Routine administration of the smallpox vaccine ended in the United States in 1972. With the reinitiation of the US smallpox vaccination program in 2002, the risk of transmission of vaccinia virus from a recently vaccinated person to a susceptible host is a concern. Secondary transmission is biologically plausible because of evidence of viral persistence in vaccinees. Vaccinia virus has been cultured from the oropharynx of vaccine recipients with a normal course following vaccination.1 In the 1960s and 1970s, it was isolated from the blood and urine of a limited number of vaccine recipients who had complications following vaccination.2 More sensitive molecular techniques are now available for detecting viruses in clinical specimens. We describe findings using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect vaccinia DNA in smallpox vaccine recipients
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health – 2014
Cui F, Liang X, Wang F, Zheng H, Hutin YJ, Yang W.
Author information
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract
China has long experience using live attenuated and inactivated vaccines against hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. We summarize this experience and provide recent data on adverse events after immunization (AEFIs) with hepatitis A vaccines in China. We reviewed the published literature (in Chinese and English) and the published Chinese regulatory documents on hepatitis A vaccine development, production, and postmarketing surveillance of AEFI. We described the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccines and horizontal transmission of live HAV vaccine in China. In clinical trials, live HAV vaccine was associated with fever (0.4%-5% of vaccinees), rash (0%-1.1%), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (0.015%). Inactivated HAV vaccine was associated with fever (1%-8%), but no serious AEFIs were reported. Live HAV vaccine had seroconversion rates of 83% to 91%, while inactivated HAV vaccine had seroconversion rates of 95% to 100%. Community trials showed efficacy rates of 90% to 95% for live HAV and 95% to 100% for inactivated HAV vaccine. Postmarketing surveillance showed that HAV vaccination resulted in an AEFI incidence rate of 34 per million vaccinees, which accounted for 0.7% of adverse events reported to the China AEFI monitoring system. There was no difference in AEFI rates between live and inactivated HAV vaccines. Live and inactivated HAV vaccines manufactured in China were immunogenic, effective, and safe. Live HAV vaccine had substantial horizontal transmission due to vaccine virus shedding; thus, further monitoring of the safety of virus shedding is warranted.
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health – Nov 2016
Jeong S – 1, Than VT – 1, Lim I – 2, Kim W – 3
Author information
1 Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
3 Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: kimwy@cau.ac.kr.
Abstract
RotaTeq® is a live attenuated human-bovine reassortant vaccine against rotaviruses that is used worldwide. However, shedding of the virus used in RotaTeq® has been detected in the feces of children following vaccination by the oral route, possibly affecting community immunity. Therefore, a simple and efficient method to discriminate between virulent and RotaTeq® vaccine strains is required. In this study, a novel one-step multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay targeting the NSP3 gene was developed to detect RotaTeq® vaccine strains in fecal samples. RotaTeq® vaccine viruses were successfully distinguished from known wild-type rotavirus genotypes. In addition, the developed assay was able to detect rotaviruses in clinical stool samples obtained from South Korea during the 2011-2013 rotavirus seasons. Of the 1106 stool specimens from children with acute gastroenteritis that were screened, 286 rotaviruses were genotyped. RotaTeq® vaccine strains were identified in 39 samples (13.6%). The novel RT-PCR assay that was developed could be used to detect and discriminate between RotaTeq® vaccine strains that are shed in fecal matter, and to estimate the quantification of virus that has been shed after vaccination.
VAXXED TV – Something is Wrong
I Really Trusted Her
100% Proof! Human DNA in Vaccines
More M.D.s Come Forward
Adam’s Letter Board
We signed his life away
What kills 7,300 babies in the United States each year?
