fever; decreased appetite. Resolves itself.
2. Diptheria = low fever, sore throat, croup-like cough; many infections are asymptomatic or mild. Treat with antitoxin and antibiotics. Garlic juice and table salt are natural remedies to successfully treat diphtheria, as well.
3. Haemophilus influenzae Type B (Hib) = flu symptoms, stiff neck, lethargy. Treat with antibiotics for 10 days.
4. Hepatitis A = transmitted by eating food or drinking water contaminated with feces; children usually have no symptoms; when symptoms occur, they include flu-like symptoms, nausea, jaundice. Resolves itself.
5. Hepatitis B = transmitted through blood, semen, vaginal fluids; flu-like symptoms, dark urine, vomiting, jaundice; most people do not show symptoms. Acute Hep B resolves itself.
6. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) = transmitted sexually; usually resolves itself with no symptoms; takes years to develop into cancer; regular pap screens prevent cancer; vaccine discontinued in Japan due to adverse reactions.
7. Influenza (flu) = high fever, cold symptoms, vomiting; lasts 7-10 days; Resolves itself. (Flu vaccine contains mercury [thimerosal]).
8. Measles = fever, cold symptoms, rash; 7-10 days; Resolves itself. Infection can be avoided with proper nutrition, primarily adequate levels of Vitamin A and C.
9. Meningitis = flu symptoms, stiff neck; usually caused by bacteria or virus; viral usually causes no symptoms and resolves itself; bacterial is spread through saliva (kissing, coughing); Most people who ‘carry’ the bacteria never become sick; bacterial meningitis is treated with antibiotics.
10. Mumps = fever, swelling of salivary glands; many people show no symptoms; Resolves itself within a few weeks. (There are many effective natural home remedies for mumps which are safe and provide relief from pain without any harmful side effects.)
11. Pertussis (whooping cough) = dry cough, watery eyes, slight fever, lethargy; treated with high doses of vitamin C; garlic, almond oil, honey, and onion are also effective, natural remedies to treat pertussis.
12. Pneumococcal Pneumonia = flu-like symptoms, fatigue, chills, stiff neck; Treated with antibiotics.
13. Poliomyelitis = 72% of infections cause no symptoms; 25% flu-like symptoms that last 2-5 days; 0.5% leads to more severe symptoms such as paralytic polio; only people with the paralytic infection are considered to have the disease. It is noteworthy to mention that a congressional hearing in the 1950s shed light that polio was actually the result of DDT poisoning and that the federal government and the chemical industry fabricated polio to conceal the true cause of paralysis-inducing epidemic sweeping the country. (Read more about polio here.)
14. Rotavirus = infection in the intestinal tract that causes vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration; Children, even those that are vaccinated for rotavirus, may develop the disease more than once. A diet high in potassium, such as BRAT, will help bind the bowels and can greatly alleviate the symptoms of Rotavirus. Other natural remedies can be found here.
15. Rubella (German measles) = flu-like symptoms, swollen lymph nodes, joint pain, fatigue, rash; 1-3 days; 25 to 50% of people infected with rubella will not experience any symptoms. Resolves itself. Turmeric, licorice, and citrus are highly effective home remedies.
16. Tetanus = sudden, painful contractions of muscle groups; caused by Clostridium tetani transmitted through broken skin; Prevention is to allow wound to bleed freely. Tetanus bacteria is anaerobic – meaning oxygen will kill it.

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Microvascular Damage
by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
Dr. Andrew Moulden recognized that every dose of vaccine given to a person produced microvascular damage whether or not the person was aware of the damage or had debilitating symptoms at the time the vaccines were given. He courageously stepped out of the conventional box of medical diagnosis and treatment, and gave us a new way to look at modern neurodevelopmental illnesses and syndromes.
This series of articles is intended to preserve the work of Dr. Moulden, who unexpectedly died in November of 2013. I want to acknowledge the contribution of this forward-thinking pioneer who worked to explain the truth about vaccine damage. This is article two in a series of four articles about Dr. Moulden’s life work.
As a physician and PhD researcher, he raised strong public objection to vaccine use, because he could literally see evidence of vaccine damage in the expressions of the human face. Each dose of a vaccine causes tiny strokes in the brain and in other organs of the body, which bring about a wide range of unexpected health conditions.
Dr. Moulden saw that the rapid rise in modern neurodevelopmental diseases such as autism, Alzheimer’s, and numerous other syndromes were actually caused by the same process. He saw the current epidemic of these modern diseases as having a single origin. The notion of single diseases with single causes had to be put aside, because that model could not adequately explain what we are facing in the world today.
How Vaccines and Toxins Producing a Syndrome of Closely Related Illnesses
Dr. Moulden understood that vaccines and toxins (in the air, in our water, in our homes, and in our food) were producing a syndrome of closely related illnesses. He said that it was time to begin thinking in terms of multiple causes for a syndrome that had multiple sets of symptoms.
Multiple factors can work together to trigger a single type of reaction in the body, which can then produce various sets of symptoms. Even though there were different sets of symptoms and different disease names given to each one, they were actually all part of a spectrum of diseases that he called Moulden Anoxia Spectrum Syndromes.
Learning disabilities, autism, Alzheimer’s, irritable bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, colitis, food allergies, shaken baby syndrome, sudden infant death, idiopathic seizure disorders, Gulf War syndrome, Gardasil adverse reactions, schizophrenia, Tourette’s syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, expressive aphasia, impaired speech skills, attention deficit disorders, silent ischemic strokes, blood clots, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, Parkinson’s disease, and other modern neurodevelopmental disorders are closely related in many ways, and are part of a larger syndrome.

