Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes in Vaccines all Found Murdered
Rory Hall — February 27, 2016
Nagalese prevents vitamin D being produced In the body
Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans.(SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO)
Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defence to naturally kill cancer cells.
According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!!
This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!!
And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Dr’s they killed in FL had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.
Depopulation 101..add poison to vaccines…make it law that all children must be injected to attend school. Slow kill methods. They think they’re being fair w/ their “survival of the fittest” type mentality. Only the best genes survive? These people have no souls.
Dr Ted Broer broke it on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took them a whole hour just to get him on air b/c their 3 hour show was brought down and every line they tried to use kept disconnecting…and then their servers were brought down.
Murdered Holistic Doctors Discovered Cancer-Causing Enzyme Being Added to All Vaccines
So apparently the holistic doctors who were all being killed in FL had found out via their research that the nagalase enzyme protein is INTENTIONALLY being added to the population via immunizations. Nagalase STOPS vitamin D from binding to the Gc protein. This completely strips a human being’s body of it’s natural ability to kill cancer cells.
Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!! This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!! And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Dr’s they killed in FL had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.
12 Holistic Doctors have now died within a little over 90 Days
Tim Brown — October 13, 2015
Back in July, I reported that five holistic doctors had met untimely and suspicious deaths within 30 days and that five more were still missing. Within days of that report, two more doctors were also found dead under suspicious circumstances, which made 7 inside of a month. Now, within the span of 90 days, eleven doctors have been found dead under suspicious circumstances, and just prior to the writing of this article a twelfth holistic doctor, Marie Paas was found dead due to an apparent suicide.
The woman who broke these stories, Erin Elizabeth of Health Nut News, spoke to Luke Rudkowski and recounted that three of the doctors were found outside in the woods, who died of alleged suicide, four established murders and several who died suddenly for no apparent reason. Even family members have questioned their deaths since autopsies don’t seem to confirm a reason for their deaths.
2 More Doctors Go Missing, after 3 Found Dead in 2 Weeks
By Erin Elizabeth – July 5, 2015
UPDATE: Chief Deputy Mcarty of the Sheriff’s Dept in charge of the case of missing Dr. Jeffrey Whiteside MD, is directly asked if there is a tie to the doctor’s disappearance to my breaking stories about other doctors who are missing or were found dead. The Chief says the following about my articles and any correlation:
McCarty said that information has been given to investigators to determine if there’s any correlation to the Whiteside case.
“We haven’t been contacted by any other law-enforcement agency or by the FBI or anything like that,” he said.
Just hours or days after authorities said this referencing the stories I broke to the world (as gently as possible) they found Dr. Whiteside’s body right in the *very* area he was last seen (so that’s another mystery) and there was a .22 caliber found discharged by his body, but no other details are being given.
2 More Doctors Go Missing
In the past 2 weeks I’ve reported on 3 alternative doctors (2 MD’s and 1 DC, PhD) who were found dead in less than two weeks (Click through for stories and funds for families as well as numbers to report tips to authorities) It was with heavy heart, as I knew a few of the doctors and have many mutual friends with all three.
Monsanto, Pesticides, Vaccines, & Autism: If We Continue On This Route, “All Children Will Be Autistic By 2025”
Posted on 2017/02/18 By Arjun Walia via Collective Evolution
“Children today are sicker than they were a generation ago. From childhood cancers to autism, birth defects and asthma, a wide range of childhood diseases and disorders are on the rise. Our assessment of the latest science leaves little room for doubt; pesticides are one key driver of this sobering trend.”
— October 2012 report by Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA)
(source: Glyphosate The Elephant in the Room)
The rate at which autism instances have risen in the last 40 years is simply staggering. In 1975, 1 in every 5,000 people developed autism. In 1985, it was 1 in every 2,500, and in 2005, it was 1 in every 166.
Today it is approximately 1 in every 68 children. (source: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111102/pdf/479022a.pdf)
“If it is an environmental cause that’s contributing to an increase, we certainty want to find it.”
– Craig Newschaffer, an epidemiologist at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/autism-rise-driven-by-environment/)
Research continues to surface indicating that autism goes far beyond just genetics, and that we may need to consider multiple factors (like environmental toxins, prescription drugs, etc) when trying to figure out what’s going on, and why autism rates continue to climb exponentially.
“It’s time to start looking for the environmental culprits responsible for the remarkable increase in the rate of autism in California.”
– Irva Hertz–Picciotto, epidemiology professor at University of California, David
Evidence is now pointing to the fact that agricultural pesticides (among various other environmental toxins) might play a large role in the rapid increase in autism rates over the past few decades. A senior researcher from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Dr. Stephanie Seneff is doing her part to create more awareness of these facts, which have yet to make big news in the world of mainstream medicine.
At a recent event sponsored by the holistic-focused Groton Wellness Organization, she stated that “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.”
Seneff presented slides showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the rising use of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide (with its active ingredient glyphosate) on crops and the rising rates of autism. Her research also reveals that the side effects of autism mimic glyphosate toxicity and deficiencies.
Most scientists ‘can’t replicate studies by their peers’
By Tom Feilden 22 February 2017
Science is facing a “reproducibility crisis” where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments, research suggests.
This is frustrating clinicians and drug developers who want solid foundations of pre-clinical research to build upon.
From his lab at the University of Virginia’s Centre for Open Science, immunologist Dr Tim Errington runs The Reproducibility Project, which attempted to repeat the findings reported in five landmark cancer studies.
“The idea here is to take a bunch of experiments and to try and do the exact same thing to see if we can get the same results.”
You could be forgiven for thinking that should be easy. Experiments are supposed to be replicable.