1 Corinthians 15 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 by which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Hebrews 6 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
2 of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
3 And this will we do, if God permit.
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6 if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
8 but that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant,and as a root out of a dry ground:he hath no form nor comeliness;and when we shall see him,there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He is despised and rejected of men;a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief:and we hid as it were our faces from him;he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he hath borne our griefs,and carried our sorrows:yet we did esteem him stricken,smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions,he was bruised for our iniquities:the chastisement of our peace was upon him;and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray;we have turned every one to his own way;and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,yet he opened not his mouth:he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter,and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb,so he openeth not his mouth.
8 He was taken from prison and from judgment:and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living:for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
9 And he made his grave with the wicked,and with the rich in his death;because he had done no violence,neither was any deceit in his mouth.
10 Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him;he hath put him to grief:when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin,he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days,and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.
11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied:by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many;for he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great,and he shall divide the spoil with the strong;because he hath poured out his soul unto death:and he was numbered with the transgressors;and he bare the sin of many,and made intercession for the transgressors.
This is Part 4, where things really get interesting!The first two man-made causes of paralytic polio have something in common with the third: The paralysis almost always occurs at the same place as the “injury”. Does this seemingly obscure fact inform us as to the main way polio paralyzes? I think so! Watch Part 1
Vaccines maim children. Vaccines kill children. Will you let that happen to your child? Say no, and go vaccine free: http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com [The footage that I say is from Mexico is actually Columbia.]
En Corrèze, l’équipe de “Complément d’enquête” a rencontré Stanislas Geoffrit et Amandine Chaouche. Leur petit garçon de 2 ans souffre d’épilepsie et d’une méningo-encéphalite herpétique. Livio est handicapé à 80%. Il ne marche pas, ne parle pas, et suit un traitement médical très lourd. “Quinze jours après le rappel, Livio est dans le coma”
Selon ses parents, le petit garçon était en bonne santé avant une injection d’Infanrix (ou DTP, le vaccin obligatoire contre la diphtérie, le tétanos et la polio). Le couple “faisant confiance au pédiatre et au système de santé”, Livio est vacciné à 2 mois. Le lendemain, le bébé est pris d’une “énorme fièvre” qui dure “plus d’une semaine”. Le pédiatre rassure les parents. A 4 mois, l’enfant subit deux autres injections. “Moins de quinze jours après, Livio est dans le coma”, raconte son père.
Le couple a dû cesser de travailler et vit de l’allocation pour enfant handicapé : 1 200 euros par mois. Il a porté plainte contre le pédiatre et contre GSK, le fabricant du vaccin. Amandine est de nouveau enceinte, mais cette fois, “il n’y aura pas de vaccin : s’il faut aller en prison, j’irai en prison”, prévient Stanislas. Dans trois mois, des experts examineront Livio pour établir si sa maladie est liée au vaccin. Si le lien de cause à effet est reconnu, l’indemnisation pourrait atteindre plusieurs millions d’euros.
Un extrait de “Vaccinés contre les vaccins”, un reportage diffusé dans “Complément d’enquête. Vaccins, médicaments, médecins : la défiance” le 25 février 2016.
In Corrèze, the “Survey Supplement” team met with stanislas geoffrit and amandine chaouche. Their 2-Year-old boy suffers from epilepsy and encephalitis. Livio is disabled at 80 %. He doesn’t work, doesn’t talk, and follows a very heavy medical treatment.
“fifteen days after the reminder, livio is in a coma”
According to his parents, the little boy was healthy before an injection of infanrix (or dtp, the mandatory vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and polio). The couple “trusting the pediatrician and the health system”, livio is vaccinated at 2 months. The next day, the baby is taken from a ” huge fever ” that lasts ” more than a week “. the pediatrician rassure the parents. At 4 months, the child undergoes two further injections. “less than days later, livio is in a coma”, says his father.
The couple had to stop working and live in the disabled child allowance: € 1 per month. He filed a complaint against the pediatrician and against gsk, the vaccine manufacturer. Amandine is pregnant again, but this time, “there will be no vaccine: if you have to go to jail, I will go to jail”, warns stanislas. In three months, experts will examine livio to establish whether his illness is related to the vaccine. If the causal link is recognized, compensation could reach several million euros.