Slate.com tries to school Trump on vaccines. Fails.
You should watch this hilarious takedown of a Slate.com article on Trump and his Slow-Vaxxin’ ways.
Shares work better than likes!
Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books & Stickers for sale:
http://myincredibleopinion.com
All video episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MyIncredibleOpinionWithForrestMaready

Study – Oxidative Stress and NAD+ in Ischemic Brain Injury: Current Advances and Future Perspectives
Abstract
Numerous studies have indicated oxidative stress as a key pathological factor in ischemic brain injury. One of the key links between oxidative stress and cell death is excessive activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), which plays an important role in the ischemic brain damage in male animals. Multiple studies have also suggested that NAD+ depletion mediates PARP-1 cytotoxicity, and NAD+ administration can decrease ischemic brain injury.
A number of recent studies have provided novel information regarding the mechanisms underlying the roles of oxidative stress and NAD+-dependent enzymes in ischemic brain injury. Of particular interest, there have been exciting progresses regarding the mechanisms underlying the roles of NADPH oxidase and PARP-1 in cerebral ischemia. For examples, it has been suggested that androgen signaling and binding of PARP-1 onto estrogen receptors could account for the intriguing findings that PARP-1 plays remarkably differential roles in the ischemic brain damage of male and female animals; and some studies have suggested casein kinase 2, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase, and estrogen signaling can modulate the expression and activity of NADPH oxidase.
This review summarizes these important current advances, and proposes future perspectives for the studies on the roles of oxidative stress and NAD+ in cerebral ischemia. It is increasingly likely that future studies on NAD- and NADP-dependent enzymes, such as NADPH oxidase, PARP-1, and sirtuins, would expose novel mechanisms underlying the roles of oxidative stress in cerebral ischemia, and suggest new therapeutic strategies for treating the debilitating disease.

Natural News – Gardasil, considered the most dangerous vaccine on the market, may soon be pushed for infants
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 by: Vicki Batts
(NaturalNews) Gardasil has been the subject of controversy for many years now. In fact, it has even been regarded as one of the most dangerous vaccines on the market today. Perhaps what is most alarming about this treacherous vaccine, however, is the fact that its manufacturer, Merck & Co, now wants to begin marketing their product to infants – and trials on babies have already begun. Merck recently launched a Gardasil vaccine trial on children at least one year old, and it’s set to conclude in early 2017.
You read that right. A pharmaceutical giant is testing a vaccine for an STD on babies. It doesn’t really get more corrupt and outrageous than that, now does it?
Gardasil was developed for the STD known as HPV, and was approved by the FDA in 2006. The disease did not become of concern until the 1980s, when research first suggested that there may be a link between HPV and cervical cancer. However, whether this link actually exists has been a major point of contention. There are several hypotheses that explain why HPV may not actually cause cancer, but one particularly interesting theory was expressed by McCormack et al in their paper published by the journal Molecular Cytogenetics in 2015. The research team also raised several significant questions about the prevailing theory on the connection between HPV and cervical cancer. For example, HPV is present in 70 to 80 percent of the American adult population, so why does cervical cancer only effect one out of ever 10,000 women?
According to their paper, neither HPV nor genetic predisposition is required for the onset of cervical cancer. In fact, all of the cervical cancer cells analyzed during the course of their study contained new abnormal karyotypes. The genetic makeup of these new abnormal karyotypes suggested that the cervical cancers originated within the karyotypes, and not from a virus. A karyotype is the size, number and shape of chromosomes within an organism. Their theory, called the Karyotypic Speciation Theory, essentially suggests that “carcinomas are generated de novo from cellular chromosomes, genes and proteins, which are not immunogenic in the host of origin (just like all other cancers).” As SaneVax.org explains, in this theory, hypothetical cancer cells that are generated by viral proteins (such as HPV) would be eliminated by antiviral immunity.

Dr Tenpenny on Vit K
TinyURL.com/TenpennyVitK
#VaXism NEWS

VACCINURILE ȘI AUTOIMUNITATEA – un tratat de imunologie aplicată echilibrat; rezultatul zecilor de ani de experiență în vaccinologie și autoimunitate și a studierii unei cazuistici și literaturi de specialitate extrem de vaste, are 37 de capitole și exprimă un adevăr dramatic: o parte dintre oamenii sănătoși (despre care nu știm dacă s-ar fi îmbolnăvit vreodată) fac boli autoimune după și prin administrarea unui vaccin: lupus, vasculite, artrită reumatoidă, boli de țesut conjunctiv nediferențiate, purpură trombocitopenică, boală celiacă ETC.
« Autorii cărții sunt medici specializați în imunologie fundamentală și clinică. Este vorba de o lucrare curajoasă în condițiile vremurilor noastre deoarece trezește un spirit de prudență – altfel destul de amorțit sau bine manipulat – spirit prevazător imperios necesar de vreme ce unele guverne vor să decreteze obligativitatea vaccinării, adică să-și agreseze poporul lor cu o lege totalitară. », Dr. Pavel Chirilă, Prefață la ediția 2016.

Vaccine news: The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm

Mary Holland, a professor from NYU Law School, discusses her life as an autism mother and activist in this wide-ranging interview.

New Guidelines for Safe Usage of Colloidal Silver
The Silver Safety Committee has announced its creation of the Silver Safety Pyramid, which is designed to enable anyone to easily determine safe usage levels of any dietary supplement containing silver, typically referred to as ionic silver or colloidal silver.
The Silver Safety Committee consists of doctors, chemistry professors and world leaders in health-freedom advocacy.
According to Herbert Slavin, M.D., director of the Institute of Advanced Medicine in Lauderhill, Florida, and a member of the Committee:
“This is an area where confusion and concern developed needlessly. Few things in life are as cut-and-dried as the fact that silver is completely safe when used within normal limits. The U.S. government provides a very clear guideline for the safe oral intake of silver. We’ve simply provided an easy method for applying that guideline to the safe use of any silver supplement product.”
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has a guideline called the Reference Dose (RfD) for safe limits on daily intake of silver. The EPA’s RfD guideline is specifically intended to keep a person’s intake of silver below the level that could possibly discolor the skin.
Says Jeffrey Blumer, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Center for Drug Research, the world’s largest clinical research center for pediatric drugs, and former director of the Greater Cleveland Poison Control Center:
“Common substances like table salt and aspirin are harmless with normal use, but excessive intake can become toxic and even life-threatening. With normal responsible usage, silver supplements are entirely harmless to humans.”
The Silver Safety Pyramid is based on the Committee’s Silver Safety Guideline, which recommends that a person’s intake of silver from dietary supplements be limited to 25 percent of the EPA’s recommended limit for total daily intake of silver.
It utilizes the Silver Safety Calculation, a simple mathematical formula that enables a person to easily determine how much to take of any silver-containing product to remain within the safety guidelines.