The authors should have done it themselves before publication, and all you have to do is read the methods section in the paper and follow the instructions.
Sadly nothing, it seems, could be further from the truth.
After meticulous research involving painstaking attention to detail over several years (the project was launched in 2011), the team was able to confirm only two of the original studies’ findings.
Two more proved inconclusive and in the fifth, the team completely failed to replicate the result.
“It’s worrying because replication is supposed to be a hallmark of scientific integrity,” says Dr Errington.
Concern over the reliability of the results published in scientific literature has been growing for some time.
An Open Letter to Daniel Summers, MD
Note: Thanks to Anne for this open letter to Massachusetts Pediatrician Dr. Daniel Summers. We need to ask doctors by name how they can justify vaccine injury without batting an eye.
By Anne Dachel
Toxicity studies have never been done on either the mercury additive thimerosal or the aluminum used in vaccines. (And yes, thimerosal is still in large amounts in the flu vaccine given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months. In addition, while American children have reduced levels of mercury in their other vaccines, no such protection is afforded children in poor countries where vaccines are laced with full doses of thimerosal.)
The Danish research that you cited as independent comes from Dr. Poul Thorsen, the principal researcher who is under indictment for 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering by the U.S. government, having stolen over $1 million in research funding paid for by the U.S taxpayers. How reliable do you think his work is?
What Kennedy is offering is $100,000 for anyone who can produce the reputable science showing that injecting mercury into humans is safe. (And the 19 easily flawed and manipulated population studies that officials use just don’t make it. They are proof of nothing.) Where are the toxicity studies? Where are the animal studies?
There are none.
Parents who’ve looked into the issue of vaccine safety see huge holes in your arguments and a lot of omissions.
The Effect of Aluminum in Vaccines on Humans
Dietary Aluminum vs. Injectable Aluminum – Dietary Aluinum is excreted fairly rapidly, where injectable Aluminum stays around damaging the bodies nervous system(circuitry)… Educate before you vaccinate and watch The Greater Good @ http://www.greatergoodmovie.org
Vaccine Test Results
First results of vaccine investigations
Translated by Erwin Alber from the German original Erste Ergebnisse der Impfstoffuntersuchungen published in Hans Tolzin’s newsletter impf report
(ht) In 2016, several thousand euros were donated to the non-profit association AGBUG e. V. for the investigation of the contents of currently used vaccines. We would like to thank all those who have contributed to this.
Originally, it was intended to only test the vaccines for their mercury content. The association has then however extended the focus of the investigation to include all searchable elements.
AGBUG has now published the results of the first batch on its website, so far without any evaluation! All those of you who have are knowledgeable about the toxic effects of particular elements are invited to contribute their expertise. Please send your feedback by e-mail to email@example.com or post under this article as a comment.
Erste Ergebnisse der Impfstoffuntersuchungen
(ht) Im Jahr 2016 wurden dem gemeinnützigen Verein AGBUG e. V. mehrere Tausend Euro für die Untersuchung gängiger Impfstoffe auf die enthaltenen Elemente gespendet. Allen, die dazu beigetragen haben, sei an dieser Stelle noch einmal herzlich gedankt.
Ursprünglich sollten die Impfstoffe nur auf ihren Quecksilbergehalt hin untersucht werden. Der Verein hat den Focus dann aber auf alle untersuchbaren Elemente erweitert.
AGBUG hat nun die Untersuchungsergebnisse der ersten Charge auf seiner Webseite veröffentlicht. Bisher ohne jede Bewertung! Alle, die Ahnung haben über die giftige Wirkung bestimmter Elemente, sind hiermit eingeladen, ihr Wissen einzubringen. Rückmeldungen bitte per Email an firstname.lastname@example.org oder unter diesem Beitrag als Kommentar.
Impfen – (k)eine leichte Entscheidung?
Warum eine Plausibilitätsprüfung notwendig ist
Impfungen sind nicht ohne Risiken und rechtlich gesehen Körperverletzungen, die der mündigen Einwilligung bedürfen. Um diese mündige Einwilligung geben zu können, sollten wir vor unserer Entscheidung zumindest eine Plausibilitätsprüfung vornehmen. Diese sollte sich als Erstes mit der Frage beschäftigen, ob es überzeugende Beweise für den Nutzen der Impfungen und für ihre Sicherheit gibt. Die entscheidende Frage ist also: Sind Geimpfte gesünder als Ungeimpfte?
Kein direkter Wirksamkeitsnachweis
Eigenartig ist nun, dass weder bei der Zulassung eines Impfstoffs noch während seines massenhaften Einsatzes überprüft wird, ob Geimpfte tatsächlich seltener erkranken bzw. gesünder sind als Ungeimpfte. Man misst bei der Zulassung statt dessen die Höhe des sogenannten “Antikörpertiters” im Blut. Meßbare Antikörper sind jedoch kein eindeutiger Beleg für Immunität. Er wird von den zuständigen Experten deshalb auch einen “Surrogatmarker” (“Ersatzmeßgröße”) genannt. Da die Antikörper auch aus schulmedizinischer Sicht nicht der einzige Bestandteil der Immunabwehr sind, kann ein Mensch auch ohne meßbaren Titer immun sein. Dazu kommt, dass es zahlreiche Beispiele (z. B. bei Tetanus) dafür gibt, dass auch vorhandene Antikörper eine Erkrankung nicht verhindern konnten.
Die Frage, welche wissenschaftliche Beweise es dafür gibt, dass die gemessenen Antikörper einen Erkrankungsschutz darstellen, können die befragten Experten regelmäßig nicht beantworten. Entsprechend Beobachtungsstudien wären jedoch jederzeit einfach durchzuführen.
Fehlende Daten über die Risiken