An Extract from ” vaccinated against vaccines “, a report circulated in ” further investigation. Vaccines, drugs, doctors: Defiance ” on 25 February 2016.
7 Trivia Facts About Polio
t’s called the “Gold Standard of Medicine.”
I’m referring to the current vaccine schedule. But is there an apparent hidden catch? Can justification for the aggressive vaccine schedule arguably be traced back to the polio vaccine that is trotted out as proof vaccines work?
If you don’t believe me, question any parent on vaccines. The knee-jerk question in almost every case is, “What about polio?”
Well, what about it? Here I discuss 7 trivia facts for VacTruth.com readers to investigate further about polio and question the motives of those who would profit from vaccines and disease.
Trivia Fact #1 – Chemicals Used in Pesticides Increased Your Chance for Viral Infections
Trivia Fact #2 – Milk Was Heavily Contaminated with Pesticides; Quietly Taken Off Shelves While Farmers Paid
Trivia Fact #3 – Polio Is/Was Transmitted Through Contaminated Milk
Trivia Fact #4–Removing Your Tonsils Exposed You to the Worst Kind of Paralysis
Trivia Fact #5 – Pharmaceutical Companies Funded the writing of the “History of Poliomyelitis”
Trivia Fact #6 – A Dangerous Vaccine: Americans Not Told Vaccine Caused Paralysis
vTrivia Fact #7 – Researchers Discover How to Paralyze Monkeys with Vaccines
More Than 100 Seniors Died After Receiving This Flu Shot Given By Pharmacies
by Yelena Sukhoterina
As it happens every winter, the marketing push for receiving a flu shot continues. CVS is offering a 20% shopping pass when you get your flu shot. They are also marketing a high-dose vaccine, which is of course more profitable for the manufacturer and the pharmacy, but there are plenty of reasons to be wary of it — especially for seniors.
Fluzone® High-Dose is an injectable vaccine, specifically approved for people ages 65 and older. Manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur, this shot contains three flu strains and four times more antigen (substance that causes an immune response) than regular flu shots, claims CVS Pharmacy (Rite Aid also offers it and admits that “more studies are being done” to see whether it actually offers an improvement at all).
The pharmacy does admit that the vaccine is not recommended for anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction (especially Guillain-Barré syndrome) to vaccines in the past.
But between their marketing campaigns and promoting a 20% shopping coupon, they omitted a vital piece of information: 105 seniors died after taking part in two Fluzone high-dose vaccine trials, and 91 died after getting the regular Fluzone vaccine.
“Little Study Was Done” — Pediatrician Warns Parents about a Toxin in Vaccines Given to Most Babies That Is WORSE Than Mercury
by Yelena Sukhoterina
Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and through drug needles. These are not two activities that a newborn baby is capable of doing, and yet, within 24 hours of being born, a baby receives a Hep B vaccination — whether the mother is infected or not.
When parents sign in to have a baby at the hospital, they are signing up for their baby to receive the Hep B vaccination.
What the parents don’t realize is that they sign the baby up to be given 250 micro-grams (mcg) of aluminum contained in this vaccine.
Board Certified Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, a graduate of Dartmouth Medical School, explains how dangerous this amount of aluminum can potentially be – an adult daily maximum is 50 micro-grams.
This safety limit comes from a 2012 study that compared premature babies who were administered a solution contaminated with aluminum to those who had a solution without this toxic metal.
Now Dr. Thomas is speaking out against what he says is a potentially dangerous and misguided process administered under the guise of public health, one that is unnecessarily putting countless thousands of babies at risk.