Study : Simultaneous sudden infant death syndrome.

J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Feb;14(2):87-91.
Abstract
The simultaneous sudden deaths of twins rarely occur and therefore it has received limited attention in the medical literature. When the deaths of the twins meet the defined criteria for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) independently and take place within the same 24 h range it can be called as simultaneous SIDS (SSIDS). The case(s): Twin girls (3.5-month-old) were found dead by their mother in their crib, both in supine position. The infants were identical twins and delivered at a hospital by cesarean section. Both infants were healthy and did not have any serious medical history. Two days prior to the incident, the twins had received the second dose of oral polio, DPT and the first dose of hepatitis B vaccines and they had fever on the first day of the vaccination and been given teaspoonful of acetaminophen. Death scene investigation, judicial investigation, parental assessment, macroscopic and microscopic autopsy findings and the toxicological analysis did not yield any specific cause of death. The case(s) were referred to a supreme board composed of multidisciplinary medical professionals at the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, in Istanbul. The Board decided that the available data was consistent with SIDS. These SIDS case(s) are presented because twin SIDS are rare and this is the first time that a simultaneous twin SIDS have been reported in Turkey. Simultaneous SIDS cases have many implications regarding definition, diagnosis and medico-legal approach.

Study : A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.

J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(14):903-16. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2011.573736.

Abstract
The reason for the rapid rise of autism in the United States that began in the 1990s is a mystery. Although individuals probably have a genetic predisposition to develop autism, researchers suspect that one or more environmental triggers are also needed. One of those triggers might be the battery of vaccinations that young children receive. Using regression analysis and controlling for family income and ethnicity, the relationship between the proportion of children who received the recommended vaccines by age 2 years and the prevalence of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and 2007 was determined. A positive and statistically significant relationship was found: The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher was the prevalence of AUT or SLI. A 1% increase in vaccination was associated with an additional 680 children having AUT or SLI. Neither parental behavior nor access to care affected the results, since vaccination proportions were not significantly related (statistically) to any other disability or to the number of pediatricians in a U.S. state. The results suggest that although mercury has been removed from many vaccines, other culprits may link vaccines to autism. Further study into the relationship between vaccines and autism is warranted.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a British doctor, may understand the issue of vaccine-induced autism better than anyone on the planet. Listen to the doctor-turned filmmaker (Vaxxed) tell the truth about how to end the autism epidemic.

Ever wonder WHY we NEED a religious exemption from vaccines?
Are you aware that some vaccines are made from ABORTIONS?
Marcella Piper-Terry explains in detail how abortions are used in vaccine manufacturing and the implications of that.
Interview by Polly Tommey and camera by Joshua Coleman and Anu Vaidya with editing by Joshua Coleman.
The Vaxxed bus makes a special stop in Fort Wayne, Indiana to talk to Independent Researcher Marcella Piper-Terry about religious exemptions from vaccines and aborted fetal cells. Interview by Polly Tommey and camera by Joshua Coleman and Anu Vaidya with editing by Joshua Coleman.

Autism-Vaccine Theory Yet to Be Debunked
Contrary to the popular misconception, the autism-vaccine link has never been disproven. The autism-vaccine debate has been going around for decades, yet until recently, no official safety study has been done by the CDC itself. Many other studies done had either conflict of interest or insufficient data (most importantly, the CDC admits that a study comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children has never been done).
In 2004 when the CDC finally concluded a long-term study on vaccinations and autism in children, the results were not what they expected. They found a potential link between the two, primarily in African American boys, and decided to hide the information from the public.
Their study was published, but the significant information was not, instead it was literally thrown into a huge garbage can.
This came to light in 2014 when a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. William Thompson came forward, admitting to what they did. Florida U.S. Representative Bill Posey spoke about it to the House of Representatives urging for an official investigation, but not much has been done since.
Healthy Children Can Become Horribly Sick After Vaccinations
For many, these stories are nothing but anecdotes, but for thousands of families who have gone through this (and doctors who witnessed it), it is a real tragedy. More people are coming forward with eerily similar stories. Seemingly healthy children become sick after receiving vaccinations (some within hours), and many never recover.
Public health officials and the CDC say that vaccines are necessary for public health, pointing to their effect on disease outbreaks such as polio, measles and other preventable diseases. But critics say they’re unwilling to fairly study or even discuss the other side of the question: vaccine injured people.
One of the reasons we might not hear about them is that the only place the affected families can go to report injuries is to VAERS, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, created by the CDC and FDA.
The site welcomes its visitors with: “Have you or your child had a reaction following vaccination?”
After that, families can ask for monetary compensation from what many call the vaccine court, an administrative procedure, which is run by a government program called 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act using government-funded science. The act was passed in large part because of lobbying from pharmaceutical companies, which now cannot be sued for anything related to the vaccines they make — a clear conflict of interest.
Most importantly, these hearings are not open to the public or press, so we rarely hear about them.
Porter Bridges developed brain damage after childhood vaccinations. Photo: Bought movie.
Some stories do find a way to get noticed. In 1994 the Bridges family filed a suit through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, after their son Porter became autistic. In 2011 they won the case and received about $7 million. The court concluded that a combination of childhood vaccines caused Porter to have encephalopathy – brain damage.
(Porter’s story was thoroughly discussed in the movie Bought, a film bringing light to the money involved in the pharmaceutical industry and its effect in making vaccines).
Injuries such as encephalopathy are controversial because the defendants may say the child does not have autism, they have encephalopathy, and the link between autism and vaccines is therefore “disproved.”
But autism spectrum conditions have grown to include many symptoms, and the main one is brain developmental issues. Whether in the future, studies will be able to classify encephalopathy or brain damage and autism as the same thing, it’s worth noting that the two have many identical symptoms: confusion, memory issues, muscle weakness, twitching, trembling, difficulty speaking, seizures, and even coma.
And encephalopathy is a common vaccine injury. The VAERS site lists it as a possible result of the DTP shot (noticeable within 72 hours) and MMR (within 5-15 days).
One of the most famous MMR court cases is that of Bailey Banks. The court concluded that childhood vaccinations caused Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis or ADEM (intense brain swelling).
The true numbers of injured are hard to count, as many families never report them or ask for compensation knowing that it might take up to two decades to see the results.
Vaccine Pamphlets Themselves List Many Serious Side-Effects
Every vaccine comes with a long insert of side-effects, which are rarely shown to patients. And if one were to ask, doctors have been known to get upset.
Looking at an insert from any vaccine paints a similar picture. This is an insert for M-M-R II vaccine (measles, mumps, and rubella) made by Merck, one of the first biggest pharmaceutical companies.
First of all, the safety of this particular vaccine has been determined by studies on a small number of children, 284 total.
The vaccine has also never been studied for its effect on the development of the fetus in pregnant women.
The safety of this vaccine, when given before the age of 12 months, has not been established. It is also not 100% effective, like all vaccines.
Patients who may experience an adverse reaction are instructed to report it to VAERS.
The list of the adverse reactions reported is long, but what is particularly important are injuries to the nervous system:
Encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE); subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); transverse myelitis; febrile convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia.
In the 2016 VAERS report (not yet complete), encephalopathy is mentioned many times, as well as autism (mentioned 97 times).
Patients’ families reported: “loss of speech, regression from previous milestones, a light went out from child’s eyes, fever, lethargy, refusing to eat, encephalopathy.”
“Difficulty breathing, fever, hive-like rashes. Currently being assessed for Autism spectrum, speech loss, occupational therapy, etc.”
“Insomnia, anxiety, paranoia, (GABA) seizures, tics…legs would suddenly give out and she would fall, acne, headaches, stomach aches, dizziness, regression, anemia, mood swings, emotional lability, cognitive decline, brain inflammation.”

