NaturalNews – Causing autism before birth – is that the insidious goal of Big Pharma’s new push for vaccinating babies in the womb?

Causing autism before birth – is that the insidious goal of Big Pharma’s new push for vaccinating babies in the womb?
(NaturalNews) Has there ever been “vaccine safety science?” Ever since the disputed Polio vaccination was “discovered” by Dr. Jonas F. Salk, fear and propaganda have been the only advertising needed to convince a couple hundred million Americans that vaccines are safe and effective, even though most are neither. Dial it back to 1955 when a rogue, haphazard scientist by the name of Salk took some monkey kidneys, cut them up into little pieces, rocked them in vials like a baby in a carriage with some polio viruses in a “nutrient solution,” and suddenly declared he found the cure for polio.
Next, he took the three different strains of polio virus that he had mixed together and diluted them with formaldehyde, a deadly embalming fluid used to preserve corpses, and never tested it even once on a single human being. Voila! Chill and ship. One month later the cure for Polio is announced and the concoction is duplicated millions of times and injected into children all over the planet. Why do people believe it works? Because it’s declared “safe, potent and efficient” and the “miracle vaccine of the century” all over mass media.
Pay it forward sixty plus years. Now the CDC recommends up to 70 vaccinations for children before age seven, beginning from the day of birth. Autism rates have skyrocketed since this insane vaccine schedule has doubled in quantity and frequency over the last two decades. It used to be about 1 in 10,000 kids had autism, but now it’s 1 in about 50 suffering some form of autism spectrum disorder. The MMR and the flu shot are prime time suspects. It’s only been a short while since the powerful and insidious vaccine lobby rammed SB277 through the California legislature, destroying any chance parents had of opting their children out of dozens of doses of mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and MSG injected into their muscle tissue, without any safety or efficacy proof.
Say hello to 21st Century Cures Act – an attempt by Big Pharma to give babies autism while still in the womb
Why would Big Pharma want children to suffer from metallic brain disorder, central nervous system disorders, autism, Asperger’s syndrome, metabolic syndrome, immune deficiency, auto-immune disorder, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and other often permanent “side effects” caused by chemical violence (vaccines)? Money.

Advertisements

Big Pharma Wants to Vaccinate Unborn Babies in the Womb

Big Pharma Wants to Vaccinate Unborn Babies in the Womb
For many months now, we’ve been monitoring the progress of the 21st Century Cures bill. This legislation is intended to bring medicine into the 21st century, but as we’ve noted before, it does the opposite. Rather than looking forward, this bill simply doubles down on conventional approaches that have been in place for decades.
21st Century Cures passed the House last year. The Senate has broken up the bill into over a dozen separate pieces, which could be considered any day now.
One extremely worrisome provision seems to put structures in place for amending the current vaccine schedule and including more vaccinations for pregnant mothers. Senate bill S. 2742 (the “Promoting Biomedical Research and Public Health for Patients Act”) contains the following language:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of this subtitle, both a woman who received a covered vaccine while pregnant and any child who was in utero at the time such woman received the vaccine shall be considered persons to whom the covered vaccine was administered and persons who received the covered vaccine.
This may have been written for liability reasons. Perhaps Big Pharma is concerned that the child would be eligible to sue for damages, unlike anyone vaccinated after birth. Perhaps the thinking is that doctors tend to have more control over mothers before birth, so why not force vaccines on them then, rather than after birth?
Then again, this provision may be intended simply to increase vaccinations given to pregnant mothers. If a developing child is considered a “person” eligible to receive vaccinations, the vaccine industry could begin to develop more vaccines intended specifically for children in utero.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) already recommend that pregnant mothers get whooping cough, flu, and hepatitis B vaccines. Good questions remain about whether this is necessary or useful. Some scientific studies have shown virtually no benefit to the maternal flu vaccine, and of course flu vaccines contain mercury. Injecting a mother with mercury, much less a baby in utero, seems totally reckless to us.
In addition, if the language quoted above becomes law, the whole CDC vaccine schedule could be shifted or expanded to create more vaccine industry profit-making opportunities. Maybe the first DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) shot will be given to the mother and the fetus, rather than to the child at one month. Perhaps the schedule will be expanded.
The risks in doing this are frightening. The adjuvant load alone that would be delivered to the mother and shared with a child in utero (a child without a functioning immune system) could cause serious damage. As we’ve noted elsewhere, adequate safety testing of aluminum adjuvants for young children—much less for unborn children—has been completely absent!
We know of no studies that have looked at the long-term consequences of multiple vaccinations during pregnancy, nor any analysis comparing the risks to the benefits (if any). Further, the safety and effectiveness of giving certain vaccines to pregnant women was not determined before the vaccines were licensed in the US.