Study – Aluminum Exposure in Neonatal Patients Using the Least Contaminated Parenteral Nutrition Solution Products
Abstract
Aluminum (Al) is a contaminant in all parenteral nutrition (PN) solution component products. Manufacturers currently label these products with the maximum Al content at the time of expiry. We recently published data to establish the actual measured concentration of Al in PN solution products prior to being compounded in the clinical setting [1]. The investigation assessed quantitative Al content of all available products used in the formulation of PN solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the Al exposure in neonatal patients using the least contaminated PN solutions and determine if it is possible to meet the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al. The measured concentrations from our previous study were analyzed and the least contaminated products were identified. These concentrations were entered into our PN software and the least possible Al exposure was determined. A significant decrease (41%–44%) in the Al exposure in neonatal patients can be achieved using the least contaminated products, but the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al was not met. However, minimizing the Al exposure may decrease the likelihood of developing Al toxicity from PN.
Does a New Hepatitis Vaccine Cause Heart Attacks?
In this Revolution and Revelation, Milton Packer asks how you would answer this question
The FDA has a really important question and wants your advice.
This is not a fairy tale. This is a real-life story.
Hepatitis B is a serious disease. A company (Dynavax) has a new hepatitis vaccine that induces hepatitis antibodies more vigorously than existing vaccines and does so after 2 doses (instead of the usual 3). The vaccine works through a unique adjuvant. The serological advantages of the Dynavax vaccine were demonstrated in a randomized trial of >8000 patients; about 5600 people received the new vaccine and about 2800 people received the existing standard.
Why does the FDA need your help?
In the trial, an acute myocardial infarction occurred in 14 people in the Dynavax group, but in only one person receiving the conventional vaccine. The events were confirmed by adjudication. Since the Dynavax group was twice as large, the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the trial was seven times greater with the new vaccine. The FDA wants to know if the new vaccine should be approved for use in millions of people.
The FDA asked the committee if there was reasonable evidence that the vaccine was safe. On July 28, the committee vote 12-1 (with 3 abstentions) in favor of the safety of the new vaccine. I was one of the three abstentions. Most of the committee believed that the vaccine’s serological advantages outweighed the uncertainty, but the vote is non-binding. The FDA will decide on the new vaccine by August 10.
Why did I abstain? Based on the available data, it was impossible for anyone to know if the imbalance in myocardial infarctions was real or spurious. So although the question was fascinating and the discussion was terrific, my vote wasn’t that complicated.
There is a simple rule in life: if you don’t know, you should say that you don’t know.
Italy update with Andy and Francesca #vaxxed #praybig
German Supreme Court Upholds Biologist’s Claim that Measles Virus Does Not Exist Could There Be Something Wrong with the Germ Theory?
by Paul Fassa
Health Impact News
Our modern medicine’s paradigm is based mostly on the germ theory of microbes invading our bodies and causing disease, thus creating the need for a war against microbes to eliminate them all and conquer all diseases. Fear is the motivation for creating the weapons of antibiotics, antivirals, and vaccines befitting this concept, but our modern populations are sicker than ever.
Are the weapons creating chronic debilitating diseases in exchange for acute illnesses considered infectious that most manage to get over with a renewed resilience to the dreaded pathogenic microbes blamed for all illness? Are we actually destroying our immune systems with our war on microbes?
Ever since Pasteur’s claim to fame as the father of the germ theory, our overall health has decreased even while lifespans have increased. But during Pasteur’s late 19th century early 20th century media dominance and since then till now, there have been many scientists denouncing Pasteur’s model of disease, even providing evidence that he was a plagiarist and fraud.
Let’s focus on some of the few scientists and medical practitioners who have not agreed with the germ theory’s dogma that places microbes as agents of death that should be feared while ignoring other aspects of health
Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
Conclusions
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.
Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.
In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.
Groundbreaking: China Study Links Immune Activation By Vaccination & Autism
Jeff Roberts
*This article is a summary of a larger article put together by J.B. Handley at Healthcare in America. It is a conglomeration of a wide body of recent research pieced together by a growing group of concerned scientists. For more information, please visit the website, vaccinepapers.org.