If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
The argument for herd immunity was actually developed out of observations of natural immunity, not vaccination. Statisticians observed that populations were protected when sufficient members contracted the wild form of a disease, and subsequently acquired lifelong immunity. With vaccines, however, evidence shows that unvaccinated children may catch infectious diseases from vaccinated children. What is true of natural immunity is not true of vaccination.
The herd immunity argument has always been inconsistent. On the one hand, the theory goes, people who cannot receive vaccines for whatever reason are protected from the disease through a high level of vaccination in the rest of society. On the other hand, the theory continues, parents who don’t vaccinate their children put the health of wider society at risk. How can a handful of people not getting vaccinated be protected from getting sick, while at the same time being so disease-ridden that they make others sick? This doesn’t make sense.
While herd immunity may not exist, herd mentality most definitely does. Health authorities, media commentators, and schools and their parent–teacher associations waste no opportunity in perpetuating this myth. Proponents have done such a thorough job of convincing the public that a parent who questions it is treated like someone who thinks the earth is flat or believes climate change is a conspiracy. On the contrary: an unprejudiced view of the science about vaccines, and an examination of history, clearly show that the herd immunity theory is—and always has been—flawed.
Vaccines may have a place in our medical arsenal, but they are not the silver bullet they’re portrayed to be. Year after year the pharmaceutical industry, looking for lucrative new profit centers, churns out new vaccines. They use pseudo-science to convince the public that these products are safe and effective, and they use public shaming to convince the citizenry that non-compliance is a public health threat. This entire racket completely falls apart with a close examination of the herd immunity myth. Until we are honest in our assessment of both the safety and efficacy of vaccines, kids will continue to be hurt, rights will continue to be trampled, and mythology will continue to trump science.
Gretchen DuBeau is Executive Director of Alliance for Natural Health USA.

The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm
Posted on:
Sunday, January 22nd 2017 at 6:30 pm
Written By:
Celeste McGovern
The Vaccine Did It
A toddler who developed severe neurological symptoms including blindness associated with chronic encephalitis and died following MMR vaccination was found to have vaccine-derived mumps virus in his brain, a new study reports.
Published in the current issue of the journal, Acta Neuropathologica, the study is the first of its kind to conclusively demonstrate chronic brain damage in the form of “panencephalitis” due to a vaccine-derived strain of the mumps virus. In light of a recent epidemic of mumps in highly vaccinated populations, the research raises questions about the dangers of live vaccine virus mutations and about public health claims that the MMR is a completely safe and effective vaccine without serious side effects.
MMR, BRAIN INFECTION AND DEATH
The study describes an 18-month old infant who was diagnosed with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease (SCID) — a serious immune system defect that may follow infection — four months after he received the triple Measles Mumps Rubella vaccine that contains live viruses.
The baby was treated for the illness but six months later became ill again with fever, rash, diarrhoea, lethargy and seizures. MRI scans of his brain showed evidence of encephalitis — brain inflammation due to infection.
The toddler was treated with antimicrobials, antivirals and steroids and sent home on anticonvulsant drugs.  Over the next few months, behavioural problems became obvious, his hearing was impaired and his speech and language were delayed. A year later, by then four years old, he was still suffering from seizures and he became increasingly lethargic, disoriented and agitated. His walking was increasingly uncoordinated and he began to lose his eyesight.
A repeat MRI scan of the boy’s brain revealed abnormalities and a brain biopsy was taken at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London. It revealed neuronal death and evidence of central nervous system damage and chronic inflammation. Despite aggressive treatment, his seizures increased, he became weak on his left side, went blind and the five-year-old died seven weeks later.
VACCINE VIRUS CONFIRMED
Spinal fluid and urine samples collected during the boy’s last hospitalisation, as well as RNA re-extracted from his brain biopsy, were sent to the Public Health England Virus Reference Laboratory for sequencing.
Researchers, led by Sofia Morfopoulou of the Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, and at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, used deep sequencing technology to identify the MuV -JL5 vaccine virus strain in the boy’s brain biopsy which was negative for all other viruses.
Genetic Drift and Outbreaks
Mutations in the mumps vaccine virus from that in the batch of the vaccine the boy had received were also detected. The study refers to a 2015 study confirming “genetic instability” of mumps vaccine virus that leads to “genetic drift” between different vaccine batches and may explain why some mumps vaccines induce more serious adverse reactions than others, especially when they are grown on different media.
This science may also explain why the mumps vaccine is failing. A recent outbreak among more than 1,600 mostly vaccinated people in Arkansas has public health officers there admitting that the vaccine isn’t protecting against emerging new strains of the virus.
It’s part of a growing phenomenon that scientists are reporting in many vaccines called “sero-conversion” – when vaccines diminish the strain of a virus they are targeting, but another strain of the same virus blooms — just as antibiotics wipe out bacterial infections but leave antibiotic-resistant superbugs to thrive.