A study out of China is the first to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination (hep B/BCG) on brain development in rats. Results indicate vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant (i.e., hep B) spike cytokine levels in the hippocampus region of the brain, in particular the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), the key cytokine known for its dysregulating effect on neuronal circuitry and the key cytokine implicated in autism.
Did Chinese scientists find autism’s missing puzzle piece?
BY J.B. HANDLEY February 22, 2017
Scientists appear to be far closer to explaining the mechanisms of action within the body that cause autism. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in Canada, France, Israel, and China. Four clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered are forming an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.
Vaccine facts, damage and angry grandmothers around Australia Bev Pattenden talks about the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, aborted fetal cells, and animal cells that are being injected into people by vaccines. She is one of many angry grandmothers around Australia who are standing up to speak about vaccine damage. All Communications, Answers, comments and opinions provided by Dianne Ellis and Bev Pattenden are only general information, and are not intended to be a substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, legal, or other professional advice. Bev Pattenden, Dianne Ellis and ‘The Healing Hour’ do not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages and comments left on these Forums, Blogs, social media or Knowledge Base. You should always speak with your doctor, general practitioner, physician or other healthcare professional before taking any medication or nutritional, herbal or homeopathic supplement, or adopting any natural treatment for a health problem. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, promptly contact your health care provider. Information provided by Bev Pattenden or Dianne Ellis is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you do anything recommended on this site, without the supervision of a licensed medical doctor, you do so at your own risk
Conform prospectului, vaccinul PRIORIX utilizat in Romania pentru imunizare ROR NU acoperă “virusul” de rujeolă al “epidemiei” actuale.
Detalii gasisiti mai jos:
1. Prospectul zice că ar acoperi un tip de “virus” Schwarz.
Compozitie calitativa si cantitativa:
Priorix este un preparat combinat, liofilizat, format din tulpinile atenuate ale virusurilor rujeolic Schwarz, urlian RIT 4385 (derivat din tulpina Jeryl Lynn) si rubeolic Wistar RA 27/3, obtinute separat prin propagare fie in tesut embrionar de gaina (urlian si rujeolic), fie in celule diploide umane MRC5 (rubeolic).
2. Rapoartele europene zic că “epidemia” este cu “virus” B3.
The primary case was in Romania for 17 days before symptom onset, and stayed in an area with reported measles transmission [8].
All cases sequenced from the outbreak were genotype B3, however the distinct sequence data were inconclusive to establish a link with the outbreak in Romania
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger (NaturalNews) The following video from Gary Franchi of NextNewsNetwork reveals the shocking admission by the CDC that this year’s flu vaccine doesn’t work.
As this story has gone extremely viral, I’ve also added these additional links to other news stories that report on the CDC’s admission that this year’s flu shot contains the wrong strain:
Huffington Post: “Flu Vaccine Doesn’t Protect Against This Season’s Most Dominant Strain” The Seattle Times: “Vaccine problems may signal rocky flu season” – “New evidence shows that FluMist and seasonal shots likely won’t protect very well against this year’s flu viruses…” ABC News: “Flu vaccine may not be effective for this year’s strains, CDC says” Freedom Outpost: “CDC Health Advisory: Get Your Flu Shot. It “Might” Work This Year. Sort Of”
The treatment, which uses a genetically-altered version of the polio virus to fight cancer cells, has been given fast track status for Phase 2 trials. If the Phase 2 trials are successful, Phase 3 testing may not be required, and a drug based on the treatment could be made available within a few years.
Phase 1 trials of the treatment on an aggressive form of brain cancer called glioblastoma were successful enough to give many people hope that a revolutionary new cancer-fighting weapon might be on the horizon
With the UK’s national media in a feeding frenzy whipped up by the UK’s Department of Health claiming the current outbreaks of relatively few measles cases are all the fault of Dr Andrew Wakefield, the BBC appears to have slipped up and confirmed that the main plank of the General Medical Council’s case against Dr Wakefield and his two colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital, London, England in 1998 has bitten the dust.
The main plank of the GMC’s case was that there was only one study carried out by Dr Wakefield and his colleagues on the “Lancet 12” children, that it did not have ethics approval and that it was the study reported in February 1998 in the UK’s medical journal “The Lancet”.
Whilst the BBC is meant to be independent and unbiased as a news source, it has been propping up the UK Government and Health Department’s official line for many years over the MMR/autism issue not being caused by vaccines and that Dr Wakefield was wrong.
But who in fact is wrong? If you cannot get your facts right over something pretty major then how can you have your facts right on that issue?
In a report yesterday it appears to have allowed a significant chink in the UK Government’s position. The BBC confirms there were in fact two studies carried out: one was for the Legal Aid Board but it was not the one the GMC panel Chaired by Dr Surendra Kumar decided it was.
The three defendant doctors claimed there were two studies: that the Lancet study was not the Legal Aid Board study and that the Lancet study had a different ethical approval – contrary to the GMC’s allegations.
So why has the BBC not covered this. It is important news. But here we see them including these significant facts as an aside in a different news report. This shows however that the BBC’s health journalists are fully aware of the facts and have a grasp of these important details but do not report their importance and significance to the British public who pay directly to fund the BBC. It is defrauding the British public – they are not getting what they pay vast millions of pounds sterling for.
Further, the complainant to the GMC, Mr Brian Deer, who had been paid by Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times to get “a big story” about the MMR vaccine, withheld crucial lost documents from the GMC investigation, the GMC’s lawyers, the Defendant doctor’s lawyers and everyone else including all the world’s media. The documents date back many years showing that all the three doctors subjected to the GMC investigation did in fact have and were routinely operating under ethics approval 162/95 and not ethics approval 172/96 – which was for a different study never carried out which Dr Kumar and his GMC panel decided was carried out.
Additionally Dr Kumar’s position as GMC panel Chairman demonstrates it was a “Kangaroo Court“. Barely two months after the decision to strike Dr Wakefield from the medical register, Dr Kumar was publicly calling for compulsory MMR vaccination.
Compulsory MMR vaccination is an approach described in 2008 as “stalinist” by the BMA chairman Dr Hamish Meldrum who also said forcing parents to have their children innoculated was “morally and ethically dubious”: No jabs, no school says Labour MP BBC 11 May 2008. Dr Kumar’s strongly held views on MMR vaccination were never disclosed and raised the question of whether Dr Kumar should have been debarred just from sitting on the panel under the Nolan Principles regulating standards in public life in the UK.
Here is what the BBC reported [CHS emphasis added]:
The General Medical Council found Dr Wakefield guilty of serious professional misconduct in 2010 and he was struck off the medical register. It did not investigate whether his findings were right or wrong but focused on the way he carried out his research.
Dr Wakefield’s study considered whether there was a link between the three-in-one MMR vaccine and autism and bowel disease.
It focused on tests carried out on 12 children who had been referred to hospital for gastrointestinal problems.
Dr Wakefield was also paid to carry out another study at the same time to find out if parents who claimed their children were damaged by the MMR vaccine had a case. Some children were involved in both studies.”
Government rejects measles outbreak ‘blame’ – 13 April 2013 Last updated at 07:34
And on CHS we have shown in numerous reports with how numerous times the causation position that MMR vaccine causes autistic conditions has been proven time and again and that there is a considerable body of medical and scientific evidence to that effect. Here are just a few examples:
Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines
US Government In US$20 million Legal Settlement For Vaccine Caused Autism Case
Japanese & British Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism
Ginger Taylor’s List of Research Linking Vaccines to Autism
All is of course ignored by the BBC – cowed into submission and controlled by the UK Government – which holds the purse strings for its budgets.
the news network 