Study : The administration of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine induces changes in the nasal microbiota and nasal epithelium gene expression profiles
Background
Viral infections such as influenza have been shown to predispose hosts to increased colonization of the respiratory tract by pathogenic bacteria and secondary bacterial pneumonia. To examine how viral infections and host antiviral immune responses alter the upper respiratory microbiota, we analyzed nasal bacterial composition by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing in healthy adults at baseline and at 1 to 2 weeks and 4 to 6 weeks following instillation of live attenuated influenza vaccine or intranasal sterile saline. A subset of these samples was submitted for microarray host gene expression profiling.
Results
We found that live attenuated influenza vaccination led to significant changes in microbial community structure, diversity, and core taxonomic membership as well as increases in the relative abundances of Staphylococcus and Bacteroides genera (both p < 0.05). Hypergeometric testing for the enrichment of gene ontology terms in the vaccinated group reflected a robust up-regulation of type I and type II interferon-stimulated genes in the vaccinated group relative to controls. Translational murine studies showed that poly I:C administration did in fact permit greater nasal Staphylococcus aureus persistence, a response absent in interferon alpha/beta receptor deficient mice.
Conclusions
Collectively, our findings demonstrate that although the human nasal bacterial community is heterogeneous and typically individually robust, activation of a type I interferon (IFN)-mediated antiviral response may foster the disproportionate emergence of potentially pathogenic species such as S. aureus.

Study:  In vitro and in vivo growth alter the population dynamic and properties of a Jeryl Lynn mumps vaccine

PDF source

Sarah M. Connaughton, Jun X. Wheeler, Eva Vitková, Philip Minor and Silke Schepelmann
Vaccine, 2015-08-26, Volume 33, Issue 36, Pages 4586-4593, Copyright © 2015 The Authors
Highlights
•    Mumps vaccines contain live attenuated viruses that are manufactured in cell substrates.
•    The production of the JL-CK vaccine in primary canine kidney cells is atypical.
•    Genetic changes introduced by different cell types have not been investigated.
•    JL-CK vaccine contains a unique mix of mumps viruses that have acquired a number of mutations.
•    Growth in cell or animal substrates dramatically alters the population dynamic of JL-CK.
Abstract
Mumps vaccines are live attenuated viruses. They are known to vary in effectiveness, degree of attenuation and adverse event profile. However, the underlying reasons are poorly understood. We studied two closely related mumps vaccines which originate from the same attenuated Jeryl Lynn-5 strain but have different efficacies. Jeryl Lynn-Canine Kidney (JL-CK), produced on primary canine kidney cells, is less effective than RIT4385, which is produced on chicken embryo fibroblasts. JL-CK and RIT4385 could be distinguished by a number of in vitro and in vivo properties. JL-CK produced heterogeneous, generally smaller plaques than RIT4385, but gave 100-fold higher titres when grown in cells and showed a higher degree of hydrocephalus formation in neonatal rat brains. Sanger sequencing of JL-CK identified 14 regions of heterogeneity throughout the genome. Plaque purification of JL-CK demonstrated the presence of five different Jeryl Lynn-5 variants encompassing the 14 mutations. One JL-CK mutation was associated with a small plaque phenotype, the effects of the others in vitro or in vivo were less clear. Only 4% of the JL-CK population corresponded to the parental Jeryl Lynn-5 strain. Next generation sequencing of JL-CK and virus before and after growth in cell lines or neonatal rat brains showed that propagation in vitro or in vivo altered the population dramatically. Our findings indicate that growth of JL-CK in primary canine kidney cells resulted in the selection of a mixture of mumps virus variants that have different biological properties compared to the parent Jeryl Lynn-5 virus. We also report three previously unknown heterogenic regions within the N gene of the RIT4385 vaccine.

Do your own research. Understand the risks and benefits of everything you are putting into your child.

Do your own research. Understand the risks and benefits of everything you are putting into your child.
Find a healthcare provider who doesn’t believe “one size fits all” when it comes to vaccines
There will be a permanent supply of disease “outbreaks” because the vaccines for measles, mumps, and pertussis have serious efficacy issues.
Have you ever noticed that “outbreaks” of pertussis (whooping cough) mumps, and measles seem to happen every year? There’s a pretty simple explanation for this, and it’s not necessarily what you think. Put simply: the vaccines don’t work that well. As the Associated Press reported in 2013:
“A government study offers a new theory on why the whooping cough vaccine doesn’t seem to be working as well as expected. The research suggests that while the vaccine may keep people from getting sick, it doesn’t prevent them from spreading whooping cough — also known as pertussis — to others. “It could explain the increase in pertussis that we’re seeing in the U.S.,” said one of the researchers, Tod Merkel of the Food and Drug Administration.”

Oral Contraceptives and Autism

Oral Contraceptives and Autism
The mechanisms by which oral contraceptives instigate neurodevelopmental changes is slowly emerging. It appears that in addition to preventing pregnancy, synthetic hormones like ethinylestradiol, used in most birth control formulations, initiate epigenetic alterations in the oocytes (eggs) causing persistent changes in expression of the estrogen receptor beta gene (ERβ). When those eggs become fertilized and conception ensues, the changes in the estrogen receptor gene impact the expression of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
Ethinylestradiol is an Endocrine Disruptor
Ethinylestradiol is a known endocrine disruptor. Anything that disrupts endogenous hormones can be considered an endocrine disruptor. Evidence is emerging that ethinylestradiol may trigger what is called DNA methylation of the estrogen receptor gene. This then causes decreased messenger RNA resulting in impaired brain estrogen signaling in offspring [2]. Let’s think more deeply about this.
Methylation means that, by way of a chemical process, a gene is turned on (hypomethylation) or turned off (methylation) by an enzyme or protein. Researchers believe that methylation is one of a number of mechanisms by which environmental interactions influence genetic activity. In this case, ethinylestradiol silences or turns off some important processes that are associated with estrogen signaling, namely receptor activity.
Methylation and other epigenetic reactions influence health and disease processes across generations. This is called transgenerational transmission. So, I suspect that the deleterious effects of ethinylestradiol on the estrogen receptor gene are transgenerational. This is possible because the estrogen receptor gene may be an imprinted gene. Imprinting is a dynamic epigenetic phenomenon by which certain genes are expressed in a parent-of-origin manner. If the allele, an alternative form of the same gene, inherited from the father is imprinted, it is thereby silenced, and only the allele from the mother is expressed. If the allele from the mother is imprinted, then only the allele from the father is expressed.

Study: The link between oral contraceptive use and prevalence in autism spectrum disorder
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of developmental disabilities that include full syndrome
autism, Asperger’s syndrome, and other pervasive developmental disorders. The identified prevalence of ASD has increased in a short time period across multiple studies causing some to conclude that it has reached epidemic proportions in the U.S.
Many possible explanations for the rise in numbers of individuals diagnosed with ASD have been offered and yet, causes and contributing factors for ASD are inadequately understood. Current evidence suggests that both genetics and environment play a part in causing ASD.
One possible risk factor for the increase in prevalence has been profoundly overlooked in the existing biomedical and epidemiologic literature. As the prevalence of ASD has risen in the last sixty years, so has the prevalence of the usage of the oral contraceptives and other modern hormonal delivery methods. In 1960 about one million American women were using oral contraceptives, today close to 11 million women in the U.S. use oral contraceptives. Eighty-two percent of sexually active women in the U.S. have used oral contraceptives at some point during their reproductive years. Thus, the growth in use of progesterone/estrogen-based contraceptives in the United State has reached near-ubiquitous levels among women in the child-bearing age range.
The suppression of ovulation produced by estrogen–progesterone is an indisputable abnormality. It is logical to consider the outcome of the ovum that would have been normally released from the ovary during ovulation. To date there is no comprehensive research into the potential neurodevelopmental effects of oral contraceptive use on progeny. The issue has been only sparsely considered in the biomedical literature. This article hypothesizes that the compounds, estrogen and progesterone, used in oral contraceptives modify the condition of the oocyte and give rise to a potent risk factor that helps explain the recent increase in the prevalence of ASD’s.
This hypothesis does not propose to delineate the cause of autism. Rather, it attempts to explain the recent dramatic increase in prevalence and point the way for further study that will lead to causal examination

Study: An epigenetic basis for autism spectrum disorder risk and oral contraceptive use
In the United States 1 in 68 children are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although the etiology is unknown, many scientists believe ASD is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors and/or epigenetic factors. The widespread use of oral contraceptives is one environmental risk factor that has been greatly overlooked in the biomedical literature. Oral contraceptives, synthetic hormones created to imitate natural human hormones and disrupt endogenous endocrine function to inhibit pregnancy, may be causing the harmful neurodevelopmental effects that result in the increased prevalence of ASD.
It is conceivable that the synthetic hormones repeatedly assault the oocyte causing persistent changes in expression of the estrogen receptor beta gene. Ethinylestradiol, a known endocrine
disruptor, may trigger DNA methylation of the estrogen receptor beta gene causing decreased mRNA resulting in impaired brain estrogen signaling in progeny. In addition, it is possible the deleterious effects are transgenerational as the estrogen receptor gene and many of its targets may be imprinted and the methylation marks protected from global demethylation and preserved through fertilization and beyond to progeny generations. This article will delineate the hypothesis that ethinylestradiol activates DNA methylation of the estrogen receptor beta gene causing decreased mRNA resulting in diminished brain estrogen signaling in offspring of mothers exposed to oral contraceptives. Considering the detrimental epigenetic and transgenerational effects proposed, it calls for further study.

Potential Link between Oral Contraceptives and Autism
Oral Contraceptives are Endocrine Disruptors
One of the compounds found in oral contraceptives is the synthetic estrogen called Ethinylestradiol (EE2). EE2 is a known endocrine disrupting compound (EDC) capable of causing harm to the endocrine system and to progeny. Studies show that EDCs have the potential to do harm by adversely affecting the sensitive hormonal pathways that regulate reproductive function in a variety of species including humans. The National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) reports that EDCs may disturb the endocrine system and produce adverse developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune effects in humans and wildlife. The NIEHS indicates that research also shows that the highest risk of endocrine disruption occurs during prenatal and early postnatal development. Humans might be exposed to EDCs through foods, beverages, pesticides, and cosmetics, but the case with EE2 is particularly striking because EE2 exposure in female humans occurs at a pharmacologically effective dose, administered every day, for extended periods of time.
Hormones and their signaling pathways are essential to normal functioning of all tissues and organs in invertebrate and vertebrate species. Normal communication of the endocrine system can be disrupted by exogenous substances like EDCs, which have the same attributes as endogenous hormones. EDCs possess the ability to be active at low concentrations and like endogenous hormones, they are able to bind to receptors at very low concentrations. Therefore, endocrine disruption can occur from low-dose exogenous hormone exposure or from hormonally active substances that interfere with receptors for other hormonally assisted processes. In addition, some EDCs are able to interact with multiple hormone receptors concurrently. They can work simultaneously to create additive or synergistic effects not observed with the individual compounds. EDCs can act on a number of physiological processes in a tissue specific manner. And, as with endogenous hormones, it is often not feasible to extrapolate low-dose effects from the high-dose effects of EDCs. Thus the mimicry of estradiol (E2) and the information that such compounds can cause harmful effects on reproduction and the endocrine system provide mechanistic evidence that EE2 found in oral contraceptives may adversely affect the oocyte or developing embryo.

Update: Oral Contraceptive Use and Autism
In the realm of environmental risk factors, the oral contraceptive hypothesis I first proposed is compelling. As a group of agents, there are explicit documented mechanisms through which oral contraceptives can impact the oocyte and/or the developing embryo. Additional reasons for considering the role of oral contraceptives and autism include:

The exposure concentration is directly administered and pharmacologically effective.
The exposure to the endocrine disruptor may be of larger magnitude than other environmental exposures that mostly occur through passive secondary means.
A temporal correlation exists between the increased prevalence of oral contraceptive use and the increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorders over the last fifty years.
The possibility exists that the effects of EE2 could intensify over generations due to transgenerational transmission of altered epigenetic programming.
Continued exposure across generations could possibly impart sensitivity to developing autism spectrum disorders.

Do We Really Understand Oral Contraceptives?
While researching my hypothesis linking oral contraceptive use to the development of autism in children, I wondered about why so many women are still using a drug that has dangerous side-effect and could cause neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. The simple answer seems to be lack of accurate medical information. Not only do individual women lack critical information about the pill, but the support systems women depend on for advice and help with decision-making also seem to lack information about the pill.
All health choices are complex and influenced by multiple variables that all interact. There are multiple levels, underlying determinants of health behaviors, which are relevant for understanding why oral contraceptives are still the primary method of choice in the United States. The following influencing factors are not exhaustive, but do shed light on why pill use is so prevalent in the U.S. Simply put, we don’t know better.

Why I won’t vaccinate

If you choose to read this, please read the whole thing.

So here it is, a little bit of why we no longer vaccinate, with reasoning for each particular vaccination before 12 years old:

As of 2016, a child in America is scheduled to received 74 vaccinations by the time they turn 18. With each shot, you are taking the risk of your child suffering the side effects, even as severe as SIDS, paralysis, deafness, blindness, and death. That’s 74 times… I just personally can’t agree to roll those dice with the lives and lifelong health of my children. With most shots, you are also allowing heavy metals to accumulate in their body.

I am extremely uncomfortable with the notion that as a duty to society, I must choose to inject known poisons into my child’s body. I will never be convinced again to stick a needle into my child containing recognized carcinogens, neurotoxins, and other poisons that can cross the blood-brain barrier and build up in my child’s body. When you put something like aluminum into the body by way of injection, it bypasses the protective mechanisms of the gastrointestinal tract, circulates in your body, and is deposited in your body tissues. *There are NO STUDIES that prove that the amount of aluminum in vaccines is safe to inject into an infant or a toddler (or human for that matter).*

Aluminum IS however known to cause neurological harm, degenerative problems, autoimmune disorders, and inflammatory conditions. Conditions that fall under these categories are: Lupus, Graves’ Disease, Lupus, Celiac Disease, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Chron’s Disease, Endometriosis, Fibromyalgia, Arthritis, Scleroderma, Vitiligo, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Distrophy, Cancer, Parkinson’s, Diabetes, Asthma, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and more. These are debilitating ailments that a child can develop at any time and face for the rest of their lives. How can someone tell me as a mother that I need to do this to my child because “it’s best for everyone else?”

Other harmful ingredients and additives whose toxic effects have NEVER been examined by injecting them into small children are Formaldehyde, MSG, 2-Phenoxyethanol, and others.

Formaldehyde is a carcinogen, that is a fact. It can cause genetic damage and kidney damage if inhaled, but no one has bothered to study the effects of shooting it into our children with needles. Glutamate, a component of MSG, is an excitotoxin which is a chemical that affects brain function. They’ve taken MSG out of baby food, but left it in vaccines… 2-Phenoxyethanol is a chemical preservative used in perfumes, insect repellents, germicides, solvent for dyes, plasticizers, and antiseptics. It is harmful and can cause reproductive defects and severe skin and eye irritation if inhaled, swallowed, or absorbed through the skin. Again, despite this, it’s still in vaccines and the harm hasn’t been studied by way of injection. But let’s just assume they’re all safe, right?

Also to be considered is the use of any sort of human DNA such as aborted fetal cells. This can trigger autoimmune reactions. The immune system will attack the foreign human DNA, and this attack can then in turn become an attack against the child’s own body because it can’t tell the difference between same-species DNA. The injected human DNA inserts itself into the genes of the child and alters their genetic function. Animal substances are concerning as well, because when they are screened for disease, there is a possibility of missing animal viruses there are no tests for. This has happened before.

I can’t fathom routinely injecting poisons that I know are harmful and toxic into my child and taking the risk of life-long ailments. Yes, that means I am taking a bit of a higher risk of her catching a disease that vaccines may offer some protection against, but the risks are low, and *vaccinated children catch them too.* It is a FACT that certain toxic ingredients are cause harm, while it is only a possibility that my child may catch diseases we could vaccinate against. There are healthy ways to prevent and combat these diseases, and contracting and managing most of them will result in lifelong immunity.

What I’ve written below this are the chances of my child catching the diseases vaccines are supposed to protect against, and the risks that I feel outweigh the benefits of each vaccination. This includes the side effects of the shots and the harmful chemicals that they contain.

HIB: HIB is NOT a common disease. A breastfed child who does not attend daycare is at an even lower risk of catching it. The fatality rate of those who do catch it is 5%, usually when it is not caught soon enough. There are about 25 cases per year in the US, meaning the risk for my child to catch it in their first 2 years of life is about 1 in 200,000. After age 2, it’s nearly 0. It is also treatable. Concerning adverse reactions include seizures, encephalitis (brain swelling), autoimmune reactions, nervous system dysfunction, anaphalaxis, angiodema, apnea, hives, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), convulsions, renal failure, and severe allergic reactions. The vaccine contains aluminum and formaldehyde, which I’ll explain the issues about later.

PC (Pneumococcus): 1/3 of severe cases of Pc are caused by strains NOT covered by the vaccine. The chances of a child by age 2 having a severe case is 1 out of 2850. Pc is treatable. Again, a breastfed child not in daycare is at low risk for catching this. Most infants suffer one or more systemic or local reactions with this shot. The more concerning adverse reactions in infants and toddlers during clinical studies included: DEATH (SIDS), bronchiolitis, gastroenteritis, pneumonia, SIDS, apnea, decreased limb mobility, arthritis, GBS, seizures, heart failure, pancreatitis/myocardial infarction resulting in death. This vaccine contains aluminum.

DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis): Diphtheria is extremely rare, at 5 cases per year and not a single one since 2003 in the US. The risk is basically 0. Tetanus is virtually unheard of in people under 5 years old, and there are only 10 cases per year in people 5-25 years of age. The risk is 1 in 500,000. Pertussis (Whooping Cough) is more common, but in my child’s first 12 years of life, their risk of having a severe case is 1 in 3333. Pertussis is rarely problematic after 1 year of age. Infection is likely to create life-long immunity. It is treatable. The fatality rate is 1% for infants and toddlers and adults do not die from it in the US. Reactions to this vaccine include: death, brain injury, coma, severe seizure disorders, GBS, Brachial neuritis (dysfunction of nerves in the arm), Cyanosis, anaphylactic shock, grand mal seizures, bronchitis, pneumonia, hypotonia, encephalopathy, apnea, SIDS, and autism. This contains aluminum, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde, and 2-phenoxyethanol.

Hep B: This disease is also rare in children under 12. Virtually all cases of Hep B in infants each year are results of transmission by the mother at birth. Vaccinating for this actually began with attempts to control the disease by stopping it within high risk groups. When this didn’t work, they started vaccinating all newborns for it instead. There’s really no reason for an infant to get this shot if the mother is not infected. In the first 12 years of life, chances of contracting Hep B are 1 in 40,000, almost all passed on from the mother. SOME known reactions of this shot are: lupus, blood vessel inflammation, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, liver damage, wheezing, hair loss, bruises, GBS, eczema , liver damage, asthma, heart palpitations, arthritis, anaphylaxis, severe nerve dysfunc. Paralysis, GBS, seizures, spinal cord inflammation, optic nerve inflammation, multiple sclerosis. This contains aluminum and formaldehyde.

Rotavirus: Most children who gets this don’t even know and recover from it just like any other common virus. When it becomes severe, it’s usually due to dehydration. Fatalities are rare. This vaccine is a live virus, meaning a child who gets the shot can pass the virus on to others or become infected themselves with Rotavirus (Rotavirus infection is a possible side effect). Common side effects mimic the virus itself. Worse reactions include: seizures, Kawasaki disease, intussusception (requiring emergency surgery), DEATH, SIDS, pneumonia, bleeding from low platelet counts, and hives. This vaccine contains monkey kidney cells, fetal cow blood, Polysorbate 80, and pig virus contaminants.

Polio: Polio doesn’t exist in the US, so in all reality my child is not in need of any protection this may offer. The vaccine can cause allergic reactions, anaphylactic shock, lymphadenopathy, convulsions, and other mild reactions. This shot contains baby cow blood serum, human proteins, Glutamate, formaldehyde, 2-phenoxyethanol, and monkey kidney cells.

MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella): Severe cases of these diseases are so extremely rare that the risk is basically 0 for my child. Measles is not common, at 300 cases in the US per year (all ages of people) and complications are uncommon. Mumps is just as rare, and severe complications are almost nonexistent before puberty. Rubella does not cause severe illness in infants and children. There are only 20 cases per year. This is a live virus, so the vaccinated can spread Rubella following the shot. Known reactions include: Measles infection, aseptic Meningitis, arthritis, pancreatitis, pneumonia, severe eye inflammation that can permanently affect vision, nerve deafness in the ear, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, panniculitis, vasculitis, pneumonia, pneumonitis (nonbacterial lung inflammation), and neurological reactions like brain swelling, GBS, ataxia (balance problems with difficulty walking), multiple nerve inflammation and dysfunction. This vaccine contains cow fetus serum, chick embryo proteins, DNA and protein fragments from human fetal cells, and Glutamate.

Varicella (Chickenpox): Chickenpox is not common, is treatable, and severe complications occur in less than 1% of cases. In my child’s first 12 years of life, their chance of having a severe case is 1 in 25,000. Adverse reactions to this vaccine include: chickenpox-like rash, pneomonitis (severe lung inflammation that can require intensive care), bleeding problems, neurological reactions, stroke, encephalitis, spinal cord inflammation and dysfunction, GBS, seizures, facial nerve paralysis, meningitis, pnemonia, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, bacterial skin and tissue infections, and more. This vaccine contains Gelatin, which is against my religion to consume, as well as MSG, DNA and protein from human cells, cow fetus serum, and animal cells. This vaccine sheds the Chickenpox virus in the vaccinated for 6 weeks.

Hep A: Hepatitis A is harmless to young children and preventative measures can be taken if they are exposed. Severe cases are extremely rare, and virtually all cases happen in teens and young adults. The risk in these ages is about 1 in 25,000 in teen and adult years of life. Adverse reactions to the shot include: Hepatitis, seizures, bleeding problems, GBS, encephalitis, difficulties with walking and balance, multiple sclerosis, severe anaphylactic allergic reactions, jaundice, fainting, spinal cord inflammation, vasculitis, nerve dysfunction, rashes, and flu-like symptoms.

Influenza (Flu): While the flu may be common, it’s treatable and VERY rarely are there complications from severe cases. There is a wide debate and some evidence that this shot doesn’t even work for children under 2 and the rate of side effects is unusually high, so that alone makes this not worth the potential side effects to me. The nasal mist is a live virus, so those who receive this are contagious with the flu for 6 weeks and are likely have a mild case of the flu after receiving this. Adverse reactions to the flu shot include: tonsillitis, asthma, arthritis, limb paralysis, tremors, difficulty swallowing, febrile seizures, GBS, bleeding from low platelet count, severe allergic reactions, seizures, inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, encephalopathy, dysfunction of nerves in the face, eyes, or arm, fainting, inflammation of blood vessels, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, chest pain, rapid heart rate, eye infection and redness/swelling, and more. There are many different flu vaccinations, so the list of harmful chemicals varies between them and is quite long. These include formaldehyde, MSG, and Mercury or Thimerosal which is incredibly harmful and toxic and has been removed (almost completely) from all other vaccines because of this.
———-

I hope that people will understand that not all parents who choose not to vaccinate their children are quacks who based their decisions off of Google searches, illegitimate sources, biased information, opinions, or conspiracy theories. While there are some people like that, most of us are not. I urge you to seek out peer reviewed investigatice research and consider its source, funding, and the factors that solidify or vindicate it such as amount of test subjects, presence of control groups and size, or factors that were overlooked. This is important in any research, whether it supports or opposes vaccinations. I encourage you to make the decision whether or not to vaccinate each of your children individually and that you with the risks and benefits specific to